Getting people who really, really want to go to the school? Making sure they don't have time to compare possible scholarship offers at lower schools or similar offers from peer schools? Getting full tuition out of them?puppins wrote:I generally wonder what schools get out of ED, other then a (small) impact on yield.Tofu wrote: oh, i was just thinking that the adcomm would prefer to have a higher index, with exceptions being that the adcomm sees some people it really likes
so then the situation would be that people with higher #s are just applying RD because they want a chance at HYS, while those with slightly lower #s are applying ED
though.... i could be totally wrong. i have no idea what the adcomm is thinking!
Columbia 2010 Forum
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
But RD people have to pay full tuition, and if a school doesn't want you enough, they don't have to play ball re: scholarship offers from peers. There never seems to be a shortage of people willing to pay full tuition at CLS. I guess people who really want to go is valuable, though obviously some people treat ED like a business decision (see: Mich/Penn dude).Helmholtz wrote: Getting people who really, really want to go to the school? Making sure they don't have time to compare possible scholarship offers at lower schools or similar offers from peer schools? Getting full tuition out of them?
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
maybe its just a time thing. they save time bartering and worrying by locking people up earlier on every year.puppins wrote:But RD people have to pay full tuition, and if a school doesn't want you enough, they don't have to play ball re: scholarship offers from peers. There never seems to be a shortage of people willing to pay full tuition at CLS.Helmholtz wrote: Getting people who really, really want to go to the school? Making sure they don't have time to compare possible scholarship offers at lower schools or similar offers from peer schools? Getting full tuition out of them?
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
If somebody has a 174/3.6, they might pull in some decent money from MVP or maybe a small amount of money at NYU, which could dissuade them from CLS, yet CLS might not be concerned enough to offer scholarship money to the applicant. They like the candidate, just not that much. With ED, the people never get the time to compare money offers, thereby giving CLS some candidates they might want, but not want enough to play ball re: scholarship offers.puppins wrote:But RD people have to pay full tuition, and if a school doesn't want you enough, they don't have to play ball re: scholarship offers from peers. There never seems to be a shortage of people willing to pay full tuition at CLS. I guess people who really want to go is valuable, though obviously some people treat ED like a business decision (see: Mich/Penn dude).Helmholtz wrote: Getting people who really, really want to go to the school? Making sure they don't have time to compare possible scholarship offers at lower schools or similar offers from peer schools? Getting full tuition out of them?
- Lieut Kaffee
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:01 am
Re: Columbia 2010
re: ED and $$$
When schools say ED applicants are still considered for merit scholarships, that's pretty much bs, yes?
When schools say ED applicants are still considered for merit scholarships, that's pretty much bs, yes?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Pretty much, yeah, although it's probably a large function of almost solely borderline/reach people applying ED. It's not like somebody with the possibility of a full ride at CLS is going to be applying ED.LieutKaffee wrote:re: ED and $$$
When schools say ED applicants are still considered for merit scholarships, that's pretty much bs, yes?
- Lieut Kaffee
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:01 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I'm asking because I applied ED to NYU with median-splitting numbers that may have enabled a little bit of haggling room had I applied RD and gotten decent offers from, say, Penn, Michigan, or Northwestern.Helmholtz wrote:Pretty much, yeah, although it's probably a large function of almost solely borderline/reach people applying ED. It's not like somebody with the possibility of a full ride at CLS is going to be applying ED.LieutKaffee wrote:re: ED and $$$
When schools say ED applicants are still considered for merit scholarships, that's pretty much bs, yes?
Now I'm in the wrong thread...
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
All I can say is that they have absolutely zero incentive to try to win you over with scholarship money, but there are those that they do have the incentive to do that with, so it seems a little silly to funnel money away from them when they already have you locked up.LieutKaffee wrote:I'm asking because I applied ED to NYU with median-splitting numbers that may have enabled a little bit of haggling room had I applied RD and gotten decent offers from, say, Penn, Michigan, or Northwestern.Helmholtz wrote:Pretty much, yeah, although it's probably a large function of almost solely borderline/reach people applying ED. It's not like somebody with the possibility of a full ride at CLS is going to be applying ED.LieutKaffee wrote:re: ED and $$$
When schools say ED applicants are still considered for merit scholarships, that's pretty much bs, yes?
Now I'm in the wrong thread...
- Lieut Kaffee
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:01 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Sounds about right. The logic seems clear. It's still tempting to take them a little bit at their word when they say ED applicants are still considered. Either that, or they write that for the sole purpose of luring people who are on the ED fence...Helmholtz wrote: All I can say is that they have absolutely zero incentive to try to win you over with scholarship money, but there are those that they do have the incentive to do that with, so it seems a little silly to funnel money away from them when they already have you locked up.
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
That makes sense to me. Ugh. I kinda wish I was in a position to ED somewhere. I would love to stop all of this worrying.Helmholtz wrote: If somebody has a 174/3.6, they might pull in some decent money from MVP or maybe a small amount of money at NYU, which could dissuade them from CLS, yet CLS might not be concerned enough to offer scholarship money to the applicant. They like the candidate, just not that much. With ED, the people never get the time to compare money offers, thereby giving CLS some candidates they might want, but not want enough to play ball re: scholarship offers.
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Yep, I agree with most of what has been said re: ED. I think CLS nabs quite a few people that would have gone elsewhere (if not HYS, then somewhere in CCNMVP with $$). Just looking at some of the numbers this year, CLS would have probably tossed money at them just to keep them out of HLS/SLS.
