This is TLS...WalkingPlato wrote:Why are you guys speculating how things will turn out? It's practically inevitable now. You submitted your app, and so did (and will) all others that have planned to apply. Whatever the decision making process is at HLS, that's what it is, and based on that process, you're going to be accepted or rejected. You don't want to spend days and weeks pulling your hair out thinking about what's going on in the HLS admission office when it won't affect your decision in any way possible.
Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:39 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
lol true. Sorrywert3813 wrote:Okay, but this is true for a huge amount of all human thought and speech.WalkingPlato wrote:Why are you guys speculating how things will turn out? It's practically inevitable now. You submitted your app, and so did (and will) all others that have planned to apply. Whatever the decision making process is at HLS, that's what it is, and based on that process, you're going to be accepted or rejected. You don't want to spend days and weeks pulling your hair out thinking about what's going on in the HLS admission office when it won't affect your decision in any way possible.
- kingsfield69
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Put me strongly in the Harvard will not drop class sizes unless it takes a bunch of transfer students camp. Strongly.
+1. Fixed costs make this very difficult to do.
+1. Fixed costs make this very difficult to do.
Last edited by kingsfield69 on Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
not when you can hike your variable costs up as much as you want and people still come to study at your institutionkingsfield69 wrote:+1. Fixed costs make this very difficult to do.Ling520 wrote:
Put me strongly in the Harvard will not drop class sizes unless it takes a bunch of transfer students camp. Strongly.
- kingsfield69
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
With the facility improvements they've just made, I don't foresee a substantive reduction in class size. I could be wrong.az21833 wrote:not when you can hike your variable costs up as much as you want and people still come to study at your institutionkingsfield69 wrote:+1. Fixed costs make this very difficult to do.Ling520 wrote:
Put me strongly in the Harvard will not drop class sizes unless it takes a bunch of transfer students camp. Strongly.
I think the argument is excessively focused on numbers (go figure). HLS will have no trouble seating enough students with galactic numbers to hold close to previous medians, even at the same class size. Maybe what we're seeing is an attempt to shore up the other components of the rankings equation. SLS didn't surpass HLS with numbers ... so if it wants the #2 spot back, it'll have to change its process and/or product in other ways.
I don't think HLS is reacting to reduced applicant numbers. I don't think the T3 need to do much of that. The impact will be felt further down the scale.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I can't tell if people thinking that Harvard cares in even the slightest that its "rank" dropped by one position in usnwr is one giant inside joke that I'm not a part of (I guess I never checked into the "IN" thread). Harvard has so much lay prestige that it is occasionally given a top ranking in programs of study that it doesn't even offer. I would assume that Harvard is unconcerned about usnwr rankings. Harvard would have no trouble filling its classes with the most qualified students even if it were to swap places with NYU, in my opinion.
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I don't think HLS is going to change anything dramatically just because they are now #3. I mean, historically, it seems like they've been #3 more often than not. There is no shock here.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... ?f=1&t=213
http://www.prelawhandbook.com/law_schoo ... 00_present
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... ?f=1&t=213
http://www.prelawhandbook.com/law_schoo ... 00_present
- kingsfield69
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Agree. Though I think HLS is also wise enough to understand that no school can remain in the T3 by crossing its arms. No amount of prestige will cause competitors to give up, so the school must continue to improve and innovate in order to stay ahead. I see evidence of that impulse in the admissions process. To the extent there are changes this year, I attribute them to HLS not laying back on its laurels, but working hard to field the best possible class.sinfiery wrote:I don't think HLS is going to change anything dramatically just because they are now #3. I mean, historically, it seems like they've been #3 more often than not. There is no shock here.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... ?f=1&t=213
http://www.prelawhandbook.com/law_schoo ... 00_present
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Chicago can attest to that, since historically they were often ahead of Stanford and in the T3. I'm actually surprised UChi Law doesn't have more lay prestige because of this.kingsfield69 wrote:Agree. Though I think HLS is also wise enough to understand that no school can remain in the T3 by crossing its arms. No amount of prestige will cause competitors to give up, so the school must continue to improve and innovate in order to stay ahead. I see evidence of that impulse in the admissions process. To the extent there are changes this year, I attribute them to HLS not laying back on its laurels, but working hard to field the best possible class.sinfiery wrote:I don't think HLS is going to change anything dramatically just because they are now #3. I mean, historically, it seems like they've been #3 more often than not. There is no shock here.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... ?f=1&t=213
http://www.prelawhandbook.com/law_schoo ... 00_present
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:12 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Should there be an update on Status Checker after JS1?
