Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point? Forum
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:05 am
Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
just wondering what others think
- MissMaroon
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:01 am
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
I'd prefer still being in review.
- LizLemon
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:26 am
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
Yo tambien.MissMaroon wrote:I'd prefer still being in review.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:56 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
I have also posted regarding this topic and had no luck with replies...hope someone can give some constructive feedback.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:05 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
Yea i would like to know too
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rdt854
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:53 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
depends on the school and how late you appliedEliza wrote:Yea i would like to know too
- rdt854
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:53 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
what are your numbers, school your wondering about, and date u applied? Then i can help
- OperaSoprano
- Posts: 3417
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:54 am
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
I'll take review any time, since it leaves open the possibility of direct admission, however small.
- lawfool
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:40 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
If still under review:
- you could be accepted with scholarship $ after the scholarship deadlines though unlikely (+2)
- you could be accepted (+1)
- you could be WL (+0)
- you could be rejected (-1)
If waitlisted:
- you could be accepted (+1)
- you could be rejected (-1)
I'd say it's more favorable to be under review still.
- you could be accepted with scholarship $ after the scholarship deadlines though unlikely (+2)
- you could be accepted (+1)
- you could be WL (+0)
- you could be rejected (-1)
If waitlisted:
- you could be accepted (+1)
- you could be rejected (-1)
I'd say it's more favorable to be under review still.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:56 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
As I understand, many schools have started re-reviewing the applications as of April 15 or the date of the first seat deposits. My question is whether their is some sort of priority for pending apps over waitlisted apps or if the waitlisted apps are even a part of that "re-reviewing" process? And also, in what amount of time should we (those apps still pending) be hearing from the adcomms?
- Veritas
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
My numbers are in my profile, via LSN.
What do you think USD is doing with my app? Complete since 11/11
Keep in mind I have a WL at Loyola, which is slightly comparable.
What do you think USD is doing with my app? Complete since 11/11
Keep in mind I have a WL at Loyola, which is slightly comparable.
- unfgolfer14
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:10 am
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
I would prefer to still be under review....fwiw
- rdt854
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:53 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
Id say you get in soon; they just accepted someone on the 16th with lower numbers then you... prolly just taking their sweet ass time. Try calling the admissions officeveritas85 wrote:My numbers are in my profile, via LSN.
What do you think USD is doing with my app? Complete since 11/11
Keep in mind I have a WL at Loyola, which is slightly comparable.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cconnoll
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:51 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
3.1 gpa 154. Non-URM
Chapman. Application finalized February 1st.....still in review.
Thank you!
Chapman. Application finalized February 1st.....still in review.
Thank you!
- Veritas
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
Hmm, they were URM though. I could call the office, but I feel like they are inundated lately because their process is taking so long.rdt854 wrote:Id say you get in soon; they just accepted someone on the 16th with lower numbers then you... prolly just taking their sweet ass time. Try calling the admissions officeveritas85 wrote:My numbers are in my profile, via LSN.
What do you think USD is doing with my app? Complete since 11/11
Keep in mind I have a WL at Loyola, which is slightly comparable.
Thanks for the comment though, I hope you are correct!
- cconnoll
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:51 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
cconnoll wrote:3.1 gpa 154. Non-URM
Chapman. Application finalized February 1st.....still in review.
Thank you!
+ still wondering..
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:51 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
IMO, better to be on a waitlist. Many schools look at applications not on first-come-first-serve, but based on index. If you haven't been reviewed yet, and the deadline for the school has passed some time ago, then its likely you aren't high on their index.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:12 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
3.81 gpa, 156 lsat, non-urm
Arizona State University...complete mid-jan. and still waiting for a decision
chances?
Arizona State University...complete mid-jan. and still waiting for a decision
chances?
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
I hope still in review...
Waiting from USC. Complete mid-late October. 166/3.24, 2 years WE. Long shot at best.
Waiting from USC. Complete mid-late October. 166/3.24, 2 years WE. Long shot at best.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:56 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
Apparently at John Marshall Chicago, being on the waitlist is better. According to LSN, all of the waitlisted people were accepted last week, or have been accepted by now. The only thing I can think of for why this might have happened is that they might have used their "waitlist" as a preferred group of applicants over those applications still pending. This really makes me uneasy, especially since I have yet to hear from them
. Does anyone else have any incite?

- cconnoll
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:51 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
cconnoll wrote:cconnoll wrote:3.1 gpa 154. Non-URM
Chapman. Application finalized February 1st.....still in review.
Thank you!
......
+ still wondering..
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DCDeckard
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:12 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
I am wondering the same thing. Echoing the sentiments of a poster in the "Who Did you Hear From" forum, the fact that adcoms at some schools are essentially double-dipping some applications (WLers) before even giving an initial decision to others is simply unfair.konig wrote:As I understand, many schools have started re-reviewing the applications as of April 15 or the date of the first seat deposits. My question is whether their is some sort of priority for pending apps over waitlisted apps or if the waitlisted apps are even a part of that "re-reviewing" process? And also, in what amount of time should we (those apps still pending) be hearing from the adcomms?
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:06 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
Depends on your numbers, I think. I'm a low-LSAT/high-GPA splitter, and a couple of the highest-ranked schools where I had less than a 50% chance of getting in have gotten back to me with acceptances only in the last couple weeks or so. I'd imagine that they'd also look at the apps they haven't reviewed yet before the waitlist. But who knows.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:47 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
under the same dilemma with chapman
dont know whether to waitlist and potentially wait until august or stay in review and get a response sometime soon
dont know whether to waitlist and potentially wait until august or stay in review and get a response sometime soon
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:53 pm
Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?
if they haven't:
1. accepted,
2. rejected, or
3. waitlested
you as of now (mid-late april), you are going to be:
1. waitlisted,
2. rejected, or
3. accepted
in that order of ascending probability.
1. accepted,
2. rejected, or
3. waitlested
you as of now (mid-late april), you are going to be:
1. waitlisted,
2. rejected, or
3. accepted
in that order of ascending probability.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login