UCLA? Forum

LvingLegend · Post by **LvingLegend** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 9:33 am

any splitters get in yet?

deem · Post by **deem** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 3:39 pm

got the rejection letter today...lame. Applied ED with a 167 lsat, 3.7ish gpa, and some unique softs. good luck to everyone else...hope to hear from usc soon! lol

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 3:43 pm

LvingLegend wrote:any splitters get in yet?

180/2.98 did.

I'm still waiting. Splitter, but numbers slightly higher than you in both categories.

EDIT: I also went complete at the last possible second.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:35 pm

Dear all,

I have a small but hopefully worthwhile piece of good news for all of you regarding UCLA. The YLS / SLS breaking news yesterday distracted me from mentioning it earlier. Please PM me if you would like to know; I feel a bit awkward posting this information in public.

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:37 pm

managamy wrote:Dear all,

I have a small but hopefully worthwhile piece of good news for all of you regarding UCLA. The YLS / SLS breaking news yesterday distracted me from mentioning it earlier. Please PM me if you would like to know; I feel a bit awkward posting this information in public.

You should have a PM from me.

EDIT: This better be good

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:52 pm

I've responded to 5 or 6 PMs so far...hope that you like the news! It's not earth-shattering or anything, obviously.

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:57 pm

managamy wrote:I've responded to 5 or 6 PMs so far...hope that you like the news! It's not earth-shattering or anything, obviously.

You crack me up.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 11:00 pm

rondemarino wrote:
managamy wrote:I've responded to 5 or 6 PMs so far...hope that you like the news! It's not earth-shattering or anything, obviously.
You crack me up.

Your avatar cracks me up.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Sat Dec 12, 2009 11:28 pm

About 15 PMs later, I'm astonished with the celerity of your responses. UCLA should be impressed.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 8:32 pm

About 7 or 8 more posts answered. I'm surprised how many of you were interested. If any of you is applying to GULC, the same information will be true as of next week.

Hattori Hanzo · Post by **Hattori Hanzo** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 8:34 pm

I wanna know too! PM plz

DoctorNick189 · Post by **DoctorNick189** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 8:36 pm

Agreed, hit me with a PM.

Also, no love for this 2.99/176 splitter yet.

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 8:43 pm

DoctorNick189 wrote:Agreed, hit me with a PM.

Also, no love for this 2.99/176 splitter yet.

Take a number.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:02 pm

Not sure if I dare venture into the GULC thread; my PM inbox might crash from the overload.

I'll think about it in the course of the week.

jay115 · Post by **jay115** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:31 pm

IN early decision!

ill hopefully see a bunch of you next fall in sunny Los Angeles...

imisscollege · Post by **imisscollege** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:47 pm

how many RDers with borderline numbers have heard so far?

jks289 · Post by **jks289** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:52 pm

managamy wrote:About 7 or 8 more posts answered. I'm surprised how many of you were interested. If any of you is applying to GULC, the same information will be true as of next week.

Can you pm, I'm dying to know now. Or someone managamy pm'ed wouldn't mind passing the news along....

WiretoWire09UF · Post by **WiretoWire09UF** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:55 pm

jks289 wrote:Or someone managamy pm'ed wouldn't mind passing the news along....

Please?

DOOM · Post by **DOOM** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:04 pm

WiretoWire09UF wrote:
jks289 wrote:Or someone managamy pm'ed wouldn't mind passing the news along....

Please?

+1

finalaspects · Post by **finalaspects** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:09 pm

managamy wrote:Not sure if I dare venture into the GULC thread; my PM inbox might crash from the overload. I'll think about it in the course of the week.

yea can i get this info too please?

savesthedayajb · Post by **savesthedayajb** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:10 pm

DOOM wrote:
WiretoWire09UF wrote:
jks289 wrote:Or someone managamy pm'ed wouldn't mind passing the news along....

Please?
+1

+2? Thanks

Veritas · Post by **Veritas** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:14 pm

savesthedayajb wrote:
DOOM wrote:
WiretoWire09UF wrote:
jks289 wrote:Or someone managamy pm'ed wouldn't mind passing the news along....

Please?
+1
+2? Thanks

umm it's not exciting

dgb87 · Post by **dgb87** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:17 pm

savesthedayajb wrote:
DOOM wrote:
WiretoWire09UF wrote:
jks289 wrote:Or someone managamy pm'ed wouldn't mind passing the news along....

Please?
+1
+2? Thanks

+3 that would be great!

savesthedayajb · Post by **savesthedayajb** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:18 pm

[/quote]
umm it's not exciting

[/quote]

oh.... damn. Well, even if it's not, I'm still a little curious.

rondemarino · Post by **rondemarino** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:20 pm

savesthedayajb wrote:

umm it's not exciting

[/quote]

oh.... damn. Well, even if it's not, I'm still a little curious.[/quote]

Its on the order of a "water is wet" revelation. One simple public post could have easily replaced all this artificial drama.

UCLA? Forum

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?

Re: UCLA?