LOL, nope. I just figured that if those 166s were straight up rejected, then I would suffer the same fate. Good luck everyone!!JolieSaraLee wrote:Finalaspects, your devotion to this batch makes me REALLY root for you to get in (and me, too, haha)finalaspects wrote:you're not DF though right? i'm going to remake the DF list.madhatter01 wrote:If this is truly an acceptance batch than I'm SUPER DUPER excited for all of you... especially given that my numbers are 166/3.72-- HOPE!
USC 2010! Forum
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:46 pm
Re: USC 2010!
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
DF 4/27
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.73
165/4.0
165/3.6
166/3.73
166/3.53
165/3.3
URM:
161/3.1
163/3.45 (sorta?)
160/3.6
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.73
165/4.0
165/3.6
166/3.73
166/3.53
165/3.3
URM:
161/3.1
163/3.45 (sorta?)
160/3.6
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:11 am
Re: USC 2010!
In review as of 4/27
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:32 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Hmmm...not sure if this is good or bad news. None of these look like immediate rejects, but none look like immediate admits either.finalaspects wrote:DF 4/27
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.73
165/4.0
165/3.6
166/3.73
166/3.53
165/3.3
URM:
161/3.1
163/3.45 (sorta?)
160/3.6
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
im worried that i am getting more hopeful though. i'm more inclined to believe that this is still a rejection batch. not sure if that one poster who had a 178/2.5 was telling the truth about being accepted DF 4/27. i really think he was DF 4/26 or lying.JolieSaraLee wrote: Finalaspects, your devotion to this batch makes me REALLY root for you to get in (and me, too, haha)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 1:49 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Same here, Ok im done for today. no more checking these forums for at least 1hr.... lolfinalaspects wrote:im worried that i am getting more hopeful though. i'm more inclined to believe that this is still a rejection batch. not sure if that one poster who had a 178/2.5 was telling the truth about being accepted DF 4/27. i really think he was DF 4/26 or lying.JolieSaraLee wrote: Finalaspects, your devotion to this batch makes me REALLY root for you to get in (and me, too, haha)
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
the factors we have to take into account:hellomoto wrote: Hmmm...not sure if this is good or bad news. None of these look like immediate rejects, but none look like immediate admits either.
1. end of cycle. their goal was end of this month so they have to give out decisions to everyone including those on the border line. (possibly all rejections)
2. we might not be immediate admits but we might all have some great softs of some kind. many seem to be non-traditional with work experience.
3. being near the May 1st deposit deadline, USC might have secured their medians, hence being able to accept splitters/reverse splitters to further secure their numbers. that or since they secured their medians they want diversity, which is what im hoping our softs come into play.
4. they might not have secured their medians, hence are now accepting splitters/reverse splitters to make sure since most of us can sustain or improve either the LSAT or GPA medians.
- JolieSaraLee
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:34 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I like how you think...BUT i've yet to receive that coveted e-mail all the admits seem to be getting....granted it's barely been half a day...finalaspects wrote:the factors we have to take into account:hellomoto wrote: Hmmm...not sure if this is good or bad news. None of these look like immediate rejects, but none look like immediate admits either.
1. end of cycle. their goal was end of this month so they have to give out decisions to everyone including those on the border line. (possibly all rejections)
2. we might not be immediate admits but we might all have some great softs of some kind. many seem to be non-traditional with work experience.
3. being near the May 1st deposit deadline, USC might have secured their medians, hence being able to accept splitters/reverse splitters to further secure their numbers. that or since they secured their medians they want diversity, which is what im hoping our softs come into play.
4. they might not have secured their medians, hence are now accepting splitters/reverse splitters to make sure.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
yea i believe those emails took at least took around 24-48 hours.JolieSaraLee wrote:I like how you think...BUT i've yet to receive that coveted e-mail all the admits seem to be getting....granted it's barely been half a day...finalaspects wrote:the factors we have to take into account:hellomoto wrote: Hmmm...not sure if this is good or bad news. None of these look like immediate rejects, but none look like immediate admits either.
1. end of cycle. their goal was end of this month so they have to give out decisions to everyone including those on the border line. (possibly all rejections)
2. we might not be immediate admits but we might all have some great softs of some kind. many seem to be non-traditional with work experience.
3. being near the May 1st deposit deadline, USC might have secured their medians, hence being able to accept splitters/reverse splitters to further secure their numbers. that or since they secured their medians they want diversity, which is what im hoping our softs come into play.
4. they might not have secured their medians, hence are now accepting splitters/reverse splitters to make sure.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:32 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I like the optimism. I guess we'll find out soon enoughfinalaspects wrote:the factors we have to take into account:hellomoto wrote: Hmmm...not sure if this is good or bad news. None of these look like immediate rejects, but none look like immediate admits either.
1. end of cycle. their goal was end of this month so they have to give out decisions to everyone including those on the border line. (possibly all rejections)
2. we might not be immediate admits but we might all have some great softs of some kind. many seem to be non-traditional with work experience.
3. being near the May 1st deposit deadline, USC might have secured their medians, hence being able to accept splitters/reverse splitters to further secure their numbers. that or since they secured their medians they want diversity, which is what im hoping our softs come into play.
