The thing is, it's not cheaper by much. There's about an $8,000 diff in COA to begin with. My read on the employment statistics is that Michigan has more students interested in doing government or public interest work, or working in a smaller market closer to home. It's not surprising that more of your students end up at 500+ firms when most of your grads are going to NYC. The thing I got from visiting was that at Michigan a lot of the students (especially the female students) really wanted to do public interest work, and the school supports that. Cornell gave off the vibe that it was all BigLaw BigLaw BigLaw. Thus, I actually find it encouraging that the employment stats align with that perception. I thought the Michigan students seemed a little more laid back and social, which would a) make it easier to succeed if BigLaw is what you wanted and b) make three years of law school less miserable.BigZuck wrote: Cornell b/c employment stats are significantly better and it's cheaper. Those are the two primary concerns, everything else is way down the list.
Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:37 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I don't buy this. Cornell puts 13.7 into PI, Michigan puts 16. Not a huge difference. There is a huge difference in big law and federal clerkships. Also self selection is impossible to quantify so I would rather stick to numbers that are tangible.CTT wrote:The thing is, it's not cheaper by much. There's about an $8,000 diff in COA to begin with. My read on the employment statistics is that Michigan has more students interested in doing government or public interest work, or working in a smaller market closer to home. It's not surprising that more of your students end up at 500+ firms when most of your grads are going to NYC. The thing I got from visiting was that at Michigan a lot of the students (especially the female students) really wanted to do public interest work, and the school supports that. Cornell gave off the vibe that it was all BigLaw BigLaw BigLaw. Thus, I actually find it encouraging that the employment stats align with that perception. I thought the Michigan students seemed a little more laid back and social, which would a) make it easier to succeed if BigLaw is what you wanted and b) make three years of law school less miserable.BigZuck wrote: Cornell b/c employment stats are significantly better and it's cheaper. Those are the two primary concerns, everything else is way down the list.
But if you want Michigan just do Michigan. YOLO.
Also I don't have a law school broham.
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Clearly your interest in Michigan is personal preference and quality of life. (Nothing wrong with that.)I thought the Michigan students seemed a little more laid back and social, which would a) make it easier to succeed if BigLaw is what you wanted and b) make three years of law school less miserable.
But then no one here can add any value to your personal deliberations.
btw: Michigan is no more "national" than Cornell.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:37 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Right, and I wouldn't call the federal clerkship thing huge. It leans Michigan's way by a couple percentage points.BigZuck wrote:I don't buy this. Cornell puts 13.7 into PI, Michigan puts 16. Not a huge difference. There is a huge difference in big law and federal clerkships. Also self selection is impossible to quantify so I would rather stick to numbers that are tangible.CTT wrote:The thing is, it's not cheaper by much. There's about an $8,000 diff in COA to begin with. My read on the employment statistics is that Michigan has more students interested in doing government or public interest work, or working in a smaller market closer to home. It's not surprising that more of your students end up at 500+ firms when most of your grads are going to NYC. The thing I got from visiting was that at Michigan a lot of the students (especially the female students) really wanted to do public interest work, and the school supports that. Cornell gave off the vibe that it was all BigLaw BigLaw BigLaw. Thus, I actually find it encouraging that the employment stats align with that perception. I thought the Michigan students seemed a little more laid back and social, which would a) make it easier to succeed if BigLaw is what you wanted and b) make three years of law school less miserable.BigZuck wrote: Cornell b/c employment stats are significantly better and it's cheaper. Those are the two primary concerns, everything else is way down the list.
But if you want Michigan just do Michigan. YOLO.
Also I don't have a law school broham.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Combined broseph. There is a big gap between the two schools when it comes to high end employment outcomes this most recent year.CTT wrote:Right, and I wouldn't call the federal clerkship thing huge. It leans Michigan's way by a couple percentage points.BigZuck wrote:I don't buy this. Cornell puts 13.7 into PI, Michigan puts 16. Not a huge difference. There is a huge difference in big law and federal clerkships. Also self selection is impossible to quantify so I would rather stick to numbers that are tangible.CTT wrote:The thing is, it's not cheaper by much. There's about an $8,000 diff in COA to begin with. My read on the employment statistics is that Michigan has more students interested in doing government or public interest work, or working in a smaller market closer to home. It's not surprising that more of your students end up at 500+ firms when most of your grads are going to NYC. The thing I got from visiting was that at Michigan a lot of the students (especially the female students) really wanted to do public interest work, and the school supports that. Cornell gave off the vibe that it was all BigLaw BigLaw BigLaw. Thus, I actually find it encouraging that the employment stats align with that perception. I thought the Michigan students seemed a little more laid back and social, which would a) make it easier to succeed if BigLaw is what you wanted and b) make three years of law school less miserable.BigZuck wrote: Cornell b/c employment stats are significantly better and it's cheaper. Those are the two primary concerns, everything else is way down the list.
