Just have them read it. Then you'll know.Burger in a can wrote:It sounds like 'hold' letters are also small envelopes, but idk...eberl032 wrote:My parents let me know that I recieved a letter from BC. Not a package, just a normal sized letterDoes this mean Im out? I wont be able to get it till the 23rd when I go home.
BC Law 2010 Forum
-
krispykitten

- Posts: 441
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
-
dms87

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Sorry buddy. Good luck with the rest of your cycle.kalvano wrote:Finally arrived, small envelope.
Oh well, such is life.
- kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: BC Law 2010
Burger in a can wrote:Sorry man.kalvano wrote:Finally arrived, small envelope.
Oh well, such is life.
dms87 wrote:Sorry buddy. Good luck with the rest of your cycle.kalvano wrote:Finally arrived, small envelope.
Oh well, such is life.
It's one of those schools I was hoping for but not planning on.
I will be nice to children for a week if I get in to BU.
Good luck to everyone still waiting / held.
-
krispykitten

- Posts: 441
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
I'm really sorry to hear itkalvano wrote:Burger in a can wrote:Sorry man.kalvano wrote:Finally arrived, small envelope.
Oh well, such is life.It's one of those schools I was hoping for but not planning on.dms87 wrote:Sorry buddy. Good luck with the rest of your cycle.kalvano wrote:Finally arrived, small envelope.
Oh well, such is life.
I will be nice to children for a week if I get in to BU.
Good luck to everyone still waiting / held.
- kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: BC Law 2010
Oddly, it doesn't really make me that sad. I knew it was such a long shot.
But I highly encourage anyone who thinks there is even a .02% chance to apply, so you know for sure. I much prefer having tried and knowing for sure than wondering 15 years down the road.
Besides, I got into a T50 yesterday (Wake Forest), which was my goal when I began applying, so that kind of offset any disappointment. Now if I can just crack T30, I will be unbelievably happy.
But I highly encourage anyone who thinks there is even a .02% chance to apply, so you know for sure. I much prefer having tried and knowing for sure than wondering 15 years down the road.
Besides, I got into a T50 yesterday (Wake Forest), which was my goal when I began applying, so that kind of offset any disappointment. Now if I can just crack T30, I will be unbelievably happy.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
krispykitten

- Posts: 441
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Hey, congrats! (And thanks for finding the info on their ED program)kalvano wrote:Oddly, it doesn't really make me that sad. I knew it was such a long shot.
But I highly encourage anyone who thinks there is even a .02% chance to apply, so you know for sure. I much prefer having tried and knowing for sure than wondering 15 years down the road.
Besides, I got into a T50 yesterday (Wake Forest), which was my goal when I began applying, so that kind of offset any disappointment. Now if I can just crack T30, I will be unbelievably happy.
-
BoomBoom1986

- Posts: 146
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:37 am
Re: BC Law 2010
I got a call from Minnesota informing me that I got accepted there on the same day that I got a rejection letter from BC. Well, Minnesota > BC so BC can go fuck themselves.
-
Unadilla Kayaker

- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:01 am
Re: BC Law 2010
I'd like to be able to say this but sadly cannot yet.BoomBoom1986 wrote:I got a call from Minnesota informing me that I got accepted there on the same day that I got a rejection letter from BC. Well, Minnesota > BC so BC can go fuck themselves.
-
Burger in a can

- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Well, congrats on Wake Forest, and good luck with the rest of your cycle. BC is being so unpredictable so I don't think that this means anything in terms of your chances elsewhere. You obviously don't need anyone to tell you that, though.kalvano wrote:Oddly, it doesn't really make me that sad. I knew it was such a long shot.
But I highly encourage anyone who thinks there is even a .02% chance to apply, so you know for sure. I much prefer having tried and knowing for sure than wondering 15 years down the road.
Besides, I got into a T50 yesterday (Wake Forest), which was my goal when I began applying, so that kind of offset any disappointment. Now if I can just crack T30, I will be unbelievably happy.
-
tram988

- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
silly bitterness...BC could say the same to you! Oh wait..they already did.BoomBoom1986 wrote:I got a call from Minnesota informing me that I got accepted there on the same day that I got a rejection letter from BC. Well, Minnesota > BC so BC can go fuck themselves.
-
BoomBoom1986

- Posts: 146
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:37 am
Re: BC Law 2010
Yeah, but they can't say BC > Minnesota. Minnesota can say they're > BC, though. hehe Yay for the rankings making me feel better, haha.Burger in a can wrote:Well, congrats on Wake Forest, and good luck with the rest of your cycle. BC is being so unpredictable so I don't think that this means anything in terms of your chances elsewhere. You obviously don't need anyone to tell you that, though.kalvano wrote:Oddly, it doesn't really make me that sad. I knew it was such a long shot.
But I highly encourage anyone who thinks there is even a .02% chance to apply, so you know for sure. I much prefer having tried and knowing for sure than wondering 15 years down the road.
Besides, I got into a T50 yesterday (Wake Forest), which was my goal when I began applying, so that kind of offset any disappointment. Now if I can just crack T30, I will be unbelievably happy.
-
ViP

- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
(insert lay prestige factor)BoomBoom1986 wrote:Yeah, but they can't say BC > Minnesota. Minnesota can say they're > BC, though. hehe Yay for the rankings making me feel better, haha.Burger in a can wrote:Well, congrats on Wake Forest, and good luck with the rest of your cycle. BC is being so unpredictable so I don't think that this means anything in terms of your chances elsewhere. You obviously don't need anyone to tell you that, though.kalvano wrote:Oddly, it doesn't really make me that sad. I knew it was such a long shot.
But I highly encourage anyone who thinks there is even a .02% chance to apply, so you know for sure. I much prefer having tried and knowing for sure than wondering 15 years down the road.
Besides, I got into a T50 yesterday (Wake Forest), which was my goal when I began applying, so that kind of offset any disappointment. Now if I can just crack T30, I will be unbelievably happy.
Sorry, it was too tempting.
-
tram988

- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
ViP wrote:(insert lay prestige factor)BoomBoom1986 wrote:Yeah, but they can't say BC > Minnesota. Minnesota can say they're > BC, though. hehe Yay for the rankings making me feel better, haha.Burger in a can wrote:Well, congrats on Wake Forest, and good luck with the rest of your cycle. BC is being so unpredictable so I don't think that this means anything in terms of your chances elsewhere. You obviously don't need anyone to tell you that, though.kalvano wrote:Oddly, it doesn't really make me that sad. I knew it was such a long shot.
But I highly encourage anyone who thinks there is even a .02% chance to apply, so you know for sure. I much prefer having tried and knowing for sure than wondering 15 years down the road.
Besides, I got into a T50 yesterday (Wake Forest), which was my goal when I began applying, so that kind of offset any disappointment. Now if I can just crack T30, I will be unbelievably happy.
Sorry, it was too tempting.
Haha exactly! 20 v. 26 is negligible. I'd rather have access to the Boston job market
Last edited by tram988 on Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Burger in a can

- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
I know, right? Their mashed potatoes aren't that great, but goddamn, they have some tasty-ass chicken!tram988 wrote:
Haha exactly! 20 v. 26 is negligible. I'd rather have access to the Boston market
EDIT- oh man, you edited and now my joke makes no sense.
Last edited by Burger in a can on Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
tram988

- Posts: 1160
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
hahahaha! You beat me to my edit.Burger in a can wrote:I know, right? Their mashed potatoes aren't that great, but goddamn, they have some tasty-ass chicken!tram988 wrote:
Haha exactly! 20 v. 26 is negligible. I'd rather have access to the Boston market
-
lfgsuperman

