Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
-
Big Dog

- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Post
by Big Dog » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:10 pm
If anyone was offended by me saying that the school is desperate (I know one person did based on their PM to me), sorry, wasn't my intent.
Not sure why it should offend, since it is true. Offering full rides to folks
who withdrew months ago to fill the class and hold numbers can be nothing other than an act of desperation. They would not do it if they didn't
have to. (Law schools are supposed to be a cash cow for the Uni.)
(Or, perhaps I'm just jealous since they haven't called me yet.)

-
dstars823

- Posts: 329
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:51 am
Post
by dstars823 » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:18 pm
jdmonkey wrote:Magnalum wrote:Hey guys, congrats to all who received the offer. This seems unprecedented. Is there some kind of catch? It just seems to good to be true.
Does anyone know why this is happening? (I saw a while back someone said the larger institution increased the budget, but this seems INSANE)
The WUSTL endowment is larger than that of Berkeley, UCLA, UVA, USC, NYU, Georgetown, and Cornell. WUSTL is simply buying out the competition just like U Chicago did when it wanted to get more prestigious. Never underestimate the power of our endowment! Better to spend the money on getting the best students than on ritzy faculty housing like NYU does.
by this belief half the T14 should be handing out full rides and stipends to their law students, which no lie i wouldnt mind.
-
jdmonkey

- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Post
by jdmonkey » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:20 pm
The undergrad at WUSTL is ranked # 14 and ahead of two ivies. The medical school is ranked #6. Maybe the trustees and administration want to get the law school on par with the undergrad and medical school.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Post
by BigZuck » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:21 pm
jdmonkey wrote:Magnalum wrote:Hey guys, congrats to all who received the offer. This seems unprecedented. Is there some kind of catch? It just seems to good to be true.
Does anyone know why this is happening? (I saw a while back someone said the larger institution increased the budget, but this seems INSANE)
The WUSTL endowment is larger than that of Berkeley, UCLA, UVA, USC, NYU, Georgetown, and Cornell. WUSTL is simply buying out the competition just like U Chicago did when it wanted to get more prestigious. Never underestimate the power of our endowment! Better to spend the money on getting the best students than on ritzy faculty housing like NYU does.
?
They aren't buying the numbers of schools ranked higher than them. Looks like they are just trying to maintain last years medians considering how hard they are going after 166s. Although if USC drops then maintaining might be good enough for this year.
-
dstars823

- Posts: 329
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:51 am
Post
by dstars823 » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:22 pm
i think USC is pushing pretty hard for those 166-167s right now as well, i think all of the non T14 schools just realized all of a sudden that the lower T14 dipped a bit lower than they normally would and dried up all of the 167-170s
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Dream Weave

- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm
Post
by Dream Weave » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:25 pm
Based off the two reported below GPA median/166 acceptances reported on the USC thread yesterday, do we think there is a possibility that their LSAT median is on the edge of falling?
-
jdmonkey

- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Post
by jdmonkey » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:26 pm
BigZuck wrote:jdmonkey wrote:Magnalum wrote:Hey guys, congrats to all who received the offer. This seems unprecedented. Is there some kind of catch? It just seems to good to be true.
Does anyone know why this is happening? (I saw a while back someone said the larger institution increased the budget, but this seems INSANE)
The WUSTL endowment is larger than that of Berkeley, UCLA, UVA, USC, NYU, Georgetown, and Cornell. WUSTL is simply buying out the competition just like U Chicago did when it wanted to get more prestigious. Never underestimate the power of our endowment! Better to spend the money on getting the best students than on ritzy faculty housing like NYU does.
?
They aren't buying the numbers of schools ranked higher than them. Looks like they are just trying to maintain last years medians considering how hard they are going after 166s. Although if USC drops then maintaining might be good enough for this year.
I agree you can't buy your way into the top 14 over night. It is a process. But if you consistently spend money it is only inevitable. Like I referenced the Chicago example. When that school started they tripled the salaries of professors at Harvard, Princeton, and Yale to move to the dreaded Midwest. Worked out pretty well for them.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Post
by BigZuck » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:28 pm
dstars823 wrote:i think USC is pushing pretty hard for those 166-167s right now as well, i think all of the non T14 schools just realized all of a sudden that the lower T14 dipped a bit lower than they normally would and dried up all of the 167-170s
This is relevant to my interests. I hope that's true.
-
jdmonkey

- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Post
by jdmonkey » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:32 pm
dstars823 wrote:i think USC is pushing pretty hard for those 166-167s right now as well, i think all of the non T14 schools just realized all of a sudden that the lower T14 dipped a bit lower than they normally would and dried up all of the 167-170s
I don't know. USC only offered 75k for my 167. They made the decision pretty easy for me to come to WUSTL.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
dstars823

- Posts: 329
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:51 am
Post
by dstars823 » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:32 pm
BigZuck wrote:dstars823 wrote:i think USC is pushing pretty hard for those 166-167s right now as well, i think all of the non T14 schools just realized all of a sudden that the lower T14 dipped a bit lower than they normally would and dried up all of the 167-170s
This is relevant to my interests. I hope that's true.
this may be anecdotal, but with such a large drop in LSAT takers and the drop in applicants at the top and none of the T14 other than NU having smaller class sizes its pure supply and demand at that point. Personally, i think i have outperformed my numbers greatly
-
dstars823

