William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- espressocream
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:51 am
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yea, but I drove 20 hours from Springfield, MO for a bike race here in NYC already. After that, what's another 7?ironbmike wrote:W&M is pretty far from NYC, just FYINomoretickets wrote:Just was placed on the waitlist today. I'll be visiting them next week, since I'm already in NYC to visit Cardozo. Anyone have advice for fighting your way off the waitlist?
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Good lordNomoretickets wrote:Yea, but I drove 20 hours from Springfield, MO for a bike race here in NYC already. After that, what's another 7?ironbmike wrote:W&M is pretty far from NYC, just FYINomoretickets wrote:Just was placed on the waitlist today. I'll be visiting them next week, since I'm already in NYC to visit Cardozo. Anyone have advice for fighting your way off the waitlist?

-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:22 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yea, I'm aware that I'm crazy. But it was more expensive for me to ship my bike as luggage or FedEx than to buy a second plane ticket and put it in the seat next to me. Where's the logic in that?ironbmike wrote:Good lordNomoretickets wrote:Yea, but I drove 20 hours from Springfield, MO for a bike race here in NYC already. After that, what's another 7?ironbmike wrote:W&M is pretty far from NYC, just FYINomoretickets wrote:Just was placed on the waitlist today. I'll be visiting them next week, since I'm already in NYC to visit Cardozo. Anyone have advice for fighting your way off the waitlist?Well, enjoy the drive, and I hope you avoid rush hour!
Caught the rush hour into NYC this morning unfortionatly
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:56 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waitlisted this morning too, everyone. Pleased to finally get a response; planning on riding out the waitlist and seeing what happens. This is my second waitlist. Certainly not the news I was hoping for when I applied, but it beats a rejection.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ariadne328
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:38 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
One final note. I just logged on to the status checker, which I hadn't checked since getting my WL notification and then withdrawing this morning, and my file is still listed as "in review." So, for anyone still waiting (or intrepid applicants looking back at this thread next cycle), apparently your status checker is relatively removed from the actual decision process.
Again, good luck everyone!

Again, good luck everyone!
- hailcaesar34
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:03 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Should we tour/interview before we write our LOCI or does it not matter.
-
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 2:26 am
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Presonal choice but I say it gives you more to write about if you do. How it fits well and stuff etc.hailcaesar34 wrote:Should we tour/interview before we write our LOCI or does it not matter.
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:57 am
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I absolutely agree, lol. To those accepted, congrats. If anyone has questions regarding Thrilliamsburg feel free to PM me.lhanvt13 wrote:Your alma mater sucks at being decisive1693 wrote:Waitlisted 2 years in a row, WM alum as well. Needless to say I am done with my alma mater, lol.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 8:40 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waitlisted today. Probably going to ride it out until at least mid May, but I don't know after that....
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So I guess the deposit deadline is May 1?
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:37 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
There is an "intent" form you need to fill out by April 1 I think, but deposit date is May 1, which is awesome compared to other schools!ironbmike wrote:So I guess the deposit deadline is May 1?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah I did the hold my seat for the intent form, I just want to make sure I'm not missing anything - because it seems too good to be true.illiniguy1551 wrote:There is an "intent" form you need to fill out by April 1 I think, but deposit date is May 1, which is awesome compared to other schools!ironbmike wrote:So I guess the deposit deadline is May 1?
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:37 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
New LST Score Reports, W & M kicked some ass.
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=wm
edit: except for the large amount of school funded jobs
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=wm
edit: except for the large amount of school funded jobs
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Still a 2% increase even with those taken out.illiniguy1551 wrote:New LST Score Reports, W & M kicked some ass.
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=wm
edit: except for the large amount of school funded jobs
- Greyhound42
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 3:46 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Does anyone know what the nature of W & M's "school-funded" jobs are?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Don't know. Also I am curious as to why they have so many this year as opposed to last year. Did they not report them last year, or report them as something else, or not have them? If the LT, FT, BR scores is roughly the same (actually went up), where did the mass of school-employed grads come out of?Greyhound42 wrote:Does anyone know what the nature of W & M's "school-funded" jobs are?
