Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle) Forum

[pushsum123]

.

[LawBron James]

"Not sure the sarcasm is too far out of line, considering a quick look through the thread (and any SLS history) would indicate it was a fairly goofy (/possibly self-indulgent/attention-seeking) question to begin with, even if posted in good faith."

The sarcasm is out of line. Ek5dn asked a very simple question and received the answer within a few posts. He now knows it's bad form here to go around posting similar questions on several threads. Not everyone has been using TLS for as long as many of you.

"If you post the same thing in multiple threads, and ask a question that can be answered with 3 seconds of research and common sense in the same thread you're posting in, you get what's coming. Supposedly, someone smart enough that they're a serious candidate to get into Stanford Law should be perfectly capable of doing those things."

Why are you so bothered? I guess if you were that smart and such a serious candidate, you would have aced the LSAT on the first go instead of retaking, tho. And I suppose if your friend were that great of a candidate, he wouldn't have had to reapply a cycle later... So let's just worry about ourselves

Did you just go through my posting history for that weak sauce? Creepy, man, creepy.

^ Gurl, bye. Don't call out anyone until you have yourself in check. You've been read. Now go somewhere and wait for that DLS

[qwertyTLS]

Now go somewhere and wait for that DLS

lol seems a bit unnecessary

[miamiri]

i think that TLS should be a section on your guys' resumes. This was a good 'being home with kids getting bored' reading material...you are very amusing people.

I agree that someone who is capable of Stanford will have to be capable of this bit of research. I also agree that mocking someone is never a good idea. Benefits no one. Wasted time. Agree with the poster who said, 'lets think about ourselves.'

I myself am looking forward to the next two years, as thats how long I will prob be here, until I get into Stanford....whatever it takes...

Have a fabulous day!

[lrrdrll]

"Not sure the sarcasm is too far out of line, considering a quick look through the thread (and any SLS history) would indicate it was a fairly goofy (/possibly self-indulgent/attention-seeking) question to begin with, even if posted in good faith."

The sarcasm is out of line. Ek5dn asked a very simple question and received the answer within a few posts. He now knows it's bad form here to go around posting similar questions on several threads. Not everyone has been using TLS for as long as many of you.

"If you post the same thing in multiple threads, and ask a question that can be answered with 3 seconds of research and common sense in the same thread you're posting in, you get what's coming. Supposedly, someone smart enough that they're a serious candidate to get into Stanford Law should be perfectly capable of doing those things."

Why are you so bothered? I guess if you were that smart and such a serious candidate, you would have aced the LSAT on the first go instead of retaking, tho. And I suppose if your friend were that great of a candidate, he wouldn't have had to reapply a cycle later... So let's just worry about ourselves

TOTES

[ek5dn]

Whoa whoa whoa lol I agree it was lazy of me to post an easily answered question, but I didn't think it would annoy this many people..guess I assumed my question would be ignored if people didn't want to answer.

Haha now I know not to repost. Sorry for the brawl I seem to have ignited..
It's my fault for being impatient/paranoid

Best of luck to all of us still waiting!

[RSN]

"Not sure the sarcasm is too far out of line, considering a quick look through the thread (and any SLS history) would indicate it was a fairly goofy (/possibly self-indulgent/attention-seeking) question to begin with, even if posted in good faith."

The sarcasm is out of line. Ek5dn asked a very simple question and received the answer within a few posts. He now knows it's bad form here to go around posting similar questions on several threads. Not everyone has been using TLS for as long as many of you.

"If you post the same thing in multiple threads, and ask a question that can be answered with 3 seconds of research and common sense in the same thread you're posting in, you get what's coming. Supposedly, someone smart enough that they're a serious candidate to get into Stanford Law should be perfectly capable of doing those things."

Why are you so bothered? I guess if you were that smart and such a serious candidate, you would have aced the LSAT on the first go instead of retaking, tho. And I suppose if your friend were that great of a candidate, he wouldn't have had to reapply a cycle later... So let's just worry about ourselves

Did you just go through my posting history for that weak sauce? Creepy, man, creepy.

^ Gurl, bye. Don't call out anyone until you have yourself in check. You've been read. Now go somewhere and wait for that DLS

[zaetoroftheprotoss]

guess I assumed my question would be ignored if people didn't want to answer.

IMO, this should be the only response people have for posts that bother them (not counting obvious trolls / flames, which should be struck with the fury of Zeus's thunderbolt the permaban)...we are all in this journey of applying to law school together; there is no reason to sound off (on a FREE internet forum) because one individual is a bit more anxious than and perhaps not as diligent as you are.

[Mack.Hambleton]

guess I assumed my question would be ignored if people didn't want to answer.

IMO, this should be the only response people have for posts that bother them (not counting obvious trolls / flames, which should be struck with the fury of Zeus's thunderbolt the permaban)...we are all in this journey of applying to law school together; there is no reason to sound off (on a FREE internet forum) because one individual is a bit more anxious than and perhaps not as diligent as you are.

GET OUT

[zaetoroftheprotoss]

guess I assumed my question would be ignored if people didn't want to answer.

IMO, this should be the only response people have for posts that bother them (not counting obvious trolls / flames, which should be struck with the fury of Zeus's thunderbolt the permaban)...we are all in this journey of applying to law school together; there is no reason to sound off (on a FREE internet forum) because one individual is a bit more anxious than and perhaps not as diligent as you are.

GET OUT

**Cue Taylor Swift's Shake it Off**

[steal]

under review since 12/9

[ballcaps]

K, you guys can go compare the size of your dicks somewhere else. He asked a question and has received the answer.

u mad bro

ljl

IMO, this should be the only response people have for posts that bother them (not counting obvious trolls / flames, which should be struck with the fury of Zeus's thunderbolt the permaban)...we are all in this journey of applying to law school together; there is no reason to sound off (on a FREE internet forum) because one individual is a bit more anxious than and perhaps not as diligent as you are.

GET OUT

ljljljljl

pushsum is officially the new pariah of tls!

[zaetoroftheprotoss]

ljl

Just curious...What does that mean?

[Mack.Hambleton]

ljl

Just curious...What does that mean?

"ljl" is a corruption of L-O-L meaning "laugh out loud"

[zaetoroftheprotoss]

ljl

Just curious...What does that mean?

"ljl" is a corruption of L-O-L meaning "laugh out loud"

Thanks!

[miamiri]

ljl

Just curious...What does that mean?

"ljl" is a corruption of L-O-L meaning "laugh out loud"

*gfg* (ganz fies grins)

[huskies2015]

Just saw my status checker changed to the dreaded DLS. Disappointed to say the least. Best of luck to the rest of you

[miamiri]

Just saw my status checker changed to the dreaded DLS. Disappointed to say the least. Best of luck to the rest of you

complete prior to xmas? just gauging when I am to expect the DLS status...

[huskies2015]

Just saw my status checker changed to the dreaded DLS. Disappointed to say the least. Best of luck to the rest of you

complete prior to xmas? just gauging when I am to expect the DLS status...

Yep, complete 10/15

[Mack.Hambleton]

I start sweating profusely everytime someone goes DLS

[slurpy]

I start sweating profusely everytime someone goes DLS

+1

[PrizeFighter]

under review since 12/9

+1

[middlebear]

Just got the DLS. Not terribly surprised.

[Mack.Hambleton]

Just got the DLS. Not terribly surprised.

Sorry

Chicago is cool

[fra]

Since DLS + no call seems to be moving mostly consecutively by submit date, would people who go DLS mind sharing submit or complete dates?