I agree, but it seems like they expect you to be. I was mostly trying to point out that that particular strategy (saying you'll commit if accepted) may not be as helpful as it could be with other schools' waitlists because the presumption that you'll commit already exists on HLS's part.LHS17 wrote:Many wouldn't be certain without knowing financial aid.Leliana wrote:HLS already states explicitly on their website that you should stay on the waitlist only if you're certain you would accept an offer of admission.LHS17 wrote:If you do get waitlisted and interviewed once more, tell them you'll commit if accepted. This worked for someone I know.
Tell them IF TRUE
Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
- Leliana
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:07 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Lol this was me after I talked to a friend at Yale who's tight w the admissions team..no real insight on what Harvard law profs are doing other than not admitting me tho hahaKateMcKitten wrote:Someone in the Y thread suggested that Y's delay was because professors who generally review apps are busy fighting Trump's measures, so the office is waiting on them to submit their feedback. Admittedly, H's process is a lot less reliant on faculty, but I wouldn't be surprised if that had contributed to the slowdown.appind wrote:guess it's about time someone who knows firsthand about admissions process in HLS tell us why this cycle is weird and the prognosis thereof.
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
congrats!!!!!!!addie1412 wrote:SEVEN WAITLISTS LATER AND JS2!!!!!!!!!
Just got the call, interviewed 1/25. LSAT = 75, GPA <<25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e264e/e264e8452c5c3caad75606f86b3365091a94b224" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 4:34 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
So is the JS2 wave not continuing today?
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:45 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Sorry I didn't post earlier/yesterday, but I was far too overwhelmed with excitement:
JS2! Got the call from Anne around noon! 173/3.8 non-URM KJD. Interviewed 1/4, had almost lost all hope but thank god!
JS2! Got the call from Anne around noon! 173/3.8 non-URM KJD. Interviewed 1/4, had almost lost all hope but thank god!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:29 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I would presume people haven't read the fine print (I know which article you're referencing though) and appreciate reassurance if I were in their shoes. Also, the expectation seems so impractical that I wouldn't expect every interviewer to hold it.Leliana wrote:I agree, but it seems like they expect you to be. I was mostly trying to point out that that particular strategy (saying you'll commit if accepted) may not be as helpful as it could be with other schools' waitlists because the presumption that you'll commit already exists on HLS's part.LHS17 wrote:Many wouldn't be certain without knowing financial aid.Leliana wrote:HLS already states explicitly on their website that you should stay on the waitlist only if you're certain you would accept an offer of admission.LHS17 wrote:If you do get waitlisted and interviewed once more, tell them you'll commit if accepted. This worked for someone I know.
Tell them IF TRUE
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:29 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
But yes, I agree with you, too. It may not be as helpful as other places.Leliana wrote:I agree, but it seems like they expect you to be. I was mostly trying to point out that that particular strategy (saying you'll commit if accepted) may not be as helpful as it could be with other schools' waitlists because the presumption that you'll commit already exists on HLS's part.LHS17 wrote:Many wouldn't be certain without knowing financial aid.Leliana wrote:HLS already states explicitly on their website that you should stay on the waitlist only if you're certain you would accept an offer of admission.LHS17 wrote:If you do get waitlisted and interviewed once more, tell them you'll commit if accepted. This worked for someone I know.
Tell them IF TRUE
- hellohalo
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I believe stating the true commitment will help if anythingLeliana wrote:I agree, but it seems like they expect you to be. I was mostly trying to point out that that particular strategy (saying you'll commit if accepted) may not be as helpful as it could be with other schools' waitlists because the presumption that you'll commit already exists on HLS's part.LHS17 wrote:Many wouldn't be certain without knowing financial aid.Leliana wrote:HLS already states explicitly on their website that you should stay on the waitlist only if you're certain you would accept an offer of admission.LHS17 wrote:If you do get waitlisted and interviewed once more, tell them you'll commit if accepted. This worked for someone I know.
Tell them IF TRUE
The argument is would SOMEONE you know still get in without explicitly committing themselves?
- KaijuOh8
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Sounds like WL is all I can hope for at this point... Congratulations though!futuregingerlawyer wrote:Sorry I didn't post earlier/yesterday, but I was far too overwhelmed with excitement:
JS2! Got the call from Anne around noon! 173/3.8 non-URM KJD. Interviewed 1/4, had almost lost all hope but thank god!
