Told you you'd get UCLA, Slansky. I doubt you'll end up there though.Slansky wrote:I only mailed mine. I'm pretty sure the invitation said to mail.StrawberryRed89 wrote:I mailed mine in (Priority Mail + certified)...I thought the invitation said to mail it. Is anyone e-mailing it as well?Twix wrote:I'm working on finalizing my Rothman essay, but have yet to go "In Review," still complete as of 12/10 or so.
I know there was some talk of how to submit the Rothman applications (electronically vs. snail mail). How have you all been handling this?
USC 2010! Forum
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: USC 2010!
- Slansky
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:40 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Well, it's sort of my top choice, but they offered me $0. If USC offered me a nice scholly it would make my life a lot better right now, haha.crackberry wrote:Told you you'd get UCLA, Slansky. I doubt you'll end up there though.Slansky wrote:I only mailed mine. I'm pretty sure the invitation said to mail.StrawberryRed89 wrote:I mailed mine in (Priority Mail + certified)...I thought the invitation said to mail it. Is anyone e-mailing it as well?Twix wrote:I'm working on finalizing my Rothman essay, but have yet to go "In Review," still complete as of 12/10 or so.
I know there was some talk of how to submit the Rothman applications (electronically vs. snail mail). How have you all been handling this?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Can I ask why you applied to schools like UVA, Duke and Georgetown but not schools like Michigan, Penn, Berkeley, Columbia, Chicago and NYU (not to mention Harvard, Yale and Stanford)? If all you'd applied to were LA (or even California) schools, your school list would make more sense to me. The way it stands, you've got kind of a random assortment of schools.Slansky wrote:Well, it's sort of my top choice, but they offered me $0. If USC offered me a nice scholly it would make my life a lot better right now, haha.
With 170, 3.85, you'd be a near-lock at Michigan, Penn and NYU and you'd have a great shot at Berkeley and Chicago. Granted HYS and Columbia are reaches with your numbers, but by no means are they out of the question.
PM if you're more comfortable doing it that way.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:15 am
Re: USC 2010!
Status checker changed to DF today. I went UR in mid-december and got a Rothman invitation. I'm really anxious/excited for the letter (which is hopefully an acceptance), especially after having been under review for what seemed like forever.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Rothman invitations virtually always go to future admits.deem wrote:Status checker changed to DF today. I went UR in mid-december and got a Rothman invitation. I'm really anxious/excited for the letter (which is [strike]hopefully[/strike]an acceptance), especially after having been under review for what seemed like forever.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- billyez
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:19 pm
Re: USC 2010!
It took a month and two weeks for me to go complete. Come on USC. What's going on?
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:15 am
Re: USC 2010!
(::knocking on wood::)
I'm hopeful, but still a little worried that I could end up the exception to the rule haha.
How long have letters generally taken to get to the east coast. 3-4 days? Thanks.
I'm hopeful, but still a little worried that I could end up the exception to the rule haha.
How long have letters generally taken to get to the east coast. 3-4 days? Thanks.
- Slansky
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:40 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Haha, yeah, I understand the confusion. I am only interested in going to school in SoCal. When my parents found out I'd only applied around here, they demanded that I apply to 5 schools outside of California. The number and the reasoning in general was totally arbitrary. They were just uncomfortable with me "putting all my eggs in one basket." I guess if some huge change happened in my life--somewhere on the order of armageddon--I may go to one of those schools. But really, I love SoCal, I want to practice here, and there are frankly quite a few good school choices nearby, so I feel no need to cast my net wider.crackberry wrote:Can I ask why you applied to schools like UVA, Duke and Georgetown but not schools like Michigan, Penn, Berkeley, Columbia, Chicago and NYU (not to mention Harvard, Yale and Stanford)? If all you'd applied to were LA (or even California) schools, your school list would make more sense to me. The way it stands, you've got kind of a random assortment of schools.Slansky wrote:Well, it's sort of my top choice, but they offered me $0. If USC offered me a nice scholly it would make my life a lot better right now, haha.
