165/3.79InBetweenDays wrote:Numbers anyone? PM?dirtrida2 wrote:illiniguy1551 wrote:Just got this as well.SteelPenguin wrote:I was WL a couple of weeks ago and haven't sent in a LOCI, but I just received an e-mail asking if I am interested in attending, because there will likely be a few spots available. Did anyone else get this?
W&L c/o 2016 Forum
- SteelPenguin
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:37 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 10:03 am
Re: W&L c/o 2016
I was also WL'd a few weeks ago, but sent an LOCI and had an individual visit. I wonder if this is for everyone WL'd or just those who haven't sent anything or visited?
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
bean412 wrote:I was also WL'd a few weeks ago, but sent an LOCI and had an individual visit. I wonder if this is for everyone WL'd or just those who haven't sent anything or visited?
- InBetweenDays
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:39 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
bean412 wrote:I was also WL'd a few weeks ago, but sent an LOCI and had an individual visit. I wonder if this is for everyone WL'd or just those who haven't sent anything or visited?
I didn't receive an email. I was WL'd a few weeks ago, never sent a LoCI, and I did not visit.
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: W&L c/o 2016
prob ypSteelPenguin wrote: 165/3.79
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- SteelPenguin
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:37 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
I also didn't apply until February though. I ended up getting one of the mass WL e-mails.lhanvt13 wrote:prob ypSteelPenguin wrote: 165/3.79
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
I don't think you'll have a 180 class but I know they took people off the waitlist last year.lhanvt13 wrote:This is good. That means we're not likely to have another 180 student class.SteelPenguin wrote:I was WL a couple of weeks ago and haven't sent in a LOCI, but I just received an e-mail asking if I am interested in attending, because there will likely be a few spots available. Did anyone else get this?
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: W&L c/o 2016
Yeah hopefully they're more cautious this round and get a 130 class.wannabelawstudent wrote:I don't think you'll have a 180 class but I know they took people off the waitlist last year.lhanvt13 wrote:This is good. That means we're not likely to have another 180 student class.SteelPenguin wrote:I was WL a couple of weeks ago and haven't sent in a LOCI, but I just received an e-mail asking if I am interested in attending, because there will likely be a few spots available. Did anyone else get this?
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:32 am
Re: W&L c/o 2016
I visited the school and interviewed...I thought it went fairly well however I did not receive that particular e-mail.dirtrida2 wrote:bean412 wrote:I was also WL'd a few weeks ago, but sent an LOCI and had an individual visit. I wonder if this is for everyone WL'd or just those who haven't sent anything or visited?

They did say during the visit that they had already eliminated people off the WL who they had not heard from. So I am not sure what they are doing right now.
Did anyone who visited the school receive this e-mail?
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
nbahri05 wrote:I visited the school and interviewed...I thought it went fairly well however I did not receive that particular e-mail.dirtrida2 wrote:bean412 wrote:I was also WL'd a few weeks ago, but sent an LOCI and had an individual visit. I wonder if this is for everyone WL'd or just those who haven't sent anything or visited?That concerns me.
They did say during the visit that they had already eliminated people off the WL who they had not heard from. So I am not sure what they are doing right now.
Did anyone who visited the school receive this e-mail?
There would be no reason for you to receive this email. They are looking for responses from people they have yet to hear from.
It would be a bad sign if you got this email, not a good one...
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: W&L c/o 2016
So when are people moving in.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
if attending I'll prob move 8/1lhanvt13 wrote:So when are people moving in.
do you know when does orientation begin?
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: W&L c/o 2016
http://law.wlu.edu/calendar/page.asp?pageid=1230JayJones78 wrote:if attending I'll prob move 8/1lhanvt13 wrote:So when are people moving in.
do you know when does orientation begin?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
many thankslhanvt13 wrote:http://law.wlu.edu/calendar/page.asp?pageid=1230JayJones78 wrote:if attending I'll prob move 8/1lhanvt13 wrote:So when are people moving in.
do you know when does orientation begin?
it starts much later than I thought!!
Last edited by JayJones78 on Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
Did anyone else get a waitlist update e-mail just now with an absurd amount of typos? 6 in one paragraph alone.
- InBetweenDays
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:39 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
Just received an email basically saying that I might hear from them in the next two weeks regarding the wait-list. I have not sent a LOCI or anything, but the email only said specifically to contact them if my "arrangements for law school have changed". Should I send a LOCI? Did anyone else receive a similar email? To be clear... it didn't ask if I was still interested (some other wait listed TLSers said they received emails inquiring about their continued interest). Is this good, bad, neutral? Also, the email was full of typos... almost ridiculously so...
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
that is honestly just pathetic.wannabelawstudent wrote:Did anyone else get a waitlist update e-mail just now with an absurd amount of typos? 6 in one paragraph alone.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- InBetweenDays
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:39 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
They even had a "teh" in there somewhere lolcusenation wrote:that is honestly just pathetic.wannabelawstudent wrote:Did anyone else get a waitlist update e-mail just now with an absurd amount of typos? 6 in one paragraph alone.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
Oh my. Dean McShay is prob on a day off!!InBetweenDays wrote:They even had a "teh" in there somewhere lolcusenation wrote:that is honestly just pathetic.wannabelawstudent wrote:Did anyone else get a waitlist update e-mail just now with an absurd amount of typos? 6 in one paragraph alone.
