Congrats!!d330 wrote:Just got in today too. Been lurking on this thread, but nice to be able to speak of some movement happening. Congrats to the other folks who got in.
Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm definitely digging that logic. Let's hope the CLS AdComm feels the same way, haha.Audeamus wrote:This made me laugh, and I bet some members of Columbia AdComm will laugh (or at least crack a smile) too. Laughter --> good mood. Good Mood --> ACCEPTANCE!! congratsPRgradBYU wrote:So after three months of radio silence, I emailed Columbia last week asking why the completion of my app was still pending. They told me that I needed to contact a previous educational institution and have them send in a Dean's Certification for a minor C&F issue (for distributing a proxy site in a dorm so we could access Facebook... gotta love BYU-Idaho) during my freshman year. Now that I've cleared up that problem, I literally just went complete today, haha. FML. If I had any chance of sneaking onto Columbia's wait list before, it's completely gone now.
Congrats to all the recent admits, though!
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:20 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
anyone else with no updates (no holds as well) since going complete mid-jan?
- HankBashir
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:01 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yep. I think I went complete 1/15.Lesterizer wrote:anyone else with no updates (no holds as well) since going complete mid-jan?
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:20 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
roger that. You think it's a bad sign?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- HankBashir
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:01 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Considering their ASW is next week, it's not the greatest sign.Lesterizer wrote:roger that. You think it's a bad sign?
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:35 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
any post hold movement?
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nope. Hasn't seen any other helds post about movement either.switchis32 wrote:any post hold movement?
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Withdrew. Good luck, all.
- elterrible78
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You too, pal...know where you're going?shntn wrote:Withdrew. Good luck, all.
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not yet, but I'm getting there. The list is definitely getting shorter.elterrible78 wrote:You too, pal...know where you're going?shntn wrote:Withdrew. Good luck, all.
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I visited Columbia a few days ago... y'all... it's kind of a depressing building.
-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How likely is it that some acceptances go out to January completes this week?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
its the ugliest t14.
by far
by far
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
if you don't mind me asking, where are you headed to over CLS and why?shntn wrote:Not yet, but I'm getting there. The list is definitely getting shorter.elterrible78 wrote:You too, pal...know where you're going?shntn wrote:Withdrew. Good luck, all.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
debatably true, but Columbia is a beautiful university overall so I think net attractiveness of the the campus ranks pretty highaz21833 wrote:its the ugliest t14.
by far
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
yes , amazing campus, awful law school bldg
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
it's like they tried to make the building riot proof. It's a maze. And the library is beyond depressing. The campus is gorgeous thoughaz21833 wrote:yes , amazing campus, awful law school bldg
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
... that's so disappointing. Architecture and layout actually are make-it-or-break-it factors in my decision.az21833 wrote:yes , amazing campus, awful law school bldg
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Right after square footage of the library?carboncopyx wrote:... that's so disappointing. Architecture and layout actually are make-it-or-break-it factors in my decision.az21833 wrote:yes , amazing campus, awful law school bldg
-
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It's prettier indoors.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I can't tell if you're kidding or not... damn you interwebs.carboncopyx wrote:... that's so disappointing. Architecture and layout actually are make-it-or-break-it factors in my decision.az21833 wrote:yes , amazing campus, awful law school bldg
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
YES. If I have to fight off those damn undergrads for study space during finals, my classmates will get a very real lesson in criminal law...TripTrip wrote:Right after square footage of the library?
ManOfTheMinute wrote:I can't tell if you're kidding or not... damn you interwebs.
(Embarrassingly, I'm not kidding. One of my reservations about SLS is the mission architecture. I dislike mission architecture.)
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hahahaha sorry the West Coast didn't want to copy the East Coast - your lack of appreciation for west coastian heritage and culture is disappointing!carboncopyx wrote:ManOfTheMinute wrote:I can't tell if you're kidding or not... damn you interwebs.
(Embarrassingly, I'm not kidding. One of my reservations about SLS is the mission architecture. I dislike mission architecture.)
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not as surprising as you might think. Many folks are turned off by 'furds architecture.(Embarrassingly, I'm not kidding. One of my reservations about SLS is the mission architecture. I dislike mission architecture.)
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login