no dice. I've been to but have never lived in CA. I think it's reaaally random.mrmangs wrote: I'll be more precise.Everyone I've read about who has gotten in thus far has lived in Cali at some point in his/her life. TLS admit posters are hardly exhaustive of everyone who has gotten in, however. Nor is my knowledge of every admit post on TLS.
Berkeley 2011 applicants Forum
- ads222

- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 1:50 am
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
-
lakerfanimal

- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:22 am
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
Everybody who has gotten in so far has said the word california at some point in their lives (those are some real ties there).
-
tipler4213

- Posts: 634
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 11:16 am
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
No Cali ties here. I am from Bama, which probably counts as a URM at Berkeley.ads222 wrote:no dice. I've been to but have never lived in CA. I think it's reaaally random.mrmangs wrote: I'll be more precise.Everyone I've read about who has gotten in thus far has lived in Cali at some point in his/her life. TLS admit posters are hardly exhaustive of everyone who has gotten in, however. Nor is my knowledge of every admit post on TLS.
-
tipler4213

- Posts: 634
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 11:16 am
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
Or any institution of higher education for that matter....tipler4213 wrote:No Cali ties here. I am from Bama, which probably counts as a URM at Berkeley.ads222 wrote:no dice. I've been to but have never lived in CA. I think it's reaaally random.mrmangs wrote: I'll be more precise.Everyone I've read about who has gotten in thus far has lived in Cali at some point in his/her life. TLS admit posters are hardly exhaustive of everyone who has gotten in, however. Nor is my knowledge of every admit post on TLS.
PS: I should note that I was accepted and don't have great numbers.
-
minuit

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:39 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
170/3.9 isn't great? pshhhhhhtipler4213 wrote:Or any institution of higher education for that matter....tipler4213 wrote:No Cali ties here. I am from Bama, which probably counts as a URM at Berkeley.ads222 wrote:no dice. I've been to but have never lived in CA. I think it's reaaally random.mrmangs wrote: I'll be more precise.Everyone I've read about who has gotten in thus far has lived in Cali at some point in his/her life. TLS admit posters are hardly exhaustive of everyone who has gotten in, however. Nor is my knowledge of every admit post on TLS.
PS: I should note that I was accepted and don't have great numbers.
- ihp12

- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 5:33 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
LOL, its like American Indian squaredtipler4213 wrote:
No Cali ties here. I am from Bama, which probably counts as a URM at Berkeley.
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
I'd characterize that as "decent"minuit wrote:
170/3.9 isn't great? pshhhhhh
Retake!
-
tipler4213

- Posts: 634
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 11:16 am
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
Yeah, but it leaves out the 162 and 165 that preceeded the 170.r6_philly wrote:I'd characterize that as "decent"minuit wrote:
170/3.9 isn't great? pshhhhhh![]()
Retake!
-
minuit

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:39 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
lol yeah gotta get that 98th percentile up to 99th!r6_philly wrote:I'd characterize that as "decent"minuit wrote:
170/3.9 isn't great? pshhhhhh![]()
Retake!
seriously, though, those numbers are baller.
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
Pssstttt, nobody cares about that...tipler4213 wrote:Yeah, but it leaves out the 162 and 165 that preceeded the 170.r6_philly wrote:I'd characterize that as "decent"minuit wrote:
170/3.9 isn't great? pshhhhhh![]()
Retake!
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
You know, when I got my Feb score report, my 170 was 99%. Then they bumped it down to 98% for the overall rank. So I should retake. If I get on the WL at H, I may actually retake it in Feb if all other acceptances are in.minuit wrote:lol yeah gotta get that 98th percentile up to 99th!r6_philly wrote:I'd characterize that as "decent"minuit wrote:
170/3.9 isn't great? pshhhhhh![]()
Retake!![]()
seriously, though, those numbers are baller.
-
tipler4213

- Posts: 634
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 11:16 am
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
You know, when I got my Feb score report, my 170 was 99%. Then they bumped it down to 98% for the overall rank. So I should retake. If I get on the WL at H, I may actually retake it in Feb if all other acceptances are in.[/quote]
I would consider it for that reason, although after 3 times, I just loathe that god-damn test. The thing that makes me so mad is that I have legit reasons why I could have done much better all three times. Even on this last one, I missed 6 LG questions when I missed none in June or in any of my prep sections.
I would consider it for that reason, although after 3 times, I just loathe that god-damn test. The thing that makes me so mad is that I have legit reasons why I could have done much better all three times. Even on this last one, I missed 6 LG questions when I missed none in June or in any of my prep sections.
-
minuit

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:39 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
you're making me want to retake now... but i hate that damn test, too! ugh!tipler4213 wrote: I would consider it for that reason, although after 3 times, I just loathe that god-damn test. The thing that makes me so mad is that I have legit reasons why I could have done much better all three times. Even on this last one, I missed 6 LG questions when I missed none in June or in any of my prep sections.
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
I hate to blame others for my failings so I don't usually complain, but I also had legitimate reasons why I didn't get a 172. The supervisor of the test center came in the room to talk to the proctor, for about 3-5 minutes. "Whispering" doesn't really help in a quiet test room. I actually spoke and asked them to stop. I didn't finish that section and guessed on 3 questions. This was undisclosed, so who's to say I didn't guess them all right... but I feel like I didn't get my best shot.I would consider it for that reason, although after 3 times, I just loathe that god-damn test. The thing that makes me so mad is that I have legit reasons why I could have done much better all three times. Even on this last one, I missed 6 LG questions when I missed none in June or in any of my prep sections.tipler4213 wrote:You know, when I got my Feb score report, my 170 was 99%. Then they bumped it down to 98% for the overall rank. So I should retake. If I get on the WL at H, I may actually retake it in Feb if all other acceptances are in.
I don't dislike the test material, I just dislike taking it. I didn't do one time test while prepping because I didn't have the luxury (in time availability). I think I can totally score better if I can dedicate to prepping. I jokingly say all the time I will keep taking it until I get a 180, after I get in law school because this damn test can't get the better of me.
3 administrations had gone past and I decided not to retake. But if I get all my target schools, I may really sign up for Feb...
- timmna

- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:15 am
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
So... who's up for a call today?!
- LilMonsterAnnie

- Posts: 187
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:56 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
minuit wrote:you're making me want to retake now... but i hate that damn test, too! ugh!tipler4213 wrote: I would consider it for that reason, although after 3 times, I just loathe that god-damn test. The thing that makes me so mad is that I have legit reasons why I could have done much better all three times. Even on this last one, I missed 6 LG questions when I missed none in June or in any of my prep sections.
Ditto...+1
- hipstermafia

- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:45 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
i am up for a call, an e-mail, a carrier pigeon, anything will do. really any time between now and orientation. i just want to go to berkeley.timmna wrote:So... who's up for a call today?!
- LilMonsterAnnie

- Posts: 187
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:56 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
[/quote]
I hate to blame others for my failings so I don't usually complain, but I also had legitimate reasons why I didn't get a 172. The supervisor of the test center came in the room to talk to the proctor, for about 3-5 minutes. "Whispering" doesn't really help in a quiet test room. I actually spoke and asked them to stop. I didn't finish that section and guessed on 3 questions. This was undisclosed, so who's to say I didn't guess them all right... but I feel like I didn't get my best shot.
I don't dislike the test material, I just dislike taking it. I didn't do one time test while prepping because I didn't have the luxury (in time availability). I think I can totally score better if I can dedicate to prepping. I jokingly say all the time I will keep taking it until I get a 180, after I get in law school because this damn test can't get the better of me.
3 administrations had gone past and I decided not to retake. But if I get all my target schools, I may really sign up for Feb...[/quote]
Well I for one HATE that test and HATED taking it.
no mincing around for this girlie. I will complain loud and proud about it
I hate to blame others for my failings so I don't usually complain, but I also had legitimate reasons why I didn't get a 172. The supervisor of the test center came in the room to talk to the proctor, for about 3-5 minutes. "Whispering" doesn't really help in a quiet test room. I actually spoke and asked them to stop. I didn't finish that section and guessed on 3 questions. This was undisclosed, so who's to say I didn't guess them all right... but I feel like I didn't get my best shot.
I don't dislike the test material, I just dislike taking it. I didn't do one time test while prepping because I didn't have the luxury (in time availability). I think I can totally score better if I can dedicate to prepping. I jokingly say all the time I will keep taking it until I get a 180, after I get in law school because this damn test can't get the better of me.
3 administrations had gone past and I decided not to retake. But if I get all my target schools, I may really sign up for Feb...[/quote]
Well I for one HATE that test and HATED taking it.
no mincing around for this girlie. I will complain loud and proud about it
- mrmangs

- Posts: 674
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
Wheeeelp. *stretches*ads222 wrote:no dice. I've been to but have never lived in CA. I think it's reaaally random.mrmangs wrote: I'll be more precise.Everyone I've read about who has gotten in thus far has lived in Cali at some point in his/her life. TLS admit posters are hardly exhaustive of everyone who has gotten in, however. Nor is my knowledge of every admit post on TLS.
- ihp12

- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 5:33 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
-.-- --- ..- / .... .- ...- . / -... . . -. / .- -.-. -.-. . .--. - . -.. / - --- / -... . .-. -.- . .-.. . -.-- = You have been accepted to Berkeley in Morse Codehipstermafia wrote:i am up for a call, an e-mail, a carrier pigeon, anything will do. really any time between now and orientation. i just want to go to berkeley.timmna wrote:So... who's up for a call today?!
- hipstermafia

- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:45 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
amazing, thanksihp12 wrote:-.-- --- ..- / .... .- ...- . / -... . . -. / .- -.-. -.-. . .--. - . -.. / - --- / -... . .-. -.- . .-.. . -.-- = You have been accepted to Berkeley in Morse Code
-
lalady

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
I've been hesitating to post on this thread but hopefully my stats will make everyone a little more confident about their chances and show that the admissions process/timing is unpredictable. Submitted 11/21, UR 11/22, admitted 11/30 via phone w/Dean Tom. Stats: 167/3.99 Non-URM, in state. I wrote a customized personal statement for Berkeley. Totally shocked and thrilled to be in at my top choice, wish you all the best of luck. I'm a Bay Area native so if anyone has questions about location/where to live I'd be happy to answer them.
- obrienfa

- Posts: 233
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
I got in and have never lived in Cali....mrmangs wrote:I'll be more precise.artichoke wrote:Really? Well, I've never been to California... which is weird.. which means I have a tie to CA too.. and I haven't heard back.mrmangs wrote:
Everyone I've heard about who has gotten in has had some sort of ties to CA (including myself, although I am currently OOS). I dunno if this is actually how they are deciding on things, however.Everyone I've read about who has gotten in thus far has lived in Cali at some point in his/her life. TLS admit posters are hardly exhaustive of everyone who has gotten in, however. Nor is my knowledge of every admit post on TLS.
- Sentry

- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:38 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
How dare you abandon Michigan SF house!hipstermafia wrote:i am up for a call, an e-mail, a carrier pigeon, anything will do. really any time between now and orientation. i just want to go to berkeley.timmna wrote:So... who's up for a call today?!
- hipstermafia

- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:45 pm
Re: Berkeley 2011 applicants
EEEE you caught meSentry wrote:How dare you abandon Michigan SF house!