WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
JesusChrist

Bronze
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by JesusChrist » Fri Jun 14, 2013 3:54 pm

jdmonkey wrote:
cusenation wrote:
JesusChrist wrote:As a 167 who had withdrawn, who should I email to find out if I can get this offer? General admissions email? Or a person.
MAC or JL
I would just send it to the general admissions account and the secretaries will forward it to whoever is in the office.
I emailed MAC because I remembered when I was negotiating with USC, emailing the specific dean really helped expedite my scholarship increase. Probably took less than 24 hours to get my increase.

User avatar
TigerChick13

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:34 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by TigerChick13 » Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:36 pm

cusenation wrote:http://abovethelaw.com/2013/06/law-scho ... es-tactic/

AWWW YEAAAA. We're only 4-5 embarrassments away from being as presTTTigious as UVA or GW in the ATL rankings!

Haha! I was wondering when ATL was going to post something on this whole thing.

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sublime » Fri Jun 14, 2013 5:52 pm

..

User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Fri Jun 14, 2013 5:54 pm

sublime wrote:I ended up committing today :D
Image

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sublime » Fri Jun 14, 2013 5:55 pm

..

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
MKC

Diamond
Posts: 16246
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by MKC » Fri Jun 14, 2013 6:04 pm

sublime wrote:I ended up committing today :D
Welcome to WUSTL motherfucker!

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sublime » Fri Jun 14, 2013 6:18 pm

..

JesusChrist

Bronze
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by JesusChrist » Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:24 pm

sublime wrote:
MarkinKansasCity wrote:
sublime wrote:I ended up committing today :D
Welcome to WUSTL motherfucker!

THanks man! Happy to be able to go with all you guys :D
Interesting choice of words. Anyone else perturbed by the amount of guys in the fb group? Is the midwest undergoing a demographic crisis?

JesusChrist

Bronze
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by JesusChrist » Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:27 pm

I call dibs on the woman.

EDIT: There used to be a post above mine. Now I look like a maniac talking to himself.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:37 pm

SO just discovered TLS and is now asking me who MAC is

User avatar
bananasplit19

Silver
Posts: 687
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:53 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by bananasplit19 » Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:39 pm

cusenation wrote:SO just discovered TLS and is now asking me who MAC is
Debating whether to go with the "cusenation is cheating with a mystery woman named MAC" quip, or to stick with the tried-and-true "cusenation hates women" route.

User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:41 pm

bananasplit19 wrote:
cusenation wrote:SO just discovered TLS and is now asking me who MAC is
Debating whether to go with the "cusenation is cheating with a mystery woman named MAC" quip, or to stick with the tried-and-true "cusenation hates women" route.
dat fucking halo.

hoos89

Gold
Posts: 2166
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by hoos89 » Fri Jun 14, 2013 8:13 pm

/
Last edited by hoos89 on Sat Apr 11, 2015 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
shifty_eyed

Gold
Posts: 1925
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shifty_eyed » Fri Jun 14, 2013 8:35 pm

cusenation wrote:SO just discovered TLS and is now asking me who MAC is
SO?? I was hoping for the first zealous TLS applicant and admissions officer love match!!

User avatar
FKASunny

Gold
Posts: 3904
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by FKASunny » Fri Jun 14, 2013 8:40 pm

hoos89 wrote:
zman wrote:how many apps did they get?? I mean last year they had 4000 but their ranking fell to 23rd(before making a comeback this year) so it must have declined sharply. too many people still pay attention to US news.
The ranking declined last year because WUSTL switched to the new job placement reporting a year earlier than everyone else, not because they had a greater drop in applicants than everyone else (also the 2012 rankings are not tied to the stats for last year's cycle. that class had not even deposited when the rankings came out). Almost every school has seen a significant drop in applications in the last few years. There will be plenty of medians that drop.
He wasn't saying that the ranking fell because of the drop in applicants. The argument is that there may have been a drop in applicants due to the drop in ranking.

