? It's just the name of the train from Boston/new York. Though I do think I'm going to do some of the tourist things I've never done this trip.teiswei wrote:Lakeshore limited? You are such a touristferalinfant wrote:Just arrived in Chicago on the lakeshore limited. It's a bad idea to go into the admissions office on three hours of sleep and outright supplicate myself right? Right?
Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants) Forum
- feralinfant
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:54 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
- teiswei
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
I thought you were referencing Lakeshore Drive.feralinfant wrote:? It's just the name of the train from Boston/new York. Though I do think I'm going to do some of the tourist things I've never done this trip.teiswei wrote:Lakeshore limited? You are such a touristferalinfant wrote:Just arrived in Chicago on the lakeshore limited. It's a bad idea to go into the admissions office on three hours of sleep and outright supplicate myself right? Right?
The skydeck at Sears is pretty sweet if you haven't done it. Pricey but something you can say you've done. You can also do drinks at the top of Hancock which is a 5 minute walk from NU Law. What others are you considering?
- feralinfant
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:54 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
I think the Hancock is on the list but other than that I'm not sure. I have a friends who moved here and still hasn't done this stuff so I agreed to do it. Just along for the ride.
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
Are there a bunch of ED'ers with hidden profiles on LSN? The pool looks incredibly weak (no offense to anyone here).
- teiswei
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
Perhaps the full scholly offer with ED Acceptance? Knowing this, I know admissions standards will be higher in ED than RD.ChampagnePapi wrote:Are there a bunch of ED'ers with hidden profiles on LSN? The pool looks incredibly weak (no offense to anyone here).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
That's what I mean. Where are the candidates with higher numbers who would be competitive for the scholly? I only see one or two on LSNteiswei wrote:Perhaps the full scholly offer with ED Acceptance? Knowing this, I know admissions standards will be higher in ED than RD.ChampagnePapi wrote:Are there a bunch of ED'ers with hidden profiles on LSN? The pool looks incredibly weak (no offense to anyone here).
- teiswei
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
Hoping to get in at HYS...ChampagnePapi wrote:That's what I mean. Where are the candidates with higher numbers who would be competitive for the scholly? I only see one or two on LSNteiswei wrote:Perhaps the full scholly offer with ED Acceptance? Knowing this, I know admissions standards will be higher in ED than RD.ChampagnePapi wrote:Are there a bunch of ED'ers with hidden profiles on LSN? The pool looks incredibly weak (no offense to anyone here).
-
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:22 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
Well no decisions have come out yet so they're still taking the time review them it seems.ChampagnePapi wrote:Are there a bunch of ED'ers with hidden profiles on LSN? The pool looks incredibly weak (no offense to anyone here).
I just think it's probably a small pool of people who have the credentials to get in ED (171/172 +, 3.5/3.6+) and also are sure they really wanna go to NU. Especially in a down year (apps have fallen another 24% so far this year). So most people who apply for it probably are doing it for the money and have no chance.
As I stated before in the thread, while I think overall it's probably a good idea on their part (I bet they keep it at least another year to see how a few cycles worth of data compare) it does make things more complicated. I'm a strong splitter, probably the type they would have accepted ED in years past before the scholarship. I applied ED anyway, but now have to convince them I'm really only interested in the school and the money is only a side benefit. It obfuscates the signaling mechanism of an ED app somewhat.
That said, I did not make my app as ED on LSN- I will after the cycle- so maybe others are also doing the same.
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
Honestly I love NU and would take it over H or S for any reasonable scholly.teiswei wrote:Hoping to get in at HYS...ChampagnePapi wrote:That's what I mean. Where are the candidates with higher numbers who would be competitive for the scholly? I only see one or two on LSNteiswei wrote:Perhaps the full scholly offer with ED Acceptance? Knowing this, I know admissions standards will be higher in ED than RD.ChampagnePapi wrote:Are there a bunch of ED'ers with hidden profiles on LSN? The pool looks incredibly weak (no offense to anyone here).
HINT HINT
-
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:22 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
Also- they don't really advertise it really heavily at all, so there may still be people who don't know about it.onionz wrote:Well no decisions have come out yet so they're still taking the time review them it seems.ChampagnePapi wrote:Are there a bunch of ED'ers with hidden profiles on LSN? The pool looks incredibly weak (no offense to anyone here).
I just think it's probably a small pool of people who have the credentials to get in ED (171/172 +, 3.5/3.6+) and also are sure they really wanna go to NU. Especially in a down year (apps have fallen another 24% so far this year). So most people who apply for it probably are doing it for the money and have no chance.
As I stated before in the thread, while I think overall it's probably a good idea on their part (I bet they keep it at least another year to see how a few cycles worth of data compare) it does make things more complicated. I'm a strong splitter, probably the type they would have accepted ED in years past before the scholarship. I applied ED anyway, but now have to convince them I'm really only interested in the school and the money is only a side benefit. It obfuscates the signaling mechanism of an ED app somewhat.
That said, I did not make my app as ED on LSN- I will after the cycle- so maybe others are also doing the same.
