Thanks T-14!t-14orbust wrote:@UChicagoLawAppsandapieceoftoast wrote:Does anyone know the twitter handle of UChi? Last year it looks like they gave ppl heads up on when batches were coming out just like NU does.
Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
andapieceoftoast wrote:Thanks T-14!t-14orbust wrote:@UChicagoLawAppsandapieceoftoast wrote:Does anyone know the twitter handle of UChi? Last year it looks like they gave ppl heads up on when batches were coming out just like NU does.


- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Ha. Please tell me you know something I don't. Because this cycle...hooooo boy. I am one burnt piece of toast.t-14orbust wrote:andapieceoftoast wrote:Thanks T-14!t-14orbust wrote:@UChicagoLawAppsandapieceoftoast wrote:Does anyone know the twitter handle of UChi? Last year it looks like they gave ppl heads up on when batches were coming out just like NU does.congrats in advance on your UCHI acceptance
- midwest17
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
The warning about the Green Line stop is overstated. It's fine in groups during the day. I'd be cautious about going alone (though I've done it), and I probably wouldn't go at night.2014 wrote:Hyde Park gets discussed periodically in the Ask a student thread, read it if you are bored some day.
In terms of safety, Hyde Park is completely fine. There are moderately dangerous areas surrounding it, but you have no reason to ever be in those areas so it's fine.
In terms of things to do/places to eat, Hyde Park is alright. There are definitely options, and they have done a good job developing the little downtown area which has several restaurants (including a Chipotle now!) and a movie theatre. There is really only one full service grocery store, but Hyde Park Produce is exceptional for produce. It's close to the lake which is nice if you like to walk/jog on lake shore. Transportation north is pretty accessible too. The 6 and 28 both stop at several convenient locations and will get you to the loop and the 2 despite running on a more limited schedule does the same. You will never and should never take the Green Line from Hyde Park, it is in one of the aforementioned areas you are unlikely to want to wander into lol.
The biggest pull for Hyde Park is that ~80%+ of the 1L class lives there and of the 1Ls in HP, like 75% of them live in one high rise building called Regents. Regents as a building is somewhat expensive, but it is very convenient, has a gym, restaurant, pool, coffee shop, etc. It also has like 1000 units so there is always availability which is nice. Views are very good depending on what side of the building you are on. The #1 factor though is that since the rest of the class is there, being there has huge social benefits since you can hang out with your classmates without either you or them having to commute to each other. It's a great way to get to know your classmates and something I really appreciated it. In large part because of Regents/living in Hyde Park, I can pretty much name all of my classmates and have had conversations with most outside of school. It's basically U.Chi's version of Michigan's law quad thing or other schools that do law dorms, except these are full private apartments. Bus to school is 100 feet from the door too and free.
That said, the 55 to the Garfield Red Line stop is also a good way to get downtown.
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 11:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Thanks for all the information! I will definitely check out the other threads too.2014 wrote:Hyde Park gets discussed periodically in the Ask a student thread, read it if you are bored some day.
In terms of safety, Hyde Park is completely fine. There are moderately dangerous areas surrounding it, but you have no reason to ever be in those areas so it's fine.
In terms of things to do/places to eat, Hyde Park is alright. There are definitely options, and they have done a good job developing the little downtown area which has several restaurants (including a Chipotle now!) and a movie theatre. There is really only one full service grocery store, but Hyde Park Produce is exceptional for produce. It's close to the lake which is nice if you like to walk/jog on lake shore. Transportation north is pretty accessible too. The 6 and 28 both stop at several convenient locations and will get you to the loop and the 2 despite running on a more limited schedule does the same. You will never and should never take the Green Line from Hyde Park, it is in one of the aforementioned areas you are unlikely to want to wander into lol.
The biggest pull for Hyde Park is that ~80%+ of the 1L class lives there and of the 1Ls in HP, like 75% of them live in one high rise building called Regents. Regents as a building is somewhat expensive, but it is very convenient, has a gym, restaurant, pool, coffee shop, etc. It also has like 1000 units so there is always availability which is nice. Views are very good depending on what side of the building you are on. The #1 factor though is that since the rest of the class is there, being there has huge social benefits since you can hang out with your classmates without either you or them having to commute to each other. It's a great way to get to know your classmates and something I really appreciated it. In large part because of Regents/living in Hyde Park, I can pretty much name all of my classmates and have had conversations with most outside of school. It's basically U.Chi's version of Michigan's law quad thing or other schools that do law dorms, except these are full private apartments. Bus to school is 100 feet from the door too and free.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lastsamurai
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
lol'd irlandapieceoftoast wrote:
Ha. Please tell me you know something I don't. Because this cycle...hooooo boy. I am one burnt piece of toast.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I like my toast a little crispyandapieceoftoast wrote:Ha. Please tell me you know something I don't. Because this cycle...hooooo boy. I am one burnt piece of toast.t-14orbust wrote:andapieceoftoast wrote: Thanks T-14!congrats in advance on your UCHI acceptance

- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I like my toast slathered with acceptances, but alas...t-14orbust wrote:I like my toast a little crispyandapieceoftoast wrote:Ha. Please tell me you know something I don't. Because this cycle...hooooo boy. I am one burnt piece of toast.t-14orbust wrote:andapieceoftoast wrote: Thanks T-14!congrats in advance on your UCHI acceptance

- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Common wisdom is yes for alumni interviews, no for interviews with adcoms.anubis1911 wrote:Is it proper etiquette to send a thank you note after the interview? I don't want to screw up on something so dumb.
- t14splitter
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:07 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I sent one anyway. Can't hurt to be polite.lawschool22 wrote:Common wisdom is yes for alumni interviews, no for interviews with adcoms.anubis1911 wrote:Is it proper etiquette to send a thank you note after the interview? I don't want to screw up on something so dumb.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I don't think it will hurt, but KB has said she rarely read them unless someone in the office specifically passed it on to her for some reason. They get a TON of emails, have a ton of stuff to read at this time of the year, I think I'd rather just not bug them. But again, it's not going to hurt you so it probably doesn't matter either way.t14splitter wrote:I sent one anyway. Can't hurt to be polite.lawschool22 wrote:Common wisdom is yes for alumni interviews, no for interviews with adcoms.anubis1911 wrote:Is it proper etiquette to send a thank you note after the interview? I don't want to screw up on something so dumb.
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0
Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH

Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH







- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
It doesn't matter either way. I wouldn't bother.t14splitter wrote:I sent one anyway. Can't hurt to be polite.lawschool22 wrote:Common wisdom is yes for alumni interviews, no for interviews with adcoms.anubis1911 wrote:Is it proper etiquette to send a thank you note after the interview? I don't want to screw up on something so dumb.
Also awww @ Sabine. Li Na in Melbourne last year was like saddest ever though.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Might as well kick back and relax right??? No point in stressing right???koalacity wrote:Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0
Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yea right!

- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
MARCHOsaroLJ wrote:Might as well kick back and relax right??? No point in stressing right???koalacity wrote:Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0
Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yea right!

- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
MARCH?!?!?!?!koalacity wrote:MARCHOsaroLJ wrote:Might as well kick back and relax right??? No point in stressing right???koalacity wrote:Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0
Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yea right!



Oh wait, my RC sucks. I wasn't a December submit.
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I waslawschool22 wrote: MARCH?!?!?!?!
![]()
![]()
Oh wait, my RC sucks. I wasn't a December submit.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- midwest17
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Yeah, but you're you.koalacity wrote:MARCHOsaroLJ wrote:Might as well kick back and relax right??? No point in stressing right???koalacity wrote:Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0
Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yea right!

- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
koalacity wrote:I waslawschool22 wrote: MARCH?!?!?!?!
![]()
![]()
Oh wait, my RC sucks. I wasn't a December submit.
I submitted in Jan!




- caiti
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:46 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I submitted early Dec and just got an interview request, so I don't think that timeline will apply this year.koalacity wrote:Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0
Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- rutgers17
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:43 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
+1caiti wrote:I submitted early Dec and just got an interview request, so I don't think that timeline will apply this year.koalacity wrote:Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0
Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nonconsecutive
- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Wasn't Chicago moving faster in general this year though? Meaning that I'd be surprised if the December > March Invite thing held up again.caiti wrote:I submitted early Dec and just got an interview request, so I don't think that timeline will apply this year.koalacity wrote:Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0
Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
When they say 14 days do they mean that we need to sign up for a time in the next 14 days or that that time needs to be within the next 14 days? The earliest time available for me is in February...
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
sign up within 14 daysc0llegeStUd3nt wrote:When they say 14 days do they mean that we need to sign up for a time in the next 14 days or that that time needs to be within the next 14 days? The earliest time available for me is in February...
- thechancellor
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Just finished my interview, it was exactly what I expected/what you all have said, no surprises. I prepped responses for the recommended questions which were all I was asked and it seemed to go smoothly, though we'll see if he thinks so
good luck to anyone getting ready for theirs!

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login