Ditto on NYU.Fortuitous wrote:NYU, unless my need based aid situation is magically resolved within the next 10 business days.larsoner wrote:Chicago, unless someone else gives me some good money.Tom Joad wrote:Also, assuming this SLS rollercoaster ride doesn't work out, where are other people planning on going? UVA here.
Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hello NYU friends I love Stanford, but I am down for some quality NYC time.FryBreadPower wrote:Ditto on NYU.Fortuitous wrote:NYU, unless my need based aid situation is magically resolved within the next 10 business days.larsoner wrote:Chicago, unless someone else gives me some good money.Tom Joad wrote:Also, assuming this SLS rollercoaster ride doesn't work out, where are other people planning on going? UVA here.
-
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:23 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Berkeley or NYU. Or USC with a massive scholly. I can't decide!Tom Joad wrote:Also, assuming this SLS rollercoaster ride doesn't work out, where are other people planning on going? UVA here.
- pupshaw
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:08 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Probably Berkeley or Chicago for me.
- knickerbocker
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:04 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It's hard to know what to make of this cycle. According to LSN, Stanford has both accepted and rejected a number of people who went complete after I did.
Dean Deal, if you see this, please: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aH3Q_CZy968
Dean Deal, if you see this, please: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aH3Q_CZy968
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:32 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
stanford tells me they updated my file w/ the loci. is it appropriate to send a quick "thank you" email?
- cactuarX3
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Probably Northwesternpoe wrote:Berkeley or NYU. Or USC with a massive scholly. I can't decide!Tom Joad wrote:Also, assuming this SLS rollercoaster ride doesn't work out, where are other people planning on going? UVA here.
- yankees42789
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Don't think that's necessary. My theory is that the fewer emails admissions offices get, the happier they are and a 'thank you email,' while nice, is pretty much just clutter.Geneva wrote:stanford tells me they updated my file w/ the loci. is it appropriate to send a quick "thank you" email?
- Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm finally starting to get a bit stir crazy. There are only so many times I can log into the status checker and see "Your file has been submitted for review. 11/03/11".
Last edited by Doorkeeper on Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I was just starting to be ok until everyone and their mother decided to send a LOCI. I am caught between sending and not sending which has left me in a state of indecision.Doorkeeper wrote:I'm finally starting to get a bit stir crazy. There are only so many times I can log into the status checker and see "Your file has been submitted for review. 11/03/12".
- amc987
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1. And I'm debating whether it's worth sending in a LOCI. I don't think it'll matter much either way--I don't have new grades or a new job or some super prestigious honor-- but I'm feeling compelled to do so because so many other people are and I don't want to miss out on a potential opportunity to advocate on my own behalf. Neither my dilemma nor the status checker's "Your file has been submitted for review. 10/2011" is helping my stress level ATM.Doorkeeper wrote:I'm finally starting to get a bit stir crazy. There are only so many times I can log into the status checker and see "Your file has been submitted for review. 11/03/12".
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by YesNoMaybe on Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1. Took the words right out of my mouth.amc987 wrote:+1. And I'm debating whether it's worth sending in a LOCI. I don't think it'll matter much either way--I don't have new grades or a new job or some super prestigious honor-- but I'm feeling compelled to do so because so many other people are and I don't want to miss out on a potential opportunity to advocate on my own behalf. Neither my dilemma nor the status checker's "Your file has been submitted for review. 10/2011" is helping my stress level ATM.Doorkeeper wrote:I'm finally starting to get a bit stir crazy. There are only so many times I can log into the status checker and see "Your file has been submitted for review. 11/03/12".
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 8:08 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Jeezus, they soft held a freakin' time traveler? The admitted dudes must have some crazy softs...Doorkeeper wrote:I'm finally starting to get a bit stir crazy. There are only so many times I can log into the status checker and see "Your file has been submitted for review. 11/03/12".
- Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
At this point in the game, I think it would be best to save the LOCI for if you get waitlisted.amc987 wrote:+1. And I'm debating whether it's worth sending in a LOCI. I don't think it'll matter much either way--I don't have new grades or a new job or some super prestigious honor-- but I'm feeling compelled to do so because so many other people are and I don't want to miss out on a potential opportunity to advocate on my own behalf. Neither my dilemma nor the status checker's "Your file has been submitted for review. 10/2011" is helping my stress level ATM.Doorkeeper wrote:I'm finally starting to get a bit stir crazy. There are only so many times I can log into the status checker and see "Your file has been submitted for review. 11/03/12".
I never was good at getting dates right in kindergarten.lsatcrazy wrote:Jeezus, they soft held a freakin' time traveler? The admitted dudes must have some crazy softs...
Also, personal statements involving time travel are incredibly risky for the applicant.
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
What is recently?YesNoMaybe wrote:On LSN there is someone that was recently accepted with below 25% GPA & LSAT. I'm not an LSN/TLS expert but maybe calls have been going out?
FryBreadPower, me too. I'm going to send it though. Because for me (in my mind) a waitlist would be the same as a ding. I dont think I'd be pulled from the waitlist bc I dont have a 180 or 4.0.
Last acceptance on LSN is 3/2
Edit: which means we are quickly approaching three weeks without any acceptances reported on LSN. Good lord.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Stanford, why won't you think of the children?FryBreadPower wrote:
Edit: which means we are quickly approaching three weeks without any acceptances reported on LSN. Good lord.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by YesNoMaybe on Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yes. Curious that someone would withdraw this early in the game.YesNoMaybe wrote:HAHA. See, I'm not a LSN expert. I sorted the applicants by last updated. Still there is someone that recently updated to show an acceptance that has some interesting numbers.
& she withdrew? Is that what a W meanins?
Edit: there is also something off about her file.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by YesNoMaybe on Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- sharktankdean
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So Stanford is sipping on the same thing that made Harvard ignore us for 3 weeks...something has to be up...they better make up for this.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't know about you, but Harvard is STILL ignoring me...sharktankdean wrote:So Stanford is sipping on the same thing that made Harvard ignore us for 3 weeks...something has to be up...they better make up for this.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:09 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
And the URM wave never materialized, right?
- sharktankdean
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
i think this was the worst let down...i got soooooo excited..kindaklueless wrote:And the URM wave never materialized, right?
Isn't the ASW in a month...u would think they would people a decent amount of time to make plans for that..
- Shooter
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hi guys,
Sorry if this has been covered already, but I haven't had time to follow this thread as closely as perhaps I should have.
What is the situation with LOCI's? Is it a good idea for people that haven't heard back for about 3 months to send one in? Should I wait until I get officially waitlisted?
When you do send it, did you write the LOCI into the text of e-mail or attach it as a document/pdf?
Thanks everyone - best of luck to all of you!
Sorry if this has been covered already, but I haven't had time to follow this thread as closely as perhaps I should have.
What is the situation with LOCI's? Is it a good idea for people that haven't heard back for about 3 months to send one in? Should I wait until I get officially waitlisted?
When you do send it, did you write the LOCI into the text of e-mail or attach it as a document/pdf?
Thanks everyone - best of luck to all of you!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login