Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

wert3813 · Post by **wert3813** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:24 pm

Lar-ties wrote:
wert3813 wrote:Alright. If you want a prediction...post JS1 holds tomorrow.
To advocate for the for just a moment, why would applications go on hold in late March? Isn't the point of a hold to gather more information about the applicant pool overall before making further decisions?

What further information would they need to gather at this point in the game? LSAT scores are in, most interviews have been conducted, etc.

I mostly just don't want a post-JS1 hold, but I am also genuinely interested in where my logic is faulty here.

Doubt they would leave a February JS1 hanging till May, but maybe I'm wrong.

wannabelawstudent · Post by **wannabelawstudent** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:28 pm

Lar-ties wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:FYI there will be NO JS2S unless Natalie portman wins.
Voted.
Me too.

Natalie is still down by one folks. Remember. Last time I guaranteed JS2s. It happened. Now I'm an official consultant for this thread I demand Natalie wins. I can advise you guys but if you don't do the work there's nothing I can do.

trojandave · Post by **trojandave** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:32 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:
Lar-ties wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:FYI there will be NO JS2S unless Natalie portman wins.
Voted.
Me too.
Natalie is still down by one folks. Remember. Last time I guaranteed JS2s. It happened. Now I'm an official consultant for this thread I demand Natalie wins. I can advise you guys but if you don't do the work there's nothing I can do.

Damn, she drew the toughest match-up

clouded.memory · Post by **clouded.memory** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:40 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:
Lar-ties wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:FYI there will be NO JS2S unless Natalie portman wins.
Voted.
Me too.
Natalie is still down by one folks. Remember. Last time I guaranteed JS2s. It happened. Now I'm an official consultant for this thread I demand Natalie wins. I can advise you guys but if you don't do the work there's nothing I can do.

Just voted. Because I really, really want JS2s to go out tomorrow- especially, maybe, for some of the held.

siredwrdross · Post by **siredwrdross** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:45 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:FYI there will be NO JS2S unless Natalie portman wins.

+1

PRgradBYU · Post by **PRgradBYU** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:00 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:FYI there will be NO JS2S unless Natalie portman wins.

That's a risk I just can't afford to take... she got my vote.

Eberry · Post by **Eberry** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:21 pm

Okay, so apparentlybi angered some of the whiney megaposters in that thread. I wanted Natalie to win as a joke and the backlash isn't worth it. If everyone that voted could go back and unvote and/or vote for NINA, I'd be really appreciative.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 0&t=206264

Lavitz · Post by **Lavitz** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:06 pm

Eberry wrote:Okay, so apparentlybi angered some of the whiney megaposters in that thread. I wanted Natalie to win as a joke and the backlash isn't worth it. If everyone that voted could go back and unvote and/or vote for NINA, I'd be really appreciative.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 0&t=206264

Not happening.

Come at me, megaposters.

jym_dawg · Post by **jym_dawg** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:28 pm

So what kind of movement do y'all think we will see tomorrow, if any? Will it be the usual Friday wls / holds / dings?

Eberry · Post by **Eberry** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:39 pm

Lavitz wrote:Come at me, megaposters.

It's not you they'll come at, my friend.

az21833 · Post by **az21833** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:43 pm

Rooting for H even though they decided they didnt like me

DESTROY THE LOBOS, upset city baby!!!!

wannabelawstudent · Post by **wannabelawstudent** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:59 pm

We are heating #3 seed New Mexico right now.

trojandave · Post by **trojandave** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:04 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:We are heating #3 seed New Mexico right now.

Hell yea I'm loving this. If I can have a basketball team to go with my football team life will be good. I think I'm busting out the scotch for the second half

Lavitz · Post by **Lavitz** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:09 pm

Eberry wrote:
Lavitz wrote:Come at me, megaposters.
It's not you they'll come at, my friend.

If they give you any trouble, you can relinquish any responsibility for the votes coming from this thread by directing people to me. People are voting for Natalie because our consultant wannabe said so*. Since I hired him, I'll take full responsibility.

*In my case, I just like Natalie.

wert3813 · Post by **wert3813** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:11 pm

Lavitz wrote:
Eberry wrote:
Lavitz wrote:Come at me, megaposters.
It's not you they'll come at, my friend.
If they give you any trouble, you can relinquish any responsibility for the votes coming from this thread by directing people to me. People are voting for Natalie because our consultant wannabe said so*. Since I hired him, I'll take full responsibility.

*In my case, I just like Natalie.

The fact that this isn't a joke is a part of the TLS culture I don't understand at all.

SteelPenguin · Post by **SteelPenguin** » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:39 pm

So i think i'm going to retake in june, score in the 170s, and apply to Harvard. My PS will be about how inspiring Harvard's bball team was this March Madness tournament.

Lar-ties · Post by **Lar-ties** » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:15 am

Lavitz wrote:
Eberry wrote:
Lavitz wrote:Come at me, megaposters.
It's not you they'll come at, my friend.
If they give you any trouble, you can relinquish any responsibility for the votes coming from this thread by directing people to me. People are voting for Natalie because our consultant wannabe said so*. Since I hired him, I'll take full responsibility.

*In my case, I just like Natalie.

No joke. Plus, they used a mediocre picture of her. We were just making up for it.

Shoulda gone with http://24.media.tumblr.com/051b62ece98c ... r1_250.gif

Post by **John_rizzy_rawls** » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:16 am

Congrats Harvard homies. You killed my bracket but whatevs, you earned it.

wannabelawstudent · Post by **wannabelawstudent** » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:20 am

TWICE AS MANY JS2s WILL BE RELEASED TOMORROW

trojandave · Post by **trojandave** » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:24 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:TWICE AS MANY JS2s WILL BE RELEASED TOMORROW

Twice as many deposits will be received too. Woo!

zidane13 · Post by **zidane13** » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:26 am

Ball so hard, Crimson! My local news just made three nerd jokes in a 30 second recap of the game. Probably something to get used to.

az21833 · Post by **az21833** » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:56 am

trojandave wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:TWICE AS MANY JS2s WILL BE RELEASED TOMORROW
Twice as many deposits will be received too. Woo!

oh no. high yield rate as a result of tournament win. fewer js2s?

lol just kidding

go crimson

eyfl · Post by **eyfl** » Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:41 am

Today is the day!

Lar-ties · Post by **Lar-ties** » Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:09 am

eyfl wrote:Today is the day!

They should use the momentum of last night's win to emotionally hook people with a JS2, thereby ensuring deposits.

I guess what I'm suggesting is, if HLS wants to give its matriculation numbers a little boost, it is in their best interests to make it today.

100% in their interests. I don't really have a preference either way...

TrustInMusic · Post by **TrustInMusic** » Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:18 am

Lar-ties wrote:
eyfl wrote:Today is the day!
They should use the momentum of last night's win to emotionally hook people with a JS2, thereby ensuring deposits.

I guess what I'm suggesting is, if HLS wants to give its matriculation numbers a little boost, it is in their best interests to make it today.

100% in their interests. I don't really have a preference either way...

It was all planned

Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register for access!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?