Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point? Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
memeME

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:05 am

Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by memeME » Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:45 pm

just wondering what others think

User avatar
MissMaroon

Bronze
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:01 am

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by MissMaroon » Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:53 pm

I'd prefer still being in review.

User avatar
LizLemon

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:26 am

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by LizLemon » Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:23 pm

MissMaroon wrote:I'd prefer still being in review.
Yo tambien.

konig

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:56 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by konig » Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:15 pm

I have also posted regarding this topic and had no luck with replies...hope someone can give some constructive feedback.

Eliza

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:05 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by Eliza » Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:16 pm

Yea i would like to know too

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
rdt854

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:53 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by rdt854 » Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:17 pm

Eliza wrote:Yea i would like to know too
depends on the school and how late you applied

User avatar
rdt854

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:53 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by rdt854 » Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:23 pm

what are your numbers, school your wondering about, and date u applied? Then i can help

User avatar
OperaSoprano

Gold
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:54 am

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by OperaSoprano » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:00 pm

I'll take review any time, since it leaves open the possibility of direct admission, however small.

User avatar
lawfool

New
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:40 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by lawfool » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:10 pm

If still under review:
- you could be accepted with scholarship $ after the scholarship deadlines though unlikely (+2)
- you could be accepted (+1)
- you could be WL (+0)
- you could be rejected (-1)

If waitlisted:
- you could be accepted (+1)
- you could be rejected (-1)

I'd say it's more favorable to be under review still.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


konig

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:56 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by konig » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:28 pm

As I understand, many schools have started re-reviewing the applications as of April 15 or the date of the first seat deposits. My question is whether their is some sort of priority for pending apps over waitlisted apps or if the waitlisted apps are even a part of that "re-reviewing" process? And also, in what amount of time should we (those apps still pending) be hearing from the adcomms?

User avatar
Veritas

Gold
Posts: 2695
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by Veritas » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:35 pm

My numbers are in my profile, via LSN.

What do you think USD is doing with my app? Complete since 11/11

Keep in mind I have a WL at Loyola, which is slightly comparable.

User avatar
unfgolfer14

New
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:10 am

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by unfgolfer14 » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:35 pm

I would prefer to still be under review....fwiw

User avatar
rdt854

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:53 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by rdt854 » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:37 pm

veritas85 wrote:My numbers are in my profile, via LSN.

What do you think USD is doing with my app? Complete since 11/11

Keep in mind I have a WL at Loyola, which is slightly comparable.
Id say you get in soon; they just accepted someone on the 16th with lower numbers then you... prolly just taking their sweet ass time. Try calling the admissions office

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
cconnoll

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by cconnoll » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:41 pm

3.1 gpa 154. Non-URM

Chapman. Application finalized February 1st.....still in review.

Thank you!

User avatar
Veritas

Gold
Posts: 2695
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by Veritas » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:43 pm

rdt854 wrote:
veritas85 wrote:My numbers are in my profile, via LSN.

What do you think USD is doing with my app? Complete since 11/11

Keep in mind I have a WL at Loyola, which is slightly comparable.
Id say you get in soon; they just accepted someone on the 16th with lower numbers then you... prolly just taking their sweet ass time. Try calling the admissions office
Hmm, they were URM though. I could call the office, but I feel like they are inundated lately because their process is taking so long.

Thanks for the comment though, I hope you are correct!

User avatar
cconnoll

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by cconnoll » Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:11 pm

cconnoll wrote:3.1 gpa 154. Non-URM

Chapman. Application finalized February 1st.....still in review.

Thank you!

+ still wondering..

SickD

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:51 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by SickD » Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:48 pm

IMO, better to be on a waitlist. Many schools look at applications not on first-come-first-serve, but based on index. If you haven't been reviewed yet, and the deadline for the school has passed some time ago, then its likely you aren't high on their index.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


london2nyc

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:12 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by london2nyc » Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:37 am

3.81 gpa, 156 lsat, non-urm

Arizona State University...complete mid-jan. and still waiting for a decision

chances?

buxfactor

New
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:18 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by buxfactor » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:37 pm

I hope still in review...

Waiting from USC. Complete mid-late October. 166/3.24, 2 years WE. Long shot at best.

konig

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:56 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by konig » Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:53 pm

Apparently at John Marshall Chicago, being on the waitlist is better. According to LSN, all of the waitlisted people were accepted last week, or have been accepted by now. The only thing I can think of for why this might have happened is that they might have used their "waitlist" as a preferred group of applicants over those applications still pending. This really makes me uneasy, especially since I have yet to hear from them :( . Does anyone else have any incite?

User avatar
cconnoll

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by cconnoll » Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:15 pm

cconnoll wrote:
cconnoll wrote:3.1 gpa 154. Non-URM

Chapman. Application finalized February 1st.....still in review.

Thank you!


......

+ still wondering..

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
DCDeckard

New
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:12 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by DCDeckard » Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:27 pm

konig wrote:As I understand, many schools have started re-reviewing the applications as of April 15 or the date of the first seat deposits. My question is whether their is some sort of priority for pending apps over waitlisted apps or if the waitlisted apps are even a part of that "re-reviewing" process? And also, in what amount of time should we (those apps still pending) be hearing from the adcomms?
I am wondering the same thing. Echoing the sentiments of a poster in the "Who Did you Hear From" forum, the fact that adcoms at some schools are essentially double-dipping some applications (WLers) before even giving an initial decision to others is simply unfair.

lucyinthesky

New
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:06 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by lucyinthesky » Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:27 pm

Depends on your numbers, I think. I'm a low-LSAT/high-GPA splitter, and a couple of the highest-ranked schools where I had less than a 50% chance of getting in have gotten back to me with acceptances only in the last couple weeks or so. I'd imagine that they'd also look at the apps they haven't reviewed yet before the waitlist. But who knows.

trick1

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:47 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by trick1 » Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:51 am

under the same dilemma with chapman
dont know whether to waitlist and potentially wait until august or stay in review and get a response sometime soon

jamesc760

New
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:53 pm

Re: Better to be on a waitlist or still in review at this point?

Post by jamesc760 » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:21 am

if they haven't:

1. accepted,
2. rejected, or
3. waitlested

you as of now (mid-late april), you are going to be:

1. waitlisted,
2. rejected, or
3. accepted

in that order of ascending probability.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”