Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- JamesDean1955
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
^ Idk about collective wisdom, but if you updated this week for a third time after your interview, I'd say it's a safe bet.
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Could this day feel any longer?
- robot_socrates
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Made even longer by the realization that there is no guarantee decisions will actually come out.callmemaybe84 wrote:Could this day feel any longer?
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I have this theory: the longer we go without a twitter update, the more likely we are to get decisions today. If you have a boatload of work for the day, you know pretty early on if you aren't going to make it. So they would have updated earlier w/ "sorry guys, keep an eye out on monday." I'm telling myself that the silence indicates that they are getting close.callmemaybe84 wrote:Could this day feel any longer?

-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm signing on to this baseless speculation.MacB wrote:I have this theory: the longer we go without a twitter update, the more likely we are to get decisions today. If you have a boatload of work for the day, you know pretty early on if you aren't going to make it. So they would have updated earlier w/ "sorry guys, keep an eye out on monday." I'm telling myself that the silence indicates that they are getting close.callmemaybe84 wrote:Could this day feel any longer?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Adding on to this... Chicago wants to improve its yield. A surefire way to not do that is to piss off the applicants you're going to accept by telling them they'll get decisions tomorrow and then not actually give them decisions. A great way to do that is to tell the applicants that you might get decisions tomorrow, but only if we work hard enough, and then give them decisions tomorrow, making them think that you were working really, really hard just for them.MacB wrote:I have this theory: the longer we go without a twitter update, the more likely we are to get decisions today. If you have a boatload of work for the day, you know pretty early on if you aren't going to make it. So they would have updated earlier w/ "sorry guys, keep an eye out on monday." I'm telling myself that the silence indicates that they are getting close.callmemaybe84 wrote:Could this day feel any longer?
TLDR: Either decisions are going out today or Chicago needs better PR
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:22 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ninja editLSATSCORES2012 wrote:MacB wrote:callmemaybe84 wrote:
TLDR: Either decisions are going out today or Chicago needs better PR
- JamesDean1955
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
To be fair, Chicago said "Hoping to get them out tomorrow, no promises." I still agree it's annoying to tweet the possibility of decisions and end up not giving any.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Adding on to this... Chicago wants to improve its yield. A surefire way to not do that is to piss off the applicants you're going to accept by telling them they'll get decisions tomorrow and then not actually give them decisions. A great way to do that is to tell the applicants that you might get decisions tomorrow, but only if we work hard enough, and then give them decisions tomorrow, making them think that you were working really, really hard just for them.MacB wrote:I have this theory: the longer we go without a twitter update, the more likely we are to get decisions today. If you have a boatload of work for the day, you know pretty early on if you aren't going to make it. So they would have updated earlier w/ "sorry guys, keep an eye out on monday." I'm telling myself that the silence indicates that they are getting close.callmemaybe84 wrote:Could this day feel any longer?
TLDR: Either decisions are going out today or Chicago needs better PR
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah who do they think they are, LSAC?LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Adding on to this... Chicago wants to improve its yield. A surefire way to not do that is to piss off the applicants you're going to accept by telling them they'll get decisions tomorrow and then not actually give them decisions. A great way to do that is to tell the applicants that you might get decisions tomorrow, but only if we work hard enough, and then give them decisions tomorrow, making them think that you were working really, really hard just for them.MacB wrote:I have this theory: the longer we go without a twitter update, the more likely we are to get decisions today. If you have a boatload of work for the day, you know pretty early on if you aren't going to make it. So they would have updated earlier w/ "sorry guys, keep an eye out on monday." I'm telling myself that the silence indicates that they are getting close.callmemaybe84 wrote:Could this day feel any longer?
TLDR: Either decisions are going out today or Chicago needs better PR
-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JamesDean1955 wrote:^ Idk about collective wisdom, but if you updated this week for a third time after your interview, I'd say it's a safe bet.
three post-interview updates necessary for a decision?
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
lololol pretty sure i know who you're talking aboutNoodleyOne wrote:Just had my interview...
I was fighting the urge to say "sup" to my interviewer. Should have gotten her number.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
hit me, chicago. hit me.
- JamesDean1955
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not necessary, certainly sufficient, and definitely increase your chances.whereskyle wrote:JamesDean1955 wrote:^ Idk about collective wisdom, but if you updated this week for a third time after your interview, I'd say it's a safe bet.
three post-interview updates necessary for a decision?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JamesDean1955
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Oh HELL YES do I know who you're talking about. LmaoCrowing wrote:lololol pretty sure i know who you're talking aboutNoodleyOne wrote:Just had my interview...
I was fighting the urge to say "sup" to my interviewer. Should have gotten her number.
-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JamesDean1955 wrote:Not necessary, certainly sufficient, and definitely increase your chances.whereskyle wrote:JamesDean1955 wrote:^ Idk about collective wisdom, but if you updated this week for a third time after your interview, I'd say it's a safe bet.
three post-interview updates necessary for a decision?
thanks, dean
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Did anyone put on cologne for their skype interview?
-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No, but I listened to Bob Marley's Everything's Gonna Be Allright immediately beforehand. It provided an ethereal flavor, which I believe was detected by my interviewer.darkgrayclouds wrote:Did anyone put on cologne for their skype interview?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Wearing a strong cologne is both necessary and sufficient for admission.darkgrayclouds wrote:Did anyone put on cologne for their skype interview?
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Crowing wrote:lololol pretty sure i know who you're talking aboutNoodleyOne wrote:Just had my interview...
I was fighting the urge to say "sup" to my interviewer. Should have gotten her number.
Me too.

- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1 hahaDr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Crowing wrote:lololol pretty sure i know who you're talking aboutNoodleyOne wrote:Just had my interview...
I was fighting the urge to say "sup" to my interviewer. Should have gotten her number.
Me too.
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
GOOD GOD. haha.Teflon_Don wrote:+1 hahaDr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Crowing wrote:lololol pretty sure i know who you're talking aboutNoodleyOne wrote:Just had my interview...
I was fighting the urge to say "sup" to my interviewer. Should have gotten her number.
Me too.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JamesDean1955
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Assuming we're all in, I call dibbs on the hottie interviewer
.
Also, gee they're really making us wait right up until the wire here...

Also, gee they're really making us wait right up until the wire here...
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Oh come on, we're all UChicago prospies, so we all know that the situation would really unfold like this.JamesDean1955 wrote:Assuming we're all in, I call dibbs on the hottie interviewer.
Also, gee they're really making us wait right up until the wire here...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTN-CVQuBR8
- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
A "sorry we couldn't finish today but decisions Monday" tweet is going to blow
- robot_socrates
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
On first read i thought you said they had just tweeted that. Gave me a good scare!Teflon_Don wrote:A "sorry we couldn't finish today but decisions Monday" tweet is going to blow
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login