Clearly Stanford is the answer.ManOfTheMinute wrote:lol @ choosing between HLS and SLS when SLS is clearly the answerBalanceCare wrote:Dinged! Pretty happy not to have to consider Y in light of my SO's deep hatred for New Haven (tho I'm agnostic). Should be much easier to choose between S and H now.
Good luck to everyone
Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Riiiiight.az21833 wrote:im leaning HLS over SLS right now FWIW. although penn might be in lead
- edgeofthenight
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Unlimited free wine and beer starting around dinner time. I know nothing about the quality of such things, but it tasted like quality stuff to my college student self.carboncopyx wrote:Wait, no way. I'm so excited about this. It's like they know the way to my heart.Yukos wrote:They're gonna get you drunk a lot more than Stanford did, but it should still be an easy decision.
Just keeping myself psyched about going to HLS...
(I want to end up in New York or DC, so SLS wasn't even on my radar. I've dealt with upstate New York winters for 4 years, Cambridge is going to be a picnic.)
It was 50 degrees here last week and I wore a dress. Without tights. It was basically summer.LOL @ Californians thinking that the 50s is freezing half to death...
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
aww thanks man. I actually don't have a choice at the moment. I'm only gracing one of the big three unlike you heavy lifters.az21833 wrote:so yukos wert MOTM and all my other brotherin, you're all leaning SLS over HLS right now? anybody picking HLS over SLS?
Full Disclosure: I visited SLS and loved it. Problem: I am not accepted at SLS, therefore I am going to try to convince all of you to go to HLS.
Last edited by wert3813 on Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
(I want to end up in New York or DC, so SLS wasn't even on my radar. I've dealt with upstate New York winters for 4 years, Cambridge is going to be a picnic.)
You do know a fifth of SLS's class goes to DC and a fifth goes to NY. I mean, just saying, if you want those markets, you don't have to go to Cambridge.
Man, the butchery has been pretty extreme.
You do know a fifth of SLS's class goes to DC and a fifth goes to NY. I mean, just saying, if you want those markets, you don't have to go to Cambridge.
Man, the butchery has been pretty extreme.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
But they'll go to SLS and after experiencing that weather not WANT to go to NY or DC... so OP has a pointcallmemaybe84 wrote:(I want to end up in New York or DC, so SLS wasn't even on my radar. I've dealt with upstate New York winters for 4 years, Cambridge is going to be a picnic.)
You do know a fifth of SLS's class goes to DC and a fifth goes to NY. I mean, just saying, if you want those markets, you don't have to go to Cambridge.
Man, the butchery has been pretty extreme.
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Sorry, i messed up your quote. Damn coding.edgeofthenight wrote:
Just keeping myself psyched about going to HLS...
(I want to end up in New York or DC, so SLS wasn't even on my radar. I've dealt with upstate New York winters for 4 years, Cambridge is going to be a picnic.)
Maybe, MOTM, maybe.
Last edited by callmemaybe84 on Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
SLS grads are MUCH more sought after in NYC DC than HLS. there are SOOO many fewer of them to start off with, let alone trying to move across country. u r like a unicorn
- edgeofthenight
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
True, but I also didn't want to leave the east coast (and my entire life) to get there. Cambridge'll work just fine for me.callmemaybe84 wrote:(I want to end up in New York or DC, so SLS wasn't even on my radar. I've dealt with upstate New York winters for 4 years, Cambridge is going to be a picnic.)
You do know a fifth of SLS's class goes to DC and a fifth goes to NY. I mean, just saying, if you want those markets, you don't have to go to Cambridge.
Man, the butchery has been pretty extreme.
Harvard places very well at my dream job and in other offices in my specific field within those cities.SLS grads are MUCH more sought after in NYC DC than HLS. there are SOOO many fewer of them to start off with, let alone trying to move across country. u r like a unicorn
Last edited by edgeofthenight on Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Assuming the weather won't kill you, I think the HLS/SLS debate really comes down to size. I wanted a class small enough that I would get to know almost everyone anyway; current Harvard students saying it could be really hard to get into my favorite clinic and much more difficult to make law review at HLS was just icing on the cake.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:02 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Maybe they're sending some rejections by post?
