not me, shoot them an email, nothing happened in the past 3 weeksBlazersTime wrote:BC has always been very prompt in responding to my emails, admittance, scholarship and what not. I'm not even a super star candidate
BC 2012-2013 Applicants Forum
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
- rufus&miles
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:37 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I haven't bad any issues, at most it took 2 days to hear back, but they always had the answer when it took longer than a day.
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I was surprised to notice this as well.whatsup2b wrote:Is BC Law worth sticker? I went to ASD and it seems like most people plan to pay sticker
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:31 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Don't want to bash people for paying sticker, but honestly there are very few law schools (probably only 3 for sure) that are worth that much, and BC is not one of them.whatsup2b wrote:Is BC Law worth sticker? I went to ASD and it seems like most people plan to pay sticker
With the market the way it is today, it is an absolutely huge gamble.
But then again, I don't know other people's situations or level of confidence in their ability to accomplish what they have in mind.
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Perhaps some/many have family money, so they have a source of funding other than loans.Is BC Law worth sticker? I went to ASD and it seems like most people plan to pay sticker
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:02 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Hey guys, I recently went to BC's ASD and really liked the school. The people seem great and the employment stats (specifically big law) are well above their peer schools. So I am wondering if someone knows why their rank keeps dropping over the last couple of years? Please refrain from the US News bashing, i understand we have to look at the rankings with a grain of salt and I don't put high weight in them, but just want to know what's causing the drop in rank and if its something that should be a cause for long term concern. Any insight would be great, thanks in advance!
- dirtrida2
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
ls23 wrote:Hey guys, I recently went to BC's ASD and really liked the school. The people seem great and the employment stats (specifically big law) are well above their peer schools. So I am wondering if someone knows why their rank keeps dropping over the last couple of years? Please refrain from the US News bashing, i understand we have to look at the rankings with a grain of salt and I don't put high weight in them, but just want to know what's causing the drop in rank and if its something that should be a cause for long term concern. Any insight would be great, thanks in advance!
Possibly cost of attendance and competition/over-saturated north-east market.
At least it didn't take as hard of a hit as Fordham who has comparable stats and COA.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:02 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
dirtrida2 wrote:ls23 wrote:Hey guys, I recently went to BC's ASD and really liked the school. The people seem great and the employment stats (specifically big law) are well above their peer schools. So I am wondering if someone knows why their rank keeps dropping over the last couple of years? Please refrain from the US News bashing, i understand we have to look at the rankings with a grain of salt and I don't put high weight in them, but just want to know what's causing the drop in rank and if its something that should be a cause for long term concern. Any insight would be great, thanks in advance!
Possibly cost of attendance and competition/over-saturated north-east market.
At least it didn't take as hard of a hit as Fordham who has comparable stats and COA.
But if you look at the tuition for other schools that BC considers peers and compare its big law numbers in an saturated market they are still faring better than most, which is what is confusing me...
- drinion
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:00 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
BC's "assessment score by lawyers/judges" is lower than any higher-ranked school. That's the metric that it seems to fair comparably poor in. I forget what its score was last year, but 3.7 is surprisingly low. For comparison, the next two lower-ranked schools have scores of 4.0.dirtrida2 wrote:ls23 wrote:Hey guys, I recently went to BC's ASD and really liked the school. The people seem great and the employment stats (specifically big law) are well above their peer schools. So I am wondering if someone knows why their rank keeps dropping over the last couple of years? Please refrain from the US News bashing, i understand we have to look at the rankings with a grain of salt and I don't put high weight in them, but just want to know what's causing the drop in rank and if its something that should be a cause for long term concern. Any insight would be great, thanks in advance!
Possibly cost of attendance and competition/over-saturated north-east market.
At least it didn't take as hard of a hit as Fordham who has comparable stats and COA.
