Post removed. Forum

sasquatchsam · Post by **sasquatchsam** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:52 pm

I didn't mean to cause so much panic

If it makes you feel better, I might be remembering the UR1 date incorrectly...I was pretty sure it was 12/3 though. It is difficult to go back and check now...sorry

Robert_Bert · Post by **Robert_Bert** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:52 pm

literally just got in via phone!

Never went UR 2. UR #1-- 11/23. RD.

OsaroLJ · Post by **OsaroLJ** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:54 pm

Robert_Bert wrote:literally just got in via phone!

Never went UR 2. UR #1-- 11/23. RD.

Congrats!

gatorgal · Post by **gatorgal** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:54 pm

Congrats, all!

thechancellor · Post by **thechancellor** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:01 pm

sasquatchsam wrote:I didn't mean to cause so much panic If it makes you feel better, I might be remembering the UR1 date incorrectly...I was pretty sure it was 12/3 though. It is difficult to go back and check now...sorry

Lol no worries. Either we get in or not, yeah? Glad you got in, though!!

HarvardHopeful · Post by **HarvardHopeful** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:50 pm

Looks like they are done calling for the day. Hopefully they do another batch of RD tomorrow!

TakeABow94 · Post by **TakeABow94** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:54 pm

lastsamurai · Post by **lastsamurai** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:55 pm

TakeABow94 wrote:what was the latest completed date to get a call today?

anyone in the 12/3 UR1 batch get one?

looks like sasquatchsam did, but the rest of us are still waiting. he also went UR2 on 12/17

Nonconsecutive · Post by **Nonconsecutive** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:55 pm

Robert_Bert wrote:literally just got in via phone!

Never went UR 2. UR #1-- 11/23. RD.

Congrats!

EzraFitz · Post by **EzraFitz** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:28 pm

Just went UR2 as of 12/19

wrkrb · Post by **wrkrb** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:19 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:
applelover wrote:
alex.cm wrote:
teenybean wrote:Accepted via phone call!!!!!! So happy I pulled over to post this. Pm for stats. I was rd!!!

applelover wrote:In at Penn!! RD. I missed the call an hour ago!
Congrats guys!!
eta: is the acceptance reflected in the status checker?
Nope! But I went under review 1 on the first day thy started reviewing rd applicants and went under review 2 the first day RDs went under second review. I'm already in at Harvard but it's very exciting to be accepted places.

wow
much rude
many superior
wow

Nonconsecutive · Post by **Nonconsecutive** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:26 pm

wrkrb wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:
applelover wrote: Nope! But I went under review 1 on the first day thy started reviewing rd applicants and went under review 2 the first day RDs went under second review. I'm already in at Harvard but it's very exciting to be accepted places.

wow
much rude
many superior
wow

lastsamurai · Post by **lastsamurai** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:51 am

jcb5329 wrote:Just went UR2 as of 12/19

Were you a 12/3 UR1??

applelover · Post by **applelover** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:14 am

wrkrb wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:
wow
much rude
many superior
wow

It's not rude. Harvard was one of my top choices, so that acceptance means more to me and is more significant. Once I joined TLS, people here claimed Penn would YP me like they do other URMS with my stats, so I never thought I would get accepted. It is exciting to have options for law school. It doesn't mean I think I'm superior so chill out.

Edit: iPhone autocorrect errors.

applelover · Post by **applelover** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:16 am

But anyway I checked my dates for people who PMd me. UR 1 12/21 UR2 12/10. Call at around 1pmest

barrelofmonkeys · Post by **barrelofmonkeys** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:18 am

applelover wrote:
wrkrb wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:
wow
much rude
many superior
wow
It's not rude. Harvard was one of my top choices, so that acceptance means more to me and is more significant. Once I joined TLS people here claimed Penn would YP me like they do other URMS with my stats, so I never thought I would get accepted. It is exciting so have options for law school. It doesn't mean I think I'm superior so chill out.

it just came off wrong, i think
eta: pro-tip: don't tell people to chill out

applelover · Post by **applelover** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:20 am

barrelofmonkeys wrote:
applelover wrote:
wrkrb wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:
wow
much rude
many superior
wow
It's not rude. Harvard was one of my top choices, so that acceptance means more to me and is more significant. Once I joined TLS people here claimed Penn would YP me like they do other URMS with my stats, so I never thought I would get accepted. It is exciting so have options for law school. It doesn't mean I think I'm superior so chill out.
it just came off wrong, i think
eta: pro-tip: don't tell people to chill out

If people don't like my post they can foe me. There's a simple remedy.

EDIT: Autocorrect correction.

barrelofmonkeys · Post by **barrelofmonkeys** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:22 am

applelover wrote:
barrelofmonkeys wrote:
applelover wrote:
wrkrb wrote:
wow
much rude
many superior
wow
It's not rude. Harvard was one of my top choices, so that acceptance means more to me and is more significant. Once I joined TLS people here claimed Penn would YP me like they do other URMS with my stats, so I never thought I would get accepted. It is exciting so have options for law school. It doesn't mean I think I'm superior so chill out.
it just came off wrong, i think
eta: pro-tip: don't tell people to chill out
If people don't like my post they can foe me. There's a simply remedy.

Sure, but this seems like the wrong attitude to me.

applelover · Post by **applelover** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:25 am

barrelofmonkeys wrote: Sure, but this seems like the wrong attitude to me.

Well everyone is entitled to their opinion of me.

Edit: let's drop the conversation... It's off topic now.

barrelofmonkeys · Post by **barrelofmonkeys** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:27 am

applelover wrote:
barrelofmonkeys wrote: Sure, but this seems like the wrong attitude to me.
Well everyone is entitled to their opinion of me.

I suppose it doesn't really matter whether people foe you though. Mostly they just see "." for your posts.

applelover · Post by **applelover** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:29 am

barrelofmonkeys wrote:
applelover wrote:
barrelofmonkeys wrote: Sure, but this seems like the wrong attitude to me.
Well everyone is entitled to their opinion of me.
I suppose it doesn't really matter whether people foe you though. Mostly they just see "." for your posts.

Okay. Excuse me for editing out identifiable things after they have been read by the intended parties.

Clearly · Post by **Clearly** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:16 am

applelover wrote:
If people don't like my post they can foe me. There's a simply remedy.

applelover wrote:
barrelofmonkeys wrote:
applelover wrote:
barrelofmonkeys wrote: Sure, but this seems like the wrong attitude to me.
Well everyone is entitled to their opinion of me.
I suppose it doesn't really matter whether people foe you though. Mostly they just see "." for your posts.
Okay. Excuse me for editing out identifiable things after they have been read by the intended parties.

I for one am happy you're going to Harvard.

barrelofmonkeys · Post by **barrelofmonkeys** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:18 am

Clearly wrote: I for one am happy you're going to Harvard.

omg

applelover · Post by **applelover** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:19 am

Clearly wrote: I for one am happy you're going to Harvard.

Eh I think I'll attend Penn now just for you.

rebexness · Post by **rebexness** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:26 am

Post removed. Forum

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)