- kingsfield69
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You will see an "interview scheduled" update sometime after you've been invited for a JS1, but there's no additional status update post-JS1. Next time you see movement will be when you get a decision.harvardboy24 wrote:Should there be an update on Status Checker after JS1?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:42 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How long does it typically take after going complete to get a JS1? What is the earliest turnaround (and is an early interview invitation turnaround mainly based on high numbers?)
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Varies widely. A week-ish? Maybe a slight correlation but plenty of people with high stats wait a month or more for a JS1.lsat_180 wrote:How long does it typically take after going complete to get a JS1? What is the earliest turnaround (and is an early interview invitation turnaround mainly based on high numbers?)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The wait for the JS1 was tough but it's the wait for JS2 that drives you nearly insane. I've been JS1 for almost a month now.wert3813 wrote:Varies widely. A week-ish? Maybe a slight correlation but plenty of people with high stats wait a month or more for a JS1.lsat_180 wrote:How long does it typically take after going complete to get a JS1? What is the earliest turnaround (and is an early interview invitation turnaround mainly based on high numbers?)
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:42 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
FWIW, my status never updated to reflect my interview being scheduled, pre or post interview.kingsfield69 wrote:You will see an "interview scheduled" update sometime after you've been invited for a JS1, but there's no additional status update post-JS1. Next time you see movement will be when you get a decision.harvardboy24 wrote:Should there be an update on Status Checker after JS1?
- clouded.memory
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same here.Wormfather wrote:Mine just updated for an interview that took place a week ago.aredhello wrote:FWIW, my status never updated to reflect my interview being scheduled, pre or post interview.kingsfield69 wrote:You will see an "interview scheduled" update sometime after you've been invited for a JS1, but there's no additional status update post-JS1. Next time you see movement will be when you get a decision.harvardboy24 wrote:Should there be an update on Status Checker after JS1?
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1clouded.memory wrote:Same here.Wormfather wrote:Mine just updated for an interview that took place a week ago.aredhello wrote:FWIW, my status never updated to reflect my interview being scheduled, pre or post interview.kingsfield69 wrote:
You will see an "interview scheduled" update sometime after you've been invited for a JS1, but there's no additional status update post-JS1. Next time you see movement will be when you get a decision.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:06 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just as a check: for the people that are getting JS1s scheduled right now, when did you guys go complete?
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
wait, I don't think JS1s are going out now. We're talking about earlier this month. But I went complete 11/13andreskicdo wrote:Just as a check: for the people that are getting JS1s scheduled right now, when did you guys go complete?
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Application complete today, finallyyyyyy. I was starting to get worried that they'd lost me in the shuffle!
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
After Friday's bloodbath is there any hope for good news today?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I thought we'd get some JS2s today since it's been over a week since the last ones, but no dice so far. I'm guessing we get a small trickle of dings/holds on Friday with a big batch of JS2s.
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:06 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I meant interviews being scheduled in the last week or so. when did you guys go complete?
-
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:05 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JS2s gave previously started to go out after noon EST.Yukos wrote:I thought we'd get some JS2s today since it's been over a week since the last ones, but no dice so far. I'm guessing we get a small trickle of dings/holds on Friday with a big batch of JS2s.
Last edited by mommalee on Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- zidane13
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 6:26 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Early October.andreskicdo wrote:I meant interviews being scheduled in the last week or so. when did you guys go complete?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login