- Xs20
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:03 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
How do you not even take the time to spellcheck the thing, though? That kind of laziness reflects really poorly on a school IMO.JayJones78 wrote:Oh my. Dean McShay is prob on a day off!!InBetweenDays wrote:They even had a "teh" in there somewhere lolcusenation wrote:that is honestly just pathetic.wannabelawstudent wrote:Did anyone else get a waitlist update e-mail just now with an absurd amount of typos? 6 in one paragraph alone.
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: W&L c/o 2016
Share the LOL's pm me the email please?wannabelawstudent wrote:Did anyone else get a waitlist update e-mail just now with an absurd amount of typos? 6 in one paragraph alone.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
I hope not. I would hate it if a school was falsely signing e-mails.JayJones78 wrote:Oh my. Dean McShay is prob on a day off!!InBetweenDays wrote:They even had a "teh" in there somewhere lolcusenation wrote:that is honestly just pathetic.wannabelawstudent wrote:Did anyone else get a waitlist update e-mail just now with an absurd amount of typos? 6 in one paragraph alone.
I like how they just sent another typo-free email immediately afterwards. Like "hey, ignore that other one, this one's good"
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
So what do you guys think of the new 3L program? Here's an article about how W&L's placement has dropped since instituting the new program. http://outsidethelawschoolscam.blogspot ... d-lee.html
Another article out this week ranking W&L 135 in terms of placement: http://www.thefacultylounge.org/2013/04 ... .html#more
ETA: third link is apparently blocked here. but look up deceptive clerkship numbers and you should find info about it.
Another article out this week ranking W&L 135 in terms of placement: http://www.thefacultylounge.org/2013/04 ... .html#more
ETA: third link is apparently blocked here. but look up deceptive clerkship numbers and you should find info about it.
Last edited by wannabelawstudent on Wed Apr 24, 2013 1:04 pm, edited 6 times in total.
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: W&L c/o 2016
can you relink the 3rd one I can't seem to open itwannabelawstudent wrote:So what do you guys think of the new 3L program? Here's an article about how W&L's placement has dropped since instituting the new program. http://outsidethelawschoolscam.blogspot ... d-lee.html
Another article out this week ranking W&L 135 in terms of placement: http://www.thefacultylounge.org/2013/04 ... .html#more
Article on how W&L is gaming the placement numbers: http://T14 Paradise.blogspot.com/2013/04/deceptive-clerkship-placement-figures.html
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:29 pm
Re: W&L c/o 2016
I can't link to the third article, but I will try to give its highlights here. It was discussing rankings on clerkships done by US News, which are here: http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/c ... clerkships
W&L came out as #12 in the country in the US News federal clerkship rankings, with Percent of 2011 employed J.D. grads with federal judicial clerkships at 9.7%. W&L also had 10.6% in state/local clerkships using the same formula, but its ranking in that category was not shown as some other schools had numbers in the 30% range such as Seton Hall.
These are US News rankings, not W&L's, so there is no allegation that W&L manipulated any stats here, the article was just quibbling over whether US News should have calculated as percentage of the employed versus the whole class, which is probably a good point. If you use the whole class, the percentages for everyone go down by about a point or two, but the relative rankings don't change much. Someone should redo the rankings for all the schools with that in mind, but I do not think you would see a significant difference. No matter how you slice it, W&L does better than most other schools in federal clerkships.
The third article makes a better point about some of the schools that had particularly large numbers of state and local clerkships, particularly the schools in New Jersey (where there are a lot of traffic court clerkships), but W&L did not figure in the state and local rankings anyway. The more significant clerkships are generally the federal ones, and that is where W&L ranked highly.
W&L came out as #12 in the country in the US News federal clerkship rankings, with Percent of 2011 employed J.D. grads with federal judicial clerkships at 9.7%. W&L also had 10.6% in state/local clerkships using the same formula, but its ranking in that category was not shown as some other schools had numbers in the 30% range such as Seton Hall.
These are US News rankings, not W&L's, so there is no allegation that W&L manipulated any stats here, the article was just quibbling over whether US News should have calculated as percentage of the employed versus the whole class, which is probably a good point. If you use the whole class, the percentages for everyone go down by about a point or two, but the relative rankings don't change much. Someone should redo the rankings for all the schools with that in mind, but I do not think you would see a significant difference. No matter how you slice it, W&L does better than most other schools in federal clerkships.
The third article makes a better point about some of the schools that had particularly large numbers of state and local clerkships, particularly the schools in New Jersey (where there are a lot of traffic court clerkships), but W&L did not figure in the state and local rankings anyway. The more significant clerkships are generally the federal ones, and that is where W&L ranked highly.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login