I meant June.corporatebarbarian wrote:current cycle applicant here. took another shot at the LSAT after getting sub 170s in July - clocked a 178. here's hoping i'm still alive for HS
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- corporatebarbarian

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:44 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- Pneumonia

- Posts: 2096
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Damn dude congrats. If you don't get in this year you should really consider waiting it out, but I think you'll get it this year (I'm assuming you have a good GPA since you haven't been rejected yet).corporatebarbarian wrote:current cycle applicant here. took another shot at the LSAT after getting sub 170s in July - clocked a 178. here's hoping i'm still alive for HS
-
NoDayButToday

- Posts: 1473
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:34 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by NoDayButToday on Sat Mar 26, 2016 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- corporatebarbarian

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:44 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Thank you! I'm pretty stunned. I'm hovering right around the median. And now I'm kicking myself that I didn't apply to Yale.Pneumonia wrote:Damn dude congrats. If you don't get in this year you should really consider waiting it out, but I think you'll get it this year (I'm assuming you have a good GPA since you haven't been rejected yet).corporatebarbarian wrote:current cycle applicant here. took another shot at the LSAT after getting sub 170s in July - clocked a 178. here's hoping i'm still alive for HS
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
You can always wait out a cycle. With those stats + an early app you would have a shot. Also you would put yourself in better positioning for money offers since a fair amount of $$ has already gone or will soon go out.corporatebarbarian wrote:Thank you! I'm pretty stunned. I'm hovering right around the median. And now I'm kicking myself that I didn't apply to Yale.Pneumonia wrote:Damn dude congrats. If you don't get in this year you should really consider waiting it out, but I think you'll get it this year (I'm assuming you have a good GPA since you haven't been rejected yet).corporatebarbarian wrote:current cycle applicant here. took another shot at the LSAT after getting sub 170s in July - clocked a 178. here's hoping i'm still alive for HS
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Congratscorporatebarbarian wrote:current cycle applicant here. took another shot at the LSAT after getting sub 170s in July - clocked a 178. here's hoping i'm still alive for HS
I'm hoping there aren't a lot of people like you. Dat extra February competition....
- rseaney

- Posts: 393
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:53 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
This is how I feel about my JS1.5
"Hi-Five Jessica! Jessica! Jessica..."
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2lcKa9/:1 ... in-sports/
"Hi-Five Jessica! Jessica! Jessica..."
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2lcKa9/:1 ... in-sports/
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Also, I have a feeling we may see action tomorrow.
- Carter1901

- Posts: 134
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:32 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
That's what I like to hear.drawstring wrote:Also, I have a feeling we may see action tomorrow.
- hiphopopotamuss

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 11:29 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Congrats! I'd be surprised if you didn't just become very competitive. I don't know much about S but for H, $ is based on need rather than merit, so I don't think (?) it matters too much if you're admitted a bit later in the cycle.... Good luck!lawschool22 wrote:...corporatebarbarian wrote:current cycle applicant here. took another shot at the LSAT after getting sub 170s in July - clocked a 178. here's hoping i'm still alive for HS
You can always wait out a cycle. With those stats + an early app you would have a shot. Also you would put yourself in better positioning for money offers since a fair amount of $$ has already gone or will soon go out.
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Tue May 13, 2014 10:19 am, edited 2 times in total.
- MagicEightBall

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:58 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
You may rely on it.drawstring wrote:Also, I have a feeling we may see action tomorrow.
- dcpanther

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 8:32 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by dcpanther on Mon Mar 03, 2014 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
plztellmeurjsMagicEightBall wrote:You may rely on it.drawstring wrote:Also, I have a feeling we may see action tomorrow.
- oxie

