Everyone does itjackbauer10 wrote:seems to be a couple with scores on the higher side. i believe bitsy and aksnow were pre-jan 10th.99.9luft wrote:Have the early-mid January UCLA applicants heard back? Not yet, right?
I'd check LSN but it is being down for that update.
...totally just outed myself as crazy lsn stalker...
UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- AKsnow

- Posts: 167
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:41 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
jackbauer10

- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:12 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
thanks! well in my defense i'm trying to keep up with all the dec waiters to see if any of us end up at the same schoolAKsnow wrote:Everyone does itjackbauer10 wrote:seems to be a couple with scores on the higher side. i believe bitsy and aksnow were pre-jan 10th.99.9luft wrote:Have the early-mid January UCLA applicants heard back? Not yet, right?
I'd check LSN but it is being down for that update.
...totally just outed myself as crazy lsn stalker...you're just a brave enough girl to admit it!
-
Spikedude

- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:12 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by Spikedude on Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Dmini7

- Posts: 724
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:20 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What type of URM? If you are AA you will be fine getting into T14. UCLA isn't too URM friendly in my opinion. Take your numbers to USC insteadSpikedude wrote:Waitlisted at UCLA. My chances of breaking into the T14 appear dimmer. 168 3.06 URM
-
delarge3

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:32 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In! got the call about an hour ago, 120k scholly mentioned.
Does UCLA give full rides or is this as close as I can get (meaning, worth negotiating for more?)
went complete 1/15
168/4.0
Does UCLA give full rides or is this as close as I can get (meaning, worth negotiating for more?)
went complete 1/15
168/4.0
-
shntn

- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That's about the biggest I've heard of. Congrats!delarge3 wrote:In! got the call about an hour ago, 120k scholly mentioned.
Does UCLA give full rides or is this as close as I can get (meaning, worth negotiating for more?)
went complete 1/15
168/4.0
-
delarge3

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:32 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks! good luck to all other applicants...shntn wrote:That's about the biggest I've heard of. Congrats!delarge3 wrote:In! got the call about an hour ago, 120k scholly mentioned.
Does UCLA give full rides or is this as close as I can get (meaning, worth negotiating for more?)
went complete 1/15
168/4.0
- uconjak

- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:20 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Damm son thats great, I only got 48K with a 168/3.9...I am going at the end of the month to LA to discuss my other "offers" with them.....hope they step up.delarge3 wrote:In! got the call about an hour ago, 120k scholly mentioned.
Does UCLA give full rides or is this as close as I can get (meaning, worth negotiating for more?)
went complete 1/15
168/4.0
- ramadden13

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:45 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I got a call from them but I was driving and missed answering it. Should I call back?delarge3 wrote:Thanks! good luck to all other applicants...shntn wrote:That's about the biggest I've heard of. Congrats!delarge3 wrote:In! got the call about an hour ago, 120k scholly mentioned.
Does UCLA give full rides or is this as close as I can get (meaning, worth negotiating for more?)
went complete 1/15
168/4.0
-
rfar1815

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:29 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Accepted
via phone call from an LA number
169/3.9x
Non URM
No work experience
Applied 12/4
Went complete 12/7
No scholarship mentioned, should I assume nothing will come in the mail either?
169/3.9x
Non URM
No work experience
Applied 12/4
Went complete 12/7
No scholarship mentioned, should I assume nothing will come in the mail either?
- ramadden13

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:45 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Called them back and found out I got in with 20K per year!!!
168/3.67
168/3.67
-
fallingup

- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I got the call on 2/1 and my snail mail acceptance came on Saturday (2/9) - FYI.
- megagnarley

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Grats! Good money.ramadden13 wrote:Called them back and found out I got in with 20K per year!!!
168/3.67
Dates?
-
delarge3

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:32 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm a special snowflake, what can I sayuconjak wrote:Damm son thats great, I only got 48K with a 168/3.9...I am going at the end of the month to LA to discuss my other "offers" with them.....hope they step up.delarge3 wrote:In! got the call about an hour ago, 120k scholly mentioned.
Does UCLA give full rides or is this as close as I can get (meaning, worth negotiating for more?)
went complete 1/15
168/4.0
Squeeze em! Good luck
- ramadden13

