If you can't express why you want to or should go to harvard law in a one page essay without sounding superficial, then I honestly don't think you deserve to get in... just sayinWhiteGuy5 wrote:It can if you come across superficialfingerscrossedxx wrote:Well their email did say that if you have a special interest in Harvard to let them know so, if they ask for it, it can't hurt!lblelalr wrote:+12938291038290183210 to thisWhiteGuy5 wrote:Sorry to derail the above conversation.
Are we really writing LOCI/Why Harvard essays? I tried imagining one and I don't know if I can say anything sincere without stating the freegin obvious (i.e. IT'S HARVARD!).
HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style Forum
- boosk
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:31 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
If you can't read properly, you shouldn't tell someone they don't deserve to go to Harvard.boosk wrote: If you can't express why you want to or should go to harvard law in a one page essay without sounding superficial, then I honestly don't think you deserve to get in... just sayin

The RC fail you had missed the point that it's not whether we have good reasons to want to go to Harvard, it's whether those reasons go beyond the fact that the school is generally an amazing place. I mean, it's difficult to say that Harvard would be a perfect fit for you because of X....because...well...it would be a perfect fit for just about everybody for a wide variety of reasons.
Also, even if you do have a "unique" reason for wanting to go to Harvard, crafting a properly written LOCI is still difficult. The danger of coming off a little superficial still exists.
In any event, I DO think I can come up with a decent LOCI for Harvard, actually.
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
To comment on everything everyone is saying about LOCI's:
I have a specific program that I not only think is really awesome, but it is uniquely emphasized at H, and I have a background that is well suited to studying and contributing within that program.
Because of the aforementioned, I think I would benefit from writing an LOCI. Picking a program that you are interested in without a background to support it is probably harder to justify.
I have a specific program that I not only think is really awesome, but it is uniquely emphasized at H, and I have a background that is well suited to studying and contributing within that program.
Because of the aforementioned, I think I would benefit from writing an LOCI. Picking a program that you are interested in without a background to support it is probably harder to justify.
- Killingly
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:17 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
This is pretty much exactly what I did. Do I have a legitimate shot? Probably not. But they held me for a reason (I assume), and I figure I might as well try to make my case stronger.EMZE wrote:To comment on everything everyone is saying about LOCI's:
I have a specific program that I not only think is really awesome, but it is uniquely emphasized at H, and I have a background that is well suited to studying and contributing within that program.
Because of the aforementioned, I think I would benefit from writing an LOCI. Picking a program that you are interested in without a background to support it is probably harder to justify.
- boosk
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:31 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Sorry, my comment wasn't directed at you personally. I just think that at this stage in the game you should have a way to articulate "why harvard?" without sounding superficial. that's all...WhiteGuy5 wrote:If you can't read properly, you shouldn't tell someone they don't deserve to go to Harvard.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- nids333
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:51 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Are most of you writing a LOCI? I am just sending in an updated resume and hoping for the best.
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Haha, yeah, I know, seriously! I mean - wow... good point.InformationOVERLOAD wrote:!

- vincanity1
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:40 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Checking in. Kb1 12/6. Held 1/19. Sent in LOCI and transcripts 2 weeks ago
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 8:08 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Just held, KB1 here too. Any (educated) guesses as to there KB1-->Held stands in relation to Held-->KB1?
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:06 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
How are people addressing KB in their letters? Right now I have Dean Buttenbaum just to be safe, but know it's technically wrong.
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I'm sure Dean Buttenbaum or Ms Buttenbaum is fine.seanPtheB wrote:How are people addressing KB in their letters? Right now I have Dean Buttenbaum just to be safe, but know it's technically wrong.

