I find it somewhat amusing that the majority of these people with "the worst cycle" at least got into NYU...rehsalt wrote:On the subject of people with shitty cycles, take a look at these:Lavitz wrote:Then while we're on the subject, this profile has always been the most worrisome to me: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wa810smart/jdbanjo wrote:That's a fair observation, and probably the reason I've been thinking about some of these anomalies.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
I was hoping we get regulus to collect a spreadsheet of some of the worst cycles, just to give some perspective to people who are sure they're having epically bad cycles.
Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It's because NYU accepts based on numbers so long as a 30 second skim of their app doesn't DQ themspyke123 wrote:I find it somewhat funny that the majority of these people with "the worst cycle" ended up attending NYU...rehsalt wrote:On the subject of people with shitty cycles, take a look at these:Lavitz wrote:Then while we're on the subject, this profile has always been the most worrisome to me: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wa810smart/jdbanjo wrote:That's a fair observation, and probably the reason I've been thinking about some of these anomalies.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
I was hoping we get regulus to collect a spreadsheet of some of the worst cycles, just to give some perspective to people who are sure they're having epically bad cycles.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I am still sitting at "completion pending" sent an email about a week ago and still no change.bbsg wrote:Anyone still sitting at "completion pending" from early Jan submission? I'm at three weeks now.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:48 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
housebro13 wrote:+1ManOfTheMinute wrote:Sweet jesus. Carterth's cycle is a travesty. Her LORs must have said, "Do not admit this person to law school."rehsalt wrote:On the subject of people with shitty cycles, take a look at these:Lavitz wrote: Then while we're on the subject, this profile has always been the most worrisome to me: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wa810smart/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
I was hoping we get regulus to collect a spreadsheet of some of the worst cycles, just to give some perspective to people who are sure they're having epically bad cycles.
Like I don't understand. what more could she have done with a 180 LSAT and 3.97 GPA ?
Well he took $50,000 at NYU over a full ride at Michigan so I feel like he might objectively be a weirdo???
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Dude, look at the rankings every once in a while. NYU is 6th, while Michigan is clearly a much shittier law school at 7th. The choice is clear.ninetails wrote:
Well he took $50,000 at NYU over a full ride at Michigan so I feel like he might objectively be a weirdo???
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I just sit on the ground at home alone rocking back and forth telling myself, "No, your softs are fine, your LORs love you, you're a good person ..."ManOfTheMinute wrote:Sweet jesus. Carterth's cycle is a travesty. Her LORs must have said, "Do not admit this person to law school."rehsalt wrote:On the subject of people with shitty cycles, take a look at these:Lavitz wrote:Then while we're on the subject, this profile has always been the most worrisome to me: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wa810smart/jdbanjo wrote:That's a fair observation, and probably the reason I've been thinking about some of these anomalies.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
I was hoping we get regulus to collect a spreadsheet of some of the worst cycles, just to give some perspective to people who are sure they're having epically bad cycles.
Edit: That, or adcoms just really despise music majors
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
FTFY.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Dude, look at the rankings every once in a while. NYU is 6th, while Michigan is clearly a much shiTTTier law school at 7th. The choice is clear.ninetails wrote:
Well he took $50,000 at NYU over a full ride at Michigan so I feel like he might objectively be a weirdo???
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You got in at Cal under admin review, with their super-holistic review process, so I'm sure your softs are solid. On the other hand, my carpet has been worn thin.jselson wrote: I just sit on the ground at home alone rocking back and forth telling myself, "No, your softs are fine, your LORs love you, you're a good person ..."
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Great, now my NYU acceptance seems strangely foreboding of becoming the next worst cycle evarrrr.ManOfTheMinute wrote:It's because NYU accepts based on numbers so long as a 30 second skim of their app doesn't DQ themspyke123 wrote:I find it somewhat funny that the majority of these people with "the worst cycle" ended up attending NYU...
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1carboncopyx wrote:Great, now my NYU acceptance seems strangely foreboding of becoming the next worst cycle evarrrr.ManOfTheMinute wrote:It's because NYU accepts based on numbers so long as a 30 second skim of their app doesn't DQ themspyke123 wrote:I find it somewhat funny that the majority of these people with "the worst cycle" ended up attending NYU...
