Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
twinkletoes16

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by twinkletoes16 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:04 am

Goodman wrote:Still nothing. Getting nervous. Happy for new admits, though.

+1 i haven't had ANY mail the last few days. extra depressing. no pizza coupons, nothing.

User avatar
txdude45

Silver
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:25 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by txdude45 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:25 am

twinkletoes16 wrote:
Goodman wrote:Still nothing. Getting nervous. Happy for new admits, though.

+1 i haven't had ANY mail the last few days. extra depressing. no pizza coupons, nothing.
Loving the new 'tar

User avatar
twinkletoes16

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by twinkletoes16 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:27 am

txdude45 wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
Goodman wrote:Still nothing. Getting nervous. Happy for new admits, though.

+1 i haven't had ANY mail the last few days. extra depressing. no pizza coupons, nothing.
Loving the new 'tar


it was between this and a Clueless/Alicia Silverstone 'tar but I'm actually a Mean Girl so decided on this. :roll:

User avatar
carboncopyx

Silver
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by carboncopyx » Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:48 am

txdude45 wrote:Loving the new 'tar
Seconded. Mean Girls ftw!

User avatar
trojandave

Bronze
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by trojandave » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:49 am

twinkletoes16 wrote:
txdude45 wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
Goodman wrote:Still nothing. Getting nervous. Happy for new admits, though.

+1 i haven't had ANY mail the last few days. extra depressing. no pizza coupons, nothing.
Loving the new 'tar


it was between this and a Clueless/Alicia Silverstone 'tar but I'm actually a Mean Girl so decided on this. :roll:
Is butter a carb? ;)

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by BigZuck » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:59 am

Not sure why but something tells me that twinkle and carbon would make one hell of a set of frenemies.

User avatar
txdude45

Silver
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:25 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by txdude45 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:01 am

BigZuck wrote:Not sure why but something tells me that twinkle and carbon would make one hell of a set of frenemies.
+1. I know I wouldn't cross either of them.

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute

Gold
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ManOfTheMinute » Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:16 am

carboncopyx wrote:
txdude45 wrote:Loving the new 'tar
Seconded. Mean Girls ftw!
No! people need to stop changing their tars. I think I associate more with someone's tar than with their actual name... im a visual person, especially when the visual is a female

User avatar
twinkletoes16

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by twinkletoes16 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:33 am

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
carboncopyx wrote:
txdude45 wrote:Loving the new 'tar
Seconded. Mean Girls ftw!
No! people need to stop changing their tars. I think I associate more with someone's tar than with their actual name... im a visual person, especially when the visual is a female

I'm done changing. Relax homie.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
ph5354a

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ph5354a » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:35 am

My phone just autocorrected nice to NCE.

Post-Columbia Stress Disorder?

User avatar
TripTrip

Gold
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by TripTrip » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:39 am

twinkletoes16 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
No! people need to stop changing their tars. I think I associate more with someone's tar than with their actual name... im a visual person, especially when the visual is a female

I'm done changing. Relax homie.
Too late. I already view you as a completely different person.

User avatar
twinkletoes16

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by twinkletoes16 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:41 am

TripTrip wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
No! people need to stop changing their tars. I think I associate more with someone's tar than with their actual name... im a visual person, especially when the visual is a female

I'm done changing. Relax homie.
Too late. I already view you as a completely different person.

Image

toothbrush

Gold
Posts: 2388
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by toothbrush » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:44 am

ph5354a wrote:My phone just autocorrected nice to NCE.

Post-Columbia Stress Disorder?
lmao yeah I knew that I was pretty obsessed when my phone had EVERY abbreviation I ever use on TLS in it as if they're real words... (gulc, loci, etc )

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
TripTrip

Gold
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by TripTrip » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:59 am

toothbrush wrote:
ph5354a wrote:My phone just autocorrected nice to NCE.

Post-Columbia Stress Disorder?
lmao yeah I knew that I was pretty obsessed when my phone had EVERY abbreviation I ever use on TLS in it as if they're real words... (gulc, loci, etc )
Ha. I haven't gone quite that far... yet.

User avatar
Audeamus

Bronze
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Audeamus » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:01 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
No! people need to stop changing their tars. I think I associate more with someone's tar than with their actual name... im a visual person, especially when the visual is a female

I'm done changing. Relax homie.
Too late. I already view you as a completely different person.

Image
Image

User avatar
TripTrip

Gold
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by TripTrip » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:04 pm

Twinkle: Because you now have the cutest 'tar ITT.

I'm only going to law school for the law ladies, after all. 8)

az21833

Silver
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by az21833 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:05 pm

thanks for the freakin GIANT package of brochures, alma mater. all i really want is a lil bit of $ for cryin out loud

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


J90

Bronze
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by J90 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:07 pm

az21833 wrote:thanks for the freakin GIANT package of brochures, alma mater. all i really want is a lil bit of $ for cryin out loud
Not gonna happen until at least late March.

Don't worry about it and just take the brochures for now.

toothbrush

Gold
Posts: 2388
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by toothbrush » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:07 pm

TripTrip wrote:Twinkle: Because you now have the cutest 'tar ITT.

I'm only going to law school for the law ladies, after all. 8)
All people who use the internet look, and act, in real life, like they portray over the internet.

wtf grammar

User avatar
TripTrip

Gold
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by TripTrip » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:09 pm

az21833 wrote:thanks for the freakin GIANT package of brochures, alma mater. all i really want is a lil bit of $ for cryin out loud
Columbia could start a new named tiny scholarship program.

Hamiltons for full, Butlers for half, and Schizers for $10.

az21833

Silver
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by az21833 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:11 pm

i've never seen so much paper in my life. why dont they just send us a link or something

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Lavitz

Gold
Posts: 3402
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Lavitz » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:25 pm

az21833 wrote:i've never seen so much paper in my life. why dont they just send us a link or something
The same reason they don't e-mail decisions: Columbia hates trees.

toothbrush

Gold
Posts: 2388
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by toothbrush » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:26 pm

Lavitz wrote:
az21833 wrote:i've never seen so much paper in my life. why dont they just send us a link or something
The same reason they don't e-mail decisions: Columbia hates trees.
itz dat ivy preftige

User avatar
twinkletoes16

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by twinkletoes16 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:27 pm

Lavitz wrote:
az21833 wrote:i've never seen so much paper in my life. why dont they just send us a link or something
The same reason they don't e-mail decisions: Columbia hates trees.

probably why they don't have the best environmental law program.

User avatar
ph5354a

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ph5354a » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:28 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
az21833 wrote:i've never seen so much paper in my life. why dont they just send us a link or something
The same reason they don't e-mail decisions: Columbia hates trees.

probably why they don't have the best environmental law program.
probably why Marshall ends up working for Martin Short.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”