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:45 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks! And here you go:megagnarley wrote:Grats! Good money.ramadden13 wrote:Called them back and found out I got in with 20K per year!!!
168/3.67
Dates?
Applied 1/15, Complete 1/18, Accepted 2/11 - scholarship communicated over the phone
- AKsnow

- Posts: 167
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:41 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats Ram!ramadden13 wrote:Thanks! And here you go:megagnarley wrote:Grats! Good money.ramadden13 wrote:Called them back and found out I got in with 20K per year!!!
168/3.67
Dates?
Applied 1/15, Complete 1/18, Accepted 2/11 - scholarship communicated over the phone
- megagnarley

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My 170/3.65 Dec 10 complete date is looking bleaker and bleaker.ramadden13 wrote:Thanks! And here you go:megagnarley wrote:Grats! Good money.ramadden13 wrote:Called them back and found out I got in with 20K per year!!!
168/3.67
Dates?
Applied 1/15, Complete 1/18, Accepted 2/11 - scholarship communicated over the phone
Thanks for the numbers ol chap!
- ramadden13

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:45 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks snow!AKsnow wrote:Congrats Ram!ramadden13 wrote:Thanks! And here you go:megagnarley wrote:Grats! Good money.ramadden13 wrote:Called them back and found out I got in with 20K per year!!!
168/3.67
Dates?
Applied 1/15, Complete 1/18, Accepted 2/11 - scholarship communicated over the phone![]()
- ramadden13

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:45 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Could you be YP with that LSAT? Only explanation I see for that.megagnarley wrote:My 170/3.65 Dec 10 complete date is looking bleaker and bleaker.ramadden13 wrote:Thanks! And here you go:megagnarley wrote:Grats! Good money.ramadden13 wrote:Called them back and found out I got in with 20K per year!!!
168/3.67
Dates?
Applied 1/15, Complete 1/18, Accepted 2/11 - scholarship communicated over the phone
Thanks for the numbers ol chap!
- megagnarley

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sadly, I doubt it. My friend with a 170/3.8 just got in today with full ride.ramadden13 wrote:Could you be YP with that LSAT? Only explanation I see for that.megagnarley wrote:My 170/3.65 Dec 10 complete date is looking bleaker and bleaker.ramadden13 wrote:Thanks! And here you go:megagnarley wrote:
Grats! Good money.
Dates?
Applied 1/15, Complete 1/18, Accepted 2/11 - scholarship communicated over the phone
Thanks for the numbers ol chap!
I also wrote a solid why UCLA essay.
Puzzlement.
ETA: Friend submitted in Jan
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
i am reaaaaaal butthurt about my lack of money. a big fat goose egg. i'm gonna have to call them soon.megagnarley wrote:
Sadly, I doubt it. My friend with a 170/3.8 just got in today with full ride.
I also wrote a solid why UCLA essay.
Puzzlement.
ETA: Friend submitted in Jan
- megagnarley

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
She was URM FYItwinkletoes16 wrote:i am reaaaaaal butthurt about my lack of money. a big fat goose egg. i'm gonna have to call them soon.megagnarley wrote:
Sadly, I doubt it. My friend with a 170/3.8 just got in today with full ride.
I also wrote a solid why UCLA essay.
Puzzlement.
ETA: Friend submitted in Jan
- GoldHattedGatsby

- Posts: 149
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:25 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The lack of any sort of status checker is certainly proving quite vexing. It's like they expect us to just wait for them to make a decision without placating the granular information cravings of our Internet-addled brains--the gall of some people...
- megagnarley

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Concur.GoldHattedGatsby wrote:The lack of any sort of status checker is certainly proving quite vexing. It's like they expect us to just wait for them to make a decision without placating the granular information cravings of our Internet-addled brains--the gall of some people...
-
hattrick87

- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
With that 75K from Michigan you can totally werk them.twinkletoes16 wrote:i am reaaaaaal butthurt about my lack of money. a big fat goose egg. i'm gonna have to call them soon.megagnarley wrote:
Sadly, I doubt it. My friend with a 170/3.8 just got in today with full ride.
I also wrote a solid why UCLA essay.
Puzzlement.
ETA: Friend submitted in Jan