But if you want Michigan just do Michigan. YOLO.
Also I don't have a law school broham.
Just do Mich. YOLO.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DaRascal
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Dude, go to Michigan! It's MVPB for a reason.
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
MVPB is a made up thing on TLS. Go wherever you will be happier.DaRascal wrote:Dude, go to Michigan! It's MVPB for a reason.
-
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
When is the deposit deadline for Cornell? I'm trying to time my letter from the reserve list :/
- Rev. Cherrycoke
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 4:23 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
April 26.LRGhost wrote:When is the deposit deadline for Cornell? I'm trying to time my letter from the reserve list :/
As far as Cornell vs Michigan, I think there is no denying that Cornell is very biglaw centric. Current students on here have confirmed it although that's not to say that you can't do PI coming out of Cornell. Personally, I also got a stronger PI-vibe from Michigan which is why going to ride out that waitlist and would pick it over Cornell unless Cornell was significantly cheaper.
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
for the need access form.. does that include my parents income? is it "stingy" aka for people who really need? i'm asking bc i usually don't qualify for need aid. should i fill that out anyways? (here I am being stingy over 28 bucks.. :/)
- yodamiked
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:07 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Finally went complete! Just over 8 weeks....yikes!
- abadname13
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:08 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ditto, FINALLY!
yodamiked wrote:Finally went complete! Just over 8 weeks....yikes!
- nsideirish
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:32 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Submitted my Cornell fin aid form, FAFSA and NeedAccess. Is that all I need? How long after submitting everything will I get my offer?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If I was accepted mid-March but haven't heard anything since then (I submitted my scholarship application the same week), would I come off as impatient if I asked Cornell whether or not I've been considered for a merit- or need-based scholarship? Anyone think that's a good idea?
My gut is telling me "no," but maybe somebody here has had success with this approach. Deadlines loom.
My gut is telling me "no," but maybe somebody here has had success with this approach. Deadlines loom.
-
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Does anyone think it's better to send off a LOCI type thing around/just after that date or is tomorrow just as fine?Rev. Cherrycoke wrote:April 26.LRGhost wrote:When is the deposit deadline for Cornell? I'm trying to time my letter from the reserve list :/
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You can email / call saying that you have XYZ offers pending at other institutions and, while Cornell remains a top choice, you want to know your aid before declining other schools.PRgradBYU wrote:If I was accepted mid-March but haven't heard anything since then (I submitted my scholarship application the same week), would I come off as impatient if I asked Cornell whether or not I've been considered for a merit- or need-based scholarship? Anyone think that's a good idea?
My gut is telling me "no," but maybe somebody here has had success with this approach. Deadlines loom.
10/10 would tell you.
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Doubtful there is any sort of data on this..LRGhost wrote:Does anyone think it's better to send off a LOCI type thing around/just after that date or is tomorrow just as fine?Rev. Cherrycoke wrote:April 26.LRGhost wrote:When is the deposit deadline for Cornell? I'm trying to time my letter from the reserve list :/
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ObviousAlias
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:55 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I also went complete today. Took 'em long enough.
- Rev. Cherrycoke
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 4:23 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not at all. You have deadlines and you obviously want to take everything into account before making a decision on those schools. Just inquire politely.PRgradBYU wrote:If I was accepted mid-March but haven't heard anything since then (I submitted my scholarship application the same week), would I come off as impatient if I asked Cornell whether or not I've been considered for a merit- or need-based scholarship? Anyone think that's a good idea?
My gut is telling me "no," but maybe somebody here has had success with this approach. Deadlines loom.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
$$$$ I love Cornell etc etc
Last edited by twinkletoes16 on Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ph5354a
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That's amazing, twinkle!! Cornell's generous merit aid strikes again.
#firstworldproblems
#firstworldproblems
Last edited by ph5354a on Tue Apr 09, 2013 7:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
holy hell congrats!twinkletoes16 wrote:Holy shit guys.
Last edited by helix23 on Tue Apr 09, 2013 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
At this point you can never again question anything I say or predict.twinkletoes16 wrote:Holy shit guys. $150k from Cornell. WHAT DO I DO NOW.
Absolutely visiting now. Jesus. I thought 120k would be my max.
Oh , and congrats
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats twinkles, that's huge!twinkletoes16 wrote:Holy shit guys. $150k from Cornell. WHAT DO I DO NOW.
Absolutely visiting now. Jesus. I thought 120k would be my max.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login