Columbia 2010 Forum
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
- MusicNutMeggie
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:12 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I've been such a creeper up until now--just lurking and reading all of your rants and worries. It's been nice knowing I wasn't alone, by the way. Got put on the reserve list today-- 3.81/168. I'm kind of kicking myself for not retaking at the last administration, since I was routinely prepping in the 175 range...anyway, good luck to everyone!
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:02 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I'm complete from September and haven't heard anything yet.js87 wrote:Anyone complete from early November still waiting? No word yet, but my stats make it a long shot; LSAT just under median, GPA at median. Non-URM.
Also, are holds coming through the mail? Are ALL decisions via snail mail, including holds and waitlists?
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Nothing at all for me today .
Come on, mailman. Someday I want to see some vomit in my doorway when I get home from work.
Come on, mailman. Someday I want to see some vomit in my doorway when I get home from work.
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:33 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Rejected today. GPA slightly below median, LSAT below median. Not overly surprised or upset. Good luck to those still waiting!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Complete since mid-September here. Not a word. (Hi psychomohel!)blue5385 wrote:I just feel so sad and ignored by CLS...most of the people in this thread have gotten their decisions already, and I haven't heard back in any form--no decision or request for further info or anything (although I'm out of school so that could explain the lack of info request). I was complete in early December and I wish they would stop acting like my file does not exist and just acknowledge me somehow. I have no expectation whatsoever for an acceptance, but any form of communication would be excellent.
/rant
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
.crackberry wrote:Complete since mid-September here. Not a word. (Hi psychomohel!)blue5385 wrote:I just feel so sad and ignored by CLS...most of the people in this thread have gotten their decisions already, and I haven't heard back in any form--no decision or request for further info or anything (although I'm out of school so that could explain the lack of info request). I was complete in early December and I wish they would stop acting like my file does not exist and just acknowledge me somehow. I have no expectation whatsoever for an acceptance, but any form of communication would be excellent.
/rant
Last edited by blue5385 on Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
+1 Been complete since September.. not a word yetcrackberry wrote:Complete since mid-September here. Not a word. (Hi psychomohel!)blue5385 wrote:I just feel so sad and ignored by CLS...most of the people in this thread have gotten their decisions already, and I haven't heard back in any form--no decision or request for further info or anything (although I'm out of school so that could explain the lack of info request). I was complete in early December and I wish they would stop acting like my file does not exist and just acknowledge me somehow. I have no expectation whatsoever for an acceptance, but any form of communication would be excellent.
/rant
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Yeah fair enough. I agree it's annoying.blue5385 wrote:I know people have been waiting longer than me crack, I just got frustrated by the fact that I'm probably going to be waiting another couple months for a hold, waitlist, or rejection.
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
- CoaltoNewCastle
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:40 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
That's really not good evidence that they don't yield protect. That's just evidence that some overqualified candidates get named scholarships and others get held or waitlisted but eventually let in if they don't withdraw. If Columbia didn't care about their ranking, they wouldn't be #4. Virtually all law schools care about their rank. If they didn't, Columbia and all the others wouldn't value GPA and LSAT so highly and devalue undergrad and major rigor and other small and medium soft factors. I don't think you can seriously tell me that you think that if that 3.9/176 had sent in a LOCI instead of a withdrawal that he would probably be rejected by Columbia. There's no way that person would be rejected by Columbia if he made it clear that he would attend. By putting him on hold, a very minor act, they've improved their stats.EijiMiyake wrote:Because they throw Hamiltons and Butlers at people that, for the most part, end up choosing HYS anyway. Why is it so hard to believe that not all schools are looking for the exact same thing? Maybe she just got a reader that was in a particularly bad mood or something.CoaltoNewCastle wrote:I'm not sure why people find it so hard to believe that CLS yield protects. It's so easy to put an overqualified applicant on hold to see if he's truly interested. So why wouldn't they do it? By putting this 176/3.9 on hold, they just slightly boosted their rank because he's withdrawing. The adcoms at Columbia are very rational people who have been hired not just to give Columbia a good student body, but also to make their rank as high as possible. There's no good reason not to practice subtle yield protection.
-
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
For Columbia, how does Waitlist compare to being put on Hold to being put on Reserve?
- BaiAilian2013
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I really, really hope you're right about that. Maybe I should get started on a LOCI now...CoaltoNewCastle wrote:I don't think you can seriously tell me that you think that if that 3.9/176 had sent in a LOCI instead of a withdrawal that he would probably be rejected by Columbia. There's no way that person would be rejected by Columbia if he made it clear that he would attend.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- EijiMiyake
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:29 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
CoaltoNewCastle wrote: That's really not good evidence that they don't yield protect. That's just evidence that some overqualified candidates get named scholarships and others get held or waitlisted but eventually let in if they don't withdraw. If Columbia didn't care about their ranking, they wouldn't be #4. Virtually all law schools care about their rank. If they didn't, Columbia and all the others wouldn't value GPA and LSAT so highly and devalue undergrad and major rigor and other small and medium soft factors. I don't think you can seriously tell me that you think that if that 3.9/176 had sent in a LOCI instead of a withdrawal that he would probably be rejected by Columbia. There's no way that person would be rejected by Columbia if he made it clear that he would attend. By putting him on hold, a very minor act, they've improved their stats.
