Haha me toohohenheim wrote:Hmm, I just went UR3. So who really knows what's going on...hohenheim wrote:My guess is that the UR3 3/28 non-interview people are either directly admitted or get interview invites tomorrow. I've looked at their profiles and everyone is pretty solid.
The UR2 3/27 non-interview people that didn't update today seem to all be splitters, so I bet we're getting the WL :/
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- hohenheim
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Until they start sending emails saying "What the what?" they haven't reached michigan statushinakas wrote: Maybe it's turning into Michigan and is going to start updating status checkers everyday so that our speculating is rendered useless.
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
For these people who have been saying that you went UR3 - did this just happen or could it have happened this morning when it happened to me and several others?
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No, I checked like an hour ago or something and no update.ManOfTheMinute wrote:For these people who have been saying that you went UR3 - did this just happen or could it have happened this morning when it happened to me and several others?
- you'rethemannowdawg
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So what should I be obsessively checking tomorrow? Email or mailbox?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UR3 today?you'rethemannowdawg wrote:So what should I be obsessively checking tomorrow? Email or mailbox?
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by chadbrochill on Fri Apr 05, 2013 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- you'rethemannowdawg
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You know it, brah.KingFish wrote:UR3 today?you'rethemannowdawg wrote:So what should I be obsessively checking tomorrow? Email or mailbox?
- davee817
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just received an email from law.admissions@uakron.edu.... I flipped the f**king table
Last edited by davee817 on Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.davee817 wrote:Just received an email from law.admissions@uakron.edu.... I flipped the f**king table.
- davee817
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I like Chicago though. Kanye West is my idol.KingFish wrote:Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.davee817 wrote:Just received an email from law.admissions@uakron.edu.... I flipped the f**king table.
- cws277
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Is he a clinical faculty member there?davee817 wrote:I like Chicago though. Kanye West is my idol.KingFish wrote:Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.davee817 wrote:Just received an email from law.admissions@uakron.edu.... I flipped the f**king table.
- davee817
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah, but at the school of Public Policy.cws277 wrote:Is he a clinical faculty member there?davee817 wrote:I like Chicago though. Kanye West is my idol.KingFish wrote:Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.davee817 wrote:Just received an email from law.admissions@uakron.edu.... I flipped the f**king table.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cws277
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- davee817
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
they're on central time, so it's not really that late.davee817 wrote:They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- cws277
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.davee817 wrote:They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
by this metric, i would stay in LA or move to miamicws277 wrote:After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.davee817 wrote:They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No city has a higher percentage of fair-weather sports fans than LA.jbagelboy wrote:by this metric, i would stay in LA or move to miamicws277 wrote:After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.davee817 wrote:They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- cws277
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It truly is the great tragedy of the legal market that there are no T14 schools in Miami.jbagelboy wrote:by this metric, i would stay in LA or move to miamicws277 wrote:After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.davee817 wrote:They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.
- you'rethemannowdawg
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Does Chicago notify by email?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yesyou'rethemannowdawg wrote:Does Chicago notify by email?
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Or Hawaii.cws277 wrote:It truly is the great tragedy of the legal market that there are no T14 schools in Miami.
We need to think seriously about sending all the top-indexed TLSers to schools in warmer climates to artificially boost their USNWR rankings. I bet we could help UCLA jump GULC.
- cws277
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Absolutely. Problem is that would require some temporary self-sacrifice for the greater good on the part of those TLSers. From my limited time here, that seems unlikely.TripTrip wrote:Or Hawaii.cws277 wrote:It truly is the great tragedy of the legal market that there are no T14 schools in Miami.
We need to think seriously about sending all the top-indexed TLSers to schools in warmer climates to artificially boost their USNWR rankings. I bet we could help UCLA jump GULC.
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
"Will you, mighty TLSer with great future potential, forgo your hopes and dreams so that future high scorers on the LSAT might have a better opportunity to spend three years in a warm climate?"cws277 wrote:Absolutely. Problem is that would require some temporary self-sacrifice for the greater good on the part of those TLSers. From my limited time here, that seems unlikely.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login