you can find me at www.top-law-schools.com! Forum

[hillz]

Did anyone else get their acceptance packet and have additional postage due? Had to pay an extra 83¢ for it, not a big deal at all, but really odd.

That's bizarre.

[taptaptop]

IN THIS MORNING VIA STATUS CHECKER!!!

I applied ED waaaaaay back in early September so I was starting to feel really worried! I'm so excited to meet everyone this summer!

HAIL.

so happy for you man!!

[jcdetroit]

Someone make an admits thread so I can gawk at pictures of the Law Quad all day instead of working

[warby93]

Did anyone else get their acceptance packet and have additional postage due? Had to pay an extra 83¢ for it, not a big deal at all, but really odd.

Haha thats weird. I didn't have to pay but the mail carrier shoved mine into my very small apartment sized mailbox and cracked my plastic folder in half

[warby93]

Someone make an admits thread so I can gawk at pictures of the Law Quad all day instead of working

I put a request in for a banner! Now that I'm at 100 posts I will probably make one in the next few days (unless someone awesome wants to do it instead!!!!!!)

[Gray]

.

[jcdetroit]

Guys does the update every day thing start after you go complete, or after you get your status checker?

After you get your status checker, I think

[Gray]

.

[Mack.Hambleton]

Guys does the update every day thing start after you go complete, or after you get your status checker?

The every day update is the status checker

[rion91]

So the date just changes? wut

[R. Jeeves]

So the date just changes? wut

yeah its kinda pointless. I guess maybe it just relieves the anxiety that some people get when they wonder if something has actually happened to their app without the status checker being updated to reflect that.

[xylocarp]

for me, the nice thing about the mich status checker was that you knew it would change once, every day, so you could just check it each morning and know your status every day (which contrasts with the refreshrefreshrefresh going on looking for NYU DLS). but then that person said his changed in the middle of the day so lol never mind I guess.

[R. Jeeves]

for me, the nice thing about the mich status checker was that you knew it would change once, every day, so you could just check it each morning and know your status every day (which contrasts with the refreshrefreshrefresh going on looking for NYU DLS). but then that person said his changed in the middle of the day so lol never mind I guess.

haha speaking of which...someone just got DLS. Mad refresh time.

ETA: nvm bc all you neuros already broke the status checker page

[rebexness]

[tk17]

I was passing time on LSN, and noticed that there are no reported acceptances for anyone with >175 LSAT. Looking at the spreadsheet, there is one anon with a 177/3.98, but other than that, all acceptances have a LSAT of 174 or lower.

Kinda weird.

[arock111]

I was passing time on LSN, and noticed that there are no reported acceptances for anyone with >175 LSAT. Looking at the spreadsheet, there is one anon with a 177/3.98, but other than that, all acceptances have a LSAT of 174 or lower.

Kinda weird.

think about how small the sample size of >175 is....

[RSN]

Well, two things:

1) The pool of people with 175+ LSATs on LSN for this cycle is pretty small right now (http://search.lawschoolnumbers.com/user ... Applicants), probably because:

2) The overall number of applicants with those scores is pretty small, making it easier to ID them if they post their stats publicly at this stage.

[tk17]

I was passing time on LSN, and noticed that there are no reported acceptances for anyone with >175 LSAT. Looking at the spreadsheet, there is one anon with a 177/3.98, but other than that, all acceptances have a LSAT of 174 or lower.

Kinda weird.

think about how small the sample size of >175 is....

Of course.

But there are definitely applicants with those scores that have applied. And every other T14 that is making a significant number of decisions (NYU, Duke, UVA, Georgetown... did I miss anyone?) has reported admittances from people above the 175 line. Michigan's LSN looks like a hard line at 174, where the other schools' LSNs are much more scattered. This makes which makes me wonder if it's intentional. Maybe a manifestation of YP?

[tk17]

Well, two things:

1) The pool of people with 175+ LSATs on LSN for this cycle is pretty small right now (http://search.lawschoolnumbers.com/user ... Applicants), probably because:

Wow. I didn't realize the sample was THAT small....

Makes sense though... I guess there's nothing to see here... Move along....

Edit: I lied. I'm not convinced. It still looks fishy to me. But it actually doesn't matter... soo....

[warby93]

The Admitted Student thread just went live!

[RSN]

Well, two things:

1) The pool of people with 175+ LSATs on LSN for this cycle is pretty small right now (http://search.lawschoolnumbers.com/user ... Applicants), probably because:

Wow. I didn't realize the sample was THAT small....

Makes sense though... I guess there's nothing to see here... Move along....

Edit: I lied. I'm not convinced. It still looks fishy to me. But it actually doesn't matter... soo....

What looks fishy? Slow day at my office so I looked at all of those 175+ profiles -- none of them have even added Michigan to their school list.

[LoganCouture]

Well, two things:

1) The pool of people with 175+ LSATs on LSN for this cycle is pretty small right now (http://search.lawschoolnumbers.com/user ... Applicants), probably because:

Wow. I didn't realize the sample was THAT small....

Makes sense though... I guess there's nothing to see here... Move along....

Edit: I lied. I'm not convinced. It still looks fishy to me. But it actually doesn't matter... soo....

Michigan YPs. It doesn't do so as vigorously as UVA or Penn but it does. I'm pretty sure you can observe it in past cycles on LSN.

[rebexness]

[tk17]

What looks fishy? Slow day at my office so I looked at all of those 175+ profiles -- none of them have even added Michigan to their school list.

The line of acceptances at 174 on LSN with nothing above it looks fishy to me.

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Raider12
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/ghostfacekilla
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cj2014
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jsweg

Not inclusive, but a sample of people with 175+ who have applied to Michigan on LSN. These might be the same as those who are on the spreadsheet. Maybe not.

We know that UM yield protects. I'm just pointing out that it's odd that we haven't seen any acceptances for people with 175+ for UM when we have for all the other T14 schools currently sending out acceptances.

*edited for stupid mistakes.

[RSN]

What looks fishy? Slow day at my office so I looked at all of those 175+ profiles -- none of them have even added Michigan to their school list.

The line of acceptances at 174 on LSN with nothing above it looks fishy to me.

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Raider12
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/ghostfacekilla
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cj2014
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jsweg

Not inclusive, but a sample of people with 175+ who have applied to Michigan on LSN. These might be the same as those who are on the spreadsheet. Maybe not.

We know that UM yield protects. I'm just pointing out that it's odd that we haven't seen any acceptances for people with 175+ for UM when we have for all the other T14 schools currently sending out acceptances.

*edited for stupid mistakes.

Okay, I put too much trust in LSN's search function, three of those did not show up in my search, which was just all users 175-180 for this cycle, no other restrictions except allowing for those who didn't list LSDAS or Degree GPA. You could be on to something, or it could be coincidental, though like you said we know Michigan YPs.