Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle) Forum
- axel.foley
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:44 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Stanford talk to me pls
- Winston1984
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
DLS. Assuming rejection. Would be pretty stoked if it was a waitlist.
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:21 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Complete before Christmas?Winston1984 wrote:DLS. Assuming rejection. Would be pretty stoked if it was a waitlist.
- Winston1984
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Complete in October.miamiri wrote:Complete before Christmas?Winston1984 wrote:DLS. Assuming rejection. Would be pretty stoked if it was a waitlist.
- ek5dn
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:14 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- pushsum123
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:15 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Stanford takes as long as it wants. You could get the phone call today... or be dinged in May. If you see DLS on your status checker, however, it means you've been dinged or waitlisted. You'll receive the letter in the mail. Sit back and relaxek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?

-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:06 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
no - you shouldn't be abandoning hope. plenty of people have been waiting for longer (basically ctrl c + ctrl v from every other thread you've asked the same question).ek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
- trynalaw123
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:44 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Everyone who has submitted since the new year needs to cool their jets, very few people have heard back so clearly some of us are still waiting from september/october even
- hillz
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:41 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
trynalaw123 wrote:Everyone who has submitted since the new year needs to cool their jets, very few people have heard back so clearly some of us are still waiting from september/october even
- DiniMae
- Posts: 734
- Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:36 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Patience. Seriously. And some of your questions regarding trends are available via mylsn, class spreadsheets, etc. If you're truly that concerned, I'd say start digging around in these threads and see what you find. But yea, patience. You've barely started your cycle.ek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:06 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
lolDiniMae wrote:You've barely started your cycle.
- radio1nowhere
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Try not to post the same thing in multiple threads. Instead, do a little of your own research. For instance, use this page to compare application dates with decision dates: http://stanford.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... &sort=sentek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Yes. I'd go ahead and withdraw your appek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LawBron James
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:13 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
C'mon Mark, I was in the process of posting this exact thing when this came up. I have to be more creative.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Yes. I'd go ahead and withdraw your appek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
ek5dn, it's basically game over. What other marketable skills do you have? Have you considered becoming a sommelier? I read there's a lot of money in that.
- pushsum123
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:15 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
K, you guys can go compare the size of your dicks somewhere else. He asked a question and has received the answer.LawBron James wrote:C'mon Mark, I was in the process of posting this exact thing when this came up. I have to be more creative.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Yes. I'd go ahead and withdraw your appek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
ek5dn, it's basically game over. What other marketable skills do you have? Have you considered becoming a sommelier? I read there's a lot of money in that.
- lizzielemon
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:41 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
ek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
complete since 1/6. I refuse to give up hope..
- cc78
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:00 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
I enjoyed this quite a bit. Thanks.LawBron James wrote:C'mon Mark, I was in the process of posting this exact thing when this came up. I have to be more creative.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Yes. I'd go ahead and withdraw your appek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
ek5dn, it's basically game over. What other marketable skills do you have? Have you considered becoming a sommelier? I read there's a lot of money in that.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- LawBron James
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:13 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
If you post the same thing in multiple threads, and ask a question that can be answered with 3 seconds of research and common sense in the same thread you're posting in, you get what's coming. Supposedly, someone smart enough that they're a serious candidate to get into Stanford Law should be perfectly capable of doing those things.pushsum123 wrote:K, you guys can go compare the size of your dicks somewhere else. He asked a question and has received the answer.LawBron James wrote:C'mon Mark, I was in the process of posting this exact thing when this came up. I have to be more creative.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Yes. I'd go ahead and withdraw your appek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
ek5dn, it's basically game over. What other marketable skills do you have? Have you considered becoming a sommelier? I read there's a lot of money in that.
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:06 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
it's not that he/she asked a question - it's that they asked it like 3 or 4 times in a bunch of different threads. reading 1 or 2 pages of these threads and they would have known the answer.pushsum123 wrote:K, you guys can go compare the size of your dicks somewhere else. He asked a question and has received the answer.LawBron James wrote:C'mon Mark, I was in the process of posting this exact thing when this came up. I have to be more creative.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Yes. I'd go ahead and withdraw your appek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
ek5dn, it's basically game over. What other marketable skills do you have? Have you considered becoming a sommelier? I read there's a lot of money in that.
also it's getting late in the cycle and people are anxious - may not be fair but when people have been waiting for months and months on end it's hard to sympathize with someone who is being dramatic about waiting for a few weeks
- pushsum123
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:15 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
While I agree that the info he wanted is very easy to find using google and the search bar, he doesn't deserved to be mocked. Several people answered the original question. Another person already told him not to post the same question on multiple threads. I think he gets the point without the masturbatory sarcasm in which some posters here seem to engage habitually.
