LSAT < = 153? Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
HoustonOrBust

New
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:56 pm

LSAT < = 153?

Post by HoustonOrBust » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:16 pm

Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?

Sandro

Gold
Posts: 2525
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by Sandro » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:20 pm

HoustonOrBust wrote: Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
Yes.

jmill

New
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by jmill » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:22 pm

I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.

User avatar
akili

Gold
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by akili » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:23 pm

jmill wrote:I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.
...you are also URM?

User avatar
TT09

Bronze
Posts: 371
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:40 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by TT09 » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:25 pm

akili wrote:
jmill wrote:I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.
...you are also URM?
I mean it says it in his profile...just sayin'...

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


jmill

New
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by jmill » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:25 pm

akili wrote:
jmill wrote:I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.
...you are also URM?
Yes....I am also a URM. So nobody knows where I'll land on an acceptance board.

User avatar
Justathought

Silver
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:16 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by Justathought » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:31 pm

TT09 wrote:
akili wrote:
jmill wrote:I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.
...you are also URM?
I mean it says it in his profile...just sayin'...
Clearly he's expected to qualify all his cycle related posts with, "but I'm a URM." This of course is despite the fact he has a detailed profile. :roll:

User avatar
jacketman03

Silver
Posts: 763
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:44 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by jacketman03 » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:34 pm

Justathought wrote:
TT09 wrote:
akili wrote:
jmill wrote:I've been accepted places (T2/T3/T4) with a 150 LSAT. Surprisingly even waitlisted at UT and American.
...you are also URM?
I mean it says it in his profile...just sayin'...
Clearly he's expected to qualify all his cycle related posts with, "but I'm a URM." This of course is despite the fact he has a detailed profile. :roll:
Don't you know it. Us URMs should wear a big sign on our avatars showing the boards that this is so. /sarcasm

User avatar
Jack Smirks

Silver
Posts: 1330
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by Jack Smirks » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:35 pm

Justathought wrote:Clearly he's expected to qualify all his cycle related posts with, "but I'm a URM." This of course is despite the fact he has a detailed profile. :roll:
Because clearly that's what akili was implying and everyone should read every profile before asking a very simple question. :roll:

doingitrite?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
akili

Gold
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by akili » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:43 pm

I was making the point that OP's cycle can't be predicted because a URM got in to schools with a 150.

eta: sorry if it came across a different way

User avatar
Justathought

Silver
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:16 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by Justathought » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:50 pm

akili wrote:I was making the point that OP's cycle can't be predicted because a URM got in to schools with a 150.

eta: sorry if it came across a different way



i actually knew what you were getting at, but the poster above you did not - at least it appears as though he did not, given the response he posted. I'll be honest and say that it read a little condescendingly to me, but that clearly wasn't your intent. Sorry to jump on you like that.

User avatar
akili

Gold
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by akili » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:57 pm

Justathought wrote:
akili wrote:I was making the point that OP's cycle can't be predicted because a URM got in to schools with a 150.

eta: sorry if it came across a different way



i actually knew what you were getting at, but the poster above you did not - at least it appears as though he did not, given the response he posted. I'll be honest and say that it read a little condescendingly to me, but that clearly wasn't your intent. Sorry to jump on you like that.
It's ok. I should have been more clear!!

Sandro

Gold
Posts: 2525
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by Sandro » Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:00 pm

You cant assume everyone will check profile boxes to see if they are a URM when they say things like "I got a 150 and XXXX" giving false hope to those with low LSAT scores. Once again, people's URM sensitivity is wayy too high. There is a clear difference between AA debate trolling and providing useful facts/data/information to people including whether or not someone is an URM which drastically alters the meaning of their LSAT/GPA.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


jmill

New
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by jmill » Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:02 pm

I didn't mean to start all that. I should have stated the URM status at first.

User avatar
red_alertz

Bronze
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by red_alertz » Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:10 pm

jmill wrote:I didn't mean to start all that. I should have stated the URM status at first.
we have forgiven your mistakes, you can come home now

User avatar
jacketman03

Silver
Posts: 763
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:44 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by jacketman03 » Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:12 pm

red_alertz wrote:
jmill wrote:I didn't mean to start all that. I should have stated the URM status at first.
we have forgiven your mistakes, you can come home now
And way to go on your cycle, too.

lateblooming

New
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:48 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by lateblooming » Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:17 pm

the only way to settle this is with 10 more pages of inane bickering.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
EstboundNDwn

Bronze
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:15 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by EstboundNDwn » Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:31 pm

HoustonOrBust wrote:Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
Did you at least apply to some backups? A URM with those numbers should have no problem with at least a handful of Tier 3's.

pseudonym1

New
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:02 am

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by pseudonym1 » Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:05 pm

HoustonOrBust wrote:Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
3.3/153 here. Accepted into WVU & NKU. Waitlisted at Cincinnati, went under review three times at UK, and on hold at Louisville. Still waiting on Richmond & pending at Alabama. Oh, and I am not a URM.

jmill

New
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by jmill » Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:11 pm

jacketman03 wrote:
red_alertz wrote:
jmill wrote:I didn't mean to start all that. I should have stated the URM status at first.
we have forgiven your mistakes, you can come home now
And way to go on your cycle, too.

Thanks, this cycle has been a lot more friendly than I thought it would be.

graceful1

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:31 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by graceful1 » Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:34 pm

151/3.91/English/Business Concentration, non-URM.

Admitted:
Ave Maria
Houston
St. Mary's
Southern Methodist (PT)
Texas Tech
Texas Wesleyan

Pending:
South Texas

Denied:
Baylor (Declined Application for Spring 2012)
Catholic
Texas
Last edited by graceful1 on Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:50 am, edited 2 times in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


NJcollegestudent

Bronze
Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 5:12 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by NJcollegestudent » Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:45 pm

153 and 3.98 and was accepted and earned a full scholarship to Widener. You can receive admissions with a 153, so it may be another factor.

denisea

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:32 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by denisea » Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:59 pm

HoustonOrBust wrote:Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
Hey, 150 and 3.6 GPA. Was accepted to Wake Forest and UC Hastings. Waitlisted at W&M.

User avatar
red_alertz

Bronze
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:42 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by red_alertz » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:12 pm

denisea wrote:
HoustonOrBust wrote:Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
Hey, 150 and 3.6 GPA. Was accepted to Wake Forest and UC Hastings. Waitlisted at W&M.
how did you manage that? URM? real strong softs?

denisea

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:32 pm

Re: LSAT < = 153?

Post by denisea » Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:29 pm

red_alertz wrote:
denisea wrote:
HoustonOrBust wrote:Hi TLS,
I am 3.6/153/Public Relations, wait listed and losing my mind waiting to hear something. I figure it's got to be my LSAT score. Has anyone been accepted with a 153 or under?
Hey, 150 and 3.6 GPA. Was accepted to Wake Forest and UC Hastings. Waitlisted at W&M.
how did you manage that? URM? real strong softs?

Strong softs. I have 10 years work experience (worked in a jail for the Sheriff's dept), African American Studies major (which no one does, I am the only one graduating with it from Columbia this year), and great LOR's.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”