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 11:25 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Any URM's still waiting/hoping for a JS1?
What's going on with this cycle... Going insane!
What's going on with this cycle... Going insane!
- poptart123
- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:31 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
yeskamy123 wrote:Any URM's still waiting/hoping for a JS1?
What's going on with this cycle... Going insane!
- taxman14
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:04 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
so bizarre...a ton will happen in the next weekpoptart123 wrote:yeskamy123 wrote:Any URM's still waiting/hoping for a JS1?
What's going on with this cycle... Going insane!
Quick q: any estimates of how many JS2s are remaining?? I'm sure someone has done the analysis
- poptart123
- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:31 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
what makes you think a lot will happen next week? I want to be optimistic!taxman14 wrote:so bizarre...a ton will happen in the next weekpoptart123 wrote:yeskamy123 wrote:Any URM's still waiting/hoping for a JS1?
What's going on with this cycle... Going insane!
Quick q: any estimates of how many JS2s are remaining?? I'm sure someone has done the analysis
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- taxman14
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:04 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Last year there was a big wave on 3/28 s othat would be next week!poptart123 wrote:what makes you think a lot will happen next week? I want to be optimistic!taxman14 wrote:so bizarre...a ton will happen in the next weekpoptart123 wrote:yeskamy123 wrote:Any URM's still waiting/hoping for a JS1?
What's going on with this cycle... Going insane!
Quick q: any estimates of how many JS2s are remaining?? I'm sure someone has done the analysis
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 11:25 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Is there any hope for a JS1 this late in the cycle? With all this talk about decisions being made by April 1st, I'm beginning to lose all hope...poptart123 wrote:what makes you think a lot will happen next week? I want to be optimistic!taxman14 wrote:so bizarre...a ton will happen in the next weekpoptart123 wrote:yeskamy123 wrote:Any URM's still waiting/hoping for a JS1?
What's going on with this cycle... Going insane!
Quick q: any estimates of how many JS2s are remaining?? I'm sure someone has done the analysis
- KaijuOh8
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
If you get waitlisted without a JS1, you might get a JS1 later. TBF, I would start managing my expectations if I were in your position.kamy123 wrote:Is there any hope for a JS1 this late in the cycle? With all this talk about decisions being made by April 1st, I'm beginning to lose all hope...
- SybillAnnDorsett
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:59 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I wonder why last year and the year before, the first JS2s went to WL-JS1s and not pre-WL JS1s.KaijuOh8 wrote:If you get waitlisted without a JS1, you might get a JS1 later. TBF, I would start managing my expectations if I were in your position.kamy123 wrote:Is there any hope for a JS1 this late in the cycle? With all this talk about decisions being made by April 1st, I'm beginning to lose all hope...
Gives me hope that if I'm waitlisted I could hear as early as late May.
(delusions of grandeur are so fun, you should really try it!)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
A lot of people probably take themselves off the waitlist by that point.I wonder why last year and the year before, the first JS2s went to WL-JS1s and not pre-WL JS1s.
Gives me hope that if I'm waitlisted I could hear as early as late May.
- LSRAT
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:02 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Also, since there are no interviews tomorrow, doesn't it make sense that a large reject/wl wave will happen?
- Kinch08
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Here's some math I did in a PM to SMC that might be comforting/helpful to all the other JS1's who haven't heard back yet:taxman14 wrote:so bizarre...a ton will happen in the next weekpoptart123 wrote:yeskamy123 wrote:Any URM's still waiting/hoping for a JS1?
What's going on with this cycle... Going insane!
Quick q: any estimates of how many JS2s are remaining?? I'm sure someone has done the analysis
There's one wave left, probably average-sized (so, 1/5 of the 1000 non-WL admits, or 200 potential HLS'ers). Maybe 30 spots in it (I'm just spitballing here, but it's honest spitballing--I'm not fudging numbers to make you feel better) will be taken up by last-minute JS1's (there haven't been enough last-minute JS1's to fill more than 30 ish spots). We know from the thread that everyone who wasn't a last minute JS1 (i.e. people with JS1's in early March or earlier) was considered for this last wave, so the other 170 JS2's will be given out to people exactly like you. I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a better chance than someone who JS1'd in November, but by the same token, I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a worse shot than someone who JS1'd in late February. So the question is, how many people are you competing against for those 170 spots? Well, that math is easy--it's the total number of non-WL JS1's (around 1200, when you account for the last-minute people) minus the admits so far (800-ish). 400. 170/400 = 42.5%. You have a better than 40% "raw" chance of getting in. That's not the 75% chance you started out with, but it ain't bad.