- Posts: 201
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:51 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Just wanted to let you guys know that I updated the post on T14 waitlist data from LSN, including some new stuff about movement from the Harvard waitlist. Here’s the HLS-relevant stuff:
• During the 2012-2013 cycle, 120 of the 464 applicants with posted results on LSN were waitlisted and 101 did not indicate that they withdrew from the waitlist. Of those 101 applicants who stayed on the waitlist, 27 (26.7%) were eventually admitted.
• During the past three cycles, 383 of the 1,303 applicants with posted results on LSN were waitlisted and 312 did not indicate that they withdrew from the waitlist. Of those 312 applicants who stayed on the waitlist, 74 (23.7%) were eventually admitted.
Here's some info about the characteristics of WL→Admit applicants (the numbers don't match the above because some folks do not include their LSAT or GPA on LSN):
• During the past three cycles, 150 applicants on LSN at/above their cycle’s LSAT median and at/above their cycle’s GPA median were straight admits while 25 were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted applicants, 12 were eventually admitted and 4 withdrew from the waitlist.
• During the past three cycles, 112 applicants on LSN at/above their cycle’s LSAT median and below their cycle’s GPA median were straight admits while 115 were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted applicants, 24 were eventually admitted and 17 withdrew from the waitlist.
• During the past three cycles, 80 applicants on LSN below their cycle’s LSAT median and at/above their cycle’s GPA median were straight admits while 102 were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted applicants, 24 were eventually admitted and 18 withdrew from the waitlist.
• During the past three cycles, 48 applicants on LSN below their cycle’s LSAT median and below their cycle’s GPA median were straight admits while 128 were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted applicants, 12 were eventually admitted and 30 withdrew from the waitlist.
• During the past three cycles, 66 URM applicants on LSN were straight admits while 58 were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted applicants, 9 were eventually admitted and 18 withdrew from the waitlist.
• During the 2012-2013 cycle, 120 of the 464 applicants with posted results on LSN were waitlisted and 101 did not indicate that they withdrew from the waitlist. Of those 101 applicants who stayed on the waitlist, 27 (26.7%) were eventually admitted.
• During the past three cycles, 383 of the 1,303 applicants with posted results on LSN were waitlisted and 312 did not indicate that they withdrew from the waitlist. Of those 312 applicants who stayed on the waitlist, 74 (23.7%) were eventually admitted.
Here's some info about the characteristics of WL→Admit applicants (the numbers don't match the above because some folks do not include their LSAT or GPA on LSN):
• During the past three cycles, 150 applicants on LSN at/above their cycle’s LSAT median and at/above their cycle’s GPA median were straight admits while 25 were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted applicants, 12 were eventually admitted and 4 withdrew from the waitlist.
• During the past three cycles, 112 applicants on LSN at/above their cycle’s LSAT median and below their cycle’s GPA median were straight admits while 115 were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted applicants, 24 were eventually admitted and 17 withdrew from the waitlist.
• During the past three cycles, 80 applicants on LSN below their cycle’s LSAT median and at/above their cycle’s GPA median were straight admits while 102 were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted applicants, 24 were eventually admitted and 18 withdrew from the waitlist.
• During the past three cycles, 48 applicants on LSN below their cycle’s LSAT median and below their cycle’s GPA median were straight admits while 128 were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted applicants, 12 were eventually admitted and 30 withdrew from the waitlist.
• During the past three cycles, 66 URM applicants on LSN were straight admits while 58 were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted applicants, 9 were eventually admitted and 18 withdrew from the waitlist.
- Quest4Knowledge

- Posts: 293
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 2:36 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Um, I think this is wrong.FuriousDuck wrote:Harvard and Stanford financial aid are both based on merit.
I believe HLS provides need aid, but not merit:
http://www.law.harvard.edu/prospective/jd/finaid/index.html wrote:HLS does not award merit or full-ride scholarships, but instead focuses on need-based aid.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Arrow4Christ

- Posts: 418
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:07 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Pretty sure they're both based on need...FuriousDuck wrote:Harvard and Stanford financial aid are both based on merit.
- rseaney

- Posts: 393
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:53 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
das rightQuest4Knowledge wrote:Um, I think this is wrong.FuriousDuck wrote:Harvard and Stanford financial aid are both based on merit.
I believe HLS provides need aid, but not merit:http://www.law.harvard.edu/prospective/jd/finaid/index.html wrote:HLS does not award merit or full-ride scholarships, but instead focuses on need-based aid.
EDIT: just saw that you quoted the website haha my affirmation of accuracy now seems pretty unnecessary
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Thanks for the update oxie!
Glad to see that roughly half of the waitlisted at/above both medians got in.......still a chance.
Glad to see that roughly half of the waitlisted at/above both medians got in.......still a chance.
- bbkk

- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
dcpanther wrote:checking in too.
snuck in an app before the deadline, got a good lsat score on Feb retake (over 176) but gpa of 3.5x so not particularly optimistic but you never know!
Congrats guys!! Well done!!corporatebarbarian wrote:current cycle applicant here. took another shot at the LSAT after getting sub 170s in July - clocked a 178. here's hoping i'm still alive for HS
and this...
drawstring wrote:
I'm hoping there aren't a lot of people like you. Dat extra February competition....
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I was referring to schools other than HYS. For instance this poster could be in contention for full rides at CCN. I think the chances of that go up if you apply earlier.hiphopopotamuss wrote:Congrats! I'd be surprised if you didn't just become very competitive. I don't know much about S but for H, $ is based on need rather than merit, so I don't think (?) it matters too much if you're admitted a bit later in the cycle.... Good luck!lawschool22 wrote:...corporatebarbarian wrote:current cycle applicant here. took another shot at the LSAT after getting sub 170s in July - clocked a 178. here's hoping i'm still alive for HS
You can always wait out a cycle. With those stats + an early app you would have a shot. Also you would put yourself in better positioning for money offers since a fair amount of $$ has already gone or will soon go out.
- Quest4Knowledge

- Posts: 293
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 2:36 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Now that applications should all be officially in and Feb LSAT scores are out, do we think there will be a brief lapse in decisions for them to compile all of this? Hoping for some JS1s this week!
- MagicEightBall

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:58 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Signs point to yes.Quest4Knowledge wrote:Now that applications should all be officially in and Feb LSAT scores are out, do we think there will be a brief lapse in decisions for them to compile all of this? Hoping for some JS1s this week!
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Based on last year's cycle I think we can expect activity throughout March and April. Most people will have a final decision or WL decision within the next 4-6 weeks.Quest4Knowledge wrote:Now that applications should all be officially in and Feb LSAT scores are out, do we think there will be a brief lapse in decisions for them to compile all of this? Hoping for some JS1s this week!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login