- Posts: 154
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 2:39 am
Re: BC Law 2010
PLZ HELP!!!!!! I haven't heard anything from BC yet, no mail and no e-mail. should I be worried or is this a good sign? I checked my status checker and it still says pending decision. Why is everybody else hearing back already except for me?
- kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: BC Law 2010
lfgsuperman wrote:PLZ HELP!!!!!! I haven't heard anything from BC yet, no mail and no e-mail. should I be worried or is this a good sign? I checked my status checker and it still says pending decision. Why is everybody else hearing back already except for me?
Did you apply EA?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Burger in a can

- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
+1. In case you didn't know:kalvano wrote:lfgsuperman wrote:PLZ HELP!!!!!! I haven't heard anything from BC yet, no mail and no e-mail. should I be worried or is this a good sign? I checked my status checker and it still says pending decision. Why is everybody else hearing back already except for me?
Did you apply EA?
You have to indicate this on the application form. My application was complete on 11/16 but I was still not considered for Early Notification because I didn't check the box. (on purpose)For applicants whose applications are submitted by November 1, with the personal statement and fee, and whose files are complete, with both recommendations and LSDAS report, by November 23, 2009, we shall send an admission decision by December 15, 2009. Should you be admitted to the law school, it is a non-binding decision and you would not be required to submit a tuition deposit earlier than mid-April. If you wish to apply to the early notification program, please indicate so on the application for admission. Early notification applicants must take the LSAT no later than the October administration.
- BC2010

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 am
Re: BC Law 2010
Just to put in my 2 cents (this is all just in my personal experience). There are 14 national schools. They didn't arbitrarily pick 14 for the cutoff number for elite law schools, there just only are 14 of them. If you crack into the T-14, you are set: you do the best dance move you know how to and you accept and you go and have a pretty legit life. After that things get complicated...BoomBoom1986 wrote: I got a call from Minnesota informing me that I got accepted there on the same day that I got a rejection letter from BC. Well, Minnesota > BC so BC can go fuck themselves.
The next 86 schools (considered Tier 1) are regional schools. Each regional job market could construct their own rankings. If you are a vagabond with no cultural or familial ties to a region, then you can apply the USNWR ranking (you would also have a pretty original PS). But for those of us with ties to a region, NE in my example, the rankings take on a new form.
I've got a friend who got into USC last year but he went to Fordham because his entire family and all of his political connections were in NYC. I know for a fact that Nixon Peabody in Boston doesn't have MNLaw Recruitment in their rolodex, and haven't interviewed a MN grad in the past 30 years.
Basically what I'm saying is, if you want to know which school in the T-14 has been naughty or nice and lost/jumped a spot, use USNWR. If you want to know what regional school is better, look at job placement in the region you want to move to in 3 years.
- BC2010

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 am
Re: BC Law 2010
Having said that, MN law has an incredible program and great job placement in their market. So congrats on that! And don't take my rant on the USNWR as anything personal.
-
MissLucky

- Posts: 903
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
I feel like this applies to BIGLaw only...no?pmomnie wrote:Just to put in my 2 cents (this is all just in my personal experience). There are 14 national schools. They didn't arbitrarily pick 14 for the cutoff number for elite law schools, there just only are 14 of them. If you crack into the T-14, you are set: you do the best dance move you know how to and you accept and you go and have a pretty legit life. After that things get complicated...BoomBoom1986 wrote: I got a call from Minnesota informing me that I got accepted there on the same day that I got a rejection letter from BC. Well, Minnesota > BC so BC can go fuck themselves.
The next 86 schools (considered Tier 1) are regional schools. Each regional job market could construct their own rankings. If you are a vagabond with no cultural or familial ties to a region, then you can apply the USNWR ranking (you would also have a pretty original PS). But for those of us with ties to a region, NE in my example, the rankings take on a new form.
I've got a friend who got into USC last year but he went to Fordham because his entire family and all of his political connections were in NYC. I know for a fact that Nixon Peabody in Boston doesn't have MNLaw Recruitment in their rolodex, and haven't interviewed a MN grad in the past 30 years.
Basically what I'm saying is, if you want to know which school in the T-14 has been naughty or nice and lost/jumped a spot, use USNWR. If you want to know what regional school is better, look at job placement in the region you want to move to in 3 years.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- danidancer