Now, of course, those 170 spots are not given away randomly. It's a numbers game, just like it always has been.
Last edited by Kinch08 on Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:18 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Could happen, certainly. Will happen? No idea.LSRAT wrote:Also, since there are no interviews tomorrow, doesn't it make sense that a large reject/wl wave will happen?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
you're my heroKinch08 wrote:Here's some math I did in a PM to SMC that might be comforting/helpful to all the other JS1's who haven't heard back yet:taxman14 wrote:so bizarre...a ton will happen in the next weekpoptart123 wrote:yeskamy123 wrote:Any URM's still waiting/hoping for a JS1?
What's going on with this cycle... Going insane!
Quick q: any estimates of how many JS2s are remaining?? I'm sure someone has done the analysis
There's one wave left, probably average-sized (so, 1/5 of the 1000 non-WL admits, or 200 potential HLS'ers). Maybe 30 spots in it (I'm just spitballing here, but it's honest spitballing--I'm not fudging numbers to make you feel better) will be taken up by last-minute JS1's (there haven't been enough last-minute JS1's to fill more than 30 ish spots). We know from the thread that everyone who wasn't a last minute JS1 (i.e. people with JS1's in early March or earlier) was considered for this last wave, so the other 170 JS2's will be given out to people exactly like you. I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a better chance than someone who JS1'd in November, but by the same token, I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a worse shot than someone who JS1'd in late February. So the question is, how many people are you competing against for those 170 spots? Well, that math is easy--it's the total number of non-WL JS1's (around 1200, when you account for the last-minute people) minus the admits so far (800-ish). 400. 170/400 = 42.5%. You have a better than 40% "raw" chance of getting in. That's not the 75% chance you started out with, but it ain't bad.
Now, of course, those 170 spots are not given away randomly. It's a numbers game, just like it always has been.
- Leliana
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I don't think so because admissions will almost certainly be busy at ASW tomorrow.seeprybyrun wrote:Could happen, certainly. Will happen? No idea.LSRAT wrote:Also, since there are no interviews tomorrow, doesn't it make sense that a large reject/wl wave will happen?
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:18 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
True, but WL/ding emails don't take much work to send. Someone just has to push a button, assuming they've been batched up for release.Leliana wrote:I don't think so because admissions will almost certainly be busy at ASW tomorrow.seeprybyrun wrote:Could happen, certainly. Will happen? No idea.LSRAT wrote:Also, since there are no interviews tomorrow, doesn't it make sense that a large reject/wl wave will happen?
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:18 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Here's hoping!Kinch08 wrote: Here's some math I did in a PM to SMC that might be comforting/helpful to all the other JS1's who haven't heard back yet:
There's one wave left, probably average-sized (so, 1/5 of the 1000 non-WL admits, or 200 potential HLS'ers). Maybe 30 spots in it (I'm just spitballing here, but it's honest spitballing--I'm not fudging numbers to make you feel better) will be taken up by last-minute JS1's (there haven't been enough last-minute JS1's to fill more than 30 ish spots). We know from the thread that everyone who wasn't a last minute JS1 (i.e. people with JS1's in early March or earlier) was considered for this last wave, so the other 170 JS2's will be given out to people exactly like you. I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a better chance than someone who JS1'd in November, but by the same token, I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a worse shot than someone who JS1'd in late February. So the question is, how many people are you competing against for those 170 spots? Well, that math is easy--it's the total number of non-WL JS1's (around 1200, when you account for the last-minute people) minus the admits so far (800-ish). 400. 170/400 = 42.5%. You have a better than 40% "raw" chance of getting in. That's not the 75% chance you started out with, but it ain't bad.
Now, of course, those 170 spots are not given away randomly. It's a numbers game, just like it always has been.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72441/72441abe53000048a0b10cc2769468da759d8581" alt="Wink :wink:"
FWIW, I just got a Vandy from NYU this morning. So that takes some of the sting out.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login