SMU 2012 Forum
-
favrefire4

- Posts: 523
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: SMU 2012
I had forgotten all about SMU and decided to check their status checker. Updated 4/16/12 to say waitlisted. HUGE reverse splitter, so I'm pretty surprised to even get this 155/3.8
- sarahmargie

- Posts: 194
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:19 pm
Re: SMU 2012
I got waitlisted too, but I withdrew immediately.
- BVest

- Posts: 7887
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm
Re: SMU 2012
From UH thread:
kiwi4president wrote:For those trying to choose between SMU and UH I compiled some numbers from the new 2011 employment data released from http://placementsummary.abaquestionnaire.org/ All percentages are rounded up. Feel free to check my math but for the most part I think it is accurate.
UH
Total employment: 92%
Total employment minus temporary employment: 90%
Total employment minus temporary employment & 90% of business (mostly retail gigs etc.): 71%
Firm employment minus temporary employment: 53%
Firm employment minus temporary employment & small firms (solos and 2-10): 31%
Biglaw employment (firms with 50+ attorneys): 17%
Government & public interest employment minus temporary work: 14%
Academia minus temporary work: 1%
SMU
Total employment: 87%
Total employment minus temporary work: 79%
Total employment minus temporary employment and 90% of business (mostly retail gigs etc.): 65%
Firm employment minus temporary employment: 53%
Firm employment minus temporary employment & small firms (solos and 2-10): 31%
Biglaw employment (firms with 50+ attorneys): 19%
Government & public interest employment minus temporary work: 10%
Academia minus temporary work: <1%
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
- swilson215

- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:35 pm
Re: SMU 2012
This is interesting, but a lot of those "survey response" data collections are flawed.BVest wrote:From UH thread:
kiwi4president wrote:For those trying to choose between SMU and UH I compiled some numbers from the new 2011 employment data released from http://placementsummary.abaquestionnaire.org/ All percentages are rounded up. Feel free to check my math but for the most part I think it is accurate.
UH
Total employment: 92%
Total employment minus temporary employment: 90%
Total employment minus temporary employment & 90% of business (mostly retail gigs etc.): 71%
Firm employment minus temporary employment: 53%
Firm employment minus temporary employment & small firms (solos and 2-10): 31%
Biglaw employment (firms with 50+ attorneys): 17%
Government & public interest employment minus temporary work: 14%
Academia minus temporary work: 1%
SMU
Total employment: 87%
Total employment minus temporary work: 79%
Total employment minus temporary employment and 90% of business (mostly retail gigs etc.): 65%
Firm employment minus temporary employment: 53%
Firm employment minus temporary employment & small firms (solos and 2-10): 31%
Biglaw employment (firms with 50+ attorneys): 19%
Government & public interest employment minus temporary work: 10%
Academia minus temporary work: <1%
-
Stevoman

- Posts: 186
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:28 am
Re: SMU 2012
Be careful using these kinds of statistics to draw conclusions. Texas Tech has a 93% total employment, and UT is only sitting at 89%...is UT worse than both UH and TTU?BVest wrote:From UH thread:
kiwi4president wrote:For those trying to choose between SMU and UH I compiled some numbers from the new 2011 employment data released from http://placementsummary.abaquestionnaire.org/ All percentages are rounded up. Feel free to check my math but for the most part I think it is accurate.
UH
Total employment: 92%
Total employment minus temporary employment: 90%
Total employment minus temporary employment & 90% of business (mostly retail gigs etc.): 71%
Firm employment minus temporary employment: 53%
Firm employment minus temporary employment & small firms (solos and 2-10): 31%
Biglaw employment (firms with 50+ attorneys): 17%
Government & public interest employment minus temporary work: 14%
Academia minus temporary work: 1%
SMU
Total employment: 87%
Total employment minus temporary work: 79%
Total employment minus temporary employment and 90% of business (mostly retail gigs etc.): 65%
Firm employment minus temporary employment: 53%
Firm employment minus temporary employment & small firms (solos and 2-10): 31%
Biglaw employment (firms with 50+ attorneys): 19%
Government & public interest employment minus temporary work: 10%
Academia minus temporary work: <1%
-
zanzbar

