My heart definitely skipped a beat before I read the second sentence. I think I am as nervous for you as for myselfKnock wrote:Woke up to a missed call. Not from SLS.

My heart definitely skipped a beat before I read the second sentence. I think I am as nervous for you as for myselfKnock wrote:Woke up to a missed call. Not from SLS.
Haha, I think I have plenty of nerves for myselfcardinals1989 wrote:My heart definitely skipped a beat before I read the second sentence. I think I am as nervous for you as for myselfKnock wrote:Woke up to a missed call. Not from SLS.
.
Oh yes! That would be a great addition to your Why Stanford.r6_philly wrote:Yes I was searching for an authoritative opinion on the particular subject (it's 2010 cutting edge new) and the only credible reference from a law point of view was of Stanford origin. That's why I want to study at Stanford - it seem to offer the best education in a new legal frontier. Everyone else is not quite caught up yet.cardinals1989 wrote:I don't think the whole point of the update is that he contacted someone. This just leads into the fact that Stanford is at the cutting edge of his field, which is a legitimate and important thing for them to know.s0ph1e2007 wrote:
Yea they wont care. You update them on contacting someone at their school? I interviewed with two of their professors and both of them told me they have NO control over admissions. One of them even told me he had a Stan UG work for him for two years as a research assistant after graduating and he wrote him a ridiculously good recommendation, but they ended up not taking him anyways b.c. his application was right on the edge of dropping SLS's average LSAT down a point.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Thanks for the advice. I feel like I had more room to say things in the Berkeley PS since I put in 3 pages lol I am happy with my PS. Maybe my piece just hasn't found the right place to fit yet?The Stig wrote:just my .02 cents before there is a wave of Why SLS?s!- my app didn't have anything SLS-specific in the PS, but I did have two targeted letters from my recommenders. I believe they both used essentially the same LOR as for the generic one (but one did do post-doc work at Stanford, so maybe he threw a bit in there about SLS?).
From Dean Deal's blog, it sounds like they want to know how you fit into the SLS community, and how your puzzle pieces fit together (in her words). I think it would be useful to ask yourself if you have already put together that puzzle in your original app before sending in an essay. It might already be clear why you are a good fit! They've got a ton more admitting to do, so if were me I wouldn't starting sending in stuff until later (though I recognize the urge, as it's what I want to do as schools I haven't heard from
).
At least for me, I focused throughout my app on my interdisciplinary background, which seems to be one of their trademarks at SLS...that said I didn't change my app between schools...
I'm going to blame TLS-induced delirium for the many many inappropriate comments that jumped into my mind as I read that.r6_philly wrote:[Maybe my piece just hasn't found the right place to fit yet?
whathojeeves wrote:
I'm going to blame TLS-induced delirium for the many many inappropriate comments that jumped into my mind as I read that.
According to last year's thread, I don't think they started until after the New Year. Problem is they all come as snail mail. The rejection hits you and you don't even know it is coming.HopefulFish wrote:any news of rejections?
Why are you so focused on rejections? Hearing that someone else has been rejected does not make it more or less likely that you will be rejected. And it's just so negative!HopefulFish wrote:any news of rejections?
Umm, <50. So like, ~300 more acceptances to go i'm guessing.Vertigo963 wrote:So, does anyone want to hazard an estimate of how many people have been admitted so far?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
That would be great! I was afraid it was like two-thirds over.Knock wrote:Umm, <50. So like, ~300 more acceptances to go i'm guessing.
Stanford will be admitting people through April. And off the waitlist after that through the rest of the summer.Vertigo963 wrote:That would be great! I was afraid it was like two-thirds over.Knock wrote:Umm, <50. So like, ~300 more acceptances to go i'm guessing.
Story. of. my. life.s0ph1e2007 wrote:Does anyone re-read Dean Deal's blog, even though they've already read her posts before haha
... problems
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Pffft, you guys are weak. I have all her blog posts tattoo'd on my back. I hope she doesn't post a new one for a while though.cardinals1989 wrote:Story. of. my. life.s0ph1e2007 wrote:Does anyone re-read Dean Deal's blog, even though they've already read her posts before haha
... problems
Honey, I wish you'd stop doing that. I get tired of reading her words every night as I try to stay in the mood.Knock wrote: Pffft, you guys are weak. I have all her blog posts tattoo'd on my back. I hope she doesn't post a new one for a while though.
FTFY.r6_philly wrote:You guys are funny. What are you going to do until1/54/30 orwhenever they open back up?whenever they reject you?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
try to maintain my stress level...yoga?r6_philly wrote:You guys are funny. What are you going to do until 1/5 or whenever they open back up?
Congrats! Do you have high numbers?Wolverine Den wrote:In at Stanford, I hope all of you guys waiting really get a call from Dean Deal, she is as nice and warm as it gets. Good luck to the rest of you guys (specifically Knock and Cardinal).
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login