Not sure how their process of decisions go, but I got my ding yesterday. So hopefully you weren't in my batch if there was a batch. I was complete a day later than you. Good Luck!LieutKaffee wrote:Complete 12/2 and still waiting. Anyone else?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be12b/be12b57ce2afce8936fe6bc03910f337ad762f8c" alt="Smile :-)"
Not sure how their process of decisions go, but I got my ding yesterday. So hopefully you weren't in my batch if there was a batch. I was complete a day later than you. Good Luck!LieutKaffee wrote:Complete 12/2 and still waiting. Anyone else?
unknownscholar wrote:Not sure how their process of decisions go, but I got my ding yesterday. So hopefully you weren't in my batch if there was a batch. I was complete a day later than you. Good Luck!LieutKaffee wrote:Complete 12/2 and still waiting. Anyone else?
regular mail.mospina wrote:unknownscholar wrote:Not sure how their process of decisions go, but I got my ding yesterday. So hopefully you weren't in my batch if there was a batch. I was complete a day later than you. Good Luck!LieutKaffee wrote:Complete 12/2 and still waiting. Anyone else?
I'm sorry to hear that, did you hear through e-mail or regular mail?
Thanks for the info. I shall look forward to my very own rejection letter in tomorrow's mail. A waitlist would be nice....unknownscholar wrote:Not sure how their process of decisions go, but I got my ding yesterday. So hopefully you weren't in my batch if there was a batch. I was complete a day later than you. Good Luck!LieutKaffee wrote:Complete 12/2 and still waiting. Anyone else?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
They are essentially peer schools. Columbia places slightly better into BigLaw (but not significantly). Chicago places better into clerkships (significantly). About the same in academia, at this point, though Chicago has historically been better. Columbia has a better LRAP for PI.cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
Your goalie didn't look so hot against the U.S. on Friday huh?cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
However, if you submit the Columbia financial aid application, CLS may well be willing to match the Chicago offer. Worth a try if you prefer Columbia without money in consideration.Kronk wrote:They are essentially peer schools. Columbia places slightly better into BigLaw (but not significantly). Chicago places better into clerkships (significantly). About the same in academia, at this point, though Chicago has historically been better. Columbia has a better LRAP for PI.cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
Definitely Chicago unless you have an attachment to CLS for some reason.
We won gold, YEAH BABY!crackberry wrote:Your goalie didn't look so hot against the U.S. on Friday huh?cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Well yes, Canada won gold (incredible game), but I was referring to the Flames' goalie, Miikka Kiprusoff, who put on an epic display in the USA-Finland semifinal game.cflames7 wrote:We won gold, YEAH BABY!crackberry wrote:Your goalie didn't look so hot against the U.S. on Friday huh?
I found out about it by hitting refresh every 2 mins in OT from the olympic website while waiting for a flight in Bangkok. The game wasn't on TV there if you can believe it!
As a proud, patriotic Canadian I was completely detached from Kiprusoff during the olympics. I was hoping he got lit up in the relegation round and could rest for the rest of the olympics... make him hungrier when he gets back to playing for the Flames.crackberry wrote:Well yes, Canada won gold (incredible game), but I was referring to the Flames' goalie, Miikka Kiprusoff, who put on an epic display in the USA-Finland semifinal game.cflames7 wrote:We won gold, YEAH BABY!crackberry wrote:Your goalie didn't look so hot against the U.S. on Friday huh?
I found out about it by hitting refresh every 2 mins in OT from the olympic website while waiting for a flight in Bangkok. The game wasn't on TV there if you can believe it!
Well, he whined before the Olympics, saying he wouldn't play for Finland unless he was named the starter. The Finns gave in to his demands and Kiprusoff proceeded to give up 4 goals in the first 7 shots of the semifinal game against the Americans. He then pulled himself. Finland did win the bronze, however.cflames7 wrote:As a proud, patriotic Canadian I was completely detached from Kiprusoff during the olympics. I was hoping he got lit up in the relegation round and could rest for the rest of the olympics... make him hungrier when he gets back to playing for the Flames.
I submitted my NeedAccess application a few weeks ago (before my admissions offer). When will I be offered merit aid from Columbia, if at all?BenJ wrote:However, if you submit the Columbia financial aid application, CLS may well be willing to match the Chicago offer. Worth a try if you prefer Columbia without money in consideration.Kronk wrote:They are essentially peer schools. Columbia places slightly better into BigLaw (but not significantly). Chicago places better into clerkships (significantly). About the same in academia, at this point, though Chicago has historically been better. Columbia has a better LRAP for PI.cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
Definitely Chicago unless you have an attachment to CLS for some reason.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I was under the impression that need-access was for, well, need-based aid.cflames7 wrote:I submitted my NeedAccess application a few weeks ago (before my admissions offer). When will I be offered merit aid from Columbia, if at all?BenJ wrote:However, if you submit the Columbia financial aid application, CLS may well be willing to match the Chicago offer. Worth a try if you prefer Columbia without money in consideration.Kronk wrote:They are essentially peer schools. Columbia places slightly better into BigLaw (but not significantly). Chicago places better into clerkships (significantly). About the same in academia, at this point, though Chicago has historically been better. Columbia has a better LRAP for PI.cflames7 wrote:In at Columbia! (via email)
Date of the attached PDF letter is March 1st.
With a 75K scholly offer from Chicago, this is really going to make decisions hard. Any thoughts on Chicago with $ vs Columbia?
Definitely Chicago unless you have an attachment to CLS for some reason.
I submitted my application to Columbia in October, so to only recieve an admission offer now makes it seem like I was a border-line candidate, rather than an auto-admit. Does CLS give merit aid to borderline admits?
I'm not sure about this, but I recall reading that CLS's "need-based aid" is not purely need based. IIRC, Columbia appears to take merit-based attributes (like LSAT scores) into account when doling out aid in March and April. That's what a few people claimed last cycle. If anyone can confirm this, please weigh in.swc65 wrote: I was under the impression that need-access was for, well, need-based aid.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I remember reading that people were getting decisions via snail mail (admit and reject). Maybe I got my decision via email because I am an international student?tar2009 wrote:so is it generally accepted that if youre accepted you get an email and if your rejected its snail mail? What about wait list?
My decision was mailed to me, but it was sent back because they had the wrong address. They resent it today, but they wouldn't tell me what it said. Any ideas? Thanks
I have read the same thing on this TLS from time to time.Dignan wrote:I'm not sure about this, but I recall reading that CLS's "need-based aid" is not purely need based. IIRC, Columbia appears to take merit-based attributes (like LSAT scores) into account when doling out aid in March and April. That's what a few people claimed last cycle. If anyone can confirm this, please weigh in.swc65 wrote: I was under the impression that need-access was for, well, need-based aid.
I was accepted via snail mail.tar2009 wrote:so is it generally accepted that if youre accepted you get an email and if your rejected its snail mail? What about wait list?
My decision was mailed to me, but it was sent back because they had the wrong address. They resent it today, but they wouldn't tell me what it said. Any ideas? Thanks
The status checker page says all decisions are mailed. I assume that means snail mail, because it'd be silly to pay for all the paper and postage to reject people, and not spend any money on the ones they want.cflames7 wrote:I remember reading that people were getting decisions via snail mail (admit and reject). Maybe I got my decision via email because I am an international student?tar2009 wrote:so is it generally accepted that if youre accepted you get an email and if your rejected its snail mail? What about wait list?
My decision was mailed to me, but it was sent back because they had the wrong address. They resent it today, but they wouldn't tell me what it said. Any ideas? Thanks
I don't really know, just pontificating
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login