Like from a waitlist offer? No it shouldn't matter at all, you'd just have to complete new forms for the other schooljdb2013 wrote:does anyone know if accepting the scholarship/loans at wustl, applying for the grad plus and filling out the master promissory note will create an issue if I accept an offer from another school?
WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
yes from a wl offer, thanks!cusenation wrote:Like from a waitlist offer? No it shouldn't matter at all, you'd just have to complete new forms for the other schooljdb2013 wrote:does anyone know if accepting the scholarship/loans at wustl, applying for the grad plus and filling out the master promissory note will create an issue if I accept an offer from another school?
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:20 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Got my new LSAT score back today, called KO, and was offered a seat on the spot! My numbers are now competitive for a full-ride, so my fingers are crossed!
Last edited by grantev on Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:26 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by Randomnumbers on Mon Jul 01, 2013 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:20 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by grantev on Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Jesus, that is a brutally unfair schedule.hoos89 wrote:Man...whoever made this hates section A. 8 am class 4 days a week AND Mandelker at 9am on Friday? No thanks. Also, this means your class is probably going to be very small if there's only 5 sections. probably in the 160-175 range.
And I think you're right re: class size, it could be well under 200. Obviously TLS is a small sample size, but it seems like a lot of people are turning down the full ride. I'm also nervous about seeing the medians... I feel like the school is going to get pummeled, but that's just speculation at best, and hopefully other schools are in the same boat. The rankings are meaningless though, and the smaller class size will really help the c/o 2016 class a lot for jobs and stuff.
Also, lol @ those of you saying you won't drink in law school in order to save money. Unless you don't drink now, you aren't going to stop going out in law school... that's just not the environment here, even as a 1L. On the whole, people are social and like to go out. I probably drank less in quantity, but more frequently in law school than I did in college.
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:26 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The worst part about that brutal schedule is, without a doubt, Mandelker. Not only do they get boned on the schedule, but then the smart kids in the class will get completely boned on the grade.
As far as people can tell, Mandelker's grades have a *negative* correlation with other law school grades.
As far as people can tell, Mandelker's grades have a *negative* correlation with other law school grades.
- Presidentjlh
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:07 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Know me, I bet I get that schedule.
Preemptive "Thanks Obama"
Preemptive "Thanks Obama"
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:26 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
A) I saw that post
B) don't worry too much. There is a non-negligible chance that Mandelker keels over from old age by then.
B) don't worry too much. There is a non-negligible chance that Mandelker keels over from old age by then.
-
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
/
Last edited by hoos89 on Sat Apr 11, 2015 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:26 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Now tell us how you really feel.hoos89 wrote:Nope. Unless Wash U somehow finds a way to oust him, he will live (and teach) to 120.Randomnumbers wrote:A) I saw that post
B) don't worry too much. There is a non-negligible chance that Mandelker keels over from old age by then.
- bulinus
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:32 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No one who went to Yale Law School could be a bad man.Randomnumbers wrote:The worst part about that brutal schedule is, without a doubt, Mandelker. Not only do they get boned on the schedule, but then the smart kids in the class will get completely boned on the grade.
As far as people can tell, Mandelker's grades have a *negative* correlation with other law school grades.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JSD doesn't countbulinus wrote:No one who went to Yale Law School could be a bad man.Randomnumbers wrote:The worst part about that brutal schedule is, without a doubt, Mandelker. Not only do they get boned on the schedule, but then the smart kids in the class will get completely boned on the grade.
As far as people can tell, Mandelker's grades have a *negative* correlation with other law school grades.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
/
Last edited by hoos89 on Sat Apr 11, 2015 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
After months of lobbying by me and Xs20, the University has finally sent us their proofs for the new law school hoodies. Grey is men's, black is women's. I also posted on the FB group wall. Let us know your feedback so we can get back to them
- bananasplit19
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:53 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hot damn. These look great.cusenation wrote:After months of lobbying by me and Xs20, the University has finally sent us their proofs for the new law school hoodies. Grey is men's, black is women's. I also posted on the FB group wall. Let us know your feedback so we can get back to them
I have to stop checking this thread, I'm getting not-going-to-WUSTL remorse.
ETA: NEVER FORGET
WUSTL Store Website wrote:
- Xs20
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:03 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by Xs20 on Thu Nov 14, 2013 11:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:37 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My 2cents,
I like the old one a lot better bc: I think it looks a lot more academic with the small crest design and doesn't have the silly I go to state u block lettering. But that aside, as a girl I overwhelmingly prefer crewneck sweatshirts and I think the women's color combo offered is pretty bad.
Srry cuse, I know it wasn't you but just in case the bookstore really did want some feedback haha (probably not) you could pass my female perspective along :)
I like the old one a lot better bc: I think it looks a lot more academic with the small crest design and doesn't have the silly I go to state u block lettering. But that aside, as a girl I overwhelmingly prefer crewneck sweatshirts and I think the women's color combo offered is pretty bad.
Srry cuse, I know it wasn't you but just in case the bookstore really did want some feedback haha (probably not) you could pass my female perspective along :)
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You can still purchase the gray crewneck from eFollets, and we did ask them to considering turning that crewneck into a hoodie since a lot of ppl seem to like that more professional/adult design as opposed to the college-y font of these two new ones. So we're waiting to see what they say re: crewneck-to-hoodie conversiontotalgleek wrote:My 2cents,
I like the old one a lot better bc: I think it looks a lot more academic with the small crest design and doesn't have the silly I go to state u block lettering. But that aside, as a girl I overwhelmingly prefer crewneck sweatshirts and I think the women's color combo offered is pretty bad.
Srry cuse, I know it wasn't you but just in case the bookstore really did want some feedback haha (probably not) you could pass my female perspective along
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:08 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I hope i'm in section E.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm gonna be in A i just know it.howardgirl wrote:I hope i'm in section E.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I like the new designs cuse came up with. Our school colors remind me too much of Christmas with the red and green.
-
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
/
Last edited by hoos89 on Sat Apr 11, 2015 7:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
just withdrew, so there's a spot and a full scholarship for anyone still waiting. Best of luck to all of you this fall!!!
- Rory19
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:14 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Wustlers---wustle on over to page one of this thread to vote for cuse for TLS Class of 2016 Prez.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=203065
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=203065
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login