Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- Mdenis1
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:06 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Two questions: 1) Do we have a "In at Berkeley" thread for admits? 2) Has anyone heard about scholarships from Berkeley yet?
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
- wbrother
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Well theoretically, the "TLS Class of X" section of the forum is supposed to provide what you described. The Berkeley one clearly doesn't so far. Maybe if they would admit more people (*cough*me*cough*) we could get that going.Wormfather wrote:Actually I could see merit in a "In at X" thread. If I know I'm attending X, I dont want undecideds muddying that thread up trying to figure out pros and cons while the rest of us try to figure out living arrangement's and stuff. The inverse also applies.Regulus wrote:We don't need individual "In at X" threads in the Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists section.... simply go to the "X Class of 2016" thread in the TLS Class of 2016 Forum and post there. (I think the "In at Harvard" thread was made just to spite all of us who didn't get inMdenis1 wrote:Two questions: 1) Do we have a "In at Berkeley" thread for admits? 2) Has anyone heard about scholarships from Berkeley yet?)
Here is the one for Berkeley.
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'm quite certain 159 means you're a 75%er.Korteja wrote:I'm saying that I am GOING to get in. I won't be so bold to predict any scholarship money, but I'm a 1%er so it doesn't really matter.
And yes, a 1%er worrying about the application fee is quite laughable. You should learn how to troll better.
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
wbrother wrote:Well theoretically, the "TLS Class of X" section of the forum is supposed to provide what you described. The Berkeley one clearly doesn't so far. Maybe if they would admit more people (*cough*me*cough*) we could get that going.Wormfather wrote:Actually I could see merit in a "In at X" thread. If I know I'm attending X, I dont want undecideds muddying that thread up trying to figure out pros and cons while the rest of us try to figure out living arrangement's and stuff. The inverse also applies.Regulus wrote:We don't need individual "In at X" threads in the Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists section.... simply go to the "X Class of 2016" thread in the TLS Class of 2016 Forum and post there. (I think the "In at Harvard" thread was made just to spite all of us who didn't get inMdenis1 wrote:Two questions: 1) Do we have a "In at Berkeley" thread for admits? 2) Has anyone heard about scholarships from Berkeley yet?)
Here is the one for Berkeley.
I would be HONORED to get to populate that thread.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Hate those bastards.Regulus wrote:Yes, but I wouldn't necessarily say that a nearly 0% chance = not worth applying. I thought the same thing at my application to Chicago this cycle, and they proved me wrong. (I lol'ed at your user profile, Ti Malice... in at Yale yet dinged by Chicago, eh?Ti Malice wrote:LSP is generally worthless; it's completely useless for splitters (traditional and reverse). As a non-URM, he/she has essentially zero chance of admission with a 159: http://myLSN.info/ooj7k5.)

And I agree with you that the poster's remote chances don't mean that he/she shouldn't apply. I just wanted to make it clear that LSP is pretty useless and that it in no way gives an accurate prediction of his/her chances.
Congrats to you on Chicago, by the way!
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 1:05 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Whoa chill chill everyone. To clarify:
My numbers and my desire to go to berkeley are very real. With that being said, I completely understand that the odds are definitely not in my favor, as such I was being facetious in my predictions and my 1% comment. I was just trying to bring a little levity to what can be a very stressful time for some people and not trying to troll or waste anyone's time. Best of luck to everyone, and I'll see some of you in Cali this August
My numbers and my desire to go to berkeley are very real. With that being said, I completely understand that the odds are definitely not in my favor, as such I was being facetious in my predictions and my 1% comment. I was just trying to bring a little levity to what can be a very stressful time for some people and not trying to troll or waste anyone's time. Best of luck to everyone, and I'll see some of you in Cali this August

