Why quaint?Helmholtz wrote:People are applying RD to CLS this year? How quaint.catwoman wrote:Is this only true for ED people? I'm RD but submitted my application early, and it certainly would be nice to hear in December.irie wrote:pretty sure as long as they received your app before 11/15 you will hear in one of 3-4 waves, starting day before thanksgiving and then every friday until christmas.azntwice wrote:Even if you complete AFTER the ED deadline, you are still considered in the same pool, correct? I remember there was someone last year whom that happened for. And they received their decision before others who completed way earlier.
Columbia 2010 Forum
- hannah87
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:37 am
Re: Columbia 2010
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Because half the world applied ED to CLS this year.hannah87 wrote:Why quaint?
- hannah87
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:37 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Got it. FML.crackberry wrote:Because half the world applied ED to CLS this year.hannah87 wrote:Why quaint?
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:15 am
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Does anyone know if they do all of the ED before any of the RD? And is there any further notification on the status checker after "complete?"
Thanks!
Thanks!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- of Benito Cereno
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:40 am
Re: Columbia 2010
yea, I never did either. I submitted around the same time (a bit earlier) but was getting panicky. However, and I think this will come as a big relief to you: you don't need to receive any emails to check your status on the columbia law website.jocelyne wrote:I still haven't received an APP RECEIVED email....anyone know if this is normal? Submitted Nov 9th. RD
Go to the CLS website and you can just go to the status checker and create a user account using personal info such as email, social security number, lsac number, and birthdate and they'll give you access to your status. so no need to wait for an email, you can just go on the website now and see the status of your app. For me, it listed all my elements as received or complete and listed me as "completion pending."
- of Benito Cereno
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:40 am
Re: Columbia 2010
still nervous about multiple lsats at cls, especially with how long its taking me to go complete and the millions of ED apps. I have like a 3.58 from top 10 ug, european grad work, and a 178 (multiple(2) lsats with a 174 average). However, at 3.58 and 174 I'd not be all that likely to get in. 178 is another story. What do y'all think?
-
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Do you guys have numbers that say more people are than normal went ED, or are you just basing that on what people have said have declared so in this thread?crackberry wrote:Because half the world applied ED to CLS this year.hannah87 wrote:Why quaint?
-
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I think that they will probably look at your 178 because it is to their benefit to do so.of Benito Cereno wrote:still nervous about multiple lsats at cls, especially with how long its taking me to go complete and the millions of ED apps. I have like a 3.58 from top 10 ug, european grad work, and a 178 (multiple(2) lsats with a 174 average). However, at 3.58 and 174 I'd not be all that likely to get in. 178 is another story. What do y'all think?
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
People ED'd to CLS this year? How adorable.Helmholtz wrote: People are applying RD to CLS this year? How quaint.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:43 am
Re: Columbia 2010
So I guess what I'm wondering is... who does the amount of people ED'ing negatively affect more?
The ED'ers (the ED boost doesn't help them that much if too many people ED)
or the RD'ers (no room left for them if too many qualified people ED).
??
The ED'ers (the ED boost doesn't help them that much if too many people ED)
or the RD'ers (no room left for them if too many qualified people ED).
??
- wackjickham
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I hope you're wrong. Those are my numbersof Benito Cereno wrote:However, at 3.58 and 174 I'd not be all that likely to get in.
- of Benito Cereno
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:40 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I mean, its just a much more uncertain position. A blotch of yellow with some green dots mixed in on lsn rather than a pretty monochrome sea of green at 178.wackjickham wrote:I hope you're wrong. Those are my numbersof Benito Cereno wrote:However, at 3.58 and 174 I'd not be all that likely to get in.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I was here for last cycle and have talked to people who were here the cycle before that. I know it's not a perfect sample or anything, but the number of people ED'ing at CLS seems to have gone through the roof. I don't think it's possible to have any hard data at this point, but I'm not expecting an ED boost to be pronounced at all this year.Oban wrote:Do you guys have numbers that say more people are than normal went ED, or are you just basing that on what people have said have declared so in this thread?crackberry wrote:Because half the world applied ED to CLS this year.hannah87 wrote:Why quaint?