- Posts: 329
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:51 am
Post
by dstars823 » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:33 pm
jdmonkey wrote:dstars823 wrote:i think USC is pushing pretty hard for those 166-167s right now as well, i think all of the non T14 schools just realized all of a sudden that the lower T14 dipped a bit lower than they normally would and dried up all of the 167-170s
I don't know. USC only offered 75k for my 167. They made the decision pretty easy for me to come to WUSTL.
i heard earlier in their first cycle they had been offering 120k for 167s, maybe theyre running low on cash?
-
jdmonkey

- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Post
by jdmonkey » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:38 pm
dstars823 wrote:jdmonkey wrote:dstars823 wrote:i think USC is pushing pretty hard for those 166-167s right now as well, i think all of the non T14 schools just realized all of a sudden that the lower T14 dipped a bit lower than they normally would and dried up all of the 167-170s
I don't know. USC only offered 75k for my 167. They made the decision pretty easy for me to come to WUSTL.
i heard earlier in their first cycle they had been offering 120k for 167s, maybe theyre running low on cash?
.
Last edited by
jdmonkey on Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
dstars823

- Posts: 329
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:51 am
Post
by dstars823 » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:39 pm
im sure they appreciated your candor haha
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
sratcat

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:45 pm
Post
by sratcat » Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:34 pm
jdmonkey wrote:BigZuck wrote:jdmonkey wrote:Magnalum wrote:Hey guys, congrats to all who received the offer. This seems unprecedented. Is there some kind of catch? It just seems to good to be true.
Does anyone know why this is happening? (I saw a while back someone said the larger institution increased the budget, but this seems INSANE)
The WUSTL endowment is larger than that of Berkeley, UCLA, UVA, USC, NYU, Georgetown, and Cornell. WUSTL is simply buying out the competition just like U Chicago did when it wanted to get more prestigious. Never underestimate the power of our endowment! Better to spend the money on getting the best students than on ritzy faculty housing like NYU does.
?
They aren't buying the numbers of schools ranked higher than them. Looks like they are just trying to maintain last years medians considering how hard they are going after 166s. Although if USC drops then maintaining might be good enough for this year.
I agree you can't buy your way into the top 14 over night. It is a process. But if you consistently spend money it is only inevitable. Like I referenced the Chicago example. When that school started they tripled the salaries of professors at Harvard, Princeton, and Yale to move to the dreaded Midwest. Worked out pretty well for them.
WUSTL isn't trying to buy their way in overnight. Someone earlier stated that the law school received more money than they expected after the budgets for the years were figured out. If they don't use all the money they are given, there is a huge chance they will receive a lower scholarship budget next year. They're throwing money at us in order to preserve the larger scholarship budget for the upcoming years, not out of a desperation to hit medians/become T14 overnight. They just need to prove that they require that large of a budget, and since it is too late in the game to attract many other candidates we are the happy beneficiaries
-
sublime

- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
Post
by sublime » Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:52 pm
..
-
Dream Weave

- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm
Post
by Dream Weave » Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:54 pm
sublime wrote:I just got offered the full..... fuck this is going to be hard.
Had you previously withdrawn?
-
Jaqen

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Post
by Jaqen » Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:57 pm
Previously withdrew. Just got the fully plus: "There is also the possibility that housing for your first year may be provided as well."
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
sublime

- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
Post
by sublime » Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:58 pm
..
-
Aeropress

- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 6:49 pm
Post
by Aeropress » Thu Jun 13, 2013 5:55 pm
sublime wrote:Jaqen wrote:Previously withdrew. Just got the fully plus: "There is also the possibility that housing for your first year may be provided as well."
I got that too. Would like more info about it, but don't want to ask and sound greedy.
it's not greedy to ask for info. i would def inquire if they had offered.
-
Big Dog

- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm
Post
by Big Dog » Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:00 pm
Someone earlier stated that the law school received more money than they expected after the budgets for the years were figured out.
And if you believe that Spin, I gotta bridge to T14 to sell you.
They just need to prove that they require that large of a budget...
Hmmmm. And why might that be the case? Seriously. Think (critically) about it.
-
WokeUpInACar

- Posts: 5542
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:11 pm
Post
by WokeUpInACar » Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:03 pm
Got an email offering big $$$ but not full ride despite having withdrawn. If they up it to full ride like you guys it would definitely be a game changer.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
2013

- Posts: 931
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:29 am
Post
by 2013 » Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:15 pm
...
Last edited by
2013 on Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Dolphine

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 12:38 am
Post
by Dolphine » Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:26 pm
Is it crazy to think maybe they're doing this because they had some extra money and their main concern is putting their students in the best situation to succeed after law school or is that crazy talk?
-
Rory19

- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:14 am
Post
by Rory19 » Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:27 pm
I just thought I'd contribute that I withdrew months ago and received the full tuition offer plus potentially a year's housing. I am turning it down as it's pretty much equivalent to my GULC offer, minus the housing part.
It's generous, but I think if this was really about ensuring their graduates get the least debt possible because the school has extra money they would not be dipping into withdrawals. I think this is about medians.
-
DoveBodyWash

- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Post
by DoveBodyWash » Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:27 pm
Dolphine wrote:Is it crazy to think maybe they're doing this because they had some extra money and their main concern is putting their students in the best situation to succeed after law school or is that crazy talk?
Rory19 wrote:
It's generous, but I think if this was really about ensuring their graduates get the least debt possible because the school has extra money they would not be dipping into withdrawals. I think this is about medians.
I agree, this is most definitely not out of the kindness of their hearts lol
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login