Last edited by drinion on Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Yep so was SMU, have very decent employment number, but killed in the peer judgement.drinion wrote:BC's "assessment score by lawyers/judges" is lower than any higher ranked school. That's the metric that it seems to fair comparably poor in. I forget what its score was last year, but 3.7 is surprisingly low. For comparison, the next two lower-ranked schools have scores of 4.0.dirtrida2 wrote:ls23 wrote:Hey guys, I recently went to BC's ASD and really liked the school. The people seem great and the employment stats (specifically big law) are well above their peer schools. So I am wondering if someone knows why their rank keeps dropping over the last couple of years? Please refrain from the US News bashing, i understand we have to look at the rankings with a grain of salt and I don't put high weight in them, but just want to know what's causing the drop in rank and if its something that should be a cause for long term concern. Any insight would be great, thanks in advance!
Possibly cost of attendance and competition/over-saturated north-east market.
At least it didn't take as hard of a hit as Fordham who has comparable stats and COA.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:02 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
That's interesting, they biggest thing that's made BC one of my top choices was the reputation it has in Boston and the strong network in Boston, so why the low industry assessment score?maxmartin wrote:Yep so was SMU, have very decent employment number, but killed in the peer judgement.drinion wrote:BC's "assessment score by lawyers/judges" is lower than any higher ranked school. That's the metric that it seems to fair comparably poor in. I forget what its score was last year, but 3.7 is surprisingly low. For comparison, the next two lower-ranked schools have scores of 4.0.dirtrida2 wrote:ls23 wrote:Hey guys, I recently went to BC's ASD and really liked the school. The people seem great and the employment stats (specifically big law) are well above their peer schools. So I am wondering if someone knows why their rank keeps dropping over the last couple of years? Please refrain from the US News bashing, i understand we have to look at the rankings with a grain of salt and I don't put high weight in them, but just want to know what's causing the drop in rank and if its something that should be a cause for long term concern. Any insight would be great, thanks in advance!
Possibly cost of attendance and competition/over-saturated north-east market.
At least it didn't take as hard of a hit as Fordham who has comparable stats and COA.
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I believe assessment is nation wide not just great Boston region, one thing boost BC big law figure because of Ropes&Greyls23 wrote:drinion wrote:BC's "assessment score by lawyers/judges" is lower than any higher ranked school. That's the metric that it seems to fair comparably poor in. I forget what its score was last year, but 3.7 is surprisingly low. For comparison, the next two lower-ranked schools have scores of 4.0.dirtrida2 wrote:ls23 wrote:Hey guys, I recently went to BC's ASD and really liked the school. The people seem great and the employment stats (specifically big law) are well above their peer schools. So I am wondering if someone knows why their rank keeps dropping over the last couple of years? Please refrain from the US News bashing, i understand we have to look at the rankings with a grain of salt and I don't put high weight in them, but just want to know what's causing the drop in rank and if its something that should be a cause for long term concern. Any insight would be great, thanks in advance!
Possibly cost of attendance and competition/over-saturated north-east market.
At least it didn't take as hard of a hit as Fordham who has comparable stats and COA.
That's interesting, they biggest thing that's made BC one of my top choices was the reputation it has in Boston and the strong network in Boston, so why the low industry assessment score?
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I believe assessment is nation wide not just great Boston region, one thing boost BC big law figure because of Ropes&Grey[/quote]maxmartin wrote:ls23 wrote:
BC's "assessment score by lawyers/judges" is lower than any higher ranked school. That's the metric that it seems to fair comparably poor in. I forget what its score was last year, but 3.7 is surprisingly low. For comparison, the next two lower-ranked schools have scores of 4.0.
That's interesting, they biggest thing that's made BC one of my top choices was the reputation it has in Boston and the strong network in Boston, so why the low industry assessment score?
uhh the assessment scores are so unreliable and empirically worthless. you need to get all things USNWR out of your head, it is a shit methodology and USNWR has you right where they want you, thinking about the shit they pump out on a year to year basis. FULL DISCLOSURE: I do NOT go to BC
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:34 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
WL'd this morning. I'll just add them to the list.
- Rheastoria
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
+1stillwater wrote: uhh the assessment scores are so unreliable and empirically worthless. you need to get all things USNWR out of your head, it is a shit methodology and USNWR has you right where they want you, thinking about the shit they pump out on a year to year basis. FULL DISCLOSURE: I do NOT go to BC
Forget USNWR. Look at how the law school does in the market you want to work in. If you want to live and work in Boston, BC is a good option. If you want to work in CA, BC makes no sense. There are only a few law schools with serious national reach, so the best option is to go to the best school you can get into that has ties to the area in which you want to work.
