TLS c/o 2020 - In #Squad We Trust Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Rate this thread

10
10
83%
9
0
No votes
8
1
8%
7
0
No votes
6
0
No votes
5
0
No votes
4
0
No votes
3
1
8%
2
0
No votes
1
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 12

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

Silver
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:11 pm

Neo-Liberal shill :wink:

User avatar
RParadela

Silver
Posts: 858
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 1:04 am

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by RParadela » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:12 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
RParadela wrote:I think the question comes down to whether or not the government should protect people from theirselves. Even though I believe this is a generally unpopular opinion, I think government can smartly influence behavior as to decentivize certain negative behaviors in order to benefit the populace. I do think all drugs should be decriminalized, but I don't see how legalizing something like heroin is a good idea.
I definitely think the state has a solid interest in influencing the behavior of its citizenry, but I stop short of supporting laws that do it. Though the idea of the state using any of it's arms to try and coax out activity is probably one with fierce debate around it
Yeah, it's definitely a divisive issue, even among people that share otherwise similar ideologies. I'm a big supporter of changing food policy in this country, namely subsidizing vegetables and fruits and removing the subsidies to corn that causes cheap, shitty food to stay cheap. But many people would disagree on the ground that the free market should dictate food prices rather than the government stepping in and deciding which food is "better"

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Rigo » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:13 pm

Finally getting around to watching Survivor after traveling all week (but can't post in Survivor thread yet bc spoilers)

User avatar
TexasENG

Silver
Posts: 1075
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:31 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by TexasENG » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:13 pm

dclaw93 wrote:
Kopetz wrote:
airwrecka wrote:
Monday wrote:
Kopetz wrote:that 8-values politics quiz seems like a good way to spark postcount-inflating discussion/arguments. post ur stats:
Well, Kopetz and airwrecka, let's go build an echo chamber.
:lol: :lol:
like good leftists, we'll schism in no time
Right there with you guys https://8values.github.io/results.html? ... 7.3&s=83.7
Joining in on the echo chamber
[+] Spoiler
Image

User avatar
Smc1994

Silver
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Smc1994 » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:17 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
Neo-Liberal shill :wink:
If the Thank You for Smoking avatar didn't give it away...

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Kopetz

Bronze
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:06 am

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Kopetz » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:18 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
Neo-Liberal shill :wink:
clintonian neoliberalism: a classic flavor of the 90s, like orbitz or zima

User avatar
Smc1994

Silver
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Smc1994 » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:21 pm

.
Last edited by Smc1994 on Tue Apr 25, 2017 5:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dodocogon

Silver
Posts: 631
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:45 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Dodocogon » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:26 pm

I'll throw my hat in the ring
[+] Spoiler
Image
Personally surprised my 'Wealth/Equality" value isn't closer to 50/50. Probably my single-payer tendencies coming out.

User avatar
LSRAT

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:02 am

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by LSRAT » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:31 pm

Libertarian Socialism as well. Don't know how I feel about the accuracy of the test given the limit of the questions in number and scope, but can't say I wholly disagree.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by chandhi » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:31 pm

Checking into the echo chamber as a libertarian socialist. Also got almost 100% progress which apparently classifies me as a revolutionary.

User avatar
amta

Platinum
Posts: 9459
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by amta » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:32 pm

buncha liberal shills itt

Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Hennessy » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:33 pm

I agree with all my numbers except my equality percentage might be a little high.

https://8values.github.io/results.html? ... 8.4&s=91.3

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by chandhi » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:37 pm

HennessyVSOP wrote:I agree with all my numbers except my equality percentage might be a little high.

https://8values.github.io/results.html? ... 8.4&s=91.3
Our percentages are almost identical.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Hennessy » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:37 pm

chandhi wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:I agree with all my numbers except my equality percentage might be a little high.

https://8values.github.io/results.html? ... 8.4&s=91.3
Our percentages are almost identical.
Comrade.

User avatar
Gitaroo_Dude

Silver
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:06 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Gitaroo_Dude » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:39 pm

I'm boring and got Centrist.

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by chandhi » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:40 pm

HennessyVSOP wrote:
chandhi wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:I agree with all my numbers except my equality percentage might be a little high.

https://8values.github.io/results.html? ... 8.4&s=91.3
Our percentages are almost identical.
Comrade.
Revolutionary.

User avatar
amta

Platinum
Posts: 9459
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by amta » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:42 pm

some of the questions were very poorly phrased.

Image

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
thatlawlkid

Gold
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:06 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by thatlawlkid » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:44 pm

went to lunch and come back to people debating robot sexuality?

Ya'll need Jesus

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

Silver
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:45 pm

amta wrote:some of the questions were very poorly phrased.

Image
There's definitely better 8 point quizzes, but ultimately I think anyone can guess the answer to any of the questions so it's not hard to answer how you know yourself to be

User avatar
LSRAT

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:02 am

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by LSRAT » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:46 pm

HennessyVSOP wrote:
chandhi wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:I agree with all my numbers except my equality percentage might be a little high.

https://8values.github.io/results.html? ... 8.4&s=91.3
Our percentages are almost identical.
Comrade.
+180.
[+] Spoiler
Image

User avatar
LSRAT

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:02 am

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by LSRAT » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:49 pm

amta wrote:some of the questions were very poorly phrased.
[+] Spoiler
Image


I agree. For instance, "military spending is a waste of money." I think, barring some radical political viewpoints, most people would agree that at least some military spending is useful. The disagreement is usually over how much is excessive/necessary.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

Silver
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:59 pm

RParadela wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
RParadela wrote:I think the question comes down to whether or not the government should protect people from theirselves. Even though I believe this is a generally unpopular opinion, I think government can smartly influence behavior as to decentivize certain negative behaviors in order to benefit the populace. I do think all drugs should be decriminalized, but I don't see how legalizing something like heroin is a good idea.
I definitely think the state has a solid interest in influencing the behavior of its citizenry, but I stop short of supporting laws that do it. Though the idea of the state using any of it's arms to try and coax out activity is probably one with fierce debate around it
Yeah, it's definitely a divisive issue, even among people that share otherwise similar ideologies. I'm a big supporter of changing food policy in this country, namely subsidizing vegetables and fruits and removing the subsidies to corn that causes cheap, shitty food to stay cheap. But many people would disagree on the ground that the free market should dictate food prices rather than the government stepping in and deciding which food is "better"
Hold the fuck up, you want to ruin Kelly Frost's valiant corn efforts by doing away with subsidies???

Monster

User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by chargers21 » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:04 pm

.
Last edited by chargers21 on Sun Aug 27, 2017 4:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Instrumental

Silver
Posts: 1393
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Instrumental » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:05 pm

Image
seems about right.

User avatar
Kopetz

Bronze
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:06 am

Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (flexin pole)

Post by Kopetz » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:07 pm

LSRAT wrote:
amta wrote:some of the questions were very poorly phrased.
[+] Spoiler
Image


I agree. For instance, "military spending is a waste of money." I think, barring some radical political viewpoints, most people would agree that at least some military spending is useful. The disagreement is usually over how much is excessive/necessary.
That's a fair point. I think I implicitly read it as "[The current rate of] military spending [in the U.S. / by world powers] is a waste of money," which might explain both my peacenik score and my dismal performance on reading comp

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”