UCLA? Forum

Veritas · Post by **Veritas** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:22 pm

rondemarino wrote:
savesthedayajb wrote:
umm it's not exciting

oh.... damn. Well, even if it's not, I'm still a little curious.[/quote]

Its on the order of a "water is wet" revelation. One simple public post could have easily replaced all this artificial drama.[/quote]
+1, I might have given it one big

...lol

finalaspects · Post by **finalaspects** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:25 pm

Veritas wrote:
rondemarino wrote:
savesthedayajb wrote:
umm it's not exciting
oh.... damn. Well, even if it's not, I'm still a little curious.

Its on the order of a "water is wet" revelation. One simple public post could have easily replaced all this artificial drama.[/quote]
+1, I might have given it one big

...lol[/quote]

can you pm me in the information please?

hhg · Post by **hhg** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:27 pm

rondemarino wrote:
savesthedayajb wrote:
umm it's not exciting

oh.... damn. Well, even if it's not, I'm still a little curious.[/quote]

Its on the order of a "water is wet" revelation. One simple public post could have easily replaced all this artificial drama.[/quote]

agreed. not worth the trouble.

Jacques · Post by **Jacques** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:45 pm

rondemarino wrote:
savesthedayajb wrote:
umm it's not exciting

oh.... damn. Well, even if it's not, I'm still a little curious.[/quote]

Its on the order of a "water is wet" revelation. One simple public post could have easily replaced all this artificial drama.[/quote]

Having learned the info myself last night, I can say that it's not shocking, or particularly gamechanging at that.

It's certainly positive, though, if in a "butterfly effect" sort of way.

alirod12 · Post by **alirod12** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:39 pm

No love from UCLA yet. Disappointed. I was hoping they'd offer me a nice scholly as well. Snarf, snarf.

#s on LSN.

crombot · Post by **crombot** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:59 pm

I haven't heard a peep from UCLA....been complete since 11/9.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:38 pm

It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.

IAFG · Post by **IAFG** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:41 pm

managamy wrote:It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.

I found you a new tar:

--ImageRemoved--

a massive toolbox.

capitalacq · Post by **capitalacq** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:42 pm

IAFG wrote:
managamy wrote:It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.
I found you a new tar:

--ImageRemoved--

a massive toolbox.

TITCR.

finalaspects · Post by **finalaspects** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:42 pm

managamy wrote:It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.

yea you don't need to respond to my pm... it seems like you wanted this sort of attention though...

jks289 · Post by **jks289** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:47 pm

capitalacq wrote:
IAFG wrote:
managamy wrote:It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.
I found you a new tar:

--ImageRemoved--

a massive toolbox.
TITCR.

Not nearly as good as when she was giving condescending "chin up" encouragement on the Pessimism thread (i think), right after being accepted to Harvard.

IAFG · Post by **IAFG** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:50 pm

jks289 wrote:
capitalacq wrote:
IAFG wrote:
managamy wrote:It's hilarious how everyone is offering their descriptions of what I had to say. Jacques is right to say that it's not mind-boggling, game-changing, or shocking in any way. It's positive but very small; I didn't want to be public with it because it concerns me personally, not because it's shocking. People who know are free to PM people who want to know; also, it looks like I have about 15 more PMs so I'll be responding soon. Honestly, though, it's nothing to stress over.
I found you a new tar:

--ImageRemoved--

a massive toolbox.
TITCR.
Not nearly as good as when she was giving condescending "chin up" encouragement on the Pessimism thread (i think), right after being accepted to Harvard.

it was a culmination of toolish posts that led to this tar recommendation.

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:54 pm

IAFG wrote:it was a culmination of toolish posts that led to this tar recommendation.

I'm definitely coming around to this line of thinking after checking out the beginning of the USS Pessimissm thread.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:04 pm

Responded to all of the PMs. I'm a "he," FWIW. Thanks for the snarky remarks, which I'll remember before the next time I think about doing something considerate.

IAFG · Post by **IAFG** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:08 pm

managamy wrote:Responded to all of the PMs. I'm a "he," FWIW. Thanks for the snarky remarks, which I'll remember before the next time I think about doing something considerate.

thinking at all before posting, even uncharitable thoughts, would be an improvement.

LvingLegend · Post by **LvingLegend** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:25 pm

Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA

Mosca · Post by **Mosca** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:27 pm

LvingLegend wrote:Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA

That is very surprising that they would reject a 170+ this early.

jks289 · Post by **jks289** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:28 pm

LvingLegend wrote:Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA

Wow shocking! With a 172? That's a huge bummer, but you're going to have great options this cycle. Good luck!

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:30 pm

LvingLegend wrote:Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA

ED to UVA?

LvingLegend · Post by **LvingLegend** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:40 pm

rondemarino wrote:
LvingLegend wrote:Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA
ED to UVA?

doesn't the file need to be complete by the 15th?

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:41 pm

LvingLegend wrote:
rondemarino wrote:
LvingLegend wrote:Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA
ED to UVA?

doesn't the file need to be complete by the 15th?

I assume you have a P.S done, have taken the LSAT and have recs in, right?

LvingLegend · Post by **LvingLegend** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:46 pm

rondemarino wrote:
LvingLegend wrote:
rondemarino wrote:
LvingLegend wrote:Rejected. Not even a fucking wait list. FUCLA
ED to UVA?

doesn't the file need to be complete by the 15th?
I assume you have a P.S done, have taken the LSAT and have recs in, right?

Yea. But it takes a couple days for LSAC to send the information and the certification letter would take a couple days getting there.

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:48 pm

LvingLegend wrote:Yea. But it takes a couple days for LSAC to send the information and the certification letter would take a couple days getting there.

I guess the worst that happens is you don't get in ED?

SanBun · Post by **SanBun** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:48 pm

how does UCLA send out decisions (acceptances and rejections)??? snail mail or email?

SanBun · Post by **SanBun** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:49 pm

SanBun wrote:how does UCLA send out decisions (acceptances and rejections)??? snail mail or email?

AND: do they have a status checker??

UCLA? Forum

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Register for access!

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Register now!

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?