you can find me at www.top-law-schools.com! Forum

Rigo · Post by **Rigo** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:10 pm

"Is that crushing debt in your pocket or are you happy to see me?" -Neurotic's heifer groupie.

Hand · Post by **Hand** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:11 pm

LSATneurotic wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hereisonehand wrote: eta: but I might want to revise that judgment if I learn more about the percentage of students at H who share the character defects that LSATneurotic exhibits
Hey now, let's find out if they have friends before painting in a negative light.

I personally don't. All I was trying to find out was if being an insufferable elitist striver would up my friend count.
Ouch, fellas, go easy on me. I'm not that bad once you get to know me, I swear. Although I can't deny the striving/character defects.

It's not even primarily the striverdom (although that is plenty annoying), but rather your mysogionist bullshit that renders you simply godawful.

HorseThief · Post by **HorseThief** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:12 pm

Well, this thread got more fun.

On a more important note, there's still one spot for the 19th and 10 open on the 25th. Puts the total interview slots for the season at 110.

Hand · Post by **Hand** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:12 pm

Dirigo wrote:"Is that crushing debt in your pocket or are you happy to see me?" -Neurotic's heifer groupie.

rebexness · Post by **rebexness** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:13 pm

Gray · Post by **Gray** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:14 pm

LoganCouture · Post by **LoganCouture** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:16 pm

LetsGoMets wrote:Congrats to you guys for being done with your interviews. Any other reports? Did you have JS or someone else?

PM'd.

LSATneurotic · Post by **LSATneurotic** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:16 pm

hereisonehand wrote:
LSATneurotic wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hereisonehand wrote: eta: but I might want to revise that judgment if I learn more about the percentage of students at H who share the character defects that LSATneurotic exhibits
Hey now, let's find out if they have friends before painting in a negative light.

I personally don't. All I was trying to find out was if being an insufferable elitist striver would up my friend count.
Ouch, fellas, go easy on me. I'm not that bad once you get to know me, I swear. Although I can't deny the striving/character defects.
It's not even primarily the striverdom (although that is plenty annoying), but rather your mysogionist bullshit that render you simply godawful.

Nice spelling of misogynist*.

awww come on! that's completely unfair. I was just stirring up some thrilling debate. Plus I already served a ban for that one, so this is double jeopardy.

to smcgrey: I honestly don't hold anything against gold diggers. If you are attractive and have a lot of options, why not go for someone with money? YOLO, right?

Colonel_funkadunk · Post by **Colonel_funkadunk** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:18 pm

Lol @ double jeopardy

This is TLS dumbass

Hand · Post by **Hand** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:22 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Lol @ double jeopardy

This is TLS dumbass

This. Also, ESOL FTW.

BillsFan9907 · Post by **BillsFan9907** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:23 pm

smccgrey wrote:I feel like the kind of women who open their legs for only a HLS degree aren't really the kind of women worth wasting your time on, but I guess if vapid, skinny golddiggers are your thing, by all means.

What's wrong with being skinny?

Gray · Post by **Gray** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:25 pm

Colonel_funkadunk · Post by **Colonel_funkadunk** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:26 pm

Seoulless wrote:
smccgrey wrote:I feel like the kind of women who open their legs for only a HLS degree aren't really the kind of women worth wasting your time on, but I guess if vapid, skinny golddiggers are your thing, by all means.
What's wrong with being skinny?

Everything, if you're also Canadian

BillsFan9907 · Post by **BillsFan9907** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:28 pm

smccgrey wrote:
LSATneurotic wrote: to smcgrey: I honestly don't hold anything against gold diggers. If you are attractive and have a lot of options, why not go for someone with money? YOLO, right?
If you're a hot woman and your ONLY option for becoming wealthy is to latch on to some rich bhole then you're probably neither intelligent nor personable.

but they're fine for one night stands, I guess.

I think that's what the OP was going for.

