UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by BigZuck » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:05 am

uconjak wrote:I sent a email yesterday, told them i was going to visit LA In late feb. They called me to set up a time/date. They mentioned schollies at other schools, i told them that money would weigh heavily in my decision on which law school i would attend. They told me they will sit down with me to seriously discuss the situation. Will the move up their scholarship from 48 to 100k?
From what I have seen so far this cycle their whole "let us know if this is competitive" thing is a gigantic joke/flame. But maybe? Doubtful it doubles without some serious offers from seriously better schools though.

JohnMarshall17

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:52 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by JohnMarshall17 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:16 pm

BigZuck wrote:
uconjak wrote:I sent a email yesterday, told them i was going to visit LA In late feb. They called me to set up a time/date. They mentioned schollies at other schools, i told them that money would weigh heavily in my decision on which law school i would attend. They told me they will sit down with me to seriously discuss the situation. Will the move up their scholarship from 48 to 100k?
From what I have seen so far this cycle their whole "let us know if this is competitive" thing is a gigantic joke/flame. But maybe? Doubtful it doubles without some serious offers from seriously better schools though.
As someone who had their offer increased 15k to stay competitive with another offer, I can personally say it's not a joke. If they know you're seriously interested and they want you, they'll do what they can to up your offer.

User avatar
dproduct

Gold
Posts: 4078
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by dproduct » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:33 pm

JohnMarshall17 wrote:
BigZuck wrote:
uconjak wrote:I sent a email yesterday, told them i was going to visit LA In late feb. They called me to set up a time/date. They mentioned schollies at other schools, i told them that money would weigh heavily in my decision on which law school i would attend. They told me they will sit down with me to seriously discuss the situation. Will the move up their scholarship from 48 to 100k?
From what I have seen so far this cycle their whole "let us know if this is competitive" thing is a gigantic joke/flame. But maybe? Doubtful it doubles without some serious offers from seriously better schools though.
As someone who had their offer increased 15k to stay competitive with another offer, I can personally say it's not a joke. If they know you're seriously interested and they want you, they'll do what they can to up your offer.
UCLA scholarship negotiations are no joke. There are countless people who have gone from 10/15k a year to near or full-rides. They also respond extremely fast.

zman

Bronze
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by zman » Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:44 am

dproduct wrote:
JohnMarshall17 wrote:
BigZuck wrote:
uconjak wrote:I sent a email yesterday, told them i was going to visit LA In late feb. They called me to set up a time/date. They mentioned schollies at other schools, i told them that money would weigh heavily in my decision on which law school i would attend. They told me they will sit down with me to seriously discuss the situation. Will the move up their scholarship from 48 to 100k?
From what I have seen so far this cycle their whole "let us know if this is competitive" thing is a gigantic joke/flame. But maybe? Doubtful it doubles without some serious offers from seriously better schools though.
As someone who had their offer increased 15k to stay competitive with another offer, I can personally say it's not a joke. If they know you're seriously interested and they want you, they'll do what they can to up your offer.
UCLA scholarship negotiations are no joke. There are countless people who have gone from 10/15k a year to near or full-rides. They also respond extremely fast.
yeah I have heard that, they will up you early in the cycle in no time.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by BigZuck » Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:53 am

I showed them multiple offers from peers that were 60k+ cheaper, they responded by giving me a 2K "need-based" grant. I loled, seemed like a joke at the time but you guys say its not so I guess that was serious business.

My main source of frustration was them saying multiple times "let us know if this is competitive." Well no UCLA, it's not. It's actually the worst scholarship offer I have so far. Then they offered 2k more and said the same thing. No, it's not competitive. I was sincere in my desire to attend becuase ultimately I would like to work in CA but I'm very risk averse and if they insist on costing significantly more than other schools who have better job prospects then I can't possibly justify attending.

I'll try a final time and if they don't budge then I will withdraw and open up a seat.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


zman

Bronze
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by zman » Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:01 am

BigZuck wrote:I showed them multiple offers from peers that were 60k+ cheaper, they responded by giving me a 2K "need-based" grant. I loled, seemed like a joke at the time but you guys say its not so I guess that was serious business.

My main source of frustration was them saying multiple times "let us know if this is competitive." Well no UCLA, it's not. It's actually the worst scholarship offer I have so far. Then they offered 2k more and said the same thing. No, it's not competitive. I was sincere in my desire to attend becuase ultimately I would like to work in CA but I'm very risk averse and if they insist on costing significantly more than other schools who have better job prospects then I can't possibly justify attending.

