
Temple v. Rutgers-Camden Forum
- phillyfun
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:22 pm
Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
I am looking for input if anybody could help, I would really appreciate. I am deciding between two very generous offers, and really, really struggling with the decision. I have a full ride at Rutgers-Camden and 1/3 off tuition scholarship at Temple. I will be going part-time to either. I am looking to work in Philly, and hope (like everybody when they enter law school
) to end up in a mid-large sized firm. At the moment, I am thinking business/corporate law. Thoughts?

- DaRascal
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
I would say go to Temple and dominate!
Biglaw doesn't have to be a fairy tale from these schools.

Biglaw doesn't have to be a fairy tale from these schools.
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=temple
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=rutgers-camden
--
Temple is not worth paying tuition for and you will need to be in the top of your class to secure a decent job from either school. Why pay for one over the other. Looking at your LSAT I assume your GPA is holding you back?
--
*disclaimer I will most likely be attending Camden on a full tuition + stipend. I am not pushing the school for any reason other than financials. I did attend the ASD and would say that the professors are very down to earth and approachable - their pedigrees are solid, they have a really strong faculty.
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=rutgers-camden
--
Temple is not worth paying tuition for and you will need to be in the top of your class to secure a decent job from either school. Why pay for one over the other. Looking at your LSAT I assume your GPA is holding you back?
--
*disclaimer I will most likely be attending Camden on a full tuition + stipend. I am not pushing the school for any reason other than financials. I did attend the ASD and would say that the professors are very down to earth and approachable - their pedigrees are solid, they have a really strong faculty.
- phillyfun
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
The main reason I have to stay in Philly is I am married and have kids -- and my LSAT isn't good enough for Penn, so that leaves all the other area schools.
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
Well I can reasonably assume that you could commute to either school?
I just can't see you paying tuition to attend Temple.
I just can't see you paying tuition to attend Temple.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- phillyfun
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
Yeah they are both about the same distance time wise, so commuting isn't the issue. And yeah, that's the conclusion I'm starting to arrive at as well. I was set on Temple until I got this scholly, now I am like, is Temple really worth the extra money?
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
Also remember that Camdens scholarship covers tuition and fees whereas temple is only a 1/3rd scholarship - so you have to factor that in as well.phillyfun wrote:Yeah they are both about the same distance time wise, so commuting isn't the issue. And yeah, that's the conclusion I'm starting to arrive at as well. I was set on Temple until I got this scholly, now I am like, is Temple really worth the extra money?
I had some decent offers from T30-T50, but in the end, I just couldn't see paying tuition at those schools. Outside of the T14/20 everything really starts to melt together and the employment differences become marginal.
What is your GPA?
- phillyfun
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
I'd prefer not to put my exact stats on here to maintain a little anominity. :-/
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:57 pm
Re: Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
I was also considering both programs for their evening part time programs.
Since I'm a PA resident, Temple was the obvious choice for me. For your situation, I don't think you could go wrong with choosing Rutgers though.
Did you get to visit both?
Since I'm a PA resident, Temple was the obvious choice for me. For your situation, I don't think you could go wrong with choosing Rutgers though.
Did you get to visit both?
- phillyfun
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:22 pm
Re: Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
Yeah I have gone to visit both. I am going to go visit them both again, and try to ask a bunch of hard questions, just so I feel like I have really done my homework. I am also a PA resident, so atleast I get in-state at Temple.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:37 pm
Re: Temple v. Rutgers-Camden
If you're going part time, I'm assuming you have a full-time job; obviously that factors in, since you'll probably have much less debt at the end than a full-time student (depending on what you make now, I suppose). I looked at both, but between being a PA resident and a shorter commute time, Temple was the better option for me. I have no idea how much cachet Rutgers carries in the Philly area, but I know Temple is very well regarded in the area.
Whatever you decide, good luck!
Whatever you decide, good luck!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login