- porch
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:43 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I didn't know Cooley was in California...Korteja wrote:Whoa chill chill everyone. To clarify:
My numbers and my desire to go to berkeley are very real. With that being said, I completely understand that the odds are definitely not in my favor, as such I was being facetious in my predictions and my 1% comment. I was just trying to bring a little levity to what can be a very stressful time for some people and not trying to troll or waste anyone's time. Best of luck to everyone, and I'll see some of you in Cali this August
Just kidding, best of luck maybe I'll see you there
- Justin Genious
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:01 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
159porch wrote:I didn't know Cooley was in California...Korteja wrote:Whoa chill chill everyone. To clarify:
My numbers and my desire to go to berkeley are very real. With that being said, I completely understand that the odds are definitely not in my favor, as such I was being facetious in my predictions and my 1% comment. I was just trying to bring a little levity to what can be a very stressful time for some people and not trying to troll or waste anyone's time. Best of luck to everyone, and I'll see some of you in Cali this August
Just kidding, best of luck maybe I'll see you there
- LexLeon
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:03 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
If you've misused semicolons in your application, it may hurt your chances at acceptance.Korteja wrote:Quick Question:
I have a 159 LSAT & 3.99 GPA. I understand I don't have ideal numbers for Berkeley, but I understand Berkeley to be more concerned with GPA than other top schools are and slightly less concerned with LSAT. With very liberal softs/essays/LORs that cater to Berkeley folk and applications down this year, the question is; do I have a shot? Is it worth the application fee? Already in at Miami & W&M with $$$. Thanks and Merry Christmas.
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
LexLeon wrote: If you've misused semicolons in your application, it may hurt your chances at acceptance.

- Mdenis1
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:06 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Oh thanks ! I hadn't been in that section of the forums yet!Regulus wrote:We don't need individual "In at X" threads in the Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists section.... simply go to the "X Class of 2016" thread in the TLS Class of 2016 Forum and post there. (I think the "In at Harvard" thread was made just to spite all of us who didn't get inMdenis1 wrote:Two questions: 1) Do we have a "In at Berkeley" thread for admits? 2) Has anyone heard about scholarships from Berkeley yet?)
Here is the one for Berkeley.
- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Has anyone received their admit packet yet?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Teflon_Don wrote:Has anyone received their admit packet yet?
Yes, took about 4/5 business days
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Around 2 weeks for meTeflon_Don wrote:Has anyone received their admit packet yet?
- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
From what? Is there a day that they were sent posted somewhere? Thanks
- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Or is that based off your admit date? I was admitted 12/4 and hadn't received anything as of Saturday
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I see... that was some very advanced sarcasm. I think it went over everyone's heads.Korteja wrote:Whoa chill chill everyone. To clarify:
My numbers and my desire to go to berkeley are very real. With that being said, I completely understand that the odds are definitely not in my favor, as such I was being facetious in my predictions and my 1% comment. I was just trying to bring a little levity to what can be a very stressful time for some people and not trying to troll or waste anyone's time. Best of luck to everyone, and I'll see some of you in Cali this August
- bobr
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:42 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
When does the first wave of faculty reviews come out? Thanks in advance
- sean21
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:45 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Last cycle came Jan 26bobr wrote:When does the first wave of faculty reviews come out? Thanks in advance
EDIT: But rejections came Jan. 9, so if you survive the wave of rejects there's a good chance you're committee
- DaRascal
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I didn't apply but I was wondering... What's the weather like in northern California? 

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
avg. of 50-60s all year around. warmest month is september. think of it as a perpetual period of fallDaRascal wrote:I didn't apply but I was wondering... What's the weather like in northern California?
- wbrother
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
It's hotter in Berkeley than it is in SF though. There will be some 70-80s sprinkled in all year round.
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
not in the 50s all that often. Only at night really. Not sure what part of Northern California you're from.djwjddl wrote:avg. of 50-60s all year around. warmest month is september. think of it as a perpetual period of fallDaRascal wrote:I didn't apply but I was wondering... What's the weather like in northern California?
I would say 60-70s year round in Berkeley.
- DaRascal
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Hmmm okay. So would you guys say it's warmer year round than it is in New York?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login