oh.... damn. Well, even if it's not, I'm still a little curious.[/quote]rondemarino wrote:umm it's not excitingsavesthedayajb wrote:
...lolIts on the order of a "water is wet" revelation. One simple public post could have easily replaced all this artificial drama.[/quote]Veritas wrote:oh.... damn. Well, even if it's not, I'm still a little curious.rondemarino wrote:umm it's not excitingsavesthedayajb wrote:
...lol[/quote]
oh.... damn. Well, even if it's not, I'm still a little curious.[/quote]rondemarino wrote:umm it's not excitingsavesthedayajb wrote:
oh.... damn. Well, even if it's not, I'm still a little curious.[/quote]rondemarino wrote:umm it's not excitingsavesthedayajb wrote:
I found you a new tar:managamy wrote:It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.
TITCR.IAFG wrote:I found you a new tar:managamy wrote:It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.
--ImageRemoved--
a massive toolbox.
yea you don't need to respond to my pm... it seems like you wanted this sort of attention though...managamy wrote:It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.
Not nearly as good as when she was giving condescending "chin up" encouragement on the Pessimism thread (i think), right after being accepted to Harvard.capitalacq wrote:TITCR.IAFG wrote:I found you a new tar:managamy wrote:It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.
--ImageRemoved--
a massive toolbox.
it was a culmination of toolish posts that led to this tar recommendation.jks289 wrote:Not nearly as good as when she was giving condescending "chin up" encouragement on the Pessimism thread (i think), right after being accepted to Harvard.capitalacq wrote:TITCR.IAFG wrote:I found you a new tar:managamy wrote:It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.
--ImageRemoved--
a massive toolbox.
I'm definitely coming around to this line of thinking after checking out the beginning of the USS Pessimissm thread.IAFG wrote:it was a culmination of toolish posts that led to this tar recommendation.
thinking at all before posting, even uncharitable thoughts, would be an improvement.managamy wrote:Responded to all of the PMs. I'm a "he," FWIW. Thanks for the snarky remarks, which I'll remember before the next time I think about doing something considerate.
ED to UVA?LvingLegend wrote:Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA
rondemarino wrote:ED to UVA?LvingLegend wrote:Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA
I assume you have a P.S done, have taken the LSAT and have recs in, right?LvingLegend wrote:rondemarino wrote:ED to UVA?LvingLegend wrote:Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA
doesn't the file need to be complete by the 15th?
rondemarino wrote:I assume you have a P.S done, have taken the LSAT and have recs in, right?LvingLegend wrote:rondemarino wrote:ED to UVA?LvingLegend wrote:Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA
doesn't the file need to be complete by the 15th?
I guess the worst that happens is you don't get in ED?LvingLegend wrote:Yea. But it takes a couple days for LSAC to send the information and the certification letter would take a couple days getting there.
That is very surprising that they would reject a 170+ this early.
