Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Alright... anyone else just been sitting at complete (no "under review") for a long time? I've been complete since 11/28/12, no movement since, no interview.
Edit: I just noticed on LSN they rejected a 170/3.79 and a 169/3.73 already. I didn't think I was an auto-ding (maybe an auto-waitlist?) but I guess I may be wrong!
Edit: I just noticed on LSN they rejected a 170/3.79 and a 169/3.73 already. I didn't think I was an auto-ding (maybe an auto-waitlist?) but I guess I may be wrong!
- sabanist
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I went complete in that ballpark and I'm still waiting, and I think we have a decent bit of company ITT.risa wrote:Alright... anyone else just been sitting at complete (no "under review") for a long time? I've been complete since 11/28/12, no movement since, no interview.
Edit: I just noticed on LSN they rejected a 170/3.79 and a 169/3.73 already. I didn't think I was an auto-ding (maybe an auto-waitlist?) but I guess I may be wrong!
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- trojandave
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hmmm, today is my 3rd UR since the interview. Maybe these don't mean anything...
edit: Never mind, already covered ITT
edit: Never mind, already covered ITT
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Er perhaps I phrased that poorly. Basically I was wondering if there had been any further updates for anyone AFTER 1/11, since 1/11 seemed to be the last major update day. But I am also UR again on 1/17, and based on what is being reported in this thread it seems like there is not really any meaningful information to be garnered from Chicago's status checker updates.trojandave wrote:Yea, on the page before this I brought it up too. Appears to be pretty standard.Crowing wrote:Has anybody had a 2nd post-interview UR since 1/11?
I also got the 1/11 UR and I actually had my interview just before on the same day, so it seems doubtful that there was anything to that date change.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
After my interview it went to that day ur and then it updated two more times. I think tht 3 ur may be nec.... no clue if that is true or not obviously
- reallysearch
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Still no news today?
- elterrible78
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nada. For some reason, each minute of this wait seems like two of any of the others so far.reallysearch wrote:Still no news today?
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- airbud
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UR 1/17. This is either my second or third UR since interviewing on 1/4.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I really hope so.Regulus wrote:Although final results for RD applicants have been slow-coming, Chicago is definitely working.... they said it would take a couple of days for admitted students' status checkers to change once they completed the short commitment to attend form, but I sent my form in yesterday and got updated to "Commitment Form Received" almost immediately.
Anyway, because today wasn't the day, I will honestly be surprised if tomorrow isn't.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
As another person who interviewed in December and hasn't had an UR update since 12/21, I agree with this theory.moneyball026 wrote:you guys are prob correct. my theory is this: all of us have had decisions made on our respective files. thus, the multiple UR dates after interview (ive had 4 total UR now, including the post-interview update). the fact that you have had almost a month pass without a UR date, while others including myself did not have even a week pass just now before another UR, means they probably decided on you back in december, whereas they are just deciding on us today.
my optimistic theory is that they are updating a few more today just so they can wrap up the cases on a few more people before sending out initial accepts or waitlists (inevitably such as myself...) today or tomorrow.
I know, but I was really just hoping they would go back to doing phone calls. Oh well, I'll take an e-mail if it means it comes tomorrow (assuming I'm admitted at all of course.)Regulus wrote:I dunno... if they use email to notify RD admits like they did with ED, it could all easily be done in a single day.... tomorrow, for example.
For reference.
ETA: Oh, and when are you changing your tar? I think the asparagus has run its course

- spicyyoda17
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Chicago Law Admissions via Twitter: "Working on a big batch of decisions, but they will not be going out today. Interviewing means getting the January group out a little later."
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks spicy was wondering
- mtrrw
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:05 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
soooo....Monday? 

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- elterrible78
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Seems like next week, at least. I was hoping for this week, but am at least happy to have some new information.mtrrw wrote:soooo....Monday?
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I had blocked out my entire schedule next week to freak out about CLS. Now I have to squeeze in chicago.
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
banjo wrote:I had blocked out my entire schedule next week to freak out about CLS. Now I have to squeeze in chicago.


+1
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
/
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+2 although with my stats I have about a zero chance of admission at either despite strong softssinfiery wrote:banjo wrote:I had blocked out my entire schedule next week to freak out about CLS. Now I have to squeeze in chicago.![]()
![]()
+1
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I guess nothing before Tuesday unless they work weekends.... The twitter post implies that they realized people are expecting a response this week and although they tried they couldn't get it done. It seems like its basically ready next time they work whenever that will be...
- spicyyoda17
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I agree with this. Good analysis Anon444.Anonymous4444 wrote:I guess nothing before Tuesday unless they work weekends.... The twitter post implies that they realized people are expecting a response this week and although they tried they couldn't get it done. It seems like its basically ready next time they work whenever that will be...
At least there was some sort of communication and we know the admissions office is alive and well!
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
agreed, it seems like next week is a reasonable target based on that post
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login