Yes! I'd LOVE a nice big scholly offer on my bdayLuckySpurs wrote:looking at law school numbers...i saw some reports as early as feb 7...i would really really like that pattern to continuetmon wrote:They should start coming within the next couple weeks, unless things have changed this year.
WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- tmon

- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- thelawschoolproject

- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
tmon wrote:I'm obviously just trying to get everyone to withdraw so they're under enrolled and give me more money.
I'm telling myself that you're getting them to withdraw so there will be more space for me...
<---slightly delusional
- JDizzle2015

- Posts: 638
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:16 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
thelawschoolproject, you'd consider WUSTL over UMich?
tmon, no worries, I'm glad you brought it to my attention. Will probably withdraw soon (unless they give me mad $$$$ that my GPA doesn't deserve)... only because I feel it's a little rude to withdraw right after being admitted.
ETA: That 2:30 feeling; lost the ability to type.
tmon, no worries, I'm glad you brought it to my attention. Will probably withdraw soon (unless they give me mad $$$$ that my GPA doesn't deserve)... only because I feel it's a little rude to withdraw right after being admitted.
ETA: That 2:30 feeling; lost the ability to type.
Last edited by JDizzle2015 on Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- tmon

- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
IB "BETTAR ACCEPTANCESSSS" ragethelawschoolproject wrote:tmon wrote:I'm obviously just trying to get everyone to withdraw so they're under enrolled and give me more money.
I'm telling myself that you're getting them to withdraw so there will be more space for me...
<---slightly delusional
- LuckySpurs

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:46 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
that would be an amaing present. are you for sure going to wash u? from the december LSAT waiting forum i remember you were considering reapplying next cycle?tmon wrote:Yes! I'd LOVE a nice big scholly offer on my bdayLuckySpurs wrote:looking at law school numbers...i saw some reports as early as feb 7...i would really really like that pattern to continuetmon wrote:They should start coming within the next couple weeks, unless things have changed this year.
- tmon

- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm giving WUSTL serious consideration, but it depends on more factors than I care to even count at this point. So for now I'm just seeing how the cycle shakes out. If all I have is WUSTL come June I'll probably take one last time just to avoid the "what if" in the back of my head, since I was PTing significantly higher and I'm doing some tutoring for June takers now so I shouldn't be too rusty.LuckySpurs wrote: that would be an amaing present. are you for sure going to wash u? from the december LSAT waiting forum i remember you were considering reapplying next cycle?
- thelawschoolproject

- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
JDizzle2015 wrote:thelawschoolproject, you'd consider WUSTL over UMich?
Yes.
I realize all of tls hates me for complaining about this when I have other schools, but, tbf no one knows my situation.
I have family near STL and some pretty dire family stuff going on, so being close to home is better than any T14 acceptance. (Hence my applications to Mizzou and SLU.)
-
sammis89

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:38 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1. Two major admits in one day- GW and WUSTL. Feelin good.JDizzle2015 wrote:+111Cornelius wrote:Just admitted via email. Finally WUSTL.
Intrigued by this "Scholars in Law Award".
- JDizzle2015

- Posts: 638
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:16 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
lol, almost "IB".tmon wrote: IB "BETTAR ACCEPTANCESSSS" rage
- tmon

- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I legitimately lol'd when I saw your post pop up before mine.JDizzle2015 wrote:lol, almost "IB".tmon wrote: IB "BETTAR ACCEPTANCESSSS" rage
- thelawschoolproject

- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
tmon wrote:I legitimately lol'd when I saw your post pop up before mine.JDizzle2015 wrote:lol, almost "IB".tmon wrote: IB "BETTAR ACCEPTANCESSSS" rage
oooh yes let's hate on tlsp......
- LuckySpurs

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:46 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
did you write an addendum to wash u? maybe the delay because they think you'll end up going to the a top 14? When i was considering schools, the admissions office at wash u was amazing and did more for me than i could have imaginedthelawschoolproject wrote:JDizzle2015 wrote:thelawschoolproject, you'd consider WUSTL over UMich?
Yes.
I realize all of tls hates me for complaining about this when I have other schools, but, tbf no one knows my situation.
I have family near STL and some pretty dire family stuff going on, so being close to home is better than any T14 acceptance. (Hence my applications to Mizzou and SLU.)
- JDizzle2015

- Posts: 638
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:16 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't hate you/I think those are very legitimate reasons. There's definitely more to life than law school...thelawschoolproject wrote:JDizzle2015 wrote:thelawschoolproject, you'd consider WUSTL over UMich?
Yes.
I realize all of tls hates me for complaining about this when I have other schools, but, tbf no one knows my situation.
I have family near STL and some pretty dire family stuff going on, so being close to home is better than any T14 acceptance. (Hence my applications to Mizzou and SLU.)
- tmon

- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
AHEMthelawschoolproject wrote:tmon wrote:I legitimately lol'd when I saw your post pop up before mine.JDizzle2015 wrote:lol, almost "IB".tmon wrote: IB "BETTAR ACCEPTANCESSSS" rage
oooh yes let's hate on tlsp......
-
minnbills

- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just got in via email. 168 3.4
- dakure

- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
tbf, choosing michigan at all when uva is there is a stupid decision, right tlsp?