User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Fri Jun 14, 2013 8:41 pm

https://www.facebook.com/groups/wustllaw2016/

another shout-out to the FB group for any lurkers out there

jdmonkey

Bronze
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jdmonkey » Fri Jun 14, 2013 9:24 pm

sublime wrote:I ended up committing today :D
Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by BigZuck » Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:11 pm

jdmonkey wrote:
sublime wrote:I ended up committing today :D
Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.
What do they/you mean by "career opportunity?"

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sublime » Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:41 pm

..

User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:44 pm

BigZuck wrote:
jdmonkey wrote:
sublime wrote:I ended up committing today :D
Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.
What do they/you mean by "career opportunity?"
:?: :?:

jdmonkey

Bronze
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jdmonkey » Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:46 pm

BigZuck wrote:
jdmonkey wrote:
sublime wrote:I ended up committing today :D
Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.
What do they/you mean by "career opportunity?"
Censored.
Last edited by jdmonkey on Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by BigZuck » Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:07 pm

jdmonkey wrote:
BigZuck wrote:
jdmonkey wrote:
sublime wrote:I ended up committing today :D
Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.
What do they/you mean by "career opportunity?"
I assume you have a college degree? Try and figure it out....Opportunity to join the circus you moron.
I was just wondering what you thought was secured. Nothing seems very secure for us mere mortals at T20s.

User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:10 pm

BigZuck wrote: I was just wondering what you thought was secured. Nothing seems very secure for us mere mortals at T20s.
+1 to the bolded

it's whatever, we're all special snowflakes anyway. Even HYS kids can't say they're completely secure, and any security they do have only applies to that first job. No one knows what'll happen long-term. Just gotta minimize debt, study hard, and neTTTwork your ass off amirite?

not to get too Dolphine abt the situation, but lets keep the snark to a minimum (not addressed to anyone in particular). This is the WUSTL thread, we didn't get to this many pages by being unpleasant to one another :mrgreen:

jdmonkey

Bronze
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jdmonkey » Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:15 pm

BigZuck wrote:
jdmonkey wrote:
BigZuck wrote:
sublime wrote:I ended up committing today :D
Glad to have you in the class. You made the right call. I've spoken with about 15 attorneys about how to decide which law school to go to. They almost unanimously say there are two primary factors to consider: cost and career opportunity. You have just secured both.
What do they/you mean by "career opportunity?"


I was just wondering what you thought was secured. Nothing seems very secure for us mere mortals at T20s.
Nothing in life is secured. You could graduate from Harvard without a job. They are talking about a realistic chance to pursue the career you want where you want to. Whether it be big law, finance, public interest, in-house opportunities, government jobs etc. So the lawyers I spoke with said you have to strike the balance between not being in debt (if possible or minimal debt) and giving yourself the best chance to succeed professionally.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by BigZuck » Sat Jun 15, 2013 12:38 am

I wasn't trying to be snarky, it was a legit question that wasn't very well fleshed out.

jd said employment opportunity was secured, which I took to mean "Go to WUSTL, become a lawyer." We know from the most recent class that's not true, about 1/3 of the class isn't becoming a lawyer. So I wondered what these attorneys meant? If they are boomers who think go to any law school=get job as lawyer then whatever.

But, and this is what I was hoping, might these be lawyers who have a realistic handle on the job situation for new grads? Might they even have some insight on what it could be like for our class? Do they think that employment for kids at a school of WUSTLs status in the law school pecking order will get significantly better, to the point where becoming a lawyer is closer to a sure thing than a 66% chance? Further, WUSTL has shrunk their class size considerablely recently, do these people think that might bode really well for the class of 2016? Basically I was just wondering what they were saying to jd and if it was particularly insightful for the latest batch of WUSTLers. As someone who will also be attending a T20 with a shrunken class size these issues are important to me and I was hoping maybe somebody actually in the industry knew something/had a theory about our job situation getting better.

But yeah, sorry, should have fleshed my question out more instead of posting one sentence during the middle of the 7th inning stretch. I have been pissing off a WUSTLer every time I post in this thread so all I can say is sorry and I'll stop posting here. Good luck guys, really glad they came through for you all in a really big way.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”