I also think we tend to overestimate how knowledgeable people are about their odds. We don't know the numbers of non-TLS/LSN admits, but I wouldn't be at all shocked if they were some numbers in there that probably would have gotten them in the door with $$ at CLS.
I also think we tend to overestimate how knowledgeable people are about their odds. We don't know the numbers of non-TLS/LSN admits, but I wouldn't be at all shocked if they were some numbers in there that probably would have gotten them in the door with $$ at CLS.
-
- Posts: 437
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 7:52 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
yes, the law school. ... Perhaps it'll get me a sympathy WL instead of rejectionirie wrote:just to clarify, he went to the law school right? not undergrad? if so it might make a marginal difference, but you'd have to be very borderline.xcountryjunkie wrote:Nope, hence the problemHelmholtz wrote:Has your father given tons of money to the school?xcountryjunkie wrote:Quick question: Does anybody know how much or little CLS emphasizes legacy? My father went there, so I'm trying to gauge if I'll get any real boost. Otherwise, I don't expect to be too competitive (LSAT: 169, LSDAS GPA: 3.68, RD, non-URM).
Really, I don't see it making an impact at all.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Blatant anti-Berkeley trolling.AngryAvocado wrote:Yep, I agree with most of what has been said re: ED. I think CLS nabs quite a few people that would have gone elsewhere (if not HYS, then somewhere in CCNMVP with $$). Just looking at some of the numbers this year, CLS would have probably tossed money at them just to keep them out of HLS/SLS.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
And I woulda gotten away with it too, if it weren't for that meddling crackberry!crackberry wrote:Blatant anti-Berkeley trolling.AngryAvocado wrote:Yep, I agree with most of what has been said re: ED. I think CLS nabs quite a few people that would have gone elsewhere (if not HYS, then somewhere in CCNMVP with $$). Just looking at some of the numbers this year, CLS would have probably tossed money at them just to keep them out of HLS/SLS.
jk wubs u berkwey
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Was this a Scooby-Doo reference?AngryAvocado wrote:And I woulda gotten away with it too, if it weren't for that meddling crackberry!crackberry wrote:Blatant anti-Berkeley trolling.AngryAvocado wrote:Yep, I agree with most of what has been said re: ED. I think CLS nabs quite a few people that would have gone elsewhere (if not HYS, then somewhere in CCNMVP with $$). Just looking at some of the numbers this year, CLS would have probably tossed money at them just to keep them out of HLS/SLS.
jk wubs u berkwey
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Clearly, I've lost my sanity.crackberry wrote:Was this a Scooby-Doo reference?AngryAvocado wrote:And I woulda gotten away with it too, if it weren't for that meddling crackberry!crackberry wrote:Blatant anti-Berkeley trolling.AngryAvocado wrote:Yep, I agree with most of what has been said re: ED. I think CLS nabs quite a few people that would have gone elsewhere (if not HYS, then somewhere in CCNMVP with $$). Just looking at some of the numbers this year, CLS would have probably tossed money at them just to keep them out of HLS/SLS.
jk wubs u berkwey
-
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
soo is the general consensus now that most of the ED acceptances have gone out? there might be a few left but will be sprinkled in with the deferrals/rejections?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I think that's a pretty safe assumption.hopefullaw27 wrote:soo is the general consensus now that most of the ED acceptances have gone out? there might be a few left but will be sprinkled in with the deferrals/rejections?
- rx3r
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Why did they go out so early this year?
- Lieut Kaffee
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:01 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Eek, hope not man.Helmholtz wrote:I think that's a pretty safe assumption.hopefullaw27 wrote:soo is the general consensus now that most of the ED acceptances have gone out? there might be a few left but will be sprinkled in with the deferrals/rejections?
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
Re: Columbia 2010
i dont know to what extent information fromn past years is applicable given the surge of ed applicants cls probably had.
lets give it another week
lets give it another week
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rx3r
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Gah there are too many Tom Cruises floating around here!
- SanBun
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
question to those of you who applied ED:
Columbia only gives a list of accepted ED students to other schools, they don't disclose all ED applicants, right? I remember that's what it said on their ED contract. I was just wondering that if you apply ED to a school, do other schools know and are therefore hesitant to admit you early in the cycle? Pretty sure that Columbia would only disclose your name one you're in, but not before/ as you're being reviewed
Just wondering...
Columbia only gives a list of accepted ED students to other schools, they don't disclose all ED applicants, right? I remember that's what it said on their ED contract. I was just wondering that if you apply ED to a school, do other schools know and are therefore hesitant to admit you early in the cycle? Pretty sure that Columbia would only disclose your name one you're in, but not before/ as you're being reviewed
Just wondering...
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Other schools only know after you've been accepted ED.SanBun wrote:question to those of you who applied ED:
Columbia only gives a list of accepted ED students to other schools, they don't disclose all ED applicants, right? I remember that's what it said on their ED contract. I was just wondering that if you apply ED to a school, do other schools know and are therefore hesitant to admit you early in the cycle? Pretty sure that Columbia would only disclose your name one you're in, but not before/ as you're being reviewed
Just wondering...
- SanBun
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Thanks Helm! I just had a completely irrational and unwarranted freak-out moment. Guess the wait for Gtown is driving me crazy lolHelmholtz wrote:Other schools only know after you've been accepted ED.SanBun wrote:question to those of you who applied ED:
Columbia only gives a list of accepted ED students to other schools, they don't disclose all ED applicants, right? I remember that's what it said on their ED contract. I was just wondering that if you apply ED to a school, do other schools know and are therefore hesitant to admit you early in the cycle? Pretty sure that Columbia would only disclose your name one you're in, but not before/ as you're being reviewed
Just wondering...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login