- Posts: 841
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:46 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
One could also argue that Vandy, UCLA, and to an extent Texas, are "national" as well...pmomnie wrote:Just to put in my 2 cents (this is all just in my personal experience). There are 14 national schools. They didn't arbitrarily pick 14 for the cutoff number for elite law schools, there just only are 14 of them. If you crack into the T-14, you are set: you do the best dance move you know how to and you accept and you go and have a pretty legit life. After that things get complicated...BoomBoom1986 wrote: I got a call from Minnesota informing me that I got accepted there on the same day that I got a rejection letter from BC. Well, Minnesota > BC so BC can go fuck themselves.
The next 86 schools (considered Tier 1) are regional schools. Each regional job market could construct their own rankings. If you are a vagabond with no cultural or familial ties to a region, then you can apply the USNWR ranking (you would also have a pretty original PS). But for those of us with ties to a region, NE in my example, the rankings take on a new form.
I've got a friend who got into USC last year but he went to Fordham because his entire family and all of his political connections were in NYC. I know for a fact that Nixon Peabody in Boston doesn't have MNLaw Recruitment in their rolodex, and haven't interviewed a MN grad in the past 30 years.
Basically what I'm saying is, if you want to know which school in the T-14 has been naughty or nice and lost/jumped a spot, use USNWR. If you want to know what regional school is better, look at job placement in the region you want to move to in 3 years.
- jay115

- Posts: 449
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:01 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
in at BC! jeez, i wish i had political connections...danidancer wrote:One could also argue that Vandy, UCLA, and to an extent Texas, are "national" as well...pmomnie wrote:Just to put in my 2 cents (this is all just in my personal experience). There are 14 national schools. They didn't arbitrarily pick 14 for the cutoff number for elite law schools, there just only are 14 of them. If you crack into the T-14, you are set: you do the best dance move you know how to and you accept and you go and have a pretty legit life. After that things get complicated...BoomBoom1986 wrote: I got a call from Minnesota informing me that I got accepted there on the same day that I got a rejection letter from BC. Well, Minnesota > BC so BC can go fuck themselves.
The next 86 schools (considered Tier 1) are regional schools. Each regional job market could construct their own rankings. If you are a vagabond with no cultural or familial ties to a region, then you can apply the USNWR ranking (you would also have a pretty original PS). But for those of us with ties to a region, NE in my example, the rankings take on a new form.
I've got a friend who got into USC last year but he went to Fordham because his entire family and all of his political connections were in NYC. I know for a fact that Nixon Peabody in Boston doesn't have MNLaw Recruitment in their rolodex, and haven't interviewed a MN grad in the past 30 years.
Basically what I'm saying is, if you want to know which school in the T-14 has been naughty or nice and lost/jumped a spot, use USNWR. If you want to know what regional school is better, look at job placement in the region you want to move to in 3 years.
-
Burger in a can

- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
Looking at your acceptance record and you numbers, I'd be surprised if you didn't.jay115 wrote:
in at BC! jeez, i wish i had political connections...
-
FreddyBigShot

- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:51 pm
Re: BC Law 2010
(insert lay prestige factor)Yeah, but they can't say BC > Minnesota. Minnesota can say they're > BC, though. hehe Yay for the rankings making me feel better, haha.
Sorry, it was too tempting.
Boston still has a job market???Haha exactly! 20 v. 26 is negligible. I'd rather have access to the Boston job marketI'd take BC over Minnesota any day no questions asked.
All kidding aside, from what I've read in other forums the 3Ls at Minny have a brighter future (at least in the shirt-term) than their counterparts at BC. But you're also right, in that the difference is negligible...but still, there is a difference.
Both schools are in awesome cities, though.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login