4. they might not have secured their medians, hence are now accepting splitters/reverse splitters to make sure since most of us can sustain or improve either the LSAT or GPA medians.
edit:
1. I was complete on 1/20. I was still complete 1/20 when I checked 4/26 (I think). Then yesterday, I went DF 4/27.
2. I have 4 years of work experience in a fairly unique soft. I think this is how I got onto most of my waitlists.
Last edited by hellomoto on Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: USC 2010!
im still sitting at complete 1/14...anyone else have no movement since that far back?
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:07 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Does anyone think they send out the letters the same day you go DF? I am in LA, so if they sent them yesterday (by any stroke of luck), I will get mine today.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cardinalandgold
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Re: USC 2010!
They might. My status checker changed on Friday from IR to DF 4/26. I got my admissions packet in the mail on Tuesday. I live in Long Beach, so not too far from LA. Good luck!SaraLA wrote:Does anyone think they send out the letters the same day you go DF? I am in LA, so if they sent them yesterday (by any stroke of luck), I will get mine today.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
might have changed now, but in the past the letters weren't even sent out until 2 days after the DF date.SaraLA wrote:Does anyone think they send out the letters the same day you go DF? I am in LA, so if they sent them yesterday (by any stroke of luck), I will get mine today.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
strange how you went DF 3 days before the DF date.... when did you receive your email?cardinalandgold wrote:They might. My status checker changed on Friday from IR to DF 4/26. I got my admissions packet in the mail on Tuesday. I live in Long Beach, so not too far from LA. Good luck!SaraLA wrote:Does anyone think they send out the letters the same day you go DF? I am in LA, so if they sent them yesterday (by any stroke of luck), I will get mine today.
- iceskater1620
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I'm taking this down now...I'm paranoid. haha
Last edited by iceskater1620 on Wed Apr 28, 2010 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- OneKnight
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:00 pm
Re: USC 2010!
+1iceskater1620 wrote:I felt scared posting this info because I'm still waiting to hear back from a bunch of places and want to remain anon....
But I went DF 4/27 and have a 161 and a 4.0. I'm a URM, and I have some good softs. Maybe this could shed some light on the situation.
It kind of seems like we are all slightly unique in one way or another. Hopefully this means they want us!
P.S. I can't stop checking this thread.
I keep expecting the other shoe to drop
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
DF 4/27
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.73
165/4.0
165/3.6
166/3.73
166/3.53
165/3.3
URM:
161/3.1
163/3.45 (sorta?)
160/3.6
161/4.0
174/3.38
169/2.75
168/3.35
168/2.9
166/4.0
166/3.73
165/4.0
165/3.6
166/3.73
166/3.53
165/3.3
URM:
161/3.1
163/3.45 (sorta?)
160/3.6
161/4.0
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
i just want that other guy to verify if he went DF 4/27 and not 4/26.... 178/2.5 guy who got accepted already... but he really got the email too quick to be 4/27.OneKnight wrote:+1iceskater1620 wrote:I felt scared posting this info because I'm still waiting to hear back from a bunch of places and want to remain anon....
But I went DF 4/27 and have a 161 and a 4.0. I'm a URM, and I have some good softs. Maybe this could shed some light on the situation.
It kind of seems like we are all slightly unique in one way or another. Hopefully this means they want us!
P.S. I can't stop checking this thread.
I keep expecting the other shoe to drop
- cardinalandgold
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:00 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Yeah, I'm not sure why the post dated by DF date in the future. Got my email on 4/27 at around 1:30 pm PST.finalaspects wrote:strange how you went DF 3 days before the DF date.... when did you receive your email?cardinalandgold wrote:They might. My status checker changed on Friday from IR to DF 4/26. I got my admissions packet in the mail on Tuesday. I live in Long Beach, so not too far from LA. Good luck!SaraLA wrote:Does anyone think they send out the letters the same day you go DF? I am in LA, so if they sent them yesterday (by any stroke of luck), I will get mine today.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:56 pm
Re: USC 2010!
DF 4/27 on LSN seems like admits...
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:07 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Hard to know, though, if people put down the actual DF date for the decision or the date they actually find out what the decision is. Know what I mean?expungemalice wrote:DF 4/27 on LSN seems like admits...
- iceskater1620
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: USC 2010!
It kinda seems they put down the date they received the email....because why would they be getting emails and not us??
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
so technically since the day you knew you went DF (friday) it took 3 days for the email.cardinalandgold wrote:Yeah, I'm not sure why the post dated by DF date in the future. Got my email on 4/27 at around 1:30 pm PST.finalaspects wrote:strange how you went DF 3 days before the DF date.... when did you receive your email?cardinalandgold wrote:They might. My status checker changed on Friday from IR to DF 4/26. I got my admissions packet in the mail on Tuesday. I live in Long Beach, so not too far from LA. Good luck!SaraLA wrote:Does anyone think they send out the letters the same day you go DF? I am in LA, so if they sent them yesterday (by any stroke of luck), I will get mine today.
which also shows that the other guy who had a 178/2.5 who stated he got the email just now, would be a DF for 4/26 like you, and not DF 4/27. makes sense.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login