- lrrdrll
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 6:27 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Not sure the sarcasm is too far out of line, considering a quick look through the thread (and any SLS history) would indicate it was a fairly goofy (/possibly self-indulgent/attention-seeking) question to begin with, even if posted in good faith.pushsum123 wrote:K, you guys can go compare the size of your dicks somewhere else. He asked a question and has received the answer.LawBron James wrote:C'mon Mark, I was in the process of posting this exact thing when this came up. I have to be more creative.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Yes. I'd go ahead and withdraw your appek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
ek5dn, it's basically game over. What other marketable skills do you have? Have you considered becoming a sommelier? I read there's a lot of money in that.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- RSN
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
u mad bropushsum123 wrote:K, you guys can go compare the size of your dicks somewhere else. He asked a question and has received the answer.LawBron James wrote:C'mon Mark, I was in the process of posting this exact thing when this came up. I have to be more creative.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Yes. I'd go ahead and withdraw your appek5dn wrote:Complete/UR since 1/29 :'( Should I be abandoning hope?
ek5dn, it's basically game over. What other marketable skills do you have? Have you considered becoming a sommelier? I read there's a lot of money in that.
- pushsum123
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:15 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
"Not sure the sarcasm is too far out of line, considering a quick look through the thread (and any SLS history) would indicate it was a fairly goofy (/possibly self-indulgent/attention-seeking) question to begin with, even if posted in good faith."
The sarcasm is out of line. Ek5dn asked a very simple question and received the answer within a few posts. He now knows it's bad form here to go around posting similar questions on several threads. Not everyone has been using TLS for as long as many of you.
"If you post the same thing in multiple threads, and ask a question that can be answered with 3 seconds of research and common sense in the same thread you're posting in, you get what's coming. Supposedly, someone smart enough that they're a serious candidate to get into Stanford Law should be perfectly capable of doing those things."
Why are you so bothered? I guess if you were that smart and such a serious candidate, you would have aced the LSAT on the first go instead of retaking, tho. And I suppose if your friend were that great of a candidate, he wouldn't have had to reapply a cycle later... So let's just worry about ourselves
The sarcasm is out of line. Ek5dn asked a very simple question and received the answer within a few posts. He now knows it's bad form here to go around posting similar questions on several threads. Not everyone has been using TLS for as long as many of you.
"If you post the same thing in multiple threads, and ask a question that can be answered with 3 seconds of research and common sense in the same thread you're posting in, you get what's coming. Supposedly, someone smart enough that they're a serious candidate to get into Stanford Law should be perfectly capable of doing those things."
Why are you so bothered? I guess if you were that smart and such a serious candidate, you would have aced the LSAT on the first go instead of retaking, tho. And I suppose if your friend were that great of a candidate, he wouldn't have had to reapply a cycle later... So let's just worry about ourselves

-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:06 am
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
whoa what where did this come from how is it relevant?pushsum123 wrote:Why are you so bothered? I guess if you were that smart and such a serious candidate, you would have aced the LSAT on the first go instead of retaking, tho. And I suppose if your friend were that great of a candidate, he wouldn't have had to reapply a cycle later... So let's just worry about ourselves
like i said earlier, people have been waiting for months and months on end. it's late in the cycle and people are anxious. when someone comes in asking if they should abandon all hope after a few weeks, it's a bit off-putting. maybe it hits close to home, who knows. but i don't think the sarcasm was unwarranted. it's much tamer than some of the other ribbing on TLS, which can get much, much more negative
- LawBron James
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:13 pm
Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)
Did you just go through my posting history for that weak sauce? Creepy, man, creepy.pushsum123 wrote:"Not sure the sarcasm is too far out of line, considering a quick look through the thread (and any SLS history) would indicate it was a fairly goofy (/possibly self-indulgent/attention-seeking) question to begin with, even if posted in good faith."
The sarcasm is out of line. Ek5dn asked a very simple question and received the answer within a few posts. He now knows it's bad form here to go around posting similar questions on several threads. Not everyone has been using TLS for as long as many of you.
"If you post the same thing in multiple threads, and ask a question that can be answered with 3 seconds of research and common sense in the same thread you're posting in, you get what's coming. Supposedly, someone smart enough that they're a serious candidate to get into Stanford Law should be perfectly capable of doing those things."
Why are you so bothered? I guess if you were that smart and such a serious candidate, you would have aced the LSAT on the first go instead of retaking, tho. And I suppose if your friend were that great of a candidate, he wouldn't have had to reapply a cycle later... So let's just worry about ourselves
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login