- thelawschoolproject

- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
tmon wrote:AHEM
I just want to say on a completely serious note....that you are, indeed my absolute favorite. Also <3 Scarlet and WoodscommaL.
And I didn't even know any of that went down, until right now so......
Dear Ryemanhattan and Imadude,
You don't know me. You know nothing about my life. And, if you did, you'd rightfully feel pretty shitty, so stfu.
Also, if you have a problem with me feel free to PM me.
Best,
tlsp
- thelawschoolproject

- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
dakure wrote:tbf, choosing michigan at all when uva is there is a stupid decision, right tlsp?![]()
Oh you hush, silly boy.
- tmon

- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
dakure wrote:tbf, choosing michigan at all when uva is there is a stupid decision, right tlsp?![]()
- franklyscarlet

- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
thelawschoolproject wrote:tmon wrote:AHEM
I just want to say on a completely serious note....that you are, indeed my absolute favorite. Also <3 Scarlet and WoodscommaL.
And I didn't even know any of that went down, until right now so......
Dear Ryemanhattan and Imadude,
You don't know me. You know nothing about my life. And, if you did, you'd rightfully feel pretty shitty, so stfu.
Also, if you have a problem with me feel free to PM me.
Best,
tlsp
I'M ON THE FAVORITES LIST. world complete <3 <3
- dakure

- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm not one to white knight, but tlsp is right. TLS is undoubtedly a haven for law school applicants. It provides great information and is all around a great resource. But it assumes a constant set of mind and when something or someone deviates from that, for any reason, personal or public, the hivemind jumps. Its in these moments when you can really differentiate those who know what the fuck they're talking about and those that are repeating the oft accurate, but sometimes insufficient, advice purported by the majority of the posters on these boards.
The fact of the matter is, once admitted, there are a plethora of reasons to go to one law school over another. Personally, finances and job prospects are the two things that are most important to me. That doesn't have to be the case for someone else and the inability to recognize the potential nuances circling around such a monumental decision is the epitome of idiocy. People are well within their rights to want a school for reasons that don't align with the reasons other people would want a school. That doesn't make them stupid. It doesn't make them necessarily smart, but it doesn't make them stupid. And as such, if they want to complain, you have a right to voice your opinion about their complaint, but don't be a snarky, condescending asswipe about it. Just because you don't agree doesn't give you the right to assume that, for some inexplainable reason, you're smarter than they are.
The fact of the matter is, once admitted, there are a plethora of reasons to go to one law school over another. Personally, finances and job prospects are the two things that are most important to me. That doesn't have to be the case for someone else and the inability to recognize the potential nuances circling around such a monumental decision is the epitome of idiocy. People are well within their rights to want a school for reasons that don't align with the reasons other people would want a school. That doesn't make them stupid. It doesn't make them necessarily smart, but it doesn't make them stupid. And as such, if they want to complain, you have a right to voice your opinion about their complaint, but don't be a snarky, condescending asswipe about it. Just because you don't agree doesn't give you the right to assume that, for some inexplainable reason, you're smarter than they are.
-
hoos89

- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
/
Last edited by hoos89 on Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- franklyscarlet

- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
QUIT TRYING TO GET ON THE FAVORITE LIST.dakure wrote:I'm not one to white knight, but tlsp is right. TLS is undoubtedly a haven for law school applicants. It provides great information and is all around a great resource. But it assumes a constant set of mind and when something or someone deviates from that, for any reason, personal or public, the hivemind jumps. Its in these moments when you can really differentiate those who know what the fuck they're talking about and those that are repeating the oft accurate, but sometimes insufficient, advice purported by the majority of the posters on these boards.
The fact of the matter is, once admitted, there are a plethora of reasons to go to one law school over another. Personally, finances and job prospects are the two things that are most important to me. That doesn't have to be the case for someone else and the inability to recognize the potential nuances circling around such a monumental decision is the epitome of idiocy. People are well within their rights to want a school for reasons that don't align with the reasons other people would want a school. That doesn't make them stupid. It doesn't make them necessarily smart, but it doesn't make them stupid. And as such, if they want to complain, you have a right to voice your opinion about their complaint, but don't be a snarky, condescending asswipe about it. Just because you don't agree doesn't give you the right to assume that, for some inexplainable reason, you're smarter than they are.
- T00L

- Posts: 600
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:35 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
^word. Don't muddy one I my favorite schools boards.
- dakure

- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
i think you accidentally the sentence.T00L wrote:^word. Don't muddy one I my favorite schools boards.