I've got a bad feeling about this.
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Consider the alternative to holding an NYU acceptance...Lavitz wrote:+1carboncopyx wrote:Great, now my NYU acceptance seems strangely foreboding of becoming the next worst cycle evarrrr.ManOfTheMinute wrote:It's because NYU accepts based on numbers so long as a 30 second skim of their app doesn't DQ themspyke123 wrote:I find it somewhat funny that the majority of these people with "the worst cycle" ended up attending NYU...
I've got a bad feeling about this.
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Oh I know. I just wanted an excuse to post that.TripTrip wrote:Consider the alternative to holding an NYU acceptance...
Besides, we are in the Columbia thread on the eve of NCEs, so I think it works in context.
- Mr. Elshal
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Expect either a very happy or very sad post from me when the mail comes around 2pm tomorrow
always wanted to use that smiley
always wanted to use that smiley
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'll be expecting a very happy one, complete with a HamiltonMr. Elshal wrote:Expect either a very happy or very sad post from me when the mail comes around 2pm tomorrow
always wanted to use that smiley
- elterrible78
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You're the one getting the Hamilton tomorrow, pal.Lavitz wrote:I'll be expecting a very happy one, complete with a HamiltonMr. Elshal wrote:Expect either a very happy or very sad post from me when the mail comes around 2pm tomorrow
always wanted to use that smiley
- zdamico
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:57 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Does anyone have statistics on what sort of numbers often receive hamiltons/butlers?
ETA: And as of last year, they came with acceptances? I hope that doesn't change!
ETA: And as of last year, they came with acceptances? I hope that doesn't change!
Last edited by zdamico on Mon Jan 28, 2013 1:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
just to clarify, has anyone who hasn't received an NCE yet been able to access the admitted students website?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
elterrible78 wrote:You're the one getting the Hamilton tomorrow, pal.Lavitz wrote:I'll be expecting a very happy one, complete with a HamiltonMr. Elshal wrote:Expect either a very happy or very sad post from me when the mail comes around 2pm tomorrow
always wanted to use that smiley
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
- ph5354a
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Maybe this is just me, but I always assume that those with freakishly awful cycles are either convicted felons, lying about their numbers, or wrote a PS denying the Holocaust. Which also makes me wonder if these are the type of people that I'll be going to NYU with next year...
- chickpea
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Isn't it possible that some law schools would choose to reject an applicant who had astronomically high numbers but almost no extracurriculars, apparent interests, passions, etc.? Perhaps I'm naive.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I agree...while numbers certainly dominate, there is more to finding someone a job than just his/her numbers. That could be another reason why more schools will likely start interviewing applicants as wellchickpea wrote:Isn't it possible that some law schools would choose to reject an applicant who had astronomically high numbers but almost no extracurriculars, apparent interests, passions, etc.? Perhaps I'm naive.
- chickpea
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Agreed. I have heard from a couple of different lawyers at top NYC firms that they regularly turn down candidates with Harvard undergrad/HLS/180/perfect GPA, etc. because they are socially inept and would not be an asset to the firm. In these times of scary unemployment statistics and constant criticism of law schools for failing to produce capable lawyers I think schools will be paying more attention to that LOR that hints at an applicant's lack of interpersonal skills, or resume that suggests a dearth of actual interest in the law beyond getting into HLS.WhiteyCakes wrote:I agree...while numbers certainly dominate, there is more to finding someone a job than just his/her numbers. That could be another reason why more schools will likely start interviewing applicants as wellchickpea wrote:Isn't it possible that some law schools would choose to reject an applicant who had astronomically high numbers but almost no extracurriculars, apparent interests, passions, etc.? Perhaps I'm naive.
Last edited by chickpea on Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:24 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by trombalontana on Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Mr. Elshal
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks for the confidence, although it seems like this might be your time to shine. I guess we'll find out soon.Lavitz wrote:I'll be expecting a very happy one, complete with a HamiltonMr. Elshal wrote:Expect either a very happy or very sad post from me when the mail comes around 2pm tomorrow
always wanted to use that smiley
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login