- Posts: 254
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:14 pm
Re: SMU 2012
Well I think this isn't that bad to use as a comparison the source of the number breaks it down better than this by distinguishing by # of attorneys at a firm. Also they are viewed as peer schools where as I don't think anyone considers TTU or UT peers.Stevoman wrote:Be careful using these kinds of statistics to draw conclusions. Texas Tech has a 93% total employment, and UT is only sitting at 89%...is UT worse than both UH and TTU?BVest wrote:From UH thread:
kiwi4president wrote:For those trying to choose between SMU and UH I compiled some numbers from the new 2011 employment data released from http://placementsummary.abaquestionnaire.org/ All percentages are rounded up. Feel free to check my math but for the most part I think it is accurate.
UH
Total employment: 92%
Total employment minus temporary employment: 90%
Total employment minus temporary employment & 90% of business (mostly retail gigs etc.): 71%
Firm employment minus temporary employment: 53%
Firm employment minus temporary employment & small firms (solos and 2-10): 31%
Biglaw employment (firms with 50+ attorneys): 17%
Government & public interest employment minus temporary work: 14%
Academia minus temporary work: 1%
SMU
Total employment: 87%
Total employment minus temporary work: 79%
Total employment minus temporary employment and 90% of business (mostly retail gigs etc.): 65%
Firm employment minus temporary employment: 53%
Firm employment minus temporary employment & small firms (solos and 2-10): 31%
Biglaw employment (firms with 50+ attorneys): 19%
Government & public interest employment minus temporary work: 10%
Academia minus temporary work: <1%
- bringyourlunch

- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:07 pm
Re: SMU 2012
That's it. I'm withdrawing and going to UHzanzbar wrote:Well I think this isn't that bad to use as a comparison the source of the number breaks it down better than this by distinguishing by # of attorneys at a firm. Also they are viewed as peer schools where as I don't think anyone considers TTU or UT peers.Stevoman wrote:Be careful using these kinds of statistics to draw conclusions. Texas Tech has a 93% total employment, and UT is only sitting at 89%...is UT worse than both UH and TTU?BVest wrote:From UH thread:
kiwi4president wrote:For those trying to choose between SMU and UH I compiled some numbers from the new 2011 employment data released from http://placementsummary.abaquestionnaire.org/ All percentages are rounded up. Feel free to check my math but for the most part I think it is accurate.
UH
Total employment: 92%
Total employment minus temporary employment: 90%
Total employment minus temporary employment & 90% of business (mostly retail gigs etc.): 71%
Firm employment minus temporary employment: 53%
Firm employment minus temporary employment & small firms (solos and 2-10): 31%
Biglaw employment (firms with 50+ attorneys): 17%
Government & public interest employment minus temporary work: 14%
Academia minus temporary work: 1%
SMU
Total employment: 87%
Total employment minus temporary work: 79%
Total employment minus temporary employment and 90% of business (mostly retail gigs etc.): 65%
Firm employment minus temporary employment: 53%
Firm employment minus temporary employment & small firms (solos and 2-10): 31%
Biglaw employment (firms with 50+ attorneys): 19%
Government & public interest employment minus temporary work: 10%
Academia minus temporary work: <1%
- bringyourlunch

- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:07 pm
Re: SMU 2012
Since we are talking about employment outlooks, I'm going bounce a hypothetical off of y'all. Say you just started a construction management job that started you off at 52,000. The salary ceiling is probably somewhere around 100,000 and would take 10-15 years to reach. SMU offered you 26,000/yr, you have enough money saved to at least pay rent for the first 2 years of school. Would you guys keep the job, or take the scholarship?
- fathergoose

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: SMU 2012
It depends on whether you want to be a lawyer or you want to be in construction management. Don't go to law school, SMU or any other for that matter, if you are even remotely wishy-washy about wanting to be a lawyer.bringyourlunch wrote:Since we are talking about employment outlooks, I'm going bounce a hypothetical off of y'all. Say you just started a construction management job that started you off at 52,000. The salary ceiling is probably somewhere around 100,000 and would take 10-15 years to reach. SMU offered you 26,000/yr, you have enough money saved to at least pay rent for the first 2 years of school. Would you guys keep the job, or take the scholarship?
-
AgLaw

- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:38 pm
Re: SMU 2012
My application status just changed with part time being the only option... I know this happened to some people right before they were accepted to the part time program, has anyone had their status change and then they weren't admitted?
-
Oftranch

- Posts: 136
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:43 pm
Re: SMU 2012
withdrew $15,000/yr going back to y'all
- mxmatt137

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:12 pm
Re: SMU 2012
Despite the comments on here saying that SMU doesn't negotiate scholarships I decided to give it a try. Unfortunately I had the same luck as the rest of the people who tried. I hate to turn down such a generous offer, but I will very likely be withdrawing this week. Congrats to those that have chosen SMU, and good luck to everyone still waiting on a response!
- futurejdgirl

- Posts: 142
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 9:30 pm
Re: SMU 2012
I applied mid-Feb and haven't heard a peep.
3.09/162.
Should I just assume I'm not in?
3.09/162.
Should I just assume I'm not in?
- Titleist

- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:42 pm
Re: SMU 2012
FT looks bleak for you. My numbers were better an I got dinged FT and accepted PT.futurejdgirl wrote:I applied mid-Feb and haven't heard a peep.
3.09/162.
Should I just assume I'm not in?
- StarLightSpectre

- Posts: 343
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:32 pm
Re: SMU 2012
My status updated to Complete again on 4/25. I was originally held for further review in late Jan/early Feb.
IDK what that means.
IDK what that means.
- bringyourlunch

- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:07 pm
Re: SMU 2012
Any current students ever hear of SMU grads practicing construction law?
- fathergoose

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: SMU 2012
Yes. Actually a couple firms who do just construction law interviewed at one of the OCI sessions. Also a course here on it.bringyourlunch wrote:Any current students ever hear of SMU grads practicing construction law?
- bringyourlunch

- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:07 pm
Re: SMU 2012
Good to hearfathergoose wrote:Yes. Actually a couple firms who do just construction law interviewed at one of the OCI sessions. Also a course here on it.bringyourlunch wrote:Any current students ever hear of SMU grads practicing construction law?
- zx92027xz

- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:53 pm
Re: SMU 2012
Was held before. Now "Application Completed _ 4/25/2012" with nothing else visible at all (nothing in mailings, fees or requirements.) Bad news coming, or do they blank out everyone when a decision letter is in the mail?
- mxmatt137

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:12 pm
Re: SMU 2012
I'm not sure in your case, but I was accepted and never had anything in mailings, fees, or requirements. I would expect a response soon.zx92027xz wrote:Was held before. Now "Application Completed _ 4/25/2012" with nothing else visible at all (nothing in mailings, fees or requirements.) Bad news coming, or do they blank out everyone when a decision letter is in the mail?
- StarLightSpectre

- Posts: 343
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:32 pm
Re: SMU 2012
Same thing happened to me.zx92027xz wrote:Was held before. Now "Application Completed _ 4/25/2012" with nothing else visible at all (nothing in mailings, fees or requirements.) Bad news coming, or do they blank out everyone when a decision letter is in the mail?
-
zanzbar

- Posts: 254
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:14 pm
Re: SMU 2012
I have been sitting at 4/10 complete, should I call them to see what's going on?
-
Archoholic

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:18 am
Re: SMU 2012
I've got the same status, and while it's killing me to wait, I don't believe calling them will result in my learning anything worthwhile.zanzbar wrote:I have been sitting at 4/10 complete, should I call them to see what's going on?
-
zanzbar

- Posts: 254
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:14 pm
Re: SMU 2012
I gave in to temptation, decisions are going to be mailed out next week.
-
Archoholic

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:18 am
Re: SMU 2012
They told you that the "4/10 Application completed" status people's decision letters will be mailed next week? Or that yours will be, specifically?zanzbar wrote:I gave in to temptation, decisions are going to be mailed out next week.