-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:06 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Alright cool thanks sojsoj wrote:I'm sure Dean Buttenbaum or Ms Buttenbaum is fine.seanPtheB wrote:How are people addressing KB in their letters? Right now I have Dean Buttenbaum just to be safe, but know it's technically wrong.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:10 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Checking in. KB1 December 5.
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Hard to say given small sample sizes but last year some people went KB1 -> long gap -> hold -> very quick KB2. So I would say if your numbers are competitive don't give up hope yet. Most people who get held don't get KB1s until much later in the cycle so it's hard to compare to your situation.lsatcrazy wrote:Just held, KB1 here too. Any (educated) guesses as to there KB1-->Held stands in relation to Held-->KB1?
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:45 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
so bittersweet this hold business... I expected auto-reject so I should count my blessings. Sent in updated resume. Here's to hoping.
- rotaxkarter
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:24 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
For the newly held...MobyDick wrote:I thought it might be nice to gather some data about held applicants, so I made a a Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... NU5meEE6MQ
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... kRqNU5meEE
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 5:12 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I went with Ms. Buttenbaum in mine. I wasn't sure either but I figured that was pretty standardsoj wrote:I'm sure Dean Buttenbaum or Ms Buttenbaum is fine.seanPtheB wrote:How are people addressing KB in their letters? Right now I have Dean Buttenbaum just to be safe, but know it's technically wrong.
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:45 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I filled out the google doc but not sure how useful the information is given that I think the numbers game is pretty much over now. If we made it to held status, we have passed their numbers bar... now, it is about the class profile that matters. The only way the numbers matter now is if you are the same applicant as someone else they are looking at but the numbers differentiate the two (or more) of you. At least, that is what my sources tell me...rotaxkarter wrote:For the newly held...MobyDick wrote:I thought it might be nice to gather some data about held applicants, so I made a a Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... NU5meEE6MQ
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... kRqNU5meEE
- Elendil
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I definitely don't think this is true... we're seeing that a lot of people with (typically) auto-reject and (dare I say?) auto-admit numbers are being held. What if the "class profile" calls for students with highers GPA's or LSAT's? Or if the admit drop this year affects Harvard more than they anticipate? I think held is exactly what they say it is -- it means that they're interested, but not yet sure what they want to do with you.Kimberly wrote:I think the numbers game is pretty much over now. If we made it to held status, we have passed their numbers bar...rotaxkarter wrote:For the newly held...MobyDick wrote:I thought it might be nice to gather some data about held applicants, so I made a a Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... NU5meEE6MQ
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... kRqNU5meEE
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I doubt this based on the massive number of holds and the people who got in after being held last year. Most people who went hold->JR1/JR2 had Harvard numbers to begin with (i.e. were above one or both medians). I suspect most of the people who get in will come from the top portion of the hold pool numerically and the rest of us will be waitlisted.Kimberly wrote:I filled out the google doc but not sure how useful the information is given that I think the numbers game is pretty much over now. If we made it to held status, we have passed their numbers bar... now, it is about the class profile that matters. The only way the numbers matter now is if you are the same applicant as someone else they are looking at but the numbers differentiate the two (or more) of you. At least, that is what my sources tell me...rotaxkarter wrote:For the newly held...MobyDick wrote:I thought it might be nice to gather some data about held applicants, so I made a a Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... NU5meEE6MQ
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... kRqNU5meEE
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rotaxkarter
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:24 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I agree with this, though I want to add that I think URMs and Internationals are probably playing a different 'game' then the rest of the held pool.Nelson wrote:I doubt this based on the massive number of holds and the people who got in after being held last year. Most people who went hold->JR1/JR2 had Harvard numbers to begin with (i.e. were above one or both medians). I suspect most of the people who get in will come from the top portion of the hold pool numerically and the rest of us will be waitlisted.Kimberly wrote:I filled out the google doc but not sure how useful the information is given that I think the numbers game is pretty much over now. If we made it to held status, we have passed their numbers bar... now, it is about the class profile that matters. The only way the numbers matter now is if you are the same applicant as someone else they are looking at but the numbers differentiate the two (or more) of you. At least, that is what my sources tell me...rotaxkarter wrote:For the newly held...MobyDick wrote:I thought it might be nice to gather some data about held applicants, so I made a a Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... NU5meEE6MQ
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... kRqNU5meEE
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
URMs and internationals are definitely a different story. All of you guys from the 51st state seem to be having a rough cycle despite awesome numbers, though are most of you straight from undergrad as well? Do we have enough data to separate being Canadian from lacking WE yet?rotaxkarter wrote:I agree with this, though I want to add that I think URMs and Internationals are probably playing a different 'game' then the rest of the held pool.
EDIT: Nevermind, forgot you were nontrad as well. There goes my no WE theory.
- 80eight
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:18 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Anyone wanna trade LOCI now? PM me please!
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:59 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
How many people do you think are being held? 100? 500?.....
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login