A JS3!TheMostDangerousLG wrote:JS actually explicitly told me that.drawstring wrote:No. I figure that they made those calls because they were there for ASW.yomisterd wrote:Do we think JS will go two Sundays in a row?
.. I had an actual conversation with JS. Over wine. And she is super chill. Still reeling.
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- jasper09

- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 1:03 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
So incredibly, incomprehensibly jealous. Though if that's the case, I'm happy I can at least relax over the weekend. I was beginning to worry I needed to stockpile some wine to calm my nerves after today's wave.drawstring wrote:A JS3!TheMostDangerousLG wrote:JS actually explicitly told me that.drawstring wrote:No. I figure that they made those calls because they were there for ASW.yomisterd wrote:Do we think JS will go two Sundays in a row?
.. I had an actual conversation with JS. Over wine. And she is super chill. Still reeling.
- Plainsman11011

- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:36 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
So...to be clear, no JS2's today that we know of?
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Nope.Plainsman11011 wrote:So...to be clear, no JS2's today that we know of?
- PotenC

- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:13 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Well, at least I have UFC to look forward to over the weekend.
-
peaches9848

- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:36 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
gbelle wrote:Me. I've heard nothing since going complete mid October.peaches9848 wrote:I went complete in mid-November and have still not heard anything .. my numbers are well below both medians, but I'm still trying to remain positive
Anyone else in a similar boat with this long of a wait with no mention of an interview yet? Is it possible to be waitlisted and then be offered a JS1?
Oh phew, it's relieving to know I'm not alone. Have you submitted any follow-up materials? Do you think our applications are "held" even though it still says "complete"?
-
peaches9848

- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:36 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Oh, that's great to know! Thanks!Quest4Knowledge wrote:Yupp, there are applicants who are wait listed then given a JS1.peaches9848 wrote:Anyone else in a similar boat with this long of a wait with no mention of an interview yet? Is it possible to be waitlisted and then be offered a JS1?
- Nonconsecutive

- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I just finally realized what your new tar was, that is awesome.drawstring wrote:Nope.Plainsman11011 wrote:So...to be clear, no JS2's today that we know of?
- malleus discentium

- Posts: 906
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:30 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
JS3 MUST be a thing now.drawstring wrote:A JS3!TheMostDangerousLG wrote:JS actually explicitly told me that.drawstring wrote:No. I figure that they made those calls because they were there for ASW.yomisterd wrote:Do we think JS will go two Sundays in a row?
.. I had an actual conversation with JS. Over wine. And she is super chill. Still reeling.
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Tue May 13, 2014 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
wrong threadTheMostDangerousLG wrote:JS actually explicitly told me that.drawstring wrote:No. I figure that they made those calls because they were there for ASW.yomisterd wrote:Do we think JS will go two Sundays in a row?
.. I had an actual conversation with JS. Over wine. And she is super chill. Still reeling.
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Tue May 13, 2014 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
(she)FuriousDuck wrote:I think it's acceptable in this context. He did add some information that's useful to me as a waiter.
I was semi-kidding, FD.
- phillywc

- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
At risk of jinxing myself.. I'm still alive.
Radio silence since I submitted in 2013.
Radio silence since I submitted in 2013.
-
jdapplicant

- Posts: 251
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:05 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Really, really sorry about all of the dings.
I'm glad I was traveling all day and didn't know dings were going out. Ding days are bad days. Radio silence for almost 6 months now.
I'm glad I was traveling all day and didn't know dings were going out. Ding days are bad days. Radio silence for almost 6 months now.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
- KatyMarie

- Posts: 616
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Was he also a very serious career criminal? Otherwise I'm very scared.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
They said the interview didn't go well, but what does someone have to do in an interview to get straight up rejected with those numbers?
Thanks NC!Nonconsecutive wrote:I just finally realized what your new tar was, that is awesome.drawstring wrote:Nope.Plainsman11011 wrote:So...to be clear, no JS2's today that we know of?
- TheMostDangerousLG

- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Yeah, I was gonna just post that JS told me that, but then I realized "Yeah, JS told me that," is the kind of sentence that sounds like made-up BS and/or sarcastic speculation standing on its own. And then I couldn't elaborate on the fact that I actually had that conversation without stillscoobers wrote:(she)FuriousDuck wrote:I think it's acceptable in this context. He did add some information that's useful to me as a waiter.
I was semi-kidding, FD.
- Nonconsecutive

- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I wonder what happened during their JS1
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Tue May 13, 2014 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
sandclock

- Posts: 44
- Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:03 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
what even qualifies as a bad js1?Nonconsecutive wrote:
I wonder what happened during their JS1
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
jessica did not appreciate me flashing her during the interviewsandclock wrote:what even qualifies as a bad js1?Nonconsecutive wrote:
I wonder what happened during their JS1
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- PotenC

- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:13 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Someone who has an LSN account should send that boy/girl a message.
Last edited by PotenC on Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'm in contact with them already.PotenC wrote:Someone who has an LSN account should send that boy/girl a message.