LSAT < = 153? Forum
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:56 pm
LSAT < = 153?
Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
-
- Posts: 2525
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am
Re: LSAT < = 153?
Yes.HoustonOrBust wrote: Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: LSAT < = 153?
I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.
- akili
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
...you are also URM?jmill wrote:I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.
- TT09
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:40 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
I mean it says it in his profile...just sayin'...akili wrote:...you are also URM?jmill wrote:I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: LSAT < = 153?
Yes....I am also a URM. So nobody knows where I'll land on an acceptance board.akili wrote:...you are also URM?jmill wrote:I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.
- Justathought
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:16 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
Clearly he's expected to qualify all his cycle related posts with, "but I'm a URM." This of course is despite the fact he has a detailed profile.TT09 wrote:I mean it says it in his profile...just sayin'...akili wrote:...you are also URM?jmill wrote:I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.

- jacketman03
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
Don't you know it. Us URMs should wear a big sign on our avatars showing the boards that this is so. /sarcasmJustathought wrote:Clearly he's expected to qualify all his cycle related posts with, "but I'm a URM." This of course is despite the fact he has a detailed profile.TT09 wrote:I mean it says it in his profile...just sayin'...akili wrote:...you are also URM?jmill wrote:I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.
- Jack Smirks
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am
Re: LSAT < = 153?
Because clearly that's what akili was implying and everyone should read every profile before asking a very simple question.Justathought wrote:Clearly he's expected to qualify all his cycle related posts with, "but I'm a URM." This of course is despite the fact he has a detailed profile.

doingitrite?
- akili
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
I was making the point that OP's cycle can't be predicted because a URM got in to schools with a 150.
eta: sorry if it came across a different way
eta: sorry if it came across a different way
- Justathought
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:16 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
akili wrote:I was making the point that OP's cycle can't be predicted because a URM got in to schools with a 150.
eta: sorry if it came across a different way
i actually knew what you were getting at, but the poster above you did not - at least it appears as though he did not, given the response he posted. I'll be honest and say that it read a little condescendingly to me, but that clearly wasn't your intent. Sorry to jump on you like that.
- akili
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
It's ok. I should have been more clear!!Justathought wrote:akili wrote:I was making the point that OP's cycle can't be predicted because a URM got in to schools with a 150.
eta: sorry if it came across a different way
i actually knew what you were getting at, but the poster above you did not - at least it appears as though he did not, given the response he posted. I'll be honest and say that it read a little condescendingly to me, but that clearly wasn't your intent. Sorry to jump on you like that.
-
- Posts: 2525
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am
Re: LSAT < = 153?
You cant assume everyone will check profile boxes to see if they are a URM when they say things like "I got a 150 and XXXX" giving false hope to those with low LSAT scores. Once again, people's URM sensitivity is wayy too high. There is a clear difference between AA debate trolling and providing useful facts/data/information to people including whether or not someone is an URM which drastically alters the meaning of their LSAT/GPA.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: LSAT < = 153?
I didn't mean to start all that. I should have stated the URM status at first.
- red_alertz
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
we have forgiven your mistakes, you can come home nowjmill wrote:I didn't mean to start all that. I should have stated the URM status at first.
- jacketman03
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
And way to go on your cycle, too.red_alertz wrote:we have forgiven your mistakes, you can come home nowjmill wrote:I didn't mean to start all that. I should have stated the URM status at first.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:48 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
the only way to settle this is with 10 more pages of inane bickering.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- EstboundNDwn
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:15 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
Did you at least apply to some backups? A URM with those numbers should have no problem with at least a handful of Tier 3's.HoustonOrBust wrote:Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:02 am
Re: LSAT < = 153?
3.3/153 here. Accepted into WVU & NKU. Waitlisted at Cincinnati, went under review three times at UK, and on hold at Louisville. Still waiting on Richmond & pending at Alabama. Oh, and I am not a URM.HoustonOrBust wrote:Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: LSAT < = 153?
jacketman03 wrote:And way to go on your cycle, too.red_alertz wrote:we have forgiven your mistakes, you can come home nowjmill wrote:I didn't mean to start all that. I should have stated the URM status at first.
Thanks, this cycle has been a lot more friendly than I thought it would be.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:31 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
151/3.91/English/Business Concentration, non-URM.
Admitted:
Ave Maria
Houston
St. Mary's
Southern Methodist (PT)
Texas Tech
Texas Wesleyan
Pending:
South Texas
Denied:
Baylor (Declined Application for Spring 2012)
Catholic
Texas
Admitted:
Ave Maria
Houston
St. Mary's
Southern Methodist (PT)
Texas Tech
Texas Wesleyan
Pending:
South Texas
Denied:
Baylor (Declined Application for Spring 2012)
Catholic
Texas
Last edited by graceful1 on Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:50 am, edited 2 times in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 5:12 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
153 and 3.98 and was accepted and earned a full scholarship to Widener. You can receive admissions with a 153, so it may be another factor.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:32 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
Hey, 150 and 3.6 GPA. Was accepted to Wake Forest and UC Hastings. Waitlisted at W&M.HoustonOrBust wrote:Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
- red_alertz
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
how did you manage that? URM? real strong softs?denisea wrote:Hey, 150 and 3.6 GPA. Was accepted to Wake Forest and UC Hastings. Waitlisted at W&M.HoustonOrBust wrote:Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:32 pm
Re: LSAT < = 153?
red_alertz wrote:how did you manage that? URM? real strong softs?denisea wrote:Hey, 150 and 3.6 GPA. Was accepted to Wake Forest and UC Hastings. Waitlisted at W&M.HoustonOrBust wrote:Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
Strong softs. I have 10 years work experience (worked in a jail for the Sheriff's dept), African American Studies major (which no one does, I am the only one graduating with it from Columbia this year), and great LOR's.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login