- kuttlefish
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:29 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
onionz wrote:Well no decisions have come out yet so they're still taking the time review them it seems.ChampagnePapi wrote:Are there a bunch of ED'ers with hidden profiles on LSN? The pool looks incredibly weak (no offense to anyone here).
I just think it's probably a small pool of people who have the credentials to get in ED (171/172 +, 3.5/3.6+) and also are sure they really wanna go to NU. Especially in a down year (apps have fallen another 24% so far this year). So most people who apply for it probably are doing it for the money and have no chance.
As I stated before in the thread, while I think overall it's probably a good idea on their part (I bet they keep it at least another year to see how a few cycles worth of data compare) it does make things more complicated. I'm a strong splitter, probably the type they would have accepted ED in years past before the scholarship. I applied ED anyway, but now have to convince them I'm really only interested in the school and the money is only a side benefit. It obfuscates the signaling mechanism of an ED app somewhat.
That said, I did not make my app as ED on LSN- I will after the cycle- so maybe others are also doing the same.
+1 I'm a strong splitter, and I know I have no chance at the scholarship. Even though it makes things a little more complicated, I applied ED anyway. I'd rather be "that pushy splitter who really wants to come here" than "who?"
- feralinfant
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:54 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
Lol. My plan as well. That's why it's so dumb for me to be eager for the ED acceptances since I know I'll get rolled over but I can't help it.kuttlefish wrote:
+1 I'm a strong splitter, and I know I have no chance at the scholarship. Even though it makes things a little more complicated, I applied ED anyway. I'd rather be "that pushy splitter who really wants to come here" than "who?"
Eta: I'm not sure if qualify myself as a "strong splitter" though. [curses first two years of college]
- francesfarmer
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
You got waitlisted at Fordham? One more reason for me to hate Fordham and refuse to apply!feralinfant wrote:Lol. My plan as well. That's why it's so dumb for me to be eager for the ED acceptances since I know I'll get rolled over but I can't help it.kuttlefish wrote:
+1 I'm a strong splitter, and I know I have no chance at the scholarship. Even though it makes things a little more complicated, I applied ED anyway. I'd rather be "that pushy splitter who really wants to come here" than "who?"
Eta: I'm not sure if qualify myself as a "strong splitter" though. [curses first two years of college]
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- danitt
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
Were schools always this GPA centric?francesfarmer wrote:You got waitlisted at Fordham? One more reason for me to hate Fordham and refuse to apply!feralinfant wrote:Lol. My plan as well. That's why it's so dumb for me to be eager for the ED acceptances since I know I'll get rolled over but I can't help it.kuttlefish wrote:
+1 I'm a strong splitter, and I know I have no chance at the scholarship. Even though it makes things a little more complicated, I applied ED anyway. I'd rather be "that pushy splitter who really wants to come here" than "who?"
Eta: I'm not sure if qualify myself as a "strong splitter" though. [curses first two years of college]
- kuttlefish
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:29 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
FWIW, I'm 2.72/169 with 9 years of WE. I said "strong" because of the large discrepancy. Not "strong" like my LSAT is going to blow NU out of the water with its awesome power... maybe I should have said "heavy splitter."feralinfant wrote:Lol. My plan as well. That's why it's so dumb for me to be eager for the ED acceptances since I know I'll get rolled over but I can't help it.kuttlefish wrote:
+1 I'm a strong splitter, and I know I have no chance at the scholarship. Even though it makes things a little more complicated, I applied ED anyway. I'd rather be "that pushy splitter who really wants to come here" than "who?"
Eta: I'm not sure if qualify myself as a "strong splitter" though. [curses first two years of college]
- 06102016
- Posts: 13460
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm
- alwayssunnyinfl
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
slack_academic wrote:The popular term is "extreme splitter."

I'm tempted to get this tattooed somewhere after this is all said and done.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
did anyone get accepted yet? (sorry.. new to the thread..)
- teiswei
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
nospyke123 wrote:did anyone get accepted yet? (sorry.. new to the thread..)
- kuttlefish
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:29 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:slack_academic wrote:The popular term is "extreme splitter."![]()
I'm tempted to get this tattooed somewhere after this is all said and done.

-
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 5:58 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
Anyone else have a split second of excitement when the Northeastern thread is at the top of the page and you end up misreading it and thinking that NU has finally released decisions?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
Nope. I only view my own posts so that never shows up.M458 wrote:Anyone else have a split second of excitement when the Northeastern thread is at the top of the page and you end up misreading it and thinking that NU has finally released decisions?
Also, speaking of making this thread come up at the top of the page and having people think decisions might be dropping...
- amsong
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:42 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
I had my off-campus interview this morning. My interviewer was awesome. I was there for about 40 minutes, and a lot of it was just chatting about why Northwestern was awesome and why I should go there.
- lgleye
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:41 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
.
Last edited by lgleye on Sat Jul 05, 2014 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 06102016
- Posts: 13460
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm
Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)
..
Last edited by 06102016 on Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login