R. Jeeves · Post by **R. Jeeves** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:30 pm

Seoulless wrote:
smccgrey wrote:
LSATneurotic wrote: to smcgrey: I honestly don't hold anything against gold diggers. If you are attractive and have a lot of options, why not go for someone with money? YOLO, right?
If you're a hot woman and your ONLY option for becoming wealthy is to latch on to some rich bhole then you're probably neither intelligent nor personable.

but they're fine for one night stands, I guess.
I think that's what the OP was going for.

yeah obvi.
you can't make a ho a housewife amirite Lneuro?

LSATneurotic · Post by **LSATneurotic** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:32 pm

pulstar1 wrote:
Seoulless wrote:
smccgrey wrote:
LSATneurotic wrote: to smcgrey: I honestly don't hold anything against gold diggers. If you are attractive and have a lot of options, why not go for someone with money? YOLO, right?
If you're a hot woman and your ONLY option for becoming wealthy is to latch on to some rich bhole then you're probably neither intelligent nor personable.

but they're fine for one night stands, I guess.
I think that's what the OP was going for.
yeah obvi.
you can't make a ho a housewife amirite Lneuro?

hahaha yeah prolly not, and I don't intend to find out.

ETA: of course, I'm pretty sure Wiz Khalifa did that, so we will have to see how that goes.

hillz · Post by **hillz** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:35 pm

LSATneurotic wrote:
Nice spelling of misogynist*.

awww come on! that's completely unfair. I was just stirring up some thrilling debate. Plus I already served a ban for that one, so this is double jeopardy.

to smcgrey: I honestly don't hold anything against gold diggers. If you are attractive and have a lot of options, why not go for someone with money? YOLO, right?

It's his second language and trust me, he's far smarter than you or I will ever be.

Rigo · Post by **Rigo** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:38 pm

hillz wrote:
LSATneurotic wrote: Nice spelling of misogynist*.
awww come on! that's completely unfair. I was just stirring up some thrilling debate. Plus I already served a ban for that one, so this is double jeopardy.
to smcgrey: I honestly don't hold anything against gold diggers. If you are attractive and have a lot of options, why not go for someone with money? YOLO, right?
It's his second language and trust me, he's far smarter than you or I will ever be.

Yeah I'm consistently in awe of Learned Hand.
Hillz, you're p. awesome too though.

Hand · Post by **Hand** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:40 pm

hillz wrote:
LSATneurotic wrote:
Nice spelling of misogynist*.

awww come on! that's completely unfair. I was just stirring up some thrilling debate. Plus I already served a ban for that one, so this is double jeopardy.

to smcgrey: I honestly don't hold anything against gold diggers. If you are attractive and have a lot of options, why not go for someone with money? YOLO, right?

It's his second language and trust me, he's far smarter than you or I will ever be.

<3

I'm also cute like my tar btw

Colonel_funkadunk · Post by **Colonel_funkadunk** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:43 pm

Little known fact I'm actually smarter than hand

Hand · Post by **Hand** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:44 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Little known fact I'm actually smarter than hand

true, but you're not cute like your tar.

Gray · Post by **Gray** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:48 pm

Hand · Post by **Hand** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:53 pm

smccgrey wrote:I don't think I've ever seen either of you give a santa hat an erection so I guess my admission to Yale is all but finalized now.

Asha better be paying close attention to that thread, you and xylo should be a lock.

sfoglia · Post by **sfoglia** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 3:16 pm

hereisonehand wrote:
hillz wrote: It's his second language and trust me, he's far smarter than you or I will ever be.
<3

I'm also cute like my tar btw

This makes me happy.

everything_bagel · Post by **everything_bagel** » Wed Nov 12, 2014 7:11 pm

LSATneurotic wrote:No, not a lesbian, I am cisgender.

yikes, you know those aren't mutually exclusive identities, right?

you can find me at www.top-law-schools.com! Forum

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

.

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Register for access!

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

.

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Register now!

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Register now, it's still FREE!

.

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?