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Perhaps, but its better than anything else.uhh the assessment scores are so unreliable and empirically worthless.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c7e4/2c7e4d18a3f6b241d7c938b63949901cbe4fe1cd" alt="Razz :P"
Incorrect. BC, #31, is behind ASU, which has a 3.5. Iowa, #26, also has a 3.7, as does Alabama, #21.BC's "assessment score by lawyers/judges" is lower than any higher ranked school.
Personally, I follow the peer assessment scores (instead of judges): BC is s 3.3. BU is 3.4. ASU is 3.0. W&L is also 3.3. Much higher ranked, George Washington, is only a 3.4.
So, under a very quick scan, BC is ranked with its competition.
(The reason I follow PA is that I believe it more closely aligns with national rep.)
- drinion
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:00 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I missed those, my bad.Big Dog wrote:Incorrect. BC, #31, is behind ASU, which has a 3.5. Iowa, #26, also has a 3.7, as does Alabama, #21.BC's "assessment score by lawyers/judges" is lower than any higher ranked school.
Personally, I follow the peer assessment scores (instead of judges): BC is s 3.3. BU is 3.4. ASU is 3.0. W&L is also 3.3. Much higher ranked, George Washington, is only a 3.4.
So, under a very quick scan, BC is ranked with its competition.
(The reason I follow PA is that I believe it more closely aligns with national rep.)
Also, where do you see the peer scores? I can't seem to find them on the website.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:25 am
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Waitlisted today to conclude my cycle! If a waitlist can be called a conclusion..
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Have to subscribe to the online service, and then a whole lotta other "data" becomes available.Also, where do you see the peer scores? I can't seem to find them on the website.
- drinion
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:00 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I have subscribed... I'll look again.Big Dog wrote:Have to subscribe to the online service, and then a whole lotta other "data" becomes available.Also, where do you see the peer scores? I can't seem to find them on the website.
Ah, it's under the "ranking" subsection.
- danitt
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Withdrew from the waitlist today. Best of luck to everyone else with their cycle.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:36 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Has anyone had luck negotiating scholarships?
- Homelandsagreatshow
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:19 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
pcjudge wrote:Has anyone had luck negotiating scholarships?
Has anyone gotten in to this god damn school? Hahaha
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:02 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Thanks for the input everyone! But I was also curious about the trend downward, I guess just looking for people's opinion about the trend and if anyone knows if the school is doing anything about it.Big Dog wrote:Perhaps, but its better than anything else.uhh the assessment scores are so unreliable and empirically worthless.![]()
Incorrect. BC, #31, is behind ASU, which has a 3.5. Iowa, #26, also has a 3.7, as does Alabama, #21.BC's "assessment score by lawyers/judges" is lower than any higher ranked school.
Personally, I follow the peer assessment scores (instead of judges): BC is s 3.3. BU is 3.4. ASU is 3.0. W&L is also 3.3. Much higher ranked, George Washington, is only a 3.4.
So, under a very quick scan, BC is ranked with its competition.
(The reason I follow PA is that I believe it more closely aligns with national rep.)
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Being a great regional school can be a double blade, maybe it is just self-selection, most BC graduates like to stay Boston region and are doing very wellls23 wrote:Thanks for the input everyone! But I was also curious about the trend downward, I guess just looking for people's opinion about the trend and if anyone knows if the school is doing anything about it.Big Dog wrote:Perhaps, but its better than anything else.uhh the assessment scores are so unreliable and empirically worthless.![]()
Incorrect. BC, #31, is behind ASU, which has a 3.5. Iowa, #26, also has a 3.7, as does Alabama, #21.BC's "assessment score by lawyers/judges" is lower than any higher ranked school.
Personally, I follow the peer assessment scores (instead of judges): BC is s 3.3. BU is 3.4. ASU is 3.0. W&L is also 3.3. Much higher ranked, George Washington, is only a 3.4.
So, under a very quick scan, BC is ranked with its competition.
(The reason I follow PA is that I believe it more closely aligns with national rep.)
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login