I'll try a final time and if they don't budge then I will withdraw and open up a seat.
well they can't give full or near full rides to everyone. they still have to con enough suckers to go at sticker to subsidize those who get good deals although I'm sure they are cutting some other places to be able to hand out the $

Rolltide52

New
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:44 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Rolltide52 » Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:12 am

ive been complete since jan 18th any conjectures about when ill hear back?

gonnaknow

New
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:30 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by gonnaknow » Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:47 am

Rolltide52 wrote:ive been complete since jan 18th any conjectures about when ill hear back?
same here. complete since 1/12/13. hopefully we'll hear some good news on Monday.

volp

New
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:35 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by volp » Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:18 pm

not sure if i already posted here, but i was admitted in early january, went complete mid december. urm 3.6x, 168. dean's scholarship, full ride. I know UCLA isn't T14 but my god is it hard to turn down a full tuition scholarship

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


zman

Bronze
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by zman » Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:15 pm

volp wrote:not sure if i already posted here, but i was admitted in early january, went complete mid december. urm 3.6x, 168. dean's scholarship, full ride. I know UCLA isn't T14 but my god is it hard to turn down a full tuition scholarship
take it.

WDH

New
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:15 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by WDH » Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:30 pm

I got offered a pretty nice need based grant yesterday. $21,000 for next year, need to reapply each year and it depends on income and assets.

I was pretty surprised because I only submitted FAFSA last week and my need access on Thursday.

volp

New
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:35 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by volp » Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:40 pm

zman wrote:
volp wrote:not sure if i already posted here, but i was admitted in early january, went complete mid december. urm 3.6x, 168. dean's scholarship, full ride. I know UCLA isn't T14 but my god is it hard to turn down a full tuition scholarship
take it.
well i'm still waiting on a whole bunch of t14s for decisions, but their generosity is attractive.

User avatar
FromDCtoWhere

New
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by FromDCtoWhere » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:01 pm

gonnaknow wrote:
Rolltide52 wrote:ive been complete since jan 18th any conjectures about when ill hear back?
same here. complete since 1/12/13. hopefully we'll hear some good news on Monday.

Been complete since 1/14/13, any reason for saying Monday?
I have a 168/3.45 & UCLA is one of my top two choices, starting to freak out a bit.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl

Gold
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by alwayssunnyinfl » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:05 pm

You've both been complete barely a month. There are some of us still sitting on Sept-Nov dates. Just try to forget about your application until you get a decision.

User avatar
yupyup

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:00 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by yupyup » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:07 pm

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:You've both been complete barely a month. There are some of us still sitting on Sept-Nov dates. Just try to forget about your application until you get a decision.
+1

Complete early Nov. Still hanging on to hope!

thelawdoctor

Bronze
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:12 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by thelawdoctor » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:09 pm

Just go to Taft, in that state it can still sit the bar.

User avatar
yupyup

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:00 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by yupyup » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:11 pm

thelawdoctor wrote:Just go to Taft, in that state it can still sit the bar.
Was that directed at me?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl

Gold
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by alwayssunnyinfl » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:15 pm

yupyup wrote:
thelawdoctor wrote:Just go to Taft, in that state it can still sit the bar.
Was that directed at me?
Pay no attention to the troll.

thelawdoctor

Bronze
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:12 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by thelawdoctor » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:16 pm

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:You've both been complete barely a month. There are some of us still sitting on Sept-Nov dates. Just try to forget about your application until you get a decision.
You honestly aren't even a 1L yet..........................do you post while pooping?

shntn

Platinum
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shntn » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:16 pm

thelawdoctor wrote:
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:You've both been complete barely a month. There are some of us still sitting on Sept-Nov dates. Just try to forget about your application until you get a decision.
You honestly aren't even a 1L yet..........................do you post while pooping?
:lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl

Gold
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by alwayssunnyinfl » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:17 pm

shntn wrote:
thelawdoctor wrote:
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:You've both been complete barely a month. There are some of us still sitting on Sept-Nov dates. Just try to forget about your application until you get a decision.
You honestly aren't even a 1L yet..........................do you post while pooping?
:lol: :lol: :lol:
The best part is that the answer is yes

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


thelawdoctor

Bronze
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:12 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by thelawdoctor » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:17 pm

yupyup wrote:
thelawdoctor wrote:Just go to Taft, in that state it can still sit the bar.
Was that directed at me?
At the whole topic in general.

User avatar
yupyup

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:00 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by yupyup » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:23 pm

ah sorry. :oops: Guess I get a bit on edge when it comes to UCLA (one of my dream schools), not to mention my numbers. :lol:

thelawdoctor

Bronze
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:12 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by thelawdoctor » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:25 pm

yupyup wrote:ah sorry. :oops: Guess I get a bit on edge when it comes to UCLA (one of my dream schools), not to mention my numbers. :lol:
It's ok, why not apply to the Berkeley campus if that is your goal?
More "brand recognition" that way with layman clients who heard on saved by the bell once that it was the Harvard of the West. (clients are sheep)

shntn

Platinum
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shntn » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:26 pm

thelawdoctor wrote:
yupyup wrote:ah sorry. :oops: Guess I get a bit on edge when it comes to UCLA (one of my dream schools), not to mention my numbers. :lol:
It's ok, why not apply to the Berkeley campus if that is your goal?
More "brand recognition" that way with layman clients who heard on saved by the bell once that it was the Harvard of the West. (clients are sheep)
Stop.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”