With 170, 3.85, you'd be a near-lock at Michigan, Penn and NYU and you'd have a great shot at Berkeley and Chicago. Granted HYS and Columbia are reaches with your numbers, but by no means are they out of the question.
PM if you're more comfortable doing it that way.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I hear you. Every part of me wants to convince you to cast your net wider, maybe apply to Berkeley and Stanford if you really don't want to leave California. But I won't try; it's your life.Slansky wrote:Haha, yeah, I understand the confusion. I am only interested in going to school in SoCal. When my parents found out I'd only applied around here, they demanded that I apply to 5 schools outside of California. The number and the reasoning in general was totally arbitrary. They were just uncomfortable with me "putting all my eggs in one basket." I guess if some huge change happened in my life--somewhere on the order of armageddon--I may go to one of those schools. But really, I love SoCal, I want to practice here, and there are frankly quite a few good school choices nearby, so I feel no need to cast my net wider.crackberry wrote:Can I ask why you applied to schools like UVA, Duke and Georgetown but not schools like Michigan, Penn, Berkeley, Columbia, Chicago and NYU (not to mention Harvard, Yale and Stanford)? If all you'd applied to were LA (or even California) schools, your school list would make more sense to me. The way it stands, you've got kind of a random assortment of schools.Slansky wrote:Well, it's sort of my top choice, but they offered me $0. If USC offered me a nice scholly it would make my life a lot better right now, haha.
With 170, 3.85, you'd be a near-lock at Michigan, Penn and NYU and you'd have a great shot at Berkeley and Chicago. Granted HYS and Columbia are reaches with your numbers, but by no means are they out of the question.
PM if you're more comfortable doing it that way.
- Slansky
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:40 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I appreciate the urge, lol, and you are probably right that I should. I think one important factor is that I sort of don't belong on TLS--I don't care much about name recognition/prestige and I don't intend to end up in any kind of biglaw. I ended up here because I fit in with my numbers and there's a lot of good info for the higher end schools. But really, although UCLA/USC is what I'm aiming for, I would totally go to a place like Southwestern if they offered me a good deal and I liked the campus/programs (which I did when I toured last week).crackberry wrote:I hear you. Every part of me wants to convince you to cast your net wider, maybe apply to Berkeley and Stanford if you really don't want to leave California. But I won't try; it's your life.Slansky wrote:Haha, yeah, I understand the confusion. I am only interested in going to school in SoCal. When my parents found out I'd only applied around here, they demanded that I apply to 5 schools outside of California. The number and the reasoning in general was totally arbitrary. They were just uncomfortable with me "putting all my eggs in one basket." I guess if some huge change happened in my life--somewhere on the order of armageddon--I may go to one of those schools. But really, I love SoCal, I want to practice here, and there are frankly quite a few good school choices nearby, so I feel no need to cast my net wider.crackberry wrote: Can I ask why you applied to schools like UVA, Duke and Georgetown but not schools like Michigan, Penn, Berkeley, Columbia, Chicago and NYU (not to mention Harvard, Yale and Stanford)? If all you'd applied to were LA (or even California) schools, your school list would make more sense to me. The way it stands, you've got kind of a random assortment of schools.
With 170, 3.85, you'd be a near-lock at Michigan, Penn and NYU and you'd have a great shot at Berkeley and Chicago. Granted HYS and Columbia are reaches with your numbers, but by no means are they out of the question.
PM if you're more comfortable doing it that way.