-
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:38 am
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I believe the grand majority of W&M's school funded jobs are part of a growing trend that many schools refer to as legal corp. These are PI jobs that in which the school pays your salary as part of a year-long placement. From what I understand these placements usually result in a job after the first year or students have lined up work in the private sector by then. It's not big law, but it's also not working in the admissions office, pushing papers. Not a bad thing if you ask me.ironbmike wrote:Don't know. Also I am curious as to why they have so many this year as opposed to last year. Did they not report them last year, or report them as something else, or not have them? If the LT, FT, BR scores is roughly the same (actually went up), where did the mass of school-employed grads come out of?Greyhound42 wrote:Does anyone know what the nature of W & M's "school-funded" jobs are?
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hm good to know. I wonder if it's a new program or if they just reported these grads as unemployed before 2012?Aroldis105 wrote:I believe the grand majority of W&M's school funded jobs are part of a growing trend that many schools refer to as legal corp. These are PI jobs that in which the school pays your salary as part of a year-long placement. From what I understand these placements usually result in a job after the first year or students have lined up work in the private sector by then. It's not big law, but it's also not working in the admissions office, pushing papers. Not a bad thing if you ask me.ironbmike wrote:Don't know. Also I am curious as to why they have so many this year as opposed to last year. Did they not report them last year, or report them as something else, or not have them? If the LT, FT, BR scores is roughly the same (actually went up), where did the mass of school-employed grads come out of?Greyhound42 wrote:Does anyone know what the nature of W & M's "school-funded" jobs are?
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It's not a new thing at W&M, this is the first year schools are REQUIRED to disclose school funded jobs, the fact of the matter is they simply didn't have to report it as anything other than a legal job prior to this year.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No, look at the breakdown of numbers. 204 grads in 2011 and 2012. All the employments numbers remained basically the same EXCEPT that unemployed dropped in 2012 by a lot.wannabelawstudent wrote:It's not a new thing at W&M, this is the first year schools are REQUIRED to disclose school funded jobs, the fact of the matter is they simply didn't have to report it as anything other than a legal job prior to this year.
Edit: What I mean is that the school-employed jobs were not listed as FT, LT, BR jobs in 2011.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No, that's not unemployment that dropped, it UNDERemployment. These jobs were always there, its just now getting reported.ironbmike wrote:No, look at the breakdown of numbers. 204 grads in 2011 and 2012. All the employments numbers remained basically the same EXCEPT that unemployed dropped in 2012 by a lot.wannabelawstudent wrote:It's not a new thing at W&M, this is the first year schools are REQUIRED to disclose school funded jobs, the fact of the matter is they simply didn't have to report it as anything other than a legal job prior to this year.
- drinion
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:00 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If you look at the 2011 and 2012 ABA reports, you'll see that unemployment dropped drastically this past year.wannabelawstudent wrote:No, that's not unemployment that dropped, it UNDERemployment. These jobs were always there, its just now getting reported.ironbmike wrote:No, look at the breakdown of numbers. 204 grads in 2011 and 2012. All the employments numbers remained basically the same EXCEPT that unemployed dropped in 2012 by a lot.wannabelawstudent wrote:It's not a new thing at W&M, this is the first year schools are REQUIRED to disclose school funded jobs, the fact of the matter is they simply didn't have to report it as anything other than a legal job prior to this year.
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
2011wannabelawstudent wrote:No, that's not unemployment that dropped, it UNDERemployment. These jobs were always there, its just now getting reported.ironbmike wrote:No, look at the breakdown of numbers. 204 grads in 2011 and 2012. All the employments numbers remained basically the same EXCEPT that unemployed dropped in 2012 by a lot.wannabelawstudent wrote:It's not a new thing at W&M, this is the first year schools are REQUIRED to disclose school funded jobs, the fact of the matter is they simply didn't have to report it as anything other than a legal job prior to this year.
Employed, BR: 127
Employed, JD ad: 29
Employed, prof pos: 6
Employed, non-prof: 1
Pursuing grad degree: 8
Total unemployed + unknown: 33
2012
Employed, BR: 119 (-8)
Employed, JD ad: 22 (-7)
Employed, prof pos: 11 (+5)
Employed, non-prof: 0 (-1)
Pursuing grad degree: 3 (-5)
Total unemployed + unknown: 8 (-25)
School employed: 41
So where were the 2011 school-employed grads listed? Certainly not under bar required jobs. I believe they were mostly listed under unemployed in 2011. 41-25=16. So that leaves 16 more spots to be filled. 8+7+1? But why would school employed be listed in different categories? Strange.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login