I emailed MAC because I remembered when I was negotiating with USC, emailing the specific dean really helped expedite my scholarship increase. Probably took less than 24 hours to get my increase.jdmonkey wrote:I would just send it to the general admissions account and the secretaries will forward it to whoever is in the office.cusenation wrote:MAC or JLJesusChrist wrote:As a 167 who had withdrawn, who should I email to find out if I can get this offer? General admissions email? Or a person.
WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- TigerChick13
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:34 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
cusenation wrote:http://abovethelaw.com/2013/06/law-scho ... es-tactic/
AWWW YEAAAA. We're only 4-5 embarrassments away from being as presTTTigious as UVA or GW in the ATL rankings!
Haha! I was wondering when ATL was going to post something on this whole thing.
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
sublime wrote:I ended up committing today

- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MKC
- Posts: 16246
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Welcome to WUSTL motherfucker!sublime wrote:I ended up committing today
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Interesting choice of words. Anyone else perturbed by the amount of guys in the fb group? Is the midwest undergoing a demographic crisis?sublime wrote:MarkinKansasCity wrote:Welcome to WUSTL motherfucker!sublime wrote:I ended up committing today
THanks man! Happy to be able to go with all you guys
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I call dibs on the woman.
EDIT: There used to be a post above mine. Now I look like a maniac talking to himself.
EDIT: There used to be a post above mine. Now I look like a maniac talking to himself.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
SO just discovered TLS and is now asking me who MAC is
- bananasplit19
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:53 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Debating whether to go with the "cusenation is cheating with a mystery woman named MAC" quip, or to stick with the tried-and-true "cusenation hates women" route.cusenation wrote:SO just discovered TLS and is now asking me who MAC is
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
dat fucking halo.bananasplit19 wrote:Debating whether to go with the "cusenation is cheating with a mystery woman named MAC" quip, or to stick with the tried-and-true "cusenation hates women" route.cusenation wrote:SO just discovered TLS and is now asking me who MAC is
-
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
/
Last edited by hoos89 on Sat Apr 11, 2015 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
SO?? I was hoping for the first zealous TLS applicant and admissions officer love match!!cusenation wrote:SO just discovered TLS and is now asking me who MAC is
- FKASunny
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
He wasn't saying that the ranking fell because of the drop in applicants. The argument is that there may have been a drop in applicants due to the drop in ranking.hoos89 wrote:The ranking declined last year because WUSTL switched to the new job placement reporting a year earlier than everyone else, not because they had a greater drop in applicants than everyone else (also the 2012 rankings are not tied to the stats for last year's cycle. that class had not even deposited when the rankings came out). Almost every school has seen a significant drop in applications in the last few years. There will be plenty of medians that drop.zman wrote:how many apps did they get?? I mean last year they had 4000 but their ranking fell to 23rd(before making a comeback this year) so it must have declined sharply. too many people still pay attention to US news.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
https://www.facebook.com/groups/wustllaw2016/
another shout-out to the FB group for any lurkers out there
another shout-out to the FB group for any lurkers out there
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.sublime wrote:I ended up committing today
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What do they/you mean by "career opportunity?"jdmonkey wrote:Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.sublime wrote:I ended up committing today
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
BigZuck wrote:What do they/you mean by "career opportunity?"jdmonkey wrote:Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.sublime wrote:I ended up committing today


-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Censored.BigZuck wrote:What do they/you mean by "career opportunity?"jdmonkey wrote:Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.sublime wrote:I ended up committing today
Last edited by jdmonkey on Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I was just wondering what you thought was secured. Nothing seems very secure for us mere mortals at T20s.jdmonkey wrote:I assume you have a college degree? Try and figure it out....Opportunity to join the circus you moron.BigZuck wrote:What do they/you mean by "career opportunity?"jdmonkey wrote:Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.sublime wrote:I ended up committing today
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1 to the boldedBigZuck wrote: I was just wondering what you thought was secured. Nothing seems very secure for us mere mortals at T20s.
it's whatever, we're all special snowflakes anyway. Even HYS kids can't say they're completely secure, and any security they do have only applies to that first job. No one knows what'll happen long-term. Just gotta minimize debt, study hard, and neTTTwork your ass off amirite?
not to get too Dolphine abt the situation, but lets keep the snark to a minimum (not addressed to anyone in particular). This is the WUSTL thread, we didn't get to this many pages by being unpleasant to one another

-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nothing in life is secured. You could graduate from Harvard without a job. They are talking about a realistic chance to pursue the career you want where you want to. Whether it be big law, finance, public interest, in-house opportunities, government jobs etc. So the lawyers I spoke with said you have to strike the balance between not being in debt (if possible or minimal debt) and giving yourself the best chance to succeed professionally.BigZuck wrote:jdmonkey wrote:What do they/you mean by "career opportunity?"BigZuck wrote:Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.sublime wrote:I ended up committing today
I was just wondering what you thought was secured. Nothing seems very secure for us mere mortals at T20s.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I wasn't trying to be snarky, it was a legit question that wasn't very well fleshed out.
jd said employment opportunity was secured, which I took to mean "Go to WUSTL, become a lawyer." We know from the most recent class that's not true, about 1/3 of the class isn't becoming a lawyer. So I wondered what these attorneys meant? If they are boomers who think go to any law school=get job as lawyer then whatever.
But, and this is what I was hoping, might these be lawyers who have a realistic handle on the job situation for new grads? Might they even have some insight on what it could be like for our class? Do they think that employment for kids at a school of WUSTLs status in the law school pecking order will get significantly better, to the point where becoming a lawyer is closer to a sure thing than a 66% chance? Further, WUSTL has shrunk their class size considerablely recently, do these people think that might bode really well for the class of 2016? Basically I was just wondering what they were saying to jd and if it was particularly insightful for the latest batch of WUSTLers. As someone who will also be attending a T20 with a shrunken class size these issues are important to me and I was hoping maybe somebody actually in the industry knew something/had a theory about our job situation getting better.
But yeah, sorry, should have fleshed my question out more instead of posting one sentence during the middle of the 7th inning stretch. I have been pissing off a WUSTLer every time I post in this thread so all I can say is sorry and I'll stop posting here. Good luck guys, really glad they came through for you all in a really big way.
jd said employment opportunity was secured, which I took to mean "Go to WUSTL, become a lawyer." We know from the most recent class that's not true, about 1/3 of the class isn't becoming a lawyer. So I wondered what these attorneys meant? If they are boomers who think go to any law school=get job as lawyer then whatever.
But, and this is what I was hoping, might these be lawyers who have a realistic handle on the job situation for new grads? Might they even have some insight on what it could be like for our class? Do they think that employment for kids at a school of WUSTLs status in the law school pecking order will get significantly better, to the point where becoming a lawyer is closer to a sure thing than a 66% chance? Further, WUSTL has shrunk their class size considerablely recently, do these people think that might bode really well for the class of 2016? Basically I was just wondering what they were saying to jd and if it was particularly insightful for the latest batch of WUSTLers. As someone who will also be attending a T20 with a shrunken class size these issues are important to me and I was hoping maybe somebody actually in the industry knew something/had a theory about our job situation getting better.
But yeah, sorry, should have fleshed my question out more instead of posting one sentence during the middle of the 7th inning stretch. I have been pissing off a WUSTLer every time I post in this thread so all I can say is sorry and I'll stop posting here. Good luck guys, really glad they came through for you all in a really big way.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login