- TheWire
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: USC 2010!
this is how I'm looking at it...I am ALL about the west coast. BUT, that doesn't mean I wouldn't enjoy living in NYC for 3-6 yrs and then moving back...I feel like I'll be more prepared for the "real" world and life beyond the confines of sunny Cali
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Who's to say that sunny California isn't the real world and the East Coast isn't some sordid nightmare?TheWire wrote:this is how I'm looking at it...I am ALL about the west coast. BUT, that doesn't mean I wouldn't enjoy living in NYC for 3-6 yrs and then moving back...I feel like I'll be more prepared for the "real" world and life beyond the confines of sunny Cali

- TheWire
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: USC 2010!
The real world requires diverse perspective...I suppose a sordid nightmare would shed even MoRe positive light on sunny California...that tone makes me feel like you would ultimately be staying in Cali if you were following the core man...I remember hearing you had a pretty good option up north.managamy wrote:Who's to say that sunny California isn't the real world and the East Coast isn't some sordid nightmare?TheWire wrote:this is how I'm looking at it...I am ALL about the west coast. BUT, that doesn't mean I wouldn't enjoy living in NYC for 3-6 yrs and then moving back...I feel like I'll be more prepared for the "real" world and life beyond the confines of sunny Cali
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: USC 2010!
What "core?" I am indeed leaning toward staying on the Left coast though.TheWire wrote:The real world requires diverse perspective...I suppose a sordid nightmare would shed even MoRe positive light on sunny California...that tone makes me feel like you would ultimately be staying in Cali if you were following the core man...I remember hearing you had a pretty good option up north.managamy wrote:Who's to say that sunny California isn't the real world and the East Coast isn't some sordid nightmare?TheWire wrote:this is how I'm looking at it...I am ALL about the west coast. BUT, that doesn't mean I wouldn't enjoy living in NYC for 3-6 yrs and then moving back...I feel like I'll be more prepared for the "real" world and life beyond the confines of sunny Cali
- TheWire
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: USC 2010!
the "core": what's on the inside, the heart, how you really feel...
the name "Harvard" isn't that important...
...but Yale, on the other hand, would be different
the name "Harvard" isn't that important...
...but Yale, on the other hand, would be different
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I understand now. It's hard to know how much weight to put on a name. Yale would be no different for me.TheWire wrote:the "core": what's on the inside, the heart, how you really feel...
the name "Harvard" isn't that important...
...but Yale, on the other hand, would be different
- TheWire
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I'm sure they make it abundantly clear at their ASD just what the name Yale means.managamy wrote:I understand now. It's hard to know how much weight to put on a name. Yale would be no different for me.TheWire wrote:the "core": what's on the inside, the heart, how you really feel...
the name "Harvard" isn't that important...
...but Yale, on the other hand, would be different
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- smacroon
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:02 pm
Re: USC 2010!
DF 1/19 as well and Rothman invite. IR 1/6. Fingers crosseddeem wrote:Status checker changed to DF today. I went UR in mid-december and got a Rothman invitation. I'm really anxious/excited for the letter (which is hopefully an acceptance), especially after having been under review for what seemed like forever.

-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:17 am
Re: USC 2010!
DF 1/20
I received a Rothman invite and have been UR since 12/15.
I received a Rothman invite and have been UR since 12/15.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:34 pm
Re: USC 2010!
DF 1/20 - AA URM...nervous wait and obsessive mailbox checking begins now 

-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 5:04 pm
Re: USC 2010!
I was IR 1/15...updated to IR 1/20 today. Anyone else?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:16 pm
Re: USC 2010!
Still waiting for any sign from good ol' USC over here. Complete since 10/9.
168/3.81
168/3.81
- anniesaysrelax
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:04 am
Re: USC 2010!
Sent in my Rothman essay today. Not really expecting anything to come from it, but you can't get it if you don't try. I wrote it pretty hastily, but all I really want is for them to remember me when doling out the smaller scholarship offers. I like to think it can only help, unless I made some egregious error in the text. I think it would be best that I don't read it again just in case. That will only breed panic.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:21 am
Re: USC 2010!
Same here... what are your stats again? (if you don't mind)Veritas wrote:still IR 1/8 and nervous
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login