- polareagle
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I've heard this argument enough times to probably start believing it (though I've never once seen data, it makes sense on its face), but the comparatively small number of Stanford grads going to DC is also a double-edged sword. Getting your first position is almost undoubtedly going to be easier, but you will be relying on your professional network for the rest of your life, and Harvard's DC or NY network is, undeniably, much larger.az21833 wrote:SLS grads are MUCH more sought after in NYC DC than HLS. there are SOOO many fewer of them to start off with, let alone trying to move across country. u r like a unicorn
Now, I know the counterargument is that Stanford's network is stronger for whatever that's worth, but sometimes size does matter. Case in point, going back to the '60s, Democratic administrations in DC have been chock full of HLS grads (not just the current, most obvious example).
If your goal is BigLaw for life in DC or NY and you've got no other considerations, I think Stanford makes a ton of sense. If you're looking at transitioning into BigGov later on, I think there's a compelling argument to be made for Harvard.
Last edited by polareagle on Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yours will say "Mr. Kertz--he dead" in Asha's handwriting?kertz wrote:Maybe they're sending some rejections by post?
(only kidding, of course)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
spot on. for the network, HLS hands down. SLS will place u much better thoughpolareagle wrote:I've heard this argument enough times to probably start believing it (though I've never once seen data, it makes sense on its face), but the comparatively small number of Stanford grads going to DC is also a double-edged sword. Getting your first position is almost undoubtedly going to be easier, but you will be relying on your professional network for the rest of your life, and Harvard's DC or NY network is, undeniably, much larger.az21833 wrote:SLS grads are MUCH more sought after in NYC DC than HLS. there are SOOO many fewer of them to start off with, let alone trying to move across country. u r like a unicorn
Now, I know the counterargument is that Stanford's network is stronger for whatever that's worth, but sometimes size does matter. Case in point, going back to the '60s, Democratic administrations in DC have been chock full of HLS grads (not just the current, most obvious example).
If your goal is BigLaw for life in DC or NY and you've got no other considerations, I think Stanford makes a ton of sense. If you're looking at transitioning into BigGov later on, I think there's a compelling argument to be made for Harvard.
looks like yls done for tonight?
Last edited by az21833 on Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I think there's enough compelling arguments to go to the school one likes better. I'm only saying that wanting a career in that stuff shouldn't rule out stanford, they are probably equal options (or so close to equal it doesn't matter) in DC/NY markets.polareagle wrote:I've heard this argument enough times to probably start believing it (though I've never once seen data, it makes sense on its face), but the comparatively small number of Stanford grads going to DC is also a double-edged sword. Getting your first position is almost undoubtedly going to be easier, but you will be relying on your professional network for the rest of your life, and Harvard's DC or NY network is, undeniably, much larger.az21833 wrote:SLS grads are MUCH more sought after in NYC DC than HLS. there are SOOO many fewer of them to start off with, let alone trying to move across country. u r like a unicorn
Now, I know the counterargument is that Stanford's network is stronger for whatever that's worth, but sometimes size does matter. Case in point, going back to the '60s, Democratic administrations in DC have been chock full of HLS grads (not just the current, most obvious example).
If your goal is BigLaw for life in DC or NY and you've got no other considerations, I think Stanford makes a ton of sense. If you're looking at transitioning into BigGov later on, I think there's a compelling argument to be made for Harvard.
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
They only WANT you to think that!az21833 wrote:looks like yls done for tonight?
