TLS c/o 2020 - In #Squad We Trust Forum

[Scurvy Cur]

Meh, I'm in favor of a total gun ban other than hunting rifles (like England or Australia) but I'm not politically stupid and I understand that to get there (which we won't, admittedly) you have to take baby steps.

[proteinshake]

.

[amta]

I just deleted cuz I'm not c/o 2020 so I decided not to intrude. But generally yes, libertarian.

no shame, brother.

[chargers21]

Uhhhhhh I may or may not be a huge fan, and I may or may not have said that working in house for NASCAR is my dream job

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... start=3025

join the fantasy league too!

Oh, I assumed you were making fun of me

[amta]

Oh, I assumed you were making fun of me

i may have asked because i stereotyped you, but i also enjoy left-hand turns and american made muscle.

[Hennessy]

.

[Hennessy]

.

what an odd thing to post delete?

it was kind of embarrassing

What's embarrassing about essentially copy/pasting the Libertarian Party platform? I mean, I agree with like 70% of it

i just meant it was embarrassing to post your political opinion and then delete it

but he explained it's cuz he's not c/o 2020, which is understandable

but also, you are welcome here luckyirish13

[thatblondegirl]

The NRA is so extremist it's ridiculous. I'm all for guns, but I agree with background checks. I also think that someone with a history of domestic violence should not be allowed to legally own a gun. Same for extreme mental illness. Gun registries are a terrible idea. Limiting magazine capacity makes sense when considering a mass shooter situation. And I call BS on the need for high capacity magazines when hunting. If you need a magazine with 30+ rounds to kill a single dear, you're a terrible shooter and need to get your butt in the range and practice.

However, I'm always open to hear others opinions on these matters because everyone has a different background and perspective.

[Scurvy Cur]

.

what an odd thing to post delete?

it was kind of embarrassing

What's embarrassing about essentially copy/pasting the Libertarian Party platform? I mean, I agree with like 70% of it

And then there's the 30% of it that either expends an inordinate amount of energy on fringe issues, or veers into an-cap "we don't need the government concerned with currency/police/schools/roads/etc." nonsense territory, which is pretty unfortunate.

[Hennessy]

. If you need a magazine with 30+ rounds to kill a single dear, you're a terrible shooter and need to get your butt in the range and practice.

tcr

[amta]

favorite pony car?

also aren't you the one who turned up his nose at my cadillac lol

i really like early 70s cameros. and i didn't turn my nose up, i just said it wasn't luxury lol.

[waldorf]

The last day of work before vacation moves by at a literal glacial pace

[waldorf]

also my car is my baby and I treat her as such

[amta]

The NRA is so extremist it's ridiculous. I'm all for guns, but I agree with background checks. I also think that someone with a history of domestic violence should not be allowed to legally own a gun. Same for extreme mental illness. Gun registries are a terrible idea. Limiting magazine capacity makes sense when considering a mass shooter situation. And I call BS on the need for high capacity magazines when hunting. If you need a magazine with 30+ rounds to kill a single dear, you're a terrible shooter and need to get your butt in the range and practice.

However, I'm always open to hear others opinions on these matters because everyone has a different background and perspective.

i need high capacity mags for when i have to answer 1984 with 1776. anyone who argues you need a 30 round mag for hunting is huffing glue.

[chargers21]

.

[amta]

I don't have 30 round mags for hunting. I have 30 round mags for the same reason the government does

from the central texas command center in the heart of the resistance.

[luckyirish13]

.

what an odd thing to post delete?

it was kind of embarrassing

What's embarrassing about essentially copy/pasting the Libertarian Party platform? I mean, I agree with like 70% of it

i just meant it was embarrassing to post your political opinion and then delete it

but he explained it's cuz he's not c/o 2020, which is understandable

but also, you are welcome here luckyirish13

ty. And yeah I'm not embarrassed about those beliefs at all I just noticed the thread title after initially commenting and wasn't sure if I should join in. Mainly my reasoning behind libertarianism is the concept of avoiding centralized power. It seems clear from history that no political system is perfect or can last, due to humanities inherent flaws, so then it's a question of what system can provide the fundamental purposes of a government, while not intruding on another persons freedom. My answer is that localized control is the best solution, since what works in Alabama might be completely different from what works in Sweden, or Nevada, so implementing one size fits all standards will necessarily constrict the opportunities for people in certain localities. That's why I would prefer for a limited federal system that allows localities to mostly govern themselves.

[waldorf]

. If you need a magazine with 30+ rounds to kill a single dear, you're a terrible shooter and need to get your butt in the range and practice.

tcr

I don't have 30 round mags for hunting. I have 30 round mags for the same reason the government does

+1

Although when I carry I just have a 8 round mag

[forum_user]

I don't have 30 round mags for hunting. I have 30 round mags for the same reason the government does

So what exactly is your plan in the event that the government suddenly declares war on you? Do you also have an arsenal of tanks, bombers, drones, heavy artillery, stealth fighters, etc., and highly trained operatives?

[chargers21]

.

[amta]

I don't have 30 round mags for hunting. I have 30 round mags for the same reason the government does

So what exactly is your plan in the event that the government suddenly declares war on you? Do you also have an arsenal of tanks, bombers, drones, heavy artillery, stealth fighters, etc., and highly trained operatives?

factors not dispositive to the right of owning high capacity magazines

[Hennessy]

.

[luckyirish13]

I don't have 30 round mags for hunting. I have 30 round mags for the same reason the government does

So what exactly is your plan in the event that the government suddenly declares war on you? Do you also have an arsenal of tanks, bombers, drones, heavy artillery, stealth fighters, etc., and highly trained operatives?

factors not dispositive to the right of owning high capacity magazines

I'm not sure about this. Do people have an inherent right to own chemical weapons? Nuclear weapons? Biological weapons?

[jstans]

On the topic of guns, how do y'all feel about concealed carry on college campuses? The Chancellor at my UG just had to send all of the students info on where we can carry guns on campus and how to get licensed for it, since my state passed a law mandating concealed carry be allowed on public state campuses despite the general opposition to it by the college community. They did, however, remove the provision allowing guns to be carried at football games because the SEC was against it.

[amta]

I'm not sure about this. Do people have an inherent right to own chemical weapons? Nuclear weapons? Biological weapons?

i mean, i have a very lockean conception of government by tacit consent and right to revolution. i think citizens have a right to any weaponry the government posses, which i understand is unrealistic, but i'm speaking theoretically. high capacity magazines and armalite rifles are just practical applications of that theory.