Yikes!hwannabe1234 wrote:174 and 3.9 + from ivy and good PS IMO
FR
don't understand why I got FR..
UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
- Arrow4Christ

- Posts: 418
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:07 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
-
sah

- Posts: 42
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:31 am
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Yeah 3.9 174 here too. There's evidently no real rhyme or reason numbers-wise to it (I did not customize my PS/tailor my recs. Probably hurt.)
-
angelshare

- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 10:42 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
What does everyone in FR/UR2 think the faculty/students are looking for in choosing among these ~1200 or so applicants undergoing FR? I think numbers play less of a role here and think PS/whyberk statements are more important (holistic review comes in play?) because the high LSAT/GPA people would have already been autoadmitted by the dean....just a hypothesis
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
See post on previous page.angelshare wrote:What does everyone in FR/UR2 think the faculty/students are looking for in choosing among these ~1200 or so applicants undergoing FR? I think numbers play less of a role here and think PS/whyberk statements are more important (holistic review comes in play?) because the high LSAT/GPA people would have already been autoadmitted by the dean....just a hypothesis
- Pishee77

- Posts: 238
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:14 am
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
If were in FR would it be bad to send a why Berkeley now/Loci? Do you think they will add it to our application?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- scoobysnax

- Posts: 208
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:51 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
From Berkeley's Twitter:
"One-half of total committee files were sent today. No need for LOCIs (please)."
"One-half of total committee files were sent today. No need for LOCIs (please)."
-
Winter is Coming

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:51 am
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Second this.Jamesta25 wrote:Does anyone have any idea what it means to have not gone into FR? Been in UR since November. Do early applicants ever enter into the FR2 and skip FR1? Any real insight based on past years would be much appreciated rather than speculation.
- Serett

- Posts: 16088
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:06 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Looking through last year's thread, a few more acceptances might've trickled out, but the majority appear to have been subsequently denied. Based on the Tweet just above, maybe some of us will still be moving to FR, too.Winter is Coming wrote:Second this.Jamesta25 wrote:Does anyone have any idea what it means to have not gone into FR? Been in UR since November. Do early applicants ever enter into the FR2 and skip FR1? Any real insight based on past years would be much appreciated rather than speculation.
- gobears!!

- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:04 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by gobears!! on Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
sasquatchsam

- Posts: 189
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:51 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
3.9+/173 here in the exact same situation...kind of sucks because Berkeley is one of my top choices and I have very fond feelings towards them compared to other law schools because one of my non-immediate family members graduated from there and went on to do some pretty awesome stuff with his degree (SCOTUS clerk, fed prosecutor, and in house counsel)sah wrote:Yeah 3.9 174 here too. There's evidently no real rhyme or reason numbers-wise to it (I did not customize my PS/tailor my recs. Probably hurt.)
Berkeley you are awesome...why won't you love me?
-
Ally Mcbeal

- Posts: 109
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:31 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
158 3.63 FR... Shocked. Cali native so hoping for good news!!
-
kjones7

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:43 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Accepted 1/22. Application complete: 1/13
GPA: 3.78
LSAT: 166/174
California native
GPA: 3.78
LSAT: 166/174
California native
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Well, just got into Penn ED, so I'm checking out. Quick, someone take my FR spot 
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Serett

- Posts: 16088
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:06 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Gladlyohpobrecito wrote:Well, just got into Penn ED, so I'm checking out. Quick, someone take my FR spot
Edit: And congrats!
- Magical Trevor

- Posts: 149
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:10 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
So, is it a safe bet that no news is bad news? UR since mid October without any word.
-
Ally Mcbeal

- Posts: 109
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:31 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
idk.You might be an admit for next week. Stay positive.Magical Trevor wrote:So, is it a safe bet that no news is bad news? UR since mid October without any word.
- yeslekkkk

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 1:37 am
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I was happy to get the email about FR. Berkeley is a reach for me, and I thought I was autodinged. I will take that 10% chance! I'm a CA native and would love to stay here.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Jamesta25

- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:09 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
This is reassuring. Hopefully those of us who were not sent into FR today will be in this latter half. I wonder when we can expect that second half to be sent out?scoobysnax wrote:From Berkeley's Twitter:
"One-half of total committee files were sent today. No need for LOCIs (please)."
- coolbean2013

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:24 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Can someone explain to me what Berkeley's tweet means please?Jamesta25 wrote:This is reassuring. Hopefully those of us who were not sent into FR today will be in this latter half. I wonder when we can expect that second half to be sent out?scoobysnax wrote:From Berkeley's Twitter:
"One-half of total committee files were sent today. No need for LOCIs (please)."
- gobears!!

- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:04 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by gobears!! on Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Hey everyone!
Not that I'm procrastinating on anything, but here are some graphs for the new acceptances and for people who are in FR. I think this shows that FR isn't some sort of "death sentence." Berkeley is known for being very holistic (if you don't believe me, troll around LSN and you'll find people who swept HYS but didn't get Berkeley), but this shows mostly a strong foundation (
).
Everyone on our spreadsheet:

For science, LSN right now:

KJD:

Not KJD:

Average or below softs:

Above-average softs:

There weren't enough data points to make a useful C&F graph. All of these are URM-excluded (sorry! I wanted to make a URM graph but there wasn't enough data).
The graphs are all pretty uniform (more so than Harvard's), and have most of the acceptances in that upper right quadrant, which is above both medians. So basically--and this is what I've always suspected about Berkeley and Yale--they shored up their medians first, and then sent the apps on to faculty review. This is good, because it lets FR have more freedom in picking acceptances that are below medians--there is a cushion there to absorb them. They also appear willing to take a hit on GPA right now, which means super splitters should fare well in FR
Good luck everyone!
Not that I'm procrastinating on anything, but here are some graphs for the new acceptances and for people who are in FR. I think this shows that FR isn't some sort of "death sentence." Berkeley is known for being very holistic (if you don't believe me, troll around LSN and you'll find people who swept HYS but didn't get Berkeley), but this shows mostly a strong foundation (
Everyone on our spreadsheet:

For science, LSN right now:

KJD:

Not KJD:

Average or below softs:

Above-average softs:

There weren't enough data points to make a useful C&F graph. All of these are URM-excluded (sorry! I wanted to make a URM graph but there wasn't enough data).
The graphs are all pretty uniform (more so than Harvard's), and have most of the acceptances in that upper right quadrant, which is above both medians. So basically--and this is what I've always suspected about Berkeley and Yale--they shored up their medians first, and then sent the apps on to faculty review. This is good, because it lets FR have more freedom in picking acceptances that are below medians--there is a cushion there to absorb them. They also appear willing to take a hit on GPA right now, which means super splitters should fare well in FR
Good luck everyone!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Synch

- Posts: 166
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:33 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
FR email here too - GPA is below 25th, LSAT above 75th. Don't really know what to make of it - I've been UR since early november, and figured I was a ding.
- coolbean2013

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:24 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Thanks for the explanation!!gobears!! wrote:All it is saying is that they have sent about half of the FR committee reads to be reviewed (you have to be placed in this by the administration and it shows on your tracker). Presumably another wave will come at a later time. About 1200 go to FR so that means 600 or so have probably been sent. Then they just say they do not want people emailing them updates and essays unless it is necessarycoolbean2013 wrote:Can someone explain to me what Berkeley's tweet means please?Jamesta25 wrote:This is reassuring. Hopefully those of us who were not sent into FR today will be in this latter half. I wonder when we can expect that second half to be sent out?scoobysnax wrote:From Berkeley's Twitter:
"One-half of total committee files were sent today. No need for LOCIs (please)."
- wowhio

- Posts: 163
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Just wanted to say... Good luck with the committee review, everyone!
- China Spy

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: UC Berkeley c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Scoobers, how do you decide the strength of ppls softs?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login