- cougarlive
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:53 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
a.shoshana wrote:So I guess what I'm wondering is... who does the amount of people ED'ing negatively affect more?
The ED'ers (the ED boost doesn't help them that much if too many people ED)
or the RD'ers (no room left for them if too many qualified people ED).
??
Is it just me, or does Columbia really go out of its way to tell applicants ED doesn't help "boost" your chances of admission (compared to other Schools)?
(Aside from Duke which goes a step further and says that they evaluate ED applicants more rigorously)
Anyway, hoping the opposite is true for Columbia--and they show us all some Early Decision love! Good luck everyone, sounds like we should start hearing pretty soon!
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I thought their line was "no significant advantage," which is true. It's not like a 170/3.3 is going to be able to use ED to get into Columbia.cougarlive wrote: Is it just me, or does Columbia really go out of its way to tell applicants ED doesn't help "boost" your chances of admission (compared to other Schools)?
- irie
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:50 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I cant imagine why they would look at RD without finishing the EDs first, and no there is nothing after Complete, so you dont need to compulsively check anymore, just wait for their email.managamy wrote:Does anyone know if they do all of the ED before any of the RD? And is there any further notification on the status checker after "complete?"
Thanks!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- SanBun
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Dear Columbia Law School,
the more I think about you, the more I realize that we belong together. No other school makes me feel the same way. When I think of being with you, I get chills all over. I know there are other contenders, some of whom may appear to be better than me, but I promise that if you choose me, I will give my heart and soul to make this work. I hope that you understand my early commitment as a sign of my never-ending love for you.
I am waiting patiently for your love letter.
Love,
SanBun
the more I think about you, the more I realize that we belong together. No other school makes me feel the same way. When I think of being with you, I get chills all over. I know there are other contenders, some of whom may appear to be better than me, but I promise that if you choose me, I will give my heart and soul to make this work. I hope that you understand my early commitment as a sign of my never-ending love for you.
I am waiting patiently for your love letter.
Love,
SanBun
- superserial
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
in.of Benito Cereno wrote:still nervous about multiple lsats at cls, especially with how long its taking me to go complete and the millions of ED apps. I have like a 3.58 from top 10 ug, european grad work, and a 178 (multiple(2) lsats with a 174 average). However, at 3.58 and 174 I'd not be all that likely to get in. 178 is another story. What do y'all think?
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
At least an 80% chance.superserial wrote:in.of Benito Cereno wrote:still nervous about multiple lsats at cls, especially with how long its taking me to go complete and the millions of ED apps. I have like a 3.58 from top 10 ug, european grad work, and a 178 (multiple(2) lsats with a 174 average). However, at 3.58 and 174 I'd not be all that likely to get in. 178 is another story. What do y'all think?
- Legacy316
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:57 am
Re: Columbia 2010
ED? I'd be shocked if you didn't get in.managamy wrote:At least an 80% chance.superserial wrote:in.of Benito Cereno wrote:still nervous about multiple lsats at cls, especially with how long its taking me to go complete and the millions of ED apps. I have like a 3.58 from top 10 ug, european grad work, and a 178 (multiple(2) lsats with a 174 average). However, at 3.58 and 174 I'd not be all that likely to get in. 178 is another story. What do y'all think?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Oh, I didn't see that you were ED. I feel very, very confident that you are going to be when you hear from them.Legacy316 wrote:ED? I'd be shocked if you didn't get in.managamy wrote:At least an 80% chance.superserial wrote:in.of Benito Cereno wrote:still nervous about multiple lsats at cls, especially with how long its taking me to go complete and the millions of ED apps. I have like a 3.58 from top 10 ug, european grad work, and a 178 (multiple(2) lsats with a 174 average). However, at 3.58 and 174 I'd not be all that likely to get in. 178 is another story. What do y'all think?
-
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:20 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
in. prohibitively expensive so i won't be going.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Does this mean you've been accepted. I'm confused.rejectmaster wrote:in. prohibitively expensive so i won't be going.
- dudester
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
How long has it taken you guys to go complete at Columbia?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login