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'll bet someone a beer this weekend that they aren't done for tonight.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- polareagle
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Totally credited. The honest-to-god truth of it is that they're both great schools, and if you play your cards right and don't get incredibly unlucky, you'll be able to get what you consider a desirable outcome out of either one. I also totally get the spend a few years in paradise argument (though, having gone to undergrad in small town northern New England, Cambridge isn't looking all that bad to me, besides, I got a sunburn at Stanford this weekend...)callmemaybe84 wrote:I think there's enough compelling arguments to go to the school one likes better. I'm only saying that wanting a career in that stuff shouldn't rule out stanford, they are probably equal options (or so close to equal it doesn't matter) in DC/NY markets.polareagle wrote:I've heard this argument enough times to probably start believing it (though I've never once seen data, it makes sense on its face), but the comparatively small number of Stanford grads going to DC is also a double-edged sword. Getting your first position is almost undoubtedly going to be easier, but you will be relying on your professional network for the rest of your life, and Harvard's DC or NY network is, undeniably, much larger.az21833 wrote:SLS grads are MUCH more sought after in NYC DC than HLS. there are SOOO many fewer of them to start off with, let alone trying to move across country. u r like a unicorn
Now, I know the counterargument is that Stanford's network is stronger for whatever that's worth, but sometimes size does matter. Case in point, going back to the '60s, Democratic administrations in DC have been chock full of HLS grads (not just the current, most obvious example).
If your goal is BigLaw for life in DC or NY and you've got no other considerations, I think Stanford makes a ton of sense. If you're looking at transitioning into BigGov later on, I think there's a compelling argument to be made for Harvard.
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
No way, there's still 18 rejections to go on LSN.wert3813 wrote:I'll bet someone a beer this weekend that they aren't done for tonight.
- edgeofthenight
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I should have been clearer - it wasn't a "I want to work in NY/DC, so no Stanford," it was, "I'm from the NY/DC area and I'm intending to stay here, so no Stanford." Thesis/Yale delirium isn't helping my clarity tonight.callmemaybe84 wrote:I think there's enough compelling arguments to go to the school one likes better. I'm only saying that wanting a career in that stuff shouldn't rule out stanford, they are probably equal options (or so close to equal it doesn't matter) in DC/NY markets.polareagle wrote:I've heard this argument enough times to probably start believing it (though I've never once seen data, it makes sense on its face), but the comparatively small number of Stanford grads going to DC is also a double-edged sword. Getting your first position is almost undoubtedly going to be easier, but you will be relying on your professional network for the rest of your life, and Harvard's DC or NY network is, undeniably, much larger.az21833 wrote:SLS grads are MUCH more sought after in NYC DC than HLS. there are SOOO many fewer of them to start off with, let alone trying to move across country. u r like a unicorn
Now, I know the counterargument is that Stanford's network is stronger for whatever that's worth, but sometimes size does matter. Case in point, going back to the '60s, Democratic administrations in DC have been chock full of HLS grads (not just the current, most obvious example).
If your goal is BigLaw for life in DC or NY and you've got no other considerations, I think Stanford makes a ton of sense. If you're looking at transitioning into BigGov later on, I think there's a compelling argument to be made for Harvard.
I want to think that we're done, but... it's Yale, so...
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Also apparently all the booze is free....jselson wrote:No way, there's still 18 rejections to go on LSN.wert3813 wrote:I'll bet someone a beer this weekend that they aren't done for tonight.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sabanist
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I await my owl...kertz wrote:Maybe they're sending some rejections by post?
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
They're gonna sent you a screamersabanist wrote:I await my owl...kertz wrote:Maybe they're sending some rejections by post?
- edgeofthenight
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Howler.ManOfTheMinute wrote:They're gonna sent you asabanist wrote:I await my owl...kertz wrote:Maybe they're sending some rejections by post?screamer
I am expecting the same.
YOU HAVE NO WORK EXPERIENCE AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT WAS GOING ON WITH THAT 250 BUT IT WAS AWFUL. WHY WASN'T YOUR GPA HIGHER FRESHMAN YEAR? I THINK YOU COULD HAVE TRIED HARDER TO CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
edgeofthenight wrote:Howler.ManOfTheMinute wrote:They're gonna sent you asabanist wrote:I await my owl...kertz wrote:Maybe they're sending some rejections by post?screamer
I am expecting the same.
YOU HAVE NO WORK EXPERIENCE AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT WAS GOING ON WITH THAT 250 BUT IT WAS AWFUL. WHY WASN'T YOUR GPA HIGHER FRESHMAN YEAR? I THINK YOU COULD HAVE TRIED HARDER TO CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER
Burned MOTM burned.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login