Huh? I don't think anyone is saying that CLS doesn't care about their ranking.
I think that it's hard to say that a school yield protects if they don't systematically yield protect. For example, look at the LSN graphs for Virginia, Penn, and Columbia. For VP, there is a point at which it is much more likely for a candidate to get waitlisted than accepted. For CLS, the vast majority of "qualified" or "over-qualified" candidates (according to GPA/LSAT) are accepted.
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:04 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
If you are in DC it is probably delayed, due to losing 2 days of mail service this past week. Do you know for a fact that you are getting something in the mail? What does your status checker say?0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Nothing in my mail today in DC
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Well I know I am getting something in the mail because I am waiting on a few things so I think everything is just delayeddemocrattotheend wrote:If you are in DC it is probably delayed, due to losing 2 days of mail service this past week. Do you know for a fact that you are getting something in the mail? What does your status checker say?0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Nothing in my mail today in DC
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Has anyone gotten anything from them marked later than 2/9?
edit: For the people who have heard back, is there ever a DR status, or does it just stay at complete forever until they choose to purge all traces of you from their system sometime in the summer or fall?
edit: For the people who have heard back, is there ever a DR status, or does it just stay at complete forever until they choose to purge all traces of you from their system sometime in the summer or fall?
Last edited by blue5385 on Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:25 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
democrattotheend wrote:If you are in DC it is probably delayed, due to losing 2 days of mail service this past week. Do you know for a fact that you are getting something in the mail? What does your status checker say?0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Nothing in my mail today in DC
2 days! that's lucky! I haven't gotten mail since a week ago, last Friday. Today's trip to the mailbox is going to be scary...
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Yea, I havent had mail since last Thursday. Today was our first day of mail service and NOTHING came except I know that I have like 5 letters I should have received by Tuesdayrunnerman wrote:democrattotheend wrote:If you are in DC it is probably delayed, due to losing 2 days of mail service this past week. Do you know for a fact that you are getting something in the mail? What does your status checker say?0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Nothing in my mail today in DC
2 days! that's lucky! I haven't gotten mail since a week ago, last Friday. Today's trip to the mailbox is going to be scary...
- CoaltoNewCastle
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:40 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Even if they don't broadly yield protect the way other schools do, that doesn't mean they don't yield protect. Even other posters who wouldn't say that CLS yield protects, have suggested that some highly qualified candidates are being held or waitlisted because they don't seem like a proper fit for Columbia. If somebody seems like they would prefer NYU because of public interest, or Berkeley or Chicago because of regional ties, putting that person on hold is an act of yield protection. All yield protection is is increasing the apparent selectivity of the school. Still, I hope I don't get held, blegh. I just want my vomit-crusted envelope already! With money.EijiMiyake wrote: Huh? I don't think anyone is saying that CLS doesn't care about their ranking.
I think that it's hard to say that a school yield protects if they don't systematically yield protect. For example, look at the LSN graphs for Virginia, Penn, and Columbia. For VP, there is a point at which it is much more likely for a candidate to get waitlisted than accepted. For CLS, the vast majority of "qualified" or "over-qualified" candidates (according to GPA/LSAT) are accepted.
Last edited by CoaltoNewCastle on Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:02 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I got some random mail today (after a some days of no mail), but still nothing from Columbia.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Yea, I havent had mail since last Thursday. Today was our first day of mail service and NOTHING came except I know that I have like 5 letters I should have received by Tuesdayrunnerman wrote:democrattotheend wrote:If you are in DC it is probably delayed, due to losing 2 days of mail service this past week. Do you know for a fact that you are getting something in the mail? What does your status checker say?0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Nothing in my mail today in DC
2 days! that's lucky! I haven't gotten mail since a week ago, last Friday. Today's trip to the mailbox is going to be scary...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CoaltoNewCastle
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:40 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
My family got no mail today so no vomit-cloaked envelope yet.
Edit: And my parents just lost power.
Edit: And my parents just lost power.
Last edited by CoaltoNewCastle on Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- englawyer
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
btw i am held 2/9 at Columbia as well
- monkeygirl
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:52 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
My mad dash to the mailbox yielded---nothing.
Complete since October.
Complete since October.
- Sogui
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:32 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I would like to see some blatant examples of Columbia YP'ing, too many are just wishy-washy. Some people retake and only report the latest numbers so you'll see people from previous years getting rejected and held from schools with a 175/3.8